Locomotor recovery after incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) is influenced by spinal and supraspinal networks. Conventional clinical gait analysis fails to differentiate between these components. There is evidence that corticospinal control is enhanced during targeted walking, where each foot must be continuously placed on visual targets in randomized order. This study investigates the potential of targeted walking in the functional assessment of corticospinal integrity. Twenty-one controls and 16 individuals with chronic iSCI performed normal and targeted walking on a treadmill while electromyograms (EMGs) and kinematics were recorded. Precision (% of accurate foot placements) in targeted walking was significantly lower in individuals with iSCI (82.9 ± 14.7%, controls: 94.9 ± 4.0%).
Although the overall kinematic pattern was comparable between walking conditions, controls showed significantly higher semitendinosus (ST) activity before heel-strike during targeted walking. This was accompanied by a shift of relative EMG intensity from 90–120 Hz to lower frequencies of 20–60 Hz, previously associated with corticospinal control of muscle activity. Targeted walking in individuals with iSCI evoked smaller EMG changes, suggesting that the switch to more corticospinal control is impaired. Accordingly, mildly impaired iSCI individuals revealed higher adaptations to the targeted walking task than more-impaired individuals. Recording of EMGs during targeted walking holds potential as a research tool to reveal further insights into the neuromuscular control of locomotion. It also complements findings of pre-clinical studies and is a promising novel surrogate marker of integrity of corticospinal control in individuals with iSCI and other neurological impairments. Future studies should investigate its potential for diagnosis or tracking recovery during rehabilitation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarbeauH., LadouceurM., NormanK.E., PépinA., and LerouxA. (1999). Walking after spinal cord injury: evaluation, treatment, and functional recovery. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 80, 225–235.
2.
DitunnoP.L., PatrickM., StinemanM., and DitunnoJ.F. (2008). Who wants to walk?. Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord, 46, 500–506.
3.
GrillnerS. (2011). Control of locomotion in bipeds, tetrapods, and fish, in: Comprehensive Physiology, Supplement 2. Handbook of Physiology, The Nervous System, Motor Control. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.cp010226 (Last accessed July28, 2020).
4.
DrewT., and MarigoldD.S. (2015). Taking the next step: cortical contributions to the control of locomotion. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 33, 25–33.
5.
De LeonR.D., HodgsonJ.A., RoyR.R., and EdgertonV.R. (1998). Locomotor capacity attributable to step training versus spontaneous recovery after spinalization in adult cats. J. Neurophysiol. 79, 1329–1340.
FarrellB.J., BulgakovaM.A., SirotaM.G., PrilutskyB.I., and BeloozerovaI.N. (2015). Accurate stepping on a narrow path: mechanics, EMG, and motor cortex activity in the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 114, 2682–2702.
8.
ZörnerB., FilliL., StarkeyM.L., GonzenbachR., KasperH., RöthlisbergerM., BolligerM., and SchwabM.E. (2010). Profiling locomotor recovery: comprehensive quantification of impairments after CNS damage in rodents. Nat. Methods, 7, 701–708.
9.
EscalonaM., Delivet-MongrainH., KunduA., GossardJ.P., and RossignolS. (2017). Ladder treadmill: a method to assess locomotion in cats with an intact or lesioned spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 37, 5429–5446.
10.
DrewT., JiangW., and WidajewiczW. (2002). Contributions of the motor cortex to the control of the hindlimbs during locomotion in the cat. Brain Res. Rev. 40, 178–191.
11.
SchubertM., CurtA., ColomboG., BergerW., and DietzV. (1999). Voluntary control of human gait: conditioning of magnetically evoked motor responses in a precision stepping task. Exp. Brain Res. 126, 583–588.
12.
JensenP., JensenN.J., TerkildsenC.U., ChoiJ.T., NielsenJ.B., and GeertsenS.S. (2018). Increased central common drive to ankle plantar flexor and dorsiflexor muscles during visually guided gait. Physiol. Rep. 6, e13598.
13.
FilliL., MeyerC., KilleenT., LörinczL., GöpfertB., LinnebankM., Von TscharnerV., CurtA., BolligerM., and ZörnerB. (2019). Probing corticospinal control during different locomotor tasks using detailed time-frequency analysis of electromyograms. Front. Neurol. 10, doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00017.
14.
LangeG.W., HintermeisterR.A., SchlegelT., DillmanC.J., and Richard SteadmanJ. (1996). Electromyographic and kinematic analysis of graded treadmill walking and the implications for knee rehabilitation. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 23, 294–301.
15.
BarbeauH., FungJ., LerouxA., and LadouceurM. (2002). A review of the adaptability and recovery of locomotion after spinal cord injury, in: Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 137. L. McKerracher, G. Doucet, and S. Rossignol (eds). Elesevier: pps. 9–25.
16.
FarinaD., MerlettiR., and EnokaR.M. (2004). The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. J. Appl. Physiol. 96, 1486–1495.
17.
BrownP. (2000). Cortical drives to human muscle: the Piper and related rhythms. Prog. Neurobiol. 60, 97–108.
18.
MarsdenJ.F., WerhahnK.J., AshbyP., RothwellJ., NoachtarS., and BrownP. (2000). Organization of cortical activities related to movement in humans. J. Neurosci. 20, 2307–2314.
19.
FisherK.M., ZaaimiB., WilliamsT.L., BakerS.N., and BakerM.R. (2012). Beta-band intermuscular coherence: a novel biomarker of upper motor neuron dysfunction in motor neuron disease. Brain, 135, 2849–2864.
20.
JensenP., FriskR., SpeddenM.E., GeertsenS.S., BouyerL.J., HallidayD.M., and NielsenJ.B. (2019). Using corticomuscular and intermuscular coherence to assess cortical contribution to ankle plantar flexor activity during gait. J. Mot. Behav. 51, 668–680.
21.
ClarkD.J., KautzS.A., BauerA.R., ChenY.T., and ChristouE.A. (2013). Synchronous EMG activity in the piper frequency band reveals the corticospinal demand of walking tasks. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 41, 1778–1786.
22.
NielsenJ.B., BrittainJ.S., HallidayD.M., Marchand-PauvertV., MazevetD., and ConwayB.A. (2008). Reduction of common motoneuronal drive on the affected side during walking in hemiplegic stroke patients. Clin. Neurophysiol. 119, 2813–2818.
23.
Velázquez-PérezL., TünnerhoffJ., Rodríguez-LabradaR., Torres-VegaR., Ruiz-GonzalezY., BelardinelliP., Medrano-MonteroJ., Canales-OchoaN., González-ZaldivarY., Vazquez-MojenaY., AuburgerG., and ZiemannU. (2017). Early corticospinal tract damage in prodromal SCA2 revealed by EEG-EMG and EMG-EMG coherence. Clin. Neurophysiol. 128, 2493–2502.
24.
HansenN.L., ConwayB.A., HallidayD.M., HansenS., PyndtH.S., Biering-SørensenF., and NielsenJ.B. (2005). Reduction of common synaptic drive to ankle dorsiflexor motoneurons during walking in patients with spinal cord lesion. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 934–942.
25.
Von TscharnerV. (2000). Intensity analysis in time-frequency space of surface myoelectric signals by wavelets of specified resolution. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 10, 433–445.
HermensH.J., FreriksB., Disselhorst-KlugC., and RauG. (2000). Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 10, 361–374.
28.
MarinoR.J., BarrosT., Biering-SorensenF., BurnsS.P., DonovanW.H., GravesD.E., HaakM., HudsonL.M., and PriebeM.M. (2003). International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. J. Spinal Cord Med. 26, Suppl. 1, S50–S56.
29.
MartinaI.S.J., Van KoningsveldR., SchmitzP.I.M., Van Der MechéF.G.A., and Van DoornP.A. (1998). Measuring vibration threshold with a graduated tuning fork in normal aging and in patients with polyneuropathy. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 65, 743–747.
30.
MeyerC., KilleenT., EasthopeC.S., CurtA., BolligerM., LinnebankM., ZörnerB., and FilliL. (2019). Familiarization with treadmill walking: how much is enough?. Sci. Rep. 9, 5232.
31.
ZeniJ.A., RichardsJ.G., and HigginsonJ.S. (2008). Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data. Gait Posture, 27, 710–714.
32.
FilliL., SutterT., EasthopeC.S., KilleenT., MeyerC., ReuterK., LörinczL., BolligerM., WellerM., CurtA., StraumannD., LinnebankM., and ZörnerB. (2018). Profiling walking dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: characterisation, classification and progression over time. Sci. Rep. 8, 4984.
33.
Von TscharnerV., UllrichM., MohrM., Comaduran MarquezD., and NiggB.M. (2018). A wavelet based time frequency analysis of electromyograms to group steps of runners into clusters that contain similar muscle activation patterns. PLoS One, 13, e0195125.
34.
SchubertM., CurtA., JensenL., and DietzV. (1997). Corticospinal input in human gait: modulation of magnetically evoked motor responses. Exp. Brain Res. 115, 234–246.
35.
ArnellP. (1988). The biomechanics and motor control of human gait. Physiotherapy, 74, 94.
36.
ArnoldA.S., ThelenD.G., SchwartzM.H., AndersonF.C., and DelpS.L. (2007). Muscular coordination of knee motion during the terminal-swing phase of normal gait. J. Biomech. 40, 3314–3324.
37.
CimadoroG., PaizisC., AlbertiG., and BabaultN. (2013). Effects of different unstable supports on EMG activity and balance. Neurosci. Lett. 548, 228–232.
38.
DietzV., TrippelM., and HorstmannG.A. (1991). Significance of proprioceptive and vestibulo-spinal reflexes in the control of stance and gait. Adv. Psychol. 78, 37–52.
39.
DeliaginaT.G., OrlovskyG.N., ZeleninP. V., and BeloozerovaI.N. (2006). Neural bases of postural control. Physiology, 21, 216–225.
40.
BoisgontierM.P., ChevalB., ChalaviS., van RuitenbeekP., LeunissenI., LevinO., NieuwboerA., and SwinnenS.P. (2017). Individual differences in brainstem and basal ganglia structure predict postural control and balance loss in young and older adults. Neurobiol. Aging, 50, 47–59.
41.
DietzV., and DuysensJ. (2000). Significance of load receptor input during locomotion: a review. Gait Posture, 11, 102–110.
42.
YongJ.R., SilderA., and DelpS.L. (2014). Differences in muscle activity between natural forefoot and rearfoot strikers during running. J. Biomech. 47, 3593–3597.
43.
BrouwerB., and AshbyP. (1992). Corticospinal projections to lower limb motoneurons in man. Exp. Brain Res. 89, 649–654.
44.
CapadayC., LavoieB.A., BarbeauH., SchneiderC., and BonnardM. (1999). Studies on the corticospinal control of human walking. I. Responses to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 81, 129–139.
45.
BruijnS.M., and Van DieënJ.H. (2018). Control of human gait stability through foot placement. J. R. Soc. Interface, 15, 20170816.
46.
JudgeJ.O., DavisB., and OunpuuS. (1996). Step length reductions in advanced age: the role of ankle and hip kinetics. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 51, M303–M312.
47.
RankinB.L., BuffoS.K., and DeanJ.C. (2014). A neuromechanical strategy for mediolateral foot placement in walking humans. J. Neurophysiol. 112, 374–383.
WirzM., van HedelH.J., RuppR., CurtA., and DietzV. (2006). Muscle force and gait performance: relationships after spinal cord injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 87, 1218–1222.
50.
LajoieY., BarbeauH., and HamelinM. (1999). Attentional requirements of walking in spinal cord injured patients compared to normal subjects. Spinal Cord, 37, 245–250.
51.
MiharaM., MiyaiI., HatakenakaM., KubotaK., and SakodaS. (2007). Sustained prefrontal activation during ataxic gait: a compensatory mechanism for ataxic stroke?. Neuroimage, 37, 1338–1345.
52.
PlotnikM., GiladiN., and HausdorffJ.M. (2009). Bilateral coordination of gait and Parkinson's disease: the effects of dual tasking. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 80, 347–350.
53.
WakelingJ.M., and RozitisA.I. (2004). Spectral properties of myoelectric signals from different motor units in the leg extensor muscles. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 2519–2528.
54.
LodhaN., ChenY.T., McGuirkT.E., FoxE.J., KautzS.A., ChristouE.A., and ClarkD.J. (2017). EMG synchrony to assess impaired corticomotor control of locomotion after stroke. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 37, 35–40.
55.
NortonJ.A., and GorassiniM.A. (2006). Changes in cortically related intermuscular coherence accompanying improvements in locomotor skills in incomplete spinal cord injury. J. Neurophysiol. 95, 2580–2589.
56.
Van AsseldonkE.H.F., CampfensS.F., VerwerS.J.F., Van PuttenM.J.A.M., and StegemanD.F. (2014). Reliability and agreement of intramuscular coherence in tibialis anterior muscle. PLoS One, 9, e88428.
57.
CoorevitsP., DanneelsL., CambierD., RamonH., DruytsH., KarlssonJ.S., De MoorG., and VanderstraetenG. (2008). Test-retest reliability of wavelet- and Fourier-based EMG (instantaneous) median frequencies in the evaluation of back and hip muscle fatigue during isometric back extensions. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 18, 798–806.
58.
YangJ.F., and GorassiniM. (2006). Spinal and brain control of human walking: implications for retraining of walking. Neuroscientist, 12, 379–389.
59.
SpartoP.J., ParnianpourM., BarriaE.A., and JagadeeshJ.M. (2000). Wavelet and short-time fourier transform analysis of electromyography for detection of back muscle fatigue. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 8, 433–436.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
