Clinical methods for determining the severity of traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) and long-term functional outcome in the acute setting are limited in their prognostic accuracy because of the heterogeneity of injury and dynamic injury progression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the time course and sensitivity of advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods to neurological function after SCI in a rat contusion model. Rats received a graded contusion injury at T10 using a weight-drop apparatus. MRI consisted of morphological measures from T2-weighted imaging, quantitative T2 imaging, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) at 1, 30, and 90 days post-injury (dpi). The derived metrics were compared with neurological function assessed using weekly Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) locomotor scoring and return of reflexive micturition function. At the acute time point (1 dpi), diffusion metrics sensitive to axonal injury at the injury epicenter had the strongest correlation with time-matched BBB scores and best predicted 90-dpi BBB scores. At 30 dpi, axonal water fraction derived from DWI and T2 values were both correlated with time-matched locomotor scores. At the chronic time point (90 dpi), cross-sectional area was most closely correlated to BBB. Overall, the results demonstrate differential sensitivity of MRI metrics at different time points after injury, but the metrics follow the expected pathology of acute axonal injury followed by continued degeneration and finally a terminal level of atrophy. Specificity of DWI in the acute setting may make it impactful as a prognostic tool while T2 imaging provided the most information about injury severity in chronic injury.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
JainN.B., AyersG.D., PetersonE.N., HarrisM.B., MorseL., O'ConnorK.C., and GarshickE. (2015). Traumatic spinal cord injury in the United States, 1993–2012. JAMA, 313, 2236–2243.
2.
AndersonK.D. (2004). Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J. Neurotrauma, 21, 1371–1383.
3.
WilsonJ.R., GrossmanR.G., FrankowskiR.F., KissA., DavisA.M., KulkarniA.V., HarropJ.S., AarabiB., VaccaroA., TatorC.H., DvorakM., ShaffreyC.I., HarkemaS., GuestJ.D., and FehlingsM.G. (2012). A clinical prediction model for long-term functional outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury based on acute clinical and imaging factors. J. Neurotrauma, 29, 2263–2271.
4.
TalbottJ.F., HuieJ.R., FergusonA.R., BresnahanJ.C., BeattieM.S., and DhallS.S. (2019). MR imaging for assessing injury severity and prognosis in acute traumatic spinal cord injury. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 57, 319–339.
5.
ShabaniS., KaushalM., SolimanH., NguyenH., AarabiB., FehlingsM.G., KotterM., KwonB.K., HarropJ.S., and KurpadS.N. (2019). AOSpine Global Survey—international trends in utilization of MRI/CT for spinal trauma and spinal cord injury across AO Regions. J Neurotrauma, 36, 3323–3331.
6.
FreundP., CurtA., FristonK., and ThompsonA. (2013). Tracking changes following spinal cord injury: insights from neuroimaging. Neuroscientist, 19, 116–128.
7.
TalbottJ.F., WhetstoneW.D., ReaddyW.J., FergusonA.R., BresnahanJ.C., SaigalR., HawrylukG.W., BeattieM.S., MabrayM.C., PanJ.Z., ManleyG.T., and DhallS.S. (2015). The Brain and Spinal Injury Center score: a novel, simple, and reproducible method for assessing the severity of acute cervical spinal cord injury with axial T2-weighted MRI findings. J, Neurosurg, Spine, 23, 495–504.
8.
BozzoA., MarcouxJ., RadhakrishnaM., PelletierJ., and GouletB. (2011). The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of acute spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma, 28, 1401–1411.
9.
CheranS., ShanmuganathanK., ZhuoJ., MirvisS.E., AarabiB., AlexanderM.T., and GullapalliR.P. (2011). Correlation of MR diffusion tensor imaging parameters with ASIA motor scores in hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic acute spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma, 28, 1881–1892.
10.
DalkilicT., FallahN., NoonanV.K., Salimi ElizeiS., DongK., BelangerL., RitchieL., TsangA., Bourassa-MoreauE., HeranM.K.S., PaquetteS.J., AilonT., DeaN., StreetJ., FisherC.G., DvorakM.F., and KwonB.K. (2018). Predicting injury severity and neurological recovery after acute cervical spinal cord injury: a comparison of cerebrospinal fluid and magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers. J. Neurotrauma, 35, 435–445.
11.
AarabiB., SansurC.A., IbrahimiD.M., SimardJ.M., HershD.S., LeE., DiazC., MassettiJ., and Akhtar-DaneshN. (2017). Intramedullary lesion length on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging is a strong predictor of ASIA Impairment Scale grade conversion following decompressive surgery in cervical spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery, 80, 610–620.
12.
ShanmuganathanK., ZhuoJ., BodanapallyU.K., KuladeepS., AarabiB., AdamsJ., MillerC., GullapallieR., and MenakerJ. (2019). Comparison of acute diffusion tensor imaging and conventional magnetic resonance parameter in predicting long-term outcome following blunt cervical spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma. Aug 2. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6394. [Epub ahead of print]
13.
BuddeM.D., and SkinnerN.P. (2018). Diffusion MRI in acute nervous system injury. J. Magn. Reson. 292, 137–148.
14.
SkinnerN.P., KurpadS.N., SchmitB.D., and BuddeM.D. (2015). Detection of acute nervous system injury with advanced diffusion-weighted MRI: a simulation and sensitivity analysis. NMR Biomed. 28, 1489–1506.
KimJ.H., LoyD.N., WangQ., BuddeM.D., SchmidtR.E., TrinkausK., and SongS.K. (2010). Diffusion tensor imaging at 3 hours after traumatic spinal cord injury predicts long-term locomotor recovery. J. Neurotrauma, 27, 587–598.
19.
SundbergL.M., HerreraJ.J., and NarayanaP.A. (2010). In vivo longitudinal MRI and behavioral studies in experimental spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma, 27, 1753–1767.
20.
DeBoyC.A., ZhangJ., DikeS., ShatsI., JonesM., ReichD.S., MoriS., NguyenT., RothsteinB., MillerR.H., GriffinJ.T., KerrD.A., and CalabresiP.A. (2007). High resolution diffusion tensor imaging of axonal damage in focal inflammatory and demyelinating lesions in rat spinal cord. Brain, 130, 2199–2210.
21.
ZhangJ., JonesM., DeBoyC.A., ReichD.S., FarrellJ.A., HoffmanP.N., GriffinJ.W., SheikhK.A., MillerM.I., MoriS., and CalabresiP.A. (2009). Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of Wallerian degeneration in rat spinal cord after dorsal root axotomy. J. Neurosci. 29, 3160–3171.
22.
BuddeM.D., SkinnerN.P., MuftulerL.T., SchmitB.D., and KurpadS.N. (2017). Optimizing filter-probe diffusion weighting in the rat spinal cord for human translation. Front. Neurosci. 11, 706.
23.
GraeberM.B., and StreitW.J. (1990). Microglia: immune network in the CNS. Brain Pathol. 1, 2–5.
24.
NorenbergM.D., SmithJ., and MarcilloA. (2004). The pathology of human spinal cord injury: defining the problems. J. Neurotrauma, 21, 429–440.
25.
SeifM., CurtA., ThompsonA.J., GrabherP., WeiskopfN., and FreundP. (2018). Quantitative MRI of rostral spinal cord and brain regions is predictive of functional recovery in acute spinal cord injury. Neuroimage Clin. 20, 556–563.
26.
FreundP., WeiskopfN., WardN.S., HuttonC., GallA., CiccarelliO., CraggsM., FristonK., and ThompsonA.J. (2011). Disability, atrophy and cortical reorganization following spinal cord injury. Brain, 134, 1610–1622.
27.
GrabherP., CallaghanM.F., AshburnerJ., WeiskopfN., ThompsonA.J., CurtA., and FreundP. (2015). Tracking sensory system atrophy and outcome prediction in spinal cord injury. Ann. Neurol. 78, 751–761.
28.
MetzG.A., CurtA., van de MeentH., KlusmanI., SchwabM.E., and DietzV. (2000). Validation of the weight-drop contusion model in rats: a comparative study of human spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma, 17, 1–17.
BassoD.M., BeattieM.S., and BresnahanJ.C. (1995). A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats. J. Neurotrauma, 12, 1–21.
31.
McKinnonE.T., HelpernJ.A., and JensenJ.H. (2018). Modeling white matter microstructure with fiber ball imaging. Neuroimage, 176, 11–21.
32.
AssafY., and BasserP.J. (2005). Composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion (CHARMED) MR imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage, 27, 48–58.
33.
SteigerJ.H. (1980). Testing pattern hypotheses on correlation matrices: alternative statistics and some empirical results. Multivariate Behav. Res. 15, 335–352.
34.
HarelN.Y., and StrittmatterS.M. (2008). Functional MRI and other non-invasive imaging technologies: providing visual biomarkers for spinal cord structure and function after injury. Exp. Neurol. 211, 324–328.
35.
TakeuchiH., MizunoT., ZhangG., WangJ., KawanokuchiJ., KunoR., and SuzumuraA. (2005). Neuritic beading induced by activated microglia is an early feature of neuronal dysfunction toward neuronal death by inhibition of mitochondrial respiration and axonal transport. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 10444–10454.
36.
FergusonA.R., IrvineK.A., GenselJ.C., NielsonJ.L., LinA., LyJ., SegalM.R., RatanR.R., BresnahanJ.C., and BeattieM.S. (2013). Derivation of multivariate syndromic outcome metrics for consistent testing across multiple models of cervical spinal cord injury in rats. PLoS One, 8, e59712.
37.
MedanaI.M., and EsiriM.M. (2003). Axonal damage: a key predictor of outcome in human CNS diseases. Brain, 126, 515–530.
38.
CruzC.D., CoelhoA., Antunes-LopesT., and CruzF. (2015). Biomarkers of spinal cord injury and ensuing bladder dysfunction. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 82–83, 153–159.
39.
LubienieckaJ.M., StreijgerF., LeeJ.H., StoynovN., LiuJ., MottusR., PfeiferT., KwonB.K., CoorssenJ.R., FosterL.J., GrigliattiT.A., and TetzlaffW. (2011). Biomarkers for severity of spinal cord injury in the cerebrospinal fluid of rats. PLoS One, 6, e19247.
40.
KwonB.K., StammersA.M., BelangerL.M., BernardoA., ChanD., BishopC.M., SlobogeanG.P., ZhangH., UmedalyH., GiffinM., StreetJ., BoydM.C., PaquetteS.J., FisherC.G., and DvorakM.F. (2010). Cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory cytokines and biomarkers of injury severity in acute human spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma, 27, 669–682.
41.
PouwM.H., HosmanA.J., van MiddendorpJ.J., VerbeekM.M., VosP.E., and van de MeentH. (2009). Biomarkers in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 47, 519–525.
42.
RutgesJ., KwonB.K., HeranM., AilonT., StreetJ.T., and DvorakM.F. (2017). A prospective serial MRI study following acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Eur. Spine J. 26, 2324–2332.
43.
SchaeferD.M., FlandersA., NorthrupB.E., DoanH.T., and OsterholmJ.L. (1989). Magnetic resonance imaging of acute cervical spine trauma. Correlation with severity of neurologic injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14, 1090–1095.
44.
SchaeferD.M., FlandersA.E., OsterholmJ.L., and NorthrupB.E. (1992). Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging in the acute phase of cervical spine injury. J. Neurosurg. 76, 218–223.
45.
FlandersA.E., SchaeferD.M., DoanH.T., MishkinM.M., GonzalezC.F. and NorthrupB.E. (1990). Acute cervical spine trauma: correlation of MR imaging findings with degree of neurologic deficit. Radiology, 177, 25–33.
46.
MitsuiT., MurrayM., and NonomuraK. (2014). Lower urinary tract function in spinal cord-injured rats: midthoracic contusion versus transection. Spinal Cord, 52, 658–661.
47.
CruzC.D., and CruzF. (2011). Spinal cord injury and bladder dysfunction: new ideas about an old problem. ScientificWorldJournal, 11, 214–234.
48.
DavidB.T., and StewardO. (2010). Deficits in bladder function following spinal cord injury vary depending on the level of the injury. Exp. Neurol. 226, 128–135.
49.
TyagiP., KadekawaK., KashyapM., PoreS., and YoshimuraN. (2016). Spontaneous recovery of reflex voiding following spinal cord injury mediated by anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective factors. Urology, 88, 57–65.
50.
Barros FilhoT.E., and MolinaA.E. (2008). Analysis of the sensitivity and reproducibility of the Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan (BBB) scale in Wistar rats. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 63, 103–108.
51.
LinY.T., HsiehT.H., ChenS.C., LaiC.H., KuoT.S., ChenC.P., LinC.W., YoungS.T., and PengC.W. (2016). Effects of pudendal neuromodulation on bladder function in chronic spinal cord-injured rats. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 115, 703–713.
52.
RutmanA.M., PetersonD.J., CohenW.A., and Mossa-BashaM. (2018). Diffusion tensor imaging of the spinal cord: clinical value, investigational applications, and technical limitations. Curr. Probl. Diagn. Radiol. 47, 257–269.
53.
De LeenerB., LevyS., DupontS.M., FonovV.S., StikovN., Louis CollinsD., CallotV., and Cohen-AdadJ. (2017). SCT: Spinal Cord Toolbox, an open-source software for processing spinal cord MRI data. Neuroimage, 145, 24–43.
54.
PoplawskiM.M., AlizadehM., OlesonC.V., FisherJ., MarinoR.J., GorniakR.J., LeibyB.E., and FlandersA.E. (2019). Application of diffusion tensor imaging in forecasting neurological injury and recovery after human cervical spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma, 36, 3051–3061.
55.
EmamhadiM., SoltaniB., BabaeiP., MashhadinezhadH., and GhadarjaniS. (2016). Influence of sexuality in functional recovery after spinal cord injury in rats. Arch. Bone Jt. Surg. 4, 56–59.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
