This scoping review aims to synthesize existing literature regarding theory of mind (ToM) outcomes, the neuropathology associated with ToM outcomes, and the relationship between ToM outcomes and social functioning in children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury (TBI). We searched MEDLINE® and PsycINFO databases to identify all literature that examined ToM following pediatric TBI until July 2019. A total of 29 articles met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the results. These articles examined a variety of aspects of ToM, which could be broadly grouped into those focused on cognitive, cognitive-affective, and pragmatic factors. The existing literature suggests that children and adolescents with TBI, compared with their typically developing peers and peers with orthopedic injuries, are more likely to have deficits in ToM. The evidence further shows that the age at which brain injury occurs contributes to ToM disruption. Neuroimaging techniques have offered crucial insights into how TBI may impact ToM performance in children and adolescents. Finally, this review provides evidence that disruption in ToM plays a role in the difficulties in social functioning demonstrated by children and adolescents with TBI. Limitations and gaps in the existing literature warrant future research in this field.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RosemaS., CroweL., and AndersonV. (2012). Social function in children and adolescents after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review 1989-2011. J. Neurotrauma, 29, 1277–1291.
2.
van TolE., GorterJ.W., DeMatteoC., and Meester-DelverA. (2011). Participation outcomes for children with acquired brain injury: a narrative review. Brain Inj. 25, 1279–1287.
3.
AndersonV., BeauchampM.H., YeatesK.O., CrossleyL., RyanN., HearpsS.J.C., and CatroppaC. (2017). Social competence at two years after childhood traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma, 34, 2261–2271.
4.
AndersonV., BeauchampM.H., YeatesK.O., CrossleyL., HearpsS.J., and CatroppaC. (2013). Social competence at 6 months following childhood traumatic brain injury. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 19, 539–550.
5.
SiroisK., TousignantB., BoucherN., AchimA.M., BeauchampM.H., BedellG., MassicotteE., Vera-EstayE., and JacksonP.L. (2019). The contribution of social cognition in predicting social participation following moderate and severe TBI in youth. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 29, 1383–1398.
6.
LalondeG., BernierA., BeaudoinC., GravelJ., and BeauchampM.H. (2018). Investigating social functioning after early mild TBI: the quality of parent–child interactions. J. Neuropsychol. 12, 1–22.
7.
YeatesK.O., BiglerE.D., AbildskovT., DennisM., GerhardtC.A., VannattaK., RubinK.H., StancinT., and TaylorH.G. (2014). Social competence in pediatric traumatic brain injury. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 2, 97–107.
8.
PrigatanoG.P., and GuptaS. (2006). Friends after traumatic brain injury in children. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 21, 505–513.
9.
Di BattistaA., SooC., CatroppaC., and AndersonV. (2012). Quality of life in children and adolescents post-TBI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurotrauma, 29, 1717–1727.
10.
WilliamsM.W., RapportL.J., MillisS.R., and HanksR.A. (2014). Psychosocial outcomes after traumatic brain injury: Life satisfaction, community integration, and distress. Rehabil. Psychol. 59, 298.
11.
GreenL., GodfreyC., SooC., AndersonV., and CatroppaC. (2013). A preliminary investigation into psychosocial outcome and quality-of-life in adolescents following childhood traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 27, 872–877.
12.
YeatesK.O., BiglerE.D., DennisM., GerhardtC.A., RubinK.H., StancinT., TaylorH.G., and VannattaK. (2007). Social outcomes in childhood brain disorder: A heuristic integration of social neuroscience and developmental psychology. Psychol. Bull. 133, 535–556.
13.
BeauchampM.H. and AndersonV. (2010). Social: An integrative framework for the development of social skills. Psychol. Bull. 136, 39.
14.
HughesC., and LeekamS. (2004). What are the links between theory of mind and social relations?. Review, reflections and new directions for studies of typical and atypical development. Soc. Dev. 13, 590–619.
15.
MildersM., FuchsS., and CrawfordJ.R. (2003). Neuropsychological impairments and changes in emotional and social behaviour following severe traumatic brain injury. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 25, 157–172.
16.
Shamay-TsooryS.G., TomerR., BergerB.D., GoldsherD., and Aharon-PeretzJ. (2005). Impaired “affective theory of mind”. is associated with right ventromedial prefrontal damage. Cogn. Behav. Neurol. 18, 55–67.
17.
StussD.T., Gallup JrG.G., and AlexanderM.P. (2001). The frontal lobes are necessary fortheory of mind'. Brain, 124, 279–286.
18.
WellmanH.M., CrossD., and WatsonJ. (2001). Meta–analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief. Child Dev. 72, 655–684.
19.
CaputiM., LecceS., PagninA. and BanerjeeR. (2012). Longitudinal effects of theory of mind on later peer relations: the role of prosocial behavior. Dev. Psychol. 48, 257.
20.
EggumN.D., EisenbergN., KaoK., SpinradT.L., BolnickR., HoferC., KupferA.S., and FabriciusW.V. (2011). Emotion understanding, theory of mind, and prosocial orientation: Relations over time in early childhood. J. Posit. Psychol. 6, 4–16.
21.
FinkE., BegeerS., HuntC., and de RosnayM. (2014). False-belief understanding and social preference over the first 2 years of school: a longitudinal study. Child Dev. 85, 2389–2403.
22.
FinkE., BegeerS., PetersonC.C., SlaughterV., and de RosnayM. (2015). Friendlessness and theory of mind: A prospective longitudinal study. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 33, 1–17.
23.
ShakoorS., JaffeeS.R., BowesL., Ouellet-MorinI., AndreouP., HappeF., MoffittT.E., and ArseneaultL. (2012). A prospective longitudinal study of children's theory of mind and adolescent involvement in bullying. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry, 53, 254–261.
24.
WellmanH.M. (2018). Theory of mind: the state of the art. Eur. J. Dev. Psychol. 15, 728–755.
25.
PetersonC.C., WellmanH.M., and SlaughterV. (2012). The mind behind the message: Advancing theory-of-mind scales for typically developing children, and those with deafness, autism, or asperger syndrome. Child Dev. 83, 469–485.
26.
KalandN., CallesenK., Moller-NielsenA., MortensenE.L., and SmithL. (2008). Performance of children and adolescents with asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism on advanced theory of mind tasks. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 38, 1112–1123.
27.
PetersonC.C. and WellmanH.M. (2019). Longitudinal theory of mind (tom) development from preschool to adolescence with and without tom delay. Child Dev. 90, 1917–1934.
28.
WellmanH.M., and LiuD. (2004). Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks. Child Dev. 75, 523–541.
29.
PernerJ., and WimmerH. (1985). “John thinks that mary thinks that…” attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 39, 437–471.
30.
SullivanK., ZaitchikD., and Tager-FlusbergH. (1994). Preschoolers can attribute second-order beliefs. Dev. Psychol. 30, 395–402.
31.
MillerS.A. (2009). Children's understanding of second-order mental states. Psychol. Bull. 135, 749.
32.
HappeF.G. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 24, 129–154.
33.
Baron-CohenS., O'RiordanM., StoneV., JonesR., and PlaistedK. (1999). Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 29, 407–418.
34.
Baron-CohenS., WheelwrightS., SpongA., ScahillV., and LawsonJ. (2001). Are intuitive physics and intuitive psychology independent?. A test with children with asperger syndrom. J. Dev. Learn. Disord. 5, 47–78.
35.
SebastianC.L., FontaineN.M., BirdG., BlakemoreS.-J., De BritoS.A., McCroryE.J., and VidingE. (2012). Neural processing associated with cognitive and affective theory of mind in adolescents and adults. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 7, 53–63.
36.
Martin-RodriguezJ.F., and Leon-CarrionJ. (2010). Theory of mind deficits in patients with acquired brain injury: a quantitative review. Neuropsychologia, 48, 1181–1191.
37.
DeightonS., JuN., GrahamS.A., and YeatesK.O. (2020). Pragmatic language comprehension after pediatric traumatic brain injury: a scoping review. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 35, E113–E126.
38.
McDonaldS. (2013). Impairments in social cognition following severe traumatic brain injury. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 19, 231–246.
39.
CasselA., McDonaldS., KellyM., and TogherL. (2019). Learning from the minds of others: A review of social cognition treatments and their relevance to traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 29, 22–55.
40.
ArkseyH., and O'MalleyL. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 8, 19–32.
41.
LevacD., ColquhounH., and O'BrienK.K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementat. Sci. 5, 69.
42.
ColquhounH.L., LevacD., O'BrienK.K., StrausS., TriccoA.C., PerrierL., KastnerM., and MoherD. (2014). Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 67, 1291–1294.
43.
WellsG., SheaB., O'ConnellD., Peterson, j., WelchV., LososM. and TugwellP. (2013). The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Non-Randomized Studies in Meta-Analysis. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (Last accessed May2, 2019).
44.
ModestiP.A., ReboldiG., CappuccioF.P., AgyemangC., RemuzziG., RapiS., PerruoloE., ParatiG. and ESH Working Group on CV Risk in Low Resource Settings (2016). Panethnic differences in blood pressure in europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 11, e0147601.
45.
BelleroseJ., BernierA., BeaudoinC., GravelJ., and BeauchampM.H. (2015). When injury clouds understanding of others: theory of mind after mild tbi in preschool children. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 21, 483–493.
46.
BelleroseJ., BernierA., BeaudoinC., GravelJ., and BeauchampM.H. (2017). Long-term brain-injury-specific effects following preschool mild TBI: a study of theory of mind. Neuropsychology, 31, 229–241.
47.
Baron-CohenS. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A fifteen year review, in: Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience. S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, and D.J. Cohen (eds). Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp. 3–20.
48.
SnodgrassC., and KnottF. (2006). Theory of mind in children with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 20, 825–833.
49.
TurkstraL.S., DixonT.M., and BakerK.K. (2004). Theory of mind and social beliefs in adolescents with traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 19, 245–256.
50.
WalzN.C., YeatesK.O., TaylorH.G., StancinT., and WadeS.L. (2009). First-order theory of mind skills shortly after traumatic brain injury in 3- to 5-year-old children. Dev. Neuropsychol. 34, 507–519.
51.
WalzN.C., YeatesK.O., TaylorH.G., StancinT., and WadeS.L. (2010). Theory of mind skills 1 year after traumatic brain injury in 6- to 8-year-old children. J. Neuropsychol. 4, 181–195.
52.
BiglerE.D., YeatesK.O., DennisM., GerhardtC.A., RubinK.H., StancinT., Gerry TaylorH., and VannattaK. (2013). Neuroimaging and social behavior in children after traumatic brain injury: Findings from the social outcomes of brain injury in kids (sobik) study. NeuroRehabilitation, 32, 707–720.
53.
DennisM., SimicN., Gerry TaylorH., BiglerE.D., RubinK., VannattaK., GerhardtC.A., StancinT., RoncadinC., and YeatesK.O. (2012). Theory of mind in children with traumatic brain injury. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 18, 908–916.
54.
DennisM., SimicN., BiglerE.D., AbildskovT., AgostinoA., TaylorH.G., RubinK., VannattaK., GerhardtC.A., StancinT., and YeatesK.O. (2013). Cognitive, affective, and conative theory of mind (TOM) in children with traumatic brain injury. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 5, 25–39.
55.
RyanN.P., CatroppaC., CooperJ.M., BeareR., DitchfieldM., ColemanL., SilkT., CrossleyL., RogersK., BeauchampM.H., YeatesK.O., and AndersonV.A. (2015). Relationships between acute imaging biomarkers and theory of mind impairment in post-acute pediatric traumatic brain injury: a prospective analysis using susceptibility weighted imaging (swi). Neuropsychologia, 66, 32–38.
56.
HarrisonP. and OaklandT. (2003). Manual for the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System. The Psychological Corporation: San Antonio.
57.
RyanN.P., CatroppaC., BeareR., SilkT.J., HearpsS.J., BeauchampM.H., YeatesK.O., and AndersonV.A. (2017). Uncovering the neuroanatomical correlates of cognitive, affective and conative theory of mind in paediatric traumatic brain injury: a neural systems perspective. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 12, 1414–1427.
58.
LeeK. (2013). Little liars: development of verbal deception in children. Child Dev. Perspect. 7, 91–96.
59.
SodianB., and FrithU. (1992). Deception and sabotage in autistic, retarded and normal children. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry, 33, 591–605.
60.
LevyN.K., and MilgramN. (2016). Cognitive contributions to theory of mind ability in children with a traumatic head injury. Child Neuropsychol. 22, 177–196.
61.
DecetyJ., and JacksonP.L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev. 3, 71–100.
62.
Shamay-TsooryS.G. (2011). The neural bases for empathy. Neuroscientist, 17, 18–24.
63.
DavisM.H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 44, 113–126.
64.
TousignantB., JacksonP.L., MassicotteE., BeauchampM.H., AchimA.M., Vera-EstayE., BedellG., and SiroisK. (2018). Impact of traumatic brain injury on social cognition in adolescents and contribution of other higher order cognitive functions. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 28, 429–447.
65.
DennisM., BarnesM.A., WilkinsonM., and HumphreysR.P. (1998). How children with head injury represent real and deceptive emotion in short narratives. Brain Lang. 61, 450–483.
66.
DennisM., AgostinoA., TaylorH.G., BiglerE.D., RubinK., VannattaK., GerhardtC.A., StancinT., and YeatesK.O. (2013). Emotional expression and socially modulated emotive communication in children with traumatic brain injury. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 19, 34–43.
67.
RyanN.P., CatroppaC., BeareR., SilkT.J., CrossleyL., BeauchampM.H., YeatesK.O., and AndersonV.A. (2016). Theory of mind mediates the prospective relationship between abnormal social brain network morphology and chronic behavior problems after pediatric traumatic brain injury. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 11, 683–692.
68.
RyanN.P., MihaljevicK., BeauchampM.H., CatroppaC., CrossleyL., HearpsS., SilkT., GodfreyC., YeatesK.O., and AndersonV.A. (2016). Examining the prospective relationship between family affective responsiveness and theory of mind in chronic paediatric traumatic brain injury. Brain Impair. 18, 88–101.
69.
RyanN.P., CatroppaC., CooperJ.M., BeareR., DitchfieldM., ColemanL., SilkT., CrossleyL., BeauchampM.H., and AndersonV.A. (2015). The emergence of age-dependent social cognitive deficits after generalized insult to the developing brain: a longitudinal prospective analysis using susceptibility-weighted imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 36, 1677–1691.
70.
Baron-CohenS., WheelwrightS., HillJ., RasteY. and PlumbI. (2001). The “reading the mind in the eyes”. test revised version: a study with normal, adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 42, 241–251.
71.
VellanteM., Baron-CohenS., MelisM., MarroneM., PetrettoD.R., MasalaC., and PretiA. (2013). The “reading the mind in the eyes”. test: systematic review of psychometric properties and a validation study in italy. Cogn. Neuropsychiatry, 18, 326–354.
72.
WiigE.H. and SecordW. (1985). Test of Language Competence (TLC): Expanded Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
73.
DennisM., AgostinoA., RoncadinC., and LevinH. (2009). Theory of mind depends on domain-general executive functions of working memory and cognitive inhibition in children with traumatic brain injury. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 31, 835–847.
74.
StronachS.T., and TurkstraL.S. (2008). Theory of mind and use of cognitive state terms by adolescents with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 22, 1054–1070.
75.
TurkstraL.S., McDonaldS., and DePomPeiR. (2001). Social information processing in adolescents: data from normally developing adolescents and preliminary data from their peers with traumatic brain injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 16, 469–483.
76.
DennisM., PurvisK., BarnesM.A., WilkinsonM., and WinnerE. (2001). Understanding of literal truth, ironic criticism, and deceptive praise following childhood head injury. Brain Lang. 78, 1–16.
77.
DennisM., SimicN., AgostinoA., TaylorH.G., BiglerE.D., RubinK., VannattaK., GerhardtC.A., StancinT., and YeatesK.O. (2013). Irony and empathy in children with traumatic brain injury. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 19, 338–348.
78.
TurkstraL.S., WilliamsW.H., TonksJ., and FramptonI. (2008). Measuring social cognition in adolescents: Implications for students with tbi returning to school. NeuroRehabilitation, 23, 501–509.
79.
RobinsonK.E., Fountain-ZaragozaS., DennisM., TaylorH.G., BiglerE.D., RubinK., VannattaK., GerhardtC.A., StancinT., and YeatesK.O. (2014). Executive functions and theory of mind as predictors of social adjustment in childhood traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma, 31, 1835–1842.
80.
WolfeK.R., BiglerE.D., DennisM., GerhardtC.A., RubinK., TaylorH.G., VannattaK., and YeatesK.O. (2015). Self-awareness of peer-rated social attributes in children with traumatic brain injury. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 40, 272–284.
81.
ScheibelR.S., NewsomeM.R., WildeE.A., McClellandM.M., HantenG., KrawczykD.C., CookL.G., ChuZ.D., VasquezA.C., YallampalliR., LinX., HunterJ.V., and LevinH.S. (2011). Brain activation during a social attribution task in adolescents with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Soc. Neurosci. 6, 582–598.
82.
NewsomeM.R., ScheibelR.S., HantenG., ChuZ., SteinbergJ.L., HunterJ.V., LuH., VasquezA.C., LiX., LinX., CookL., and LevinH.S. (2010). Brain activation while thinking about the self from another person's perspective after traumatic brain injury in adolescents. Neuropsychology, 24, 139–147.
83.
LevinH.S., WildeE.A., HantenG., LiX., ChuZ.D., VasquezA.C., CookL., YallampalliR., and HunterJ.V. (2011). Mental state attributions and diffusion tensor imaging after traumatic brain injury in children. Dev. Neuropsychol. 36, 273–287.
84.
ReynoldsC.R., and KamphausR.W. (1998). BASC: Behavior Assessment System for Children: Manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
85.
AchenbachT., and RescorlaL. (2001). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/6–18 and 2001 Profile. University of Vermont: Burlington.
86.
SowellE.R., PetersonB.S., ThompsonP.M., WelcomeS.E., HenkeniusA.L., and TogaA.W. (2003). Mapping cortical change across the human life span. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 309–315.
87.
BlakemoreS.-J. (2008). The social brain in adolescence. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 267–277.
88.
WildeE.A., WareA.L., LiX., WuT.C., McCauleyS.R., BarnesA., NewsomeM.R., BiekmanB.D., HunterJ.V., and ChuZ.D. (2019). Orthopedic injured versus uninjured comparison groups for neuroimaging research in mild traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma, 36, 239–249.
89.
WadeM., PrimeH., JenkinsJ.M., YeatesK.O., WilliamsT., and LeeK. (2018). On the relation between theory of mind and executive functioning: a developmental cognitive neuroscience perspective. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 25, 2119–2140.
90.
PhillipsN.L., ParryL., MandalisA., and LahS. (2017). Working memory outcomes following traumatic brain injury in children: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Child Neuropsychol. 23, 26–66.
91.
SesmaH.W., SlomineB.S., DingR., McCarthyM.L., and Children's Health After Trauma StudyGroup (2008). Executive functioning in the first year after pediatric traumatic brain injury. Pediatrics, 121, e1686–1695.
92.
TurkstraL.S., MutluB., RyanC.W., Despins StafslienE.H., RichmondE.K., HosokawaE., and DuffM.C. (2020). Sex and gender differences in emotion recognition and theory of mind after TBI: a narrative review and directions for future research. Front. Neurol. 11, 59.
93.
ParolaA., SalviniR., GabbatoreI., ColleL., BerardinelliL., and BoscoF.M. (2020). Pragmatics, theory of mind and executive functions in schizophrenia: disentangling the puzzle using machine learning. PLoS One, 15, e0229603.
94.
RepacholiB.M., and GopnikA. (1997). Early reasoning about desires: evidence from 14-and 18-month-olds. Dev. Psychol. 33, 12.
95.
PearsK.C. and MosesL.J. (2003). Demographics, parenting, and theory of mind in preschool children. Social Development, 12, 1–20.
96.
Baron-CohenS., LeslieA.M., and FrithU. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”. Cognition, 21, 37–46.
97.
CarlsonS.M., and MosesL.J. (2001). Individual differences in inhibitory control and children's theory of mind. Child Dev. 72, 1032–1053.
98.
HughesC., EnsorR., and MarksA. (2011). Individual differences in false belief understanding are stable from 3 to 6 years of age and predict children's mental state talk with school friends. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 108, 96–112.
99.
FlanaganS., McDonaldS., and RollinsJ. (1998). The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT). University of New South Wales: Sydney.
100.
HeymanG.D. and GelmanS.A. (1998). Young children use motive information to make trait inferences. Dev. Psychol. 34, 310.
101.
BurgessK.B., WojslawowiczJ.C., RubinK.H., Rose-KrasnorL. and Booth-LaForceC. (2006). Social information processing and coping strategies of shy/withdrawn and aggressive children: Does friendship matter? Child Dev. 77,371–383.
102.
AchimA.M., OuelletR., RoyM.A. and JacksonP.L. (2012). Mentalizing in first-episode psychosis. Psychiatry Res. 196, 207–213.
103.
SchultzR.T., GrelottiD.J., KlinA., KleinmanJ., Van der GaagC., MaroisR., and SkudlarskiP. (2003). The role of the fusiform face area in social cognition: Implications for the pathobiology of autism. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 358, 415–427.
104.
AbellF., HappeF., and FrithU. (2000). Do triangles play tricks?. Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development. Cogn. Dev. 15, 1–16.
105.
D'ArgembeauA., RubyP., ColletteF., DegueldreC., BalteauE., LuxenA., MaquetP., and SalmonE. (2007). Distinct regions of the medial prefrontal cortex are associated with self-referential processing and perspective taking. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19, 935–944.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
