Intracranial hemorrhage after traumatic brain injury (TBI) can be life threatening and requires prompt diagnosis. Computed tomography (CT) scans are a rapid and accurate way to evaluate for hemorrhage. In patients with mild and moderate TBI, however, in whom the incidence of intracranial pathology is low, scanning every patient with CT can be costly. The Food and Drug Administration recently approved a novel biomarker screen, the Banyan Trauma Indicator (BTI), to help streamline the decision for CT scanning in mild to moderate TBI. The BTI screen diagnoses intracranial lesions with a sensitivity and specificity of 97.5% and 99.6%, respectively. We performed cost analyses of the BTI screen to determine the threshold of cost-effectiveness, compared with application of clinical decision rules or routine CT scans, for cases of mild or moderate TBI. With a 0.104 probability of an intracranial lesion in mild TBI, the biomarker screen is cost-effective if the cost is $308.96 or below per test. In moderate TBI, because of the greater prevalence of intracranial lesions at 0.663, there is a lower need for screening, and BTI becomes cost-effective up to $73.41 per test.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
TaylorC.A., BellJ.M., BreidingM.J., and XuL. (2017). Traumatic brain injury-related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths - United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveill. Summ. 66, 1–16.
2.
CoronadoV.G., McGuireL.C., SarmientoK., BellJ., LionbargerM.R., JonesC.D., GellerA.I., KhouryN., and XuL. (2012). Trends in Traumatic Brain Injury in the U.S. and the public health response: 1995–2009. J. Safety Res. 43, 299–307.
3.
JeretJ.S., MandellM., AnziskaB., LipitzM., VilceusA.P., WareJ.A., and ZesiewiczT.A. (1993). Clinical predictors of abnormality disclosed by computed tomography after mild head trauma. Neurosurgery, 32, 9–15.
4.
BrennerD.J. and HallE.J. (2007). Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N. Eng. J. Med. 357, 2277–2284.
5.
StiellI.G., WellsG.A., VandemheenK., ClementC., LesiukH., LaupacisA., McKnightR.D., VerbeekR., BrisonR., CassD., EisenhauerM.E., GreenbergG., and WorthingtonJ. (2001). The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet, 357, 1391–1396.
6.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2018). FDA authorizes marketing of first blood test to aid in the evaluation of concussion in adults. www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressannouncements/ucm596531.htm (Last accessed January27, 2019).
7.
PapaL., MittalM.K., RamirezJ., SilvestriS., GiordanoP., BragaC.F., TanC.N., AmeliN.J., LopezM.A., HaeusslerC.A., Mendez GiordanoD., and ZonfrilloM.R. (2017). Neuronal biomarker ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase detects traumatic intracranial lesions on computed tomography in children and youth with mild traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma, 34, 2132–2140.
8.
PapaL., BrophyG.M., WelchR.D., LewisL.M., BragaC.F., TanC.N., AmeliN.J., LopezM.A., HaeusslerC.A., Mendez GiordanoD.I., SilvestriS., GiordanoP., WeberK.D., Hill-PryorC., and HackD.C. (2016). Time course and diagnostic accuracy of glial and neuronal blood biomarkers GFAP and UCH-L1 in a large cohort of trauma patients with and without mild traumatic brain injury. JAMA Neurol. 73, 551–560.
9.
LewisL.M., SchloemannD.T., PapaL., FucetolaR.P., BazarianJ., LindburgM., and WelchR.D. (2017). Utility of serum biomarkers in the diagnosis and stratification of mild traumatic brain injury. Acad. Emerg. Med. 24, 710–720.
10.
Diaz-ArrastiaR., WangK.K., PapaL., SoraniM.D., YueJ.K., PuccioA.M., McMahonP.J., InoueT., YuhE.L., LingsmaH.F., MaasA.I., ValadkaA.B., OkonkwoD.O., ManleyG.T. and TRACK-TBIInvestigators. (2014). Acute biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: relationship between plasma levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein. J. Neurotrauma, 31, 19–25.
11.
RimelR.W., GiordaniB., BarthJ.T., BollT.J. and JaneJ.A. (1981). Disability caused by minor head injury. Neurosurgery, 9, 221–228.
12.
SteinS.C. (2001). Minor head injury: 13 is an unlucky number. J. Trauma, 50, 759–760.
13.
AndriessenT.M., HornJ., FranschmanG., van der NaaltJ., HaitsmaI., JacobsB., SteyerbergE.W., and VosP.E. (2011). Epidemiology, severity classification, and outcome of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a prospective multicenter study. J. Neurotrauma, 28, 2019–2031.
14.
CompagnoneC., d'AvellaD., ServadeiF., AngileriF.F., BrambillaG., ContiC., CristoforiL., DelfiniR., DenaroL., DucatiA., GainiS.M., StefiniR., TomeiG., TagliaferriF., TrinciaG., and TomaselloF. (2009). Patients with moderate head injury: a prospective multicenter study of 315 patients. Neurosurgery, 64, 690–696.
15.
FabbriA., ServadeiF., MarchesiniG., SteinS.C., and VandelliA. (2008). Early predictors of unfavourable outcome in subjects with moderate head injury in the emergency department. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 79, 567–573.
16.
FearnsideM. and McDougallP. (1998). Moderate head injury: a system of neurotrauma care. Aust. N. Z. J. Surg. 68, 58–64.
17.
GodoyD.A., RubianoA., RabinsteinA.A., BullockR., and SahuquilloJ. (2016). Moderate traumatic brain injury: the grey zone of neurotrauma. Neurocrit. Care, 25, 306–319.
18.
LundS.B., GjeiloK.H., MoenK.G., Schirmer-MikalsenK., SkandsenT., and VikA. (2016). Moderate traumatic brain injury, acute phase course and deviations in physiological variables: an observational study. Scand. J. Trauma Resusc. Emerg. Med. 24, 77.
19.
MarshallS.A. and RiechersR.G., 2nd (2012). Diagnosis and management of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury sustained in combat. Mil. Med. 177, Suppl, 8, 76–85.
20.
SteinS.C. and RossS.E. (1992). Moderate head injury: a guide to initial management. J. Neurosurg. 77, 562–564.
21.
HarbourR. and MillerJ. (2001). A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ, 323, 334–336.
22.
EinarsonT.R. (1997). Pharmacoeconomic applications of meta-analysis for single groups using antifungal onychomycosis lacquers as an example. Clin. Ther. 19, 559–569.
23.
HaydelM.J., PrestonC.A., MillsT.J., LuberS., BlaudeauE., and DeBlieuxP.M. (2000). Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N. Engl. J. Med. 343, 100–105.
24.
IngebrigtsenT., RomnerB., and Kock-JensenC. (2000). Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minimal, mild, and moderate head injuries. The Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee. J. Trauma, 48, 760–766.
25.
MowerW.R., HoffmanJ.R., HerbertM., WolfsonA.B., PollackC.V.Jr., and ZuckerM.I.; NEXUS IIInvestigators. National Emergency X-Radiography UtilizationStudy. (2002). Developing a clinical decision instrument to rule out intracranial injuries in patients with minor head trauma: methodology of the NEXUS II investigation. Ann. Emerg. Med. 40, 505–514.
26.
ServadeiF., TeasdaleG., and MerryG.; Neurotraumatology Committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies. (2001). Defining acute mild head injury in adults: a proposal based on prognostic factors, diagnosis, and management. J. Neurotrauma, 18, 657–664.
27.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2007). Head Injury Triage, Assessment, Investigation and Early Management of Head Injury in Infants, Children and Adults. Vol Clinical Guideline 56. National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care at the Royal College of Surgeons of England: London.
28.
Social Security Administration (2017). Retirement & Survivors Benefits: Life Expectancy Calculator.
29.
BrownA.W., LeibsonC.L., MalecJ.F., PerkinsP.K., DiehlN.N., and LarsonD.R. (2004). Long-term survival after traumatic brain injury: a population-based analysis. NeuroRehabilitation, 19, 37–43.
30.
Harrison-FelixC., WhiteneckG., DeVivoM., HammondF.M., and JhaA. (2004). Mortality following rehabilitation in the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems of Care. NeuroRehabilitation, 19, 45–54.
31.
ShavelleR.M., StraussD., WhyteJ., DayS.M., and YuY.L. (2001). Long-term causes of death after traumatic brain injury. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 80, 510–516.
32.
StraussD.J., ShavelleR.M., and AshwalS. (1999). Life expectancy and median survival time in the permanent vegetative state. Pediatr. Neurol. 21, 626–631.
33.
GoldM.R., SiegelJ.E., RussellL.B., and WeinsteinM.C. (1996). Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Oxford University Press: New York.
34.
SteinS.C., BurnettM.G., and GlickH.A. (2006). Indications for CT scanning in mild traumatic brain injury: a cost-effectiveness study. J. Trauma, 61, 558–566.
35.
ConcatoJ. and FeinsteinA.R. (1997). Monte Carlo methods in clinical research: applications in multivariable analysis. J. Investig. Med. 45, 394–400.
36.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (2017). FY 2017 IPPS Final Rule Homepage.
37.
FaulM., WaldM.M., Rutland-BrownW., SulliventE.E., and SattinR.W. (2007). Using a cost-benefit analysis to estimate outcomes of a clinical treatment guideline: testing the Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury. J. Trauma, 63, 1271–1278.
38.
FinkelsteinE.A., CorsoP.S., and MillerT.R. (2006). The Incidence and Economic Burden of Injuries in the United States. Oxford University Press: New York.
39.
US Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics (2018). CPI Inflation Calculator.
40.
WhitmoreR.G., ThawaniJ.P., GradyM.S., LevineJ.M., SanbornM.R., and SteinS.C. (2012). Is aggressive treatment of traumatic brain injury cost-effective?. J. Neurosurg. 116, 1106–1113.
41.
NeumannP.J., CohenJ.T., and WeinsteinM.C. (2014). Updating cost-effectiveness—the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold. N Engl. J. Med. 371, 796–797.
42.
StiellI.G., LesiukH., WellsG.A., CoyleD., McKnightR.D., BrisonR., ClementC., EisenhauerM.A., GreenbergG.H., MacphailI., ReardonM., WorthingtonJ., VerbeekR., RoweB., CassD., DreyerJ., HolroydB., MorrisonL., SchullM., LaupacisA., CanadianC.T., Head and C-S pine Study Group. (2001). Canadian CT head rule study for patients with minor head injury: methodology for phase II (validation and economic analysis). Ann. Emerg. Med. 38, 317–322.
43.
Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation NRC. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. (2005). National Academies Press: Washington, D.C.
44.
BrennerD., EllistonC., HallE., and BerdonW. (2001). Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 176, 289–296.
45.
ArabA.F., AhmedM.E., AhmedA.E., HusseinM.A., KhankanA.A., and AlokailiR.N. (2015). Accuracy of Canadian CT head rule in predicting positive findings on CT of the head of patients after mild head injury in a large trauma centre in Saudi Arabia. Neuroradiol. J. 28, 591–597.
46.
BouidaW., MarghliS., SouissiS., KsibiH., MethammemM., HaguigaH., KhedherS., BoubakerH., BeltaiefK., GrissaM.H., TrimechM.N., KerkeniW., ChebiliN., HalilaI., RejebI., BoukefR., RekikN., BouhajaB., LetaiefM., and NouiraS. (2013). Prediction value of the Canadian CT head rule and the New Orleans criteria for positive head CT scan and acute neurosurgical procedures in minor head trauma: a multicenter external validation study. Ann. Emerg. Med. 61, 521–527.
47.
EasterJ.S., HaukoosJ.S., MeehanW.P., NovackV., and EdlowJ.A. (2015). Will neuroimaging reveal a severe intracranial injury in this adult with minor head trauma?. The rational clinical examination systematic review. JAMA, 314, 2672–2681.
48.
HaydelM. (2012). Management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department. Emerg. Med. Pract. 14, 1–24.
49.
IbanezJ., ArikanF., PedrazaS., SanchezE., PocaM.A., RodriguezD., and RubioE. (2004). Reliability of clinical guidelines in the detection of patients at risk following mild head injury: results of a prospective study. J. Neurosurg. 100, 825–834.
50.
PapaL., StiellI.G., ClementC.M., PawlowiczA., WolframA., BragaC., DraviamS., and WellsG.A. (2012). Performance of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for predicting any traumatic intracranial injury on computed tomography in a United States Level I trauma center. Acad. Emerg. Med. 19, 2–10.
51.
RoY.S., ShinS.D., HolmesJ.F., SongK.J., ParkJ.O., ChoJ.S., LeeS.C., KimS.C., HongK.J., ParkC.B., ChaW.C., LeeE.J., KimY.J., AhnK.O., and OngM.E. (2011). Comparison of clinical performance of cranial computed tomography rules in patients with minor head injury: a multicenter prospective study. Acad. Emerg. Med. 18, 597–604.
52.
SmitsM., DippelD.W., de HaanG.G., DekkerH.M., VosP.E., KoolD.R., NederkoornP.J., HofmanP.A., TwijnstraA., TangheH.L., and HuninkM.G. (2005). External validation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury. JAMA, 294, 1519–1525.
53.
SteinS.C., FabbriA., ServadeiF., and GlickH.A. (2009). A critical comparison of clinical decision instruments for computed tomographic scanning in mild closed traumatic brain injury in adolescents and adults. Ann. Emerg. Med. 53, 180–188.
54.
StiellI.G., ClementC.M., RoweB.H., SchullM.J., BrisonR., CassD., EisenhauerM.A., McKnightR.D., BandieraG., HolroydB., LeeJ.S., DreyerJ., WorthingtonJ.R., ReardonM., GreenbergG., LesiukH., MacPhailI., and WellsG.A. (2005). Comparison of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria in patients with minor head injury. JAMA, 294, 1511–1518.
55.
TanD.W., LimA.M., OngD.Y., PengL.L., ChanY.H., IbrahimI., and KuanW.S. (2017). Computed tomography of the head for adult patients with minor head injury: are clinical decision rules a necessary evil?. Singapore Med. J. 59, 199–204.
56.
UndenL., CalcagnileO., UndenJ., ReinstrupP., and BazarianJ. (2015). Validation of the Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minimal, mild and moderate traumatic brain injury in adults. BMC Med. 13, 292.
57.
SharpA.L., NagarajG., RippbergerE.J., ShenE., SwapC.J., SilverM.A., McCormickT., VinsonD.R., and HoffmanJ.R. (2017). Computed tomography use for adults with head injury: describing likely avoidable emergency department imaging based on the Canadian CT Head Rule. Acad. Emerg. Med. 24, 22–30.
58.
SoxH.C., BlattM.A., HigginsM.C., and MartonK.I. (2007). Medical Decision Making. Vol 2. American College of Physicians: Philadelphia.
59.
KostyJ., MacyszynL., LaiK., McCroskeryJ., ParkH.R., and SteinS.C. (2012). Relating quality of life to Glasgow outcome scale health states. J. Neurotrauma, 29, 1322–1327.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
