Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is hallmarked by spinal canal narrowing and related cord compression and myelopathy. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure dynamics are likely disturbed due to spinal canal stenosis. The study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of continuous intraoperative CSF pressure monitoring during surgical decompression. This prospective single center study (NCT02170155) enrolled DCM patients who underwent surgical decompression between December 2019 and May 2021. Data from n = 17 patients were analyzed and symptom severity graded with the modified Japanese Orthopedic Score (mJOA). CSF pulsations were continuously monitored with a lumbar intrathecal catheter during surgical decompression. Mean patient age was 62 ± 9 years (range 38-73; 8 female), symptoms were mild-moderate in most patients (mean mJOA 14 ± 2, range 10-18). Measurements were well tolerated without safety concerns. In 15/16 patients (94%), CSF pulsations increased at the time of surgical decompression. In one case, responsiveness could not be evaluated for technical reasons. Unexpected CSF pulsation decrease was related to adverse events (i.e., CSF leakage). Median CSF pulsation amplitudes increased from pre-decompression (0.52 mm Hg, interquartile range [IQR] 0.71) to post-decompression (0.72 mm Hg, IQR 0.96; p = 0.001). Mean baseline CSF pressure increased with lower magnitude than pulsations, from 9.5 ± 3.5 to 10.3 ± 3.8 mm Hg (p = 0.003). Systematic relations of CSF pulsations were confined to surgical decompression, independent of arterial blood pressure (p = 0.927) or heart rate (p = 0.102). Intraoperative CSF pulsation monitoring was related to surgical decompression while in addition adverse events could be discerned. Further investigation of the clinical value of intraoperative guidance for decompression in complex DCM surgery is promising.
HiltonB., Tempest-MitchellJ., DaviesB., and KotterM. (2018). Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes. PLoS One, 13, e0207709.
3.
YamaguchiS., MitsuharaT., AbikoM., TakedaM., and KurisuK. (2018). Epidemiology and overview of the clinical spectrum of degenerative cervical myelopathy. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 29, 1–12.
MartinA.R., Kalsi-RyanS., AkbarM.A., RienmuellerA.C., BadhiwalaJ.H., WilsonJ.R., TetreaultL.A., NouriA., MassicotteE.M., and FehlingsM.G. (2021). Clinical outcomes of nonoperatively managed degenerative cervical myelopathy: an ambispective longitudinal cohort study in 117 patients. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 1–9.
6.
NouriA., TetreaultL., SinghA., KaradimasS.K., and FehlingsM.G. (2015). Degenerative cervical myelopathy: epidemiology, genetics, and pathogenesis. Spine, 40, E675–E693.
7.
KaradimasS.K., GatzounisG., and FehlingsM.G. (2015). Pathobiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur. Spine J. 24 Suppl, 2, 132–138.
8.
MartinA.R., TadokoroN., TetreaultL., Arocho-QuinonesE.V., BuddeM.D., KurpadS.N., and FehlingsM.G. (2018). Imaging evaluation of degenerative cervical myelopathy: current state of the art and future directions. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 29, 33–45.
9.
FujimotoK., KanchikuT., ImajoY., SuzukiH., FunabaM., NishidaN., and TaguchiT. (2017). Use of central motor conduction time and spinal cord evoked potentials in the electrophysiological assessment of compressive cervical myelopathy. Spine, 42, 895–902.
10.
PearceJ.M. (2006). Queckenstedt's manoeuvre. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 77, 728.
11.
KaplanL., and KennedyF. (1950). The effect of head posture on the manometrics of the cerebrospinal fluid in cervical lesions: a new diagnostic test. Brain, 73, 337–345.
12.
KwonB.K., CurtA., BelangerL.M., BernardoA., ChanD., MarkezJ.A., GorelikS., SlobogeanG.P., UmedalyH., GiffinM., NikolakisM.A., StreetJ., BoydM.C., PaquetteS., FisherC.G., and DvorakM.F. (2009). Intrathecal pressure monitoring and cerebrospinal fluid drainage in acute spinal cord injury: a prospective randomized trial. J. Neurosurg. Spine, 10, 181–193.
13.
ZipserC.M., SpirigJ.M., AguirreJ., HoferA.S., PfenderN., HuppM., CurtA., FarshadM., and SchubertM. (2021). Safety and feasibility of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure and intraspinal pressure studies in cervical stenosis: a case series. Acta Neurochir. Supplement, 131, 367–372.
14.
ZipserC.M., PfenderN., SpirigJ.M., BetzM., AguirreJ., HuppM., FarshadM., CurtA., and SchubertM. (2020). Study protocol for an observational study of cerebrospinal fluid pressure in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy undergoing surgical deCOMPression of the spinal CORD: the COMP-CORD study. BMJ Open, 10, e037332.
15.
FehlingsM.G., TetreaultL.A., RiewK.D., MiddletonJ.W., AarabiB., ArnoldP.M., BrodkeD.S., BurnsA.S., CaretteS., ChenR., ChibaK., DettoriJ.R., FurlanJ.C., HarropJ.S., HollyL.T., Kalsi-RyanS., KotterM., KwonB.K., MartinA.R., MilliganJ., NakashimaH., NagoshiN., RheeJ., SinghA., SkellyA.C., SodhiS., WilsonJ.R., YeeA., and WangJ.C. (2017). A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: recommendations for patients with mild, moderate, and severe disease and nonmyelopathic patients with evidence of cord compression. Global Spine J. 7, 70s–83s.
16.
VandenbrouckeJ.P., von ElmE., AltmanD.G., GøtzscheP.C., MulrowC.D., PocockS.J., PooleC., SchlesselmanJ.J., and EggerM. (2007). Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology, 18, 805–835.
17.
FehlingsM.G., BadhiwalaJ.H., AhnH., FarhadiH.F., ShaffreyC.I., NassrA., MummaneniP., ArnoldP.M., JacobsW.B., RiewK.D., KellyM., BrodkeD.S., VaccaroA.R., HilibrandA.S., WilsonJ., HarropJ.S., YoonS.T., KimK.D., FourneyD.R., SantaguidaC., MassicotteE.M., and KopjarB. (2021). Safety and efficacy of riluzole in patients undergoing decompressive surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy (CSM-Protect): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 20, 98–106.
18.
TetreaultL., KopjarB., NouriA., ArnoldP., BarbagalloG., BartelsR., QiangZ., SinghA., ZileliM., VaccaroA., and FehlingsM.G. (2017). The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale: establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Eur. Spine J. 26, 78–84.
19.
RevanappaK.K., and RajshekharV. (2011). Comparison of Nurick grading system and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system in evaluation of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur. Spine J. 20, 1545–1551.
20.
KirshblumS.C., BurnsS.P., Biering-SorensenF., DonovanW., GravesD.E., JhaA., JohansenM., JonesL., KrassioukovA., MulcaheyM.J., Schmidt-ReadM., and WaringW. (2011). International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). J. Spinal Cord Med. 34, 535–546.
21.
CatzA., and ItzkovichM. (2007). Spinal Cord Independence Measure: comprehensive ability rating scale for the spinal cord lesion patient. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 44, 65–68.
22.
Kalsi-RyanS., CurtA., VerrierM.C., and FehlingsM.G. (2012). Development of the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP): reviewing measurement specific to the upper limb in tetraplegia. J. Neurosurg. Spine, 17, 65–76.
23.
SmielewskiP., LavinioA., TimofeevI., RadolovichD., PerkesI., PickardJ.D., and CzosnykaM. (2008). ICM+, a flexible platform for investigations of cerebrospinal dynamics in clinical practice. Acta Neurochir. Supplement, 102, 145–151.
24.
WilliamsB. (1981). Simultaneous cerebral and spinal fluid pressure recordings. I. Technique,, physiology, and normal results. Acta Neurochir. 58, 167–185.
25.
WilliamsB. (1976). Cerebrospinal fluid pressure changes in response to coughing. Brain, 99, 331–346.
26.
MagnaesB., and HaugeT. (1980). Surgery for myelopathy in cervical spondylosis: safety measures and preoperative factors related to outcome. Spine, 5, 211–214.
27.
AlizadehA., DyckS.M., and Karimi-AbdolrezaeeS. (2019). Traumatic spinal cord injury: an overview of pathophysiology, models and acute injury mechanisms. Front. Neurol. 10, 282–282.
28.
TetreaultL., GoldsteinC.L., ArnoldP., HarropJ., HilibrandA., NouriA., and FehlingsM.G. (2015). Degenerative cervical myelopathy: a spectrum of related disorders affecting the aging spine. Neurosurgery 77 Suppl, 4, S51–S67.
29.
HoggF., GallagherM.J., KearneyS., ZoumprouliA., PapadopoulosM.C., and SaadounS. (2020). Acute spinal cord injury: monitoring the lumbar cerebrospinal fluid provides limited information about the injury site. J. Neurotrauma, 37, 1156–1164
30.
ChenG., WeiF., ShiL., LiJ., WangX., WangM., WuH., XuZ., LiuX., and LiuS. (2021). Inadequate spinal cord expansion in intraoperative ultrasound after decompression may predict neurological recovery of degenerative cervical myelopathy. Eur. Radiol. 31, 8478–8487
31.
SchärR.T., WilsonJ.R., and GinsbergH.J. (2019). Intraoperative ultrasound-guided posterior cervical laminectomy for degenerative cervical myelopathy. World Neurosurg. 121, 62–70.
32.
FehlingsM.G., WilsonJ.R., KopjarB., YoonS.T., ArnoldP.M., MassicotteE.M., VaccaroA.R., BrodkeD.S., ShaffreyC.I., SmithJ.S., WoodardE.J., BancoR.J., ChapmanJ.R., JanssenM.E., BonoC.M., SassoR.C., DekutoskiM.B., and GokaslanZ.L. (2013). Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America prospective multi-center study. J. Bone Joint Surg. 95, 1651–1658.
33.
BadhiwalaJ.H., HachemL.D., MeraliZ., WitiwC.D., NassiriF., AkbarM.A., AlmenawerS.A., SchomacherM., WilsonJ.R., and FehlingsM.G. (2020). Predicting outcomes after surgical decompression for mild degenerative cervical myelopathy: moving beyond the mJOA to identify surgical candidates. Neurosurgery, 86, 565–573.
34.
NouriA., MartinA.R., KatoS., Reihani-KermaniH., RiehmL.E., and FehlingsM.G. (2017). The relationship between MRI signal intensity changes, clinical presentation, and surgical outcome in degenerative cervical myelopathy: analysis of a global cohort. Spine, 42, 1851–1858.
35.
BezovD., LiptonR.B., and AshinaS. (2010). Post-dural puncture headache: part I diagnosis, epidemiology, etiology, and pathophysiology. Headache, 50, 1144–1152.
36.
AdolphR.J., FukusumiH., and FowlerN.O. (1967). Origin of cerebrospinal fluid pulsations. Am. J. Physiol. 212, 840–846.
37.
Henry-FeugeasM.C., Idy-PerettiI., BaledentO., Poncelet-DidonA., ZannoliG., BittounJ., and Schouman-ClaeysE. (2000). Origin of subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid pulsations: a phase-contrast MR analysis. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 18, 387–395.
38.
MestreH., TithofJ., DuT., SongW., PengW., SweeneyA.M., OlvedaG., ThomasJ.H., NedergaardM., and KelleyD.H. (2018). Flow of cerebrospinal fluid is driven by arterial pulsations and is reduced in hypertension. Nat. Comm. 9, 4878.
39.
SatoK., SadamotoT., HirasawaA., OueA., SubudhiA.W., MiyazawaT., and OgohS. (2012). Differential blood flow responses to CO2 in human internal and external carotid and vertebral arteries. J. Physiol. 590, 3277–3290.
40.
FehlingsM.G., BrodkeD.S., NorvellD.C., and DettoriJ.R. (2010). The evidence for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: does it make a difference?. Spine. 35.
41.
GrodzinskiB., BestwickH., BhattiF., DurhamR., KhanM., Partha SarathiC.I., TehJ.Q., MowforthO., and DaviesB. (2021). Research activity amongst DCM research priorities. Acta Neurochir. 163, 1561–1568.
42.
NagataK., YoshimuraN., HashizumeH., IshimotoY., MurakiS., YamadaH., OkaH., KawaguchiH., AkuneT., TanakaS., NakamuraK., and YoshidaM. (2017). The prevalence of tandem spinal stenosis and its characteristics in a population-based MRI study: the Wakayama Spine Study. Eur. Spine J. 26, 2529–2535.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
