Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are common in military populations and share numerous symptoms. Functional graph theory studies demonstrate altered small-world brain networks in mTBI and PTSD, but little is known about structural covariance networks or the potentially distinct topology of mTBI-PTSD comorbidity. The purpose of this study was to compare brain structural covariance networks in healthy active duty military service members (CON) to those with PTSD, mTBI, and mTBI-PTSD. Seventy-six service members (31 CON, 14 PTSD, 12 mTBI, 19 mTBI-PTSD) completed clinical questionnaires and structural magnetic resonance imaging scans. Cortical thickness–derived adjacency matrices were used to determine structural covariance network topologies. Pairwise comparisons for characteristic path length, clustering coefficient, modularity (global), closeness centrality (nodal), and local efficiency were made across a range of network densities (5–35%) using non-parametric permutation tests. All clinical groups showed greater levels of arousal, stress, anxiety, and depression compared with CON. Global network analysis revealed greater clustering and local efficiency in PTSD compared with CON, whereas nodal analysis indicated altered path lengths and closeness centrality in fronto-limbic areas with mTBI-PTSD. Global and nodal graph outcomes suggest distinct pathophysiological manifestations of mTBI, PTSD, and mTBI-PTSD in structural brain networks. Greater network segregation and nodal differences in fronto-limbic areas may be tied to emotional fluctuations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FultonJ.J., CalhounP.S., WagnerH.R., SchryA.R., HairL.P., FeelingN., ElbogenE., and BeckhamJ.C. (2015). The prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder in Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) Veterans: a meta-analysis. J. Anxiety Disord. 31, 98–107.
2.
ClarkA.L., MerrittV.C., BiglerE.D., BangenK.J., WerhaneM., SorgS.F., BondiM.W., SchiehserD.M., and Delano-WoodL. (2018). Blast-exposed veterans with mild traumatic brain injury show greater frontal cortical thinning and poorer executive functioning. Front. Neurol. 9, 873.
3.
VasterlingJ.J. and DikmenS. (2012). Mild traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic stress disorder: clinical and conceptual complexities. J. Intl. Neuropsychol. Soc. 18, 390–393.
4.
DretschM.N., LangeR.T., KatzJ.S., GoodmanA., DanielT.A., DeshpandeG., DenneyT.S., IversonG.L., and RobinsonJ.L. (2017). Examining microstructural white matter in active duty soldiers with a history of mild traumatic brain injury and traumatic stress. Open Neuroimag. J. 11, 46–57.
5.
RangaprakashD., DeshpandeG., DanielT.A., GoodmanA.M., RobinsonJ.L., SalibiN., KatzJ.S., DenneyT.S.Jr., and DretschM.N. (2017). Compromised hippocampus-striatum pathway as a potential imaging biomarker of mild-traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic stress disorder. Hum. Brain Mapp. 38, 2843–2864.
6.
DretschM.N., RangaprakashD., KatzJ.S., DanielT.A., GoodmanA.M., DenneyT.S., and DeshpandeG. (2019). Strength and temporal variance of the default mode network to investigate chronic mild traumatic brain injury in service members with psychological trauma. J. Exp. Neurosci. 13, 1179069519833966.
7.
RangaprakashD., DretschM.N., KatzJ.S., DenneyJr., T.S., and DeshpandeG. (2019). Dynamics of segregation and integration in directional brain networks: illustration in soldiers with PTSD and neurotrauma. Front. Neurosci. 13, 803.
8.
RangaprakashD., DretschM.N., VenkataramanA., KatzJ.S., DenneyT.S.Jr., and DeshpandeG. (2018). Identifying disease foci from static and dynamic effective connectivity networks: Illustration in soldiers with trauma. Hum. Brain Mapp. 39, 264–287.
9.
WolfJ.A. and KochP.F. (2016). Disruption of network synchrony and cognitive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 10, 43.
10.
DretschM.N., DanielT.A., GoodmanA.M., KatzJ.S., DenneyT., DeshpandeG., and RobinsonJ.L. (2019). Differential neural activation when voluntarily regulating emotions in service members with chronic mild traumatic brain injury. Appl. Neuropsychol. Adult, 26, 76–88.
11.
HelpmanL., PapiniS., ChhetryB.T., ShvilE., RubinM., SullivanG.M., MarkowitzJ.C., MannJ.J., and NeriaY. (2016). PTSD remission after prolonged exposure treatments is associated with anterior cingulate cortex thinning and volume reduction. Depression Anxiety, 33, 384–391.
12.
GeuzeE., WestenbergH.G.M., HeineckeA., de KloetC.S., GoebelR., and VermettenE. (2008). Thinner prefrontal cortex in veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. NeuroImage, 41, 675–681.
13.
LiuY., LiY.J., LuoE.P., LuH.B., and YinH. (2012). Cortical thinning in patients with recent onset post-traumatic stress disorder after a single prolonged trauma exposure. PloS One, 7, e39025–e39025.
14.
GovindarajanK.A., NarayanaP.A., HasanK.M., WildeE.A., LevinH.S., HunterJ.V., MillerE.R., PatelV.K.S., RobertsonC.S., and McCarthyJ.J. (2016). Cortical thickness in mild traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma, 33, 1809–1817.
15.
WangX., XieH., CottonA.S., TamburrinoM.B., BrickmanK.R., LewisT.J., McLeanS.A., and LiberzonI. (2015). Early cortical thickness change after mild traumatic brain injury following motor vehicle collision. J. Neurotrauma, 32, 455–463.
16.
MichaelA.P., StoutJ., RoskosP.T., BolzeniusJ., GfellerJ., MogulD., and BucholzR. (2015). Evaluation of cortical thickness after traumatic brain injury in military veterans. J. Neurotrauma, 32, 1751–1758.
17.
PalaciosE.M., Sala-LlonchR., JunqueC., Fernandez-EspejoD., RoigT., TormosJ.M., BargalloN., and VendrellP. (2013). Long-term declarative memory deficits in diffuse TBI: correlations with cortical thickness, white matter integrity and hippocampal volume. Cortex, 49, 646–657.
18.
EierudC., NathanD.E., BonaviaG.H., OllingerJ., and RiedyG. (2019). Cortical thinning in military blast compared to non-blast persistent mild traumatic brain injuries. Neuroimage Clin. 22, 101793.
19.
HamnerM.B., LorberbaumJ.P., and GeorgeM.S. (1999). Potential role of the anterior cingulate cortex in PTSD: review and hypothesis. Depression Anxiety, 9, 1–14.
20.
ThomaesK., DorrepaalE., DraijerN., de RuiterM.B., ElzingaB.M., SjoerdsZ., van BalkomA.J., SmitJ.H., and VeltmanD.J. (2013). Increased anterior cingulate cortex and hippocampus activation in complex PTSD during encoding of negative words. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 8, 190–200.
21.
CazalisF., BabikianT., GizaC., CopelandS., HovdaD., and AsarnowR.F. (2011). Pivotal role of anterior cingulate cortex in working memory after traumatic brain injury in youth. Front. Neurol. 1, 158–158.
22.
LindemerE.R., SalatD.H., LeritzE.C., McGlincheyR.E., and MilbergW.P. (2013). Reduced cortical thickness with increased lifetime burden of PTSD in OEF/OIF Veterans and the impact of comorbid TBI. Neuroimage Clin. 2, 601–611.
23.
SpornsO., TononiG., and KötterR. (2005). The human connectome: a structural description of the human brain. PLOS Comput. Biol. 1, e42.
24.
SpornsO. (2018). Graph theory methods: applications in brain networks. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 20, 111–121.
25.
RubinovM. and SpornsO. (2010). Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage, 52, 1059–1069.
26.
BullmoreE. and SpornsO. (2009). Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 186–198.
27.
StamC.J. and ReijneveldJ.C. (2007). Graph theoretical analysis of complex networks in the brain. Nonlinear Biomed. Phys. 1, 3.
LeiD., LiK., LiL., ChenF., HuangX., LuiS., LiJ., BiF., and GongQ. (2015). Disrupted functional brain connectome in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder. Radiology, 276, 818–827.
39.
RowlandJ.A., Stapleton-KotloskiJ.R., DobbinsD.L., RogersE., GodwinD.W., and TaberK.H. (2018). Increased small-world network topology following deployment-acquired traumatic brain injury associated with the development of post-traumatic stress disorder. Brain Connect. 8, 205–211.
40.
SpornsO. (2011). Networks of the Brain. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press: Cambridge, MA.
41.
BassettD.S. and SpornsO. (2017). Network neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 353–364.
42.
ShattuckD.W. and LeahyR.M. (2002). BrainSuite: an automated cortical surface identification tool. Med. Image Anal. 6, 129–142.
43.
ChoiS., BushA.M., BorzageM.T., JoshiA.A., MackW.J., CoatesT.D., LeahyR.M., and WoodJ.C. (2017). Hemoglobin and mean platelet volume predicts diffuse T1-MRI white matter volume decrease in sickle cell disease patients. Neuroimage Clin. 15, 239–246.
44.
ShattuckD.W., Sandor-LeahyS.R., SchaperK.A., RottenbergD.A., and LeahyR.M. (2001). Magnetic resonance image tissue classification using a partial volume model. Neuroimage, 13, 856–876.
45.
ShattuckD.W. and LeahyR.M. (2001). Automated graph-based analysis and correction of cortical volume topology. IEEE Trans. on Med. Imaging, 20, 1167–1177.
46.
LorensenW.E. and ClineH.E. (1987). Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. https://teaching.csse.uwa.edu.au/units/CITS4241/Project/references/Lorensen-Cline-brief.pdf. (Last accessed May4, 2020).
47.
JoshiA.A., ShattuckD.W., and LeahyR.M. (2012). A method for automated cortical surface registration and labeling. Biomed. Image Regist. Proc. 7359, 180–189.
48.
JoshiA.A., ShattuckD.W., ThompsonP.M., and LeahyR.M. (2005). A framework for registration, statistical characterization and classification of cortically constrained functional imaging data. Inf. Process. Med. Imaging, 19, 186–96.
49.
JoshiA., ChoiS., SonkarG., ChongM., Gonzalez-MartinezJ., NairD., ShattuckD., DamasioH., and LeahyR. (2017). A whole brain atlas with sub-parcellation of cortical gyri using resting fMRI. SPIE.
50.
WestmanE., AguilarC., MuehlboeckJ.S., and SimmonsA. (2013). Regional magnetic resonance imaging measures for multivariate analysis in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Brain Topog. 26, 9–23.
51.
PereiraJ.B., AarslandD., GinestetC.E., LebedevA.V., WahlundL.O., SimmonsA., VolpeG., and WestmanE. (2015). Aberrant cerebral network topology and mild cognitive impairment in early Parkinson's disease. Hum Brain Mapp, 36, 2980–2995.
52.
PereiraJ.B., van WestenD., StomrudE., StrandbergT.O., VolpeG., WestmanE., and HanssonO. (2018). Abnormal structural brain connectome in individuals with preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Cereb. Cortex, 28, 3638–3649.
53.
TolanE.I., Z. (2018). Graph theory based classification of brain connectivity network for autism spectrum disorder. In: Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany.
54.
VergerA., KlesseE., ChawkiM.B., WitjasT., AzulayJ.P., EusebioA. and GuedjE. (2018). Brain PET substrate of impulse control disorders in Parkinson's disease: A metabolic connectivity study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 39, 3178–3186.
55.
VeroniqueP., ClaireD., Marie-HéleneF., ArnaudW., and BeatriceA.L. (2018). Resting Brain Functional Networks and Trait Coping. Brain Connectivity, 8, 475–486.
56.
GongG., HeY., ChenZ.J., and EvansA.C. (2012). Convergence and divergence of thickness correlations with diffusion connections across the human cerebral cortex. NeuroImage, 59, 1239–1248.
57.
PereiraJ.B., MijalkovM., KakaeiE., MecocciP., VellasB., TsolakiM., KloszewskaI., SoininenH., SpengerC., LovestoneS., SimmonsA., WahlundL.O., VolpeG., and WestmanE. (2016). Disrupted network topology in patients with stable and progressive mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Cereb. Cortex, 26, 3476–3493.
58.
HallquistM.N. and HillaryF.G. (2019). Graph theory approaches to functional network organization in brain disorders: a critique for a brave new small-world. Network Neurosci. 3, 1–26.
59.
van den HeuvelM.P. and SpornsO. (2011). Rich-Club Organization of the Human Connectome. J. Neurosci. 31, 15775–15786.
60.
ArnemannK.L., ChenA.J.W., Novakovic-AgopianT., GrattonC., NomuraE.M., and D'EspositoM. (2015). Functional brain network modularity predicts response to cognitive training after brain injury. Neurology, 84, 1568–1574.
61.
BlondelV.G., GuillaumeJ.L., LambiotteR., and LefebvreE. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mechanics Theory Exp. 10.
62.
HogeC.W., RiviereL.A., WilkJ.E., HerrellR.K., and WeathersF.W. (2014). The prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in US combat soldiers: a head-to-head comparison of DSM-5 versus DSM-IV-TR symptom criteria with the PTSD checklist. Lancet Psychiatry, 1, 269–277.
63.
GuykerW.M., DonnellyK., DonnellyJ.P., DunnamM., WarnerG.C., KittlesonJ., BradshawC.B., AltM., and MeierS.T. (2013). Dimensionality, reliability, and validity of the combat experiences scale. Military Med. 178, 377–384.
64.
GrayM.J., LitzB.T., HsuJ.L., and LombardoT.W. (2004). Psychometric properties of the life events checklist. Assessment, 11, 330–341.
65.
CiceroneK. and KalmarK. (1995). Persistent postconcussion syndrome: the structure of subjective complaints after mild traumatic brain injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 10, 1–17.
66.
ZungW.W. (1971). A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics, 12, 371–379.
67.
ZungW.W. (1965). A self-rating depression scale. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 12, 63–70.
68.
JohnsM.W. (1991). A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep, 14, 540–545.
69.
BuysseD.J., ReynoldsC.F., 3rd, MonkT.H., BermanS.R., and KupferD.J. (1989). The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 28, 193–213.
70.
BenjaminiY. and HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Royal Stat. Soc. Series B, 57, 289–300.
71.
FischlB. and DaleA.M. (2000). Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97, 11050–11055.
72.
SpielbergJ.M., McGlincheyR.E., MilbergW.P., and SalatD.H. (2015). Brain network disturbance related to posttraumatic stress and traumatic brain injury in veterans. Bio. Psychiatry, 78, 210–216.
73.
van den HeuvelM.P., BullmoreE.T., and SpornsO. (2016). Comparative connectomics. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 345–361.
74.
BullmoreE. and SpornsO. (2012). The economy of brain network organization. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 336.
75.
WattsD.J. and StrogatzS.H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393, 440–442.
76.
HayesJ.P., LogueM.W., SadehN., SpielbergJ.M., VerfaellieM., HayesS.M., ReaganA., SalatD.H., WolfE.J., McGlincheyR.E., MilbergW.P., StoneA., SchichmanS.A., and MillerM.W. (2017). Mild traumatic brain injury is associated with reduced cortical thickness in those at risk for Alzheimer's disease. Brain, 140, 813–825.
77.
HayesJ.P., HayesS.M., and MikedisA.M. (2012). Quantitative meta-analysis of neural activity in posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol. Mood Anxiety Disord. 2, 9.
78.
XuJ., ZhuY., FuC., SunJ., LiH., YangX., LiW., QinW., ShiD., and TianJ. (2016). Frontal metabolic activity contributes to individual differences in vulnerability toward total sleep deprivation-induced changes in cognitive function. J. Sleep Res. 25, 169–180.
79.
BadreD. and WagnerA.D. (2007). Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2883–2901.
80.
van den HeuvelM.P., MandlR.C.W., StamC.J., KahnR.S., and Hulshoff PolH.E. (2010). Aberrant frontal and temporal complex network structure in schizophrenia: a graph theoretical analysis. 30,15915–15926.
81.
van den HeuvelM.P. and SpornsO. (2013). Network hubs in the human brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 683–696.
82.
PessoaL. (2008). On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 148–158.
83.
DrevetsW.C. (2007). Orbitofrontal cortex function and structure in depression. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1121, 499–527.
84.
MiladM.R. and RauchS.L. (2007). The role of the orbitofrontal cortex in anxiety disorders. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1121, 546–561.
85.
TewarieP., HillebrandA., van DellenE., SchoonheimM.M., BarkhofF., PolmanC.H., BeaulieuC., GongG., van DijkB.W., and StamC.J. (2014). Structural degree predicts functional network connectivity: a multimodal resting-state fMRI and MEG study. NeuroImage, 97, 296–307.
86.
VermettenE. and LaniusR.A. (2012). Chapter 18 - Biological and clinical framework for posttraumatic stress disorder. In: Handbook of Clinical Neurology. AminoffM.J.., BollerF., and SwaabD.F. (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pps. 291–342.
87.
ShinL.M., RauchS.L., and PitmanR.K. (2006). Amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex, and hippocampal function in PTSD. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1071, 67–79.
88.
van WijkB.C.M., StamC.J., and DaffertshoferA. (2010). Comparing brain networks of different size and connectivity density using graph theory. PloS One, 5, e13701–e13701.
89.
MesséA., RudraufD., GironA., and MarrelecG. (2015). Predicting functional connectivity from structural connectivity via computational models using MRI: an extensive comparison study. NeuroImage, 111, 65–75.
90.
SpornsO. (2014). Contributions and challenges for network models in cognitive neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 652–660.
91.
TewarieP., van DellenE., HillebrandA., and StamC.J. (2015). The minimum spanning tree: an unbiased method for brain network analysis. Neuroimage, 104, 177–188.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
