Individuals classified clinically as having a motor-complete spinal cord injury (mcSCI) should lack voluntary motor function below their injury level. Neurophysiological assessments using electromyography (EMG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), however, have demonstrated that persons with mcSCI retain limited cortical descending innervation and voluntary activation of muscles below their level of injury, including muscles of the trunk and lower limb. We explored the possibility of whether there is also preserved innervation of the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) in persons with mcSCI. The PFM are controlled by widespread cortical and subcortical areas and typically coactivated with trunk and gluteal muscles to maintain continence and regulate intra-abdominal pressure. Nine mcSCI and eight control subjects participated in this cross-sectional study. Surface EMG was used to record activity in the PFM. Data were recorded while participants attempted various maneuvers of the trunk and pelvis. We also applied TMS at incrementing levels of intensity over the primary motor cortex area to record motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the PFM. When performing the maneuvers, activation of the PFM was possible in all controls and the majority of SCI participants. However, the PFM were only activated in the SCI participants during maneuvers that engaged other trunk muscles, however. MEP responses in the PFM were also elicited in all controls and SCI participants, but MEP response characteristics were significantly altered in the SCI group. Our results suggest that persons with mcSCI retain some residual innervation of the PFM after injury, possibly via indirect cortical descending pathways.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KirshblumS.C., BurnsS.P., Biering-SorensenF., DonovanW., GravesD.E., JhaA., JohansenM., JonesL., KrassioukovA., MulcaheyM.J., Schmidt-ReadM., and WaringW. (2011). International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). J. Spinal Cord Med. 34, 535–546.
2.
EllawayP.H., AnandP., BergstromE.M., CatleyM., DaveyN.J., FrankelH.L., JamousA., MathiasC., NicotraA., SavicG., ShortD., and TheodorouS. (2004). Towards improved clinical and physiological assessments of recovery in spinal cord injury: a clinical initiative. Spinal Cord, 42, 325–337.
3.
4.
BjerkeforsA., SquairJ.W., MalikR., LamT., ChenZ., and CarpenterM.G. (2015). Diagnostic accuracy of common clinical tests for assessing abdominal muscle function after motor-complete spinal cord injury above T6. Spinal Cord, 53, 114–119.
5.
BjerkeforsA., CarpenterM.G., CresswellA.G., and ThorstenssonA. (2009). Trunk muscle activation in a person with clinically complete thoracic spinal cord injury. J. Rehabil. Med. 41, 390–392.
6.
SquairJ.W., BjerkeforsA., InglisJ.T., LamT., and CarpenterM.G. (2016). Cortical and vestibular stimulation reveal preserved descending motor pathways in individuals with motorcomplete spinal cord injury. J. Rehabil. Med. 48, 589–596.
7.
BjerkeforsA., SquairJ.W., ChuaR., LamT., ChenZ., and CarpenterM.G. (2015). Assessment of abdominal muscle function in individuals with motor-complete spinal cord injury above T6 in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation. J. Rehabil. Med. 47, 138–146.
8.
AlamroR.A., ChisholmA.E., WilliamsA.M., CarpenterM.G., and LamT. (2018). Overground walking with a robotic exoskeleton elicits trunk muscle activity in people with high-thoracic motor-complete spinal cord injury. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 15, 109.
9.
ChisholmA.E., AlamroR.A., WilliamsA.M., and LamT. (2017). Overground vs. treadmill-based robotic gait training to improve seated balance in people with motor-complete spinal cord injury: a case report. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 14, 27.
10.
WilliamsA.M., ChisholmA.E., LynnA., MalikR.N., EginyanG., and LamT. (2020). Arm crank ergometer “spin”. training improves seated balance and aerobic capacity in people with spinal cord injury. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sport. 30, 361–369.
11.
EllawayP.H., CatleyM., DaveyN.J., KuppuswamyA., StruttonP., FrankelH.L., JamousA., and SavicG. (2007). Review of physiological motor outcome measures in spinal cord injury using transcranial magnetic stimulation and spinal reflexes. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 44, 69–76.
12.
CarigaP., CatleyM., NowickyA.V., SavicG., EllawayP.H., and DaveyN.J. (2002). Segmental recording of cortical motor evoked potentials from thoracic paravertebral myotomes in complete spinal cord injury. Spine, 27, 1438–1443.
13.
DaveyN.J., SmithH.C., SavicG., MaskillD.W., EllawayP.H., and FrankelH.L. (1999). Comparison of input-output patterns in the corticospinal system of normal subjects and incomplete spinal cord injured patients. Exp. Brain Res. 127, 382–390.
14.
Potter-BakerK.A., JaniniD.P., FrostF.S., ChabraP., VarnerinN., CunninghamD.A., SankarasubramanianV., and PlowE.B. (2016). Reliability of TMS metrics in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 54, 980–990.
15.
NardoneR., HöllerY., ThomschewskiA., BathkeA.C., EllisA.R., GolaszewskiS.M., BrigoF., and TrinkaE. (2015). Assessment of corticospinal excitability after traumatic spinal cord injury using MEP recruitment curves: a preliminary TMS study. Spinal Cord, 53, 534–538.
16.
AlexeevaN., BrotonJ.G., and CalancieB. (1998). Latency of changes in spinal motoneuron excitability evoked by transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in spinal cord injured individuals. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 109, 297–303.
17.
CalancieB., AlexeevaN., BrotonJ.G., SuysS., HallA., and KloseK.J. (1999). Distribution and latency of muscle responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor cortex after spinal cord injury in humans. J. Neurotrauma, 16, 49–67.
18.
SmithH.C., SavicG., FrankelH.L., EllawayP.H., MaskillD.W., JamousM.A., and DaveyN.J. (2000). Corticospinal function studied over time following incomplete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 38, 292–300.
19.
OudegaM., and PerezM.A. (2012). Corticospinal reorganization after spinal cord injury. J. Physiol. 590, 3647–3663.
20.
BrouwerB., BugarestiJ., and AshbyP. (1992). Changes in corticospinal facilitation of lower limb spinal motor neurons after spinal cord lesions. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 55, 20–24.
21.
RiddingM.C., and RothwellJ.C. (1997). Stimulus/response curves as a method of measuring motor cortical excitability in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 105, 340–344.
22.
DevanneH., LavoieB.A., and CapadayC. (1997). Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway. Exp. Brain Res. 114, 329–338.
23.
ThomasS.L., and GorassiniM.A. (2005). Increases in corticospinal tract function by treadmill training after incomplete spinal cord injury. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 2844–2855.
24.
ManackA., MotskoS.P., Haag-MolkentellerC., DmochowskiR.R., GoehringE.L., Nguyen-KhoaB., and JonesJ.K. (2011). Epidemiology and healthcare utilization of neurogenic bladder patients in US claims database. Neurourol. Urodyn. 30, 395–401.
25.
TaweelW.A., and SeyamR. (2015). Neurogenic bladder in spinal cord injury patients. Res. Reports Urol. 7, 85–99.
26.
KuJ.H. (2006). The management of neurogenic bladder and quality of life in spinal cord injury. BJU Int. 98, 739–745.
27.
BøK. (2004). Pelvic floor muscle training is effective in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence, but how does it work?. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pevic Floor Dysfunct. 15, 76–84.
28.
Ashton-MillerJ.A., and DeLanceyJ.O. (2007). Functional anatomy of the female pelvic floor. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1101, 266–296.
29.
GriffithsD. (2015). Neural control of micturition in humans: a working model. Nat. Rev. Urol. 12, 695–705.
30.
HodgesP.W., SapsfordR., and PengelL.H.M. (2007). Postural and respiratory functions of the pelvic floor muscles. Neurourol. Urodyn. 26, 362–371.
31.
NeumannP., and GillV. (2002). Pelvic floor and abdominal muscle interaction: EMG activity and intra-abdominal pressure. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 13, 125–132.
32.
SapsfordR.R., and HodgesP.W. (2001). Contraction of the pelvic floor muscles during abdominal maneuvers. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 82, 1081–1088.
33.
BøK., and StienR. (1994). Needle EMG registration of striated urethral wall and pelvic floor muscle activity patterns during cough, Valsalva, abdominal, hip adductor, and gluteal muscle contractions in nulliparous healthy females. Neurourol. Urodyn. 13, 35–41.
34.
FerlaL., DarskiC., PaivaL.L., SbruzziG., and VieiraA. (2016). Synergism between abdominal and pelvic floor muscles in healthy women: a systematic review of observational studies. Fisioter. em Mov. 29, 399–410.
35.
AsavasoponS., RanaM., KiragesD.J., YaniM.S., FisherB.E., HwangD.H., LohmanE.B., BerkL.S., and KutchJ.J. (2014). Cortical activation associated with muscle synergies of the human male pelvic floor. J. Neurosci. 34, 13811–13818.
36.
YaniM.S., WondolowskiJ.H., EckelS.P., KuligK., FisherB.E., GordonJ.E., and KutchJ.J. (2018). Distributed representation of pelvic floor muscles in human motor cortex. Sci. Rep. 8, 7213.
37.
BrostrømS. (2003). Motor evoked potentials from the pelvic floor. Neurourol. Urodyn. 22, 620–637.
38.
BrostrømS., JennumP., and LoseG. (2002). Motor evoked potentials from the striated urethral sphincter and puborectal muscle: normative values. Neurourol. Urodyn. 22, 306–313.
39.
NardoneR., VersaceV., SebastianelliL., BrigoF., GolaszewskiS., ChristovaM., SaltuariL., and TrinkaE. (2019). Transcranial magnetic stimulation and bladder function: a systematic review. Clin. Neurophysiol. 130, 2032–2037.
40.
PelliccioniG., ScarpinoO., and PiloniV. (1997). Motor evoked potentials recorded from external anal sphincter by cortical and lumbo-sacral magnetic stimulation: normative data. J. Neurol. Sci. 149, 69–72.
41.
VasquezN., BalasubramniamV., KuppuswamyA., KnightS., SusserJ., GallA., EllawayP.H., and CraggsM.D. (2015). The interaction of cortico-spinal pathways and sacral sphincter reflexes in subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Neurourol. Urodyn. 34, 349–355.
42.
BrostrømS., FrederiksenJ., JennusP., and LoseG. (2003). Motor evoked potentials from the pelvic floor in patients with multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 74, 498–500.
43.
KiersL., CrosD., ChiappaK.H., and FangJ. (1993). Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 89, 415–423.
44.
CapadayC. (1997). Neurophysiological methods for studies of the motor system in freely moving human subjects. J. Neurosci. Methods, 74, 201–218.
45.
BjerkeforsA., SquairJ.W., MalikR., LamT., ChenZ., and CarpenterM.G. (2015). Diagnostic accuracy of common clinical tests for assessing abdominal muscle function after motor-complete spinal cord injury above T6. Spinal Cord, 53, 114–119.
46.
BumpR.C., HurtW.G., FantlJ.A., and WymanJ.F. (1991). Assessment of Kegel pelvic muscle exercise performance after brief verbal instruction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 165, 322–329.
47.
KandadaiP., O'DellK., and SainiJ. (2015). Correct performance of pelvic muscle exercises in women reporting prior knowledge. Female Pelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg. 21, 135–140.
48.
BrostrømS., JennumP., and LoseG. (2003). Motor evoked potentials from the striated urethral sphincter and puborectal muscle: reproducibility of latencies. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114, 1891–1895.
49.
Ertekin, Ç., HansenM. V., LarssonL.E., and SjödahlR. (1990). Examination of the descending pathway to the external anal sphincter and pelvic floor muscles by transcranial cortical stimulation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 75, 500–510.
50.
EllawayP.H., DaveyN.J., and LjubisavljevicM. (1999). Magnetic stimulation of the nervous system, in: Modern Techniques in Neuroscience Research. U. Windhorst, H. Johansson H. (eds). Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg.
51.
HolmgrenH., LarssonL.E., and PedersenS. (1990). Late muscular responses to transcranial cortical stimulation in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 75, 161–172.
52.
GandeviaS.C., and RothwellJ.C. (1987). Activation of the human diaphragm from the motor cortex. J. Physiol. 384, 109–118.
53.
HodgesP.W., and GandeviaS.C. (2000). Changes in intra-abdominal pressure during postural and respiratory activation of the human diaphragm. J. Appl. Physiol. 89, 967–976.
54.
DimitrijevićM.R., KoflerM., McKayW.B., SherwoodA.M., Van der LindenC., and LissensM.A. (1992). Early and late lower limb motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic motor cortex stimulation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 85, 365–373.
55.
RanaM., YaniM.S., AsavasoponS., FisherB.E., and KutchJ.J. (2015). Brain connectivity associated with muscle synergies in humans. J. Neurosci. 35, 14708–14716.
56.
VanderhorstV.G.J.M., TerasawaE., RalstonH.J., and HolstegeG. (2000). Monosynaptic projections from the nucleus retroambiguus to motoneurons supplying the abdominal wall, axial, hindlimb, and pelvic floor muscles in the female rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 424, 233–250.
57.
NakagawaS. (1980). Onuf's neuclesus of the sacral cord in South Smerican monkey (Saimiri): its location and bilateral cortical input from area 4. Brain Res. 191, 337–344.
58.
MacLennanA., TaylowA., WilsonD., and WilsonD. (2000). The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 107, 1460–1470.
59.
LawrenceJ.M., LukaczE.S., NagerC.W., HsuJ.W., and LuberK.M. (2008). Prevalence and co-occurrence of pelvic floor disorders in community-dwelling women. Obstet. Gynecol. 111, 678–685.
60.
KomemushiY., KomemushiA., MorimotoK., YonedaY., YoshimuraR., TanakaT., KatouT., and NakataniT. (2019). Quantitative evaluation of age-related changes to pelvic floor muscles in magnetic resonance images from 369 patients. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 19, 834–837.
61.
FluryN., KoenigI., and RadlingerL. (2017). Crosstalk considerations in studies evaluating pelvic floor muscles using surface electromyography in women: a scoping review. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 295, 799–809.
62.
MorettiE., de Moura FilhoA.G., de AlmeidaJ.C., AraujoC.M., and LemosA. (2017). Electromyographic assessment of women's pelvic floor: what is the best place for a superficial sensor?. Neurourol. Urodyn. 36, 1917–1923.
63.
DoreyG. (2005). Restoring pelvic floor function in men: review of RCTs. Br. J. Nurs. 14, 1014–1021.
64.
BøK. (2012). Pelvic floor muscle training in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and sexual dysfunction. World J. Urol. 30, 437–443.
65.
DumoulinC., CacciariL., and Hay-SmithE. (2018). Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 10, CD005654.
66.
DumoulinC., Hay-SmithJ., Habée-SéguinG. M., and MercierJ. (2015). Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane systematic review with meta-analysis. Neurourol. Urodyn. 34, 300–308.
67.
MacDonaldR., FinkH.A., HuckabayC., MongaM., and WiltT.J. (2007). Pelvic floor muscle training to improve urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of effectiveness. BJU Int. 100, 76–81.
68.
BøK., MørkvedS., FrawleyH., and SherburnM. (2009). Evidence for benefit of transversus abdominis training alone or in combination with pelvic floor training to treat female urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Neurourol. Urodyn. 28, 368–373.
Mateus-VasconcelosE.C., RibeiroA.M., AntônioF.I., BritoL.G., deO., and FerreiraC.H. (2018). Physiotherapy methods to facilitate pelvic floor muscle contraction: a systematic review. Physiother. Theory Pract. 34, 420–432.
71.
VásquezN., KnightS.L., SusserJ., GallA., EllawayP.H., and CraggsM.D. (2015). Pelvic floor muscle training in spinal cord injury and its impact on neurogenic detrusor over-activity and incontinence. Spinal Cord, 53, 887–889.
72.
ElmelundM., Biering-SorensenF., DueU., and KlarskovN. (2018). The effect of pelvic floor muscle training and intravaginal electrical stimulation on urinary incontinence in women with incomplete spinal cord injury : an investigator-blinded parallel randomized clinical trial. Int. Urogynecol. J. 29, 1597–1606.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
