Military personnel involved in Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) commonly experience blast-induced mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI). In this study, we used task-activated functional MRI (fMRI) to determine if blast-related TBI has a differential impact on brain activation in comparison with TBI caused primarily by mechanical forces in civilian settings. Four groups participated: (1) blast-related military TBI (milTBI; n=21); (2) military controls (milCON; n=22); (3) non-blast civilian TBI (civTBI; n=21); and (4) civilian controls (civCON; n=23) with orthopedic injuries. Mild to moderate TBI (MTBI) occurred 1 to 6 years before enrollment. Participants completed the Stop Signal Task (SST), a measure of inhibitory control, while undergoing fMRI. Brain activation was evaluated with 2 (mil, civ)×2 (TBI, CON) analyses of variance, corrected for multiple comparisons. During correct inhibitions, fMRI activation was lower in the TBI than CON subjects in regions commonly associated with inhibitory control and the default mode network. In contrast, inhibitory failures showed significant interaction effects in the bilateral inferior temporal, left superior temporal, caudate, and cerebellar regions. Specifically, the milTBI group demonstrated more activation than the milCON group when failing to inhibit; in contrast, the civTBI group exhibited less activation than the civCON group. Covariance analyses controlling for the effects of education and self-reported psychological symptoms did not alter the brain activation findings. These results indicate that the chronic effects of TBI are associated with abnormal brain activation during successful response inhibition. During failed inhibition, the pattern of activation distinguished military from civilian TBI, suggesting that blast-related TBI has a unique effect on brain function that can be distinguished from TBI resulting from mechanical forces associated with sports or motor vehicle accidents. The implications of these findings for diagnosis and treatment of TBI are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HogeC.W., McGurkD., ThomasJ.L., CoxA.L., EngelC.C., and CastroC.A. (2008). Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. Soldiers returning from Iraq. N. Engl. J. Med., 358, 453–463.
2.
HicksR.R., FertigS.J., DesrocherR.E., KoroshetzW.J., and PancrazioJ.J. (2010). Neurological effects of blast injury. J. Trauma, 68, 1257–1263.
3.
CernakI. and Noble-HaeussleinL.J. (2010). Traumatic brain injury: an overview of pathobiology with emphasis on military populations. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab., 30, 255–266.
4.
RisdallJ.E., and MenonD.K. (2011). Traumatic brain injury. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 366, 241–250.
5.
TerrioH., BrennerL.A., IvinsB.J., ChoJ.M., HelmickK., SchwabK., ScallyK., BretthauerR., and WardenD. (2009). Traumatic brain injury screening: preliminary findings in a US Army Brigade Combat Team. J. Head Trauma Rehabil., 24, 14–23.
6.
WardenD. (2006). Military TBI during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. J. Head Trauma Rehabil., 21, 398–402.
7.
LingG., BandakF., ArmondaR., GrantG., and EcklundJ. (2009). Explosive blast neurotrauma. J. Neurotrauma, 26, 815–825.
8.
BenzingerT.L., BrodyD., CardinS., CurleyK.C., MintunM.A., MunS.K., WongK.H., and WrathallJ.R. (2009). Blast-related brain injury: imaging for clinical and research applications: report of the 2008 St. Louis workshop. J. Neurotrauma, 26, 2127–2144.
9.
HammekeT.A., GennarelliT.A. (2003). Traumatic brain injury, in: Neuropsychiatry. SchifferR.B., RaoS.M., and FogelB.S. (eds). Lippincott Williams Wilkins: Hagerstown, MD, pps. 1149–1167.
10.
DePalmaR.G., BurrisD.G., ChampionH.R., and HodgsonM.J. (2005). Blast injuries. N. Engl. J. Med., 352, 1335–1342.
11.
SchneidermanA.I., BraverE.R., and KangH.K. (2008). Understanding sequelae of injury mechanisms and mild traumatic brain injury incurred during the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan: persistent postconcussive symptoms and posttraumatic stress disorder. Am. J. Epidemiol., 167, 1446–1452.
12.
GarmanR.H., JenkinsL.W., SwitzerR.C., 3rd, BaumanR.A., TongL.C., SwaugerP.V., ParksS.A., RitzelD.V., DixonC.E., ClarkR.S., BayirH., KaganV., JacksonE.K. and KochanekP.M. (2011). Blast exposure in rats with body shielding is characterized primarily by diffuse axonal injury. J. Neurotrauma, 28, 947–959.
13.
SäljöA., ArrhenF., BolouriH., MayorgaM. and HambergerA. (2008). Neuropathology and pressure in the pig brain resulting from low-impulse noise exposure. J. Neurotrauma, 25, 1397–1406.
14.
SäljöA., SvenssonB., MayorgaM., HambergerA., and BolouriH. (2009). Low-level blasts raise intracranial pressure and impair cognitive function in rats. J. Neurotrauma, 26, 1345–1352.
BaumanR.A., LingG., TongL., JanuszkiewiczA., AgostonD., DelanerolleN., KimY., RitzelD., BellR., EcklundJ., ArmondaR., BandakF., and ParksS. (2009). An introductory characterization of a combat-casualty-care relevant swine model of closed head injury resulting from exposure to explosive blast. J. Neurotrauma, 26, 841–860.
17.
WangY., WeiY., OguntayoS., WilkinsW., ArunP., ValiyaveettilM., SongJ., LongJ.B., and NambiarM.P. (2011). Tightly coupled repetitive blast-induced traumatic brain injury: development and characterization in mice. J. Neurotrauma, 28, 2171–2183.
18.
RislingM., PlantmanS., AngeriaM., RostamiE., BellanderB.M., KirkegaardM., ArboreliusU., and DavidssonJ. (2011). Mechanisms of blast induced brain injuries, experimental studies in rats. Neuroimage, 54, Suppl 1, S89–S97.
19.
LevinH.S., WildeE., TroyanskayaM., PetersenN.J., ScheibelR., NewsomeM., RadaidehM., WuT., YallampalliR., ChuZ., and LiX. (2010). Diffusion tensor imaging of mild to moderate blast-related traumatic brain injury and its sequelae. J. Neurotrauma, 27, 683–694.
20.
BelangerH.G., Proctor-WeberZ., KretzmerT., KimM., FrenchL.M., and VanderploegR.D. (2011). Symptom complaints following reports of blast versus non-blast mild TBI: does mechanism of injury matter? Clin. Neuropsychol., 25, 702–715.
21.
SlobounovS.M., GayM., ZhangK., JohnsonB., PennellD., SebastianelliW., HorovitzS., and HallettM. (2011). Alteration of brain functional network at rest and in response to YMCA physical stress test in concussed athletes: RsFMRI study. Neuroimage, 55, 1716–1727.
22.
ZhangK., JohnsonB., GayM., HorovitzS.G., HallettM., SebastianelliW., and SlobounovS. (2012). Default mode network in concussed individuals in response to the YMCA physical stress test. J. Neurotrauma, 29, 756–765.
23.
ScheibelR.S., NewsomeM.R., TroyanskayaM., LinX., SteinbergJ.L., RadaidehM., and LevinH.S. (2012). Altered brain activation in military personnel with one or more traumatic brain injuries following blast. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc., 18, 89–100.
24.
AronA.R., RobbinsT.W. and PoldrackR.A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci., 8, 170–177.
25.
Dimoska-DiMarco, A., McDonaldS., KellyM., TateR., and JohnstoneS. (2011). A meta-analysis of response inhibition and Stroop interference control deficits in adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI). J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol., 33, 471–485.
26.
DockreeP.M., and RobertsonI.H. (2011). Electrophysiological markers of cognitive deficits in traumatic brain injury: a review. Int. J. Psychophysiol., 82, 53–60.
27.
MatthewsS., SimmonsA., and StrigoI. (2011). The effects of loss versus alteration of consciousness on inhibition-related brain activity among individuals with a history of blast-related concussion. Psychiatry Res., 191, 76–79.
28.
SaundersJ.B., AaslandO.G., BaborT.F., de la FuenteJ.R., and GrantM. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption—II. Addiction, 88, 791–804.
29.
SkinnerH.A. (1982). The Drug-Abuse Screening-Test. Addict. Behav., 7, 363–371.
30.
SpitzerR., WIlliamsJ.B., GibbonM., FirstM.B. (1990). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R, Patient Edition/Non-Patient Edition (SCID-P/SCID-NP). American Psychiatric Press, Inc.: Washington, D.C.
31.
GreenP. (2005). Word Memory Test for Windows: User's Manual and Program. Green's Publishing: Edmonton.
32.
CiceroneK.D., and KalmarK. (1995). Persistent postconcussion syndrome—the structure of subjective complaints after mild traumatic brain injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil., 10, 1–17.
33.
WeathersF.W., LitzB.T., HermanD.S., HuskaJ.A., and KeaneT.M. (1993). The PTSD Checklist (PCL): Reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. Presented at the 9th Annual Conference of the ISTSS: San Antonio.
34.
RadloffL.S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.
35.
SmithA. (1968). The Symbol Digit Modalities test: A neuropsychologic test for economic screening of learning and other cerebral disorders. Learning Disorders, 3, 83–91.
36.
(1944). Army Individual Test of General Ability. Manual of Directions and Scoring. War Department, Adjutant General's Office: Washington, D.C.
37.
LezakM.D. (ed) (1995). Neuropsychological Assessment. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
38.
DelisD.C., KramerJ.H., KaplanE., and OberB.A. (2000). California Verbal Learning Test: Second Edition. Psychological Corporation: San Antonio.
39.
AronA.R. and PoldrackR.A. (2006). Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus. J. Neurosci, 26, 2424–2433.
40.
CoxR.W. (1996). AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research, 29, 162–173.
41.
FischlB., van der KouweA., DestrieuxC., HalgrenE., SegonneF., SalatD.H., BusaE., SeidmanL.J., GoldsteinJ., KennedyD., CavinessV., MakrisN., RosenB., and DaleA.M. (2004). Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex, 14, 11–22.
42.
DesikanR.S., SegonneF., FischlB., QuinnB.T., DickersonB.C., BlackerD., BucknerR.L., DaleA.M., MaguireR.P., HymanB.T., AlbertM.S., and KillianyR.J. (2006). An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage, 31, 968–980.
43.
RaichleM.E., MacLeodA.M., SnyderA.Z., PowersW.J., GusnardD.A., and ShulmanG.L. (2001). A default mode of brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 98, 676–682.
44.
BinderJ.R., and DesaiR.H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends Cogn Sci, 15, 527–536.
45.
ZhangS., and LiC.S. (2012). Functional networks for cognitive control in a stop signal task: independent component analysis. Hum Brain Mapp, 33, 89–104.
46.
BonnelleV., HamT.E., LeechR., KinnunenK.M., MehtaM.A., GreenwoodR.J., and SharpD.J. (2012). Salience network integrity predicts default made network function after traumatic brain injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 109, 4690–4695.
47.
KuoJ.R., KaloupekD.G., and WoodwardS.H. (2012). Amygdala volume in combat-exposed veterans with and without posttraumatic stress disorder a cross-sectional study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 69, 1080–1086.
48.
SripadaR.K., KingA.P., GarfinkelS.N., WangX., SripadaC.S., WelshR.C., and LiberzonI. (2012). Altered resting-state amygdala functional connectivity in men with posttraumatic stress disorder. J. Psychiatry Neurosci., 37, 241–249.
49.
SimmonsA.N., and MatthewsS.C. (2012). Neural circuitry of PTSD with or without mild traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis. Neuropharmacology, 62, 598–606.
BrunettiM., SepedeG., MingoiaG., CataniC., FerrettiA., MerlaA., Del GrattaC., RomaniG.L., and BabiloniC. (2010). Elevated response of human amygdala to neutral stimuli in mild post traumatic stress disorder: neural correlates of generalized emotional response. Neuroscience, 168, 670–679.
52.
LiberzonI., TaylorS.F., AmdurR., JungT.D., ChamberlainK.R., MinoshimaS., KoeppeR.A., and FigL.M. (1999). Brain activation in PTSD in response to trauma-related stimuli. Biol. Psychiatry, 45, 817–826.
53.
PackardM.G., and KnowltonB.J. (2002). Learning and memory functions of the basal ganglia. Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 25, 563–593.
54.
StoodleyC.J., and SchmahmannJ.D. (2010). Evidence for topographic organization in the cerebellum of motor control versus cognitive and affective processing. Cortex, 46, 831–844.
55.
O'ConnorD.A., RossiterS., YücelM., LubmanD.I., and HesterR. (2012). Successful inhibitory control over an immediate reward is associated with attentional disengagement in visual processing areas. Neuroimage, 62, 1841–1847.
56.
MinamotoT., OsakaM., and OsakaN. (2010). Individual differences in working memory capacity and distractor processing: Possible contribution of top-down inhibitory control. Brain Res., 1335, 63–73.
57.
BelangerH.G., CurtissG., DemeryJ.A., LebowitzB.K., and VanderploegR.D. (2005). Factors moderating neuropsychological outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc., 11, 215–227.
58.
VasterlingJ.J., BraileyK., ProctorS.P., KaneR., HeerenT., and FranzM. (2012). Neuropsychological outcomes of mild traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder and depression in Iraq-deployed US Army soldiers. Br. J. Psychiatry, 201, 186–192.
59.
SwickD., HonzelN., LarsenJ., AshleyV., and JustusT. (2012). Impaired response inhibition in veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder and mild traumatic brain injury. J. Int. Neuropsychological Soc., 18, 917–926.
60.
DavenportN.D., LimK.O., ArmstrongM.T., and SponheimS.R. (2012). Diffuse and spatially variable white matter disruptions are associated with blast-related mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage, 59, 2017–2024.
61.
SharpD.J., BonnelleV., De BoissezonX., BeckmannC.F., JamesS.G., PatelM.C., and MehtaM.A. (2010). Distinct frontal systems for response inhibition, attentional capture, and error processing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 107, 6106–6111.
62.
FlodenD., and StussD.T. (2006). Inhibitory control is slowed in patients with right superior medial frontal damage. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 18, 1843–1849.
63.
IversonG.L., LangeR.T., and FranzenM.D. (2002). Effects of mild traumatic brain injury exaggeration and malingering with the Trail Making Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 398–406.
64.
MayerA.R., MannellM.V., LingJ., GasparovicC., and YeoR.A. (2011). Functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury. Human Brain Mapping, 32, 1825–1835.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
