White matter hyperintensities (WMHIs) visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are common in both healthy adults and in those with medical or psychiatric problems. A practical methodological issue for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) researchers is whether to include, or exclude, participants from a control group who have WMHIs. The aim of this study was to compare the influence of WMHIs on whole-brain DTI in trauma control subjects. Participants were 48 patients (no-WMHIs, n=36; 2+WMHIs, n=12) prospectively recruited from the Emergency Department of Vancouver General Hospital (British Columbia, Canada). Participants completed an MRI brain scan at 6–8 weeks postinjury (mean, 47.3 days; standard deviation [SD], 6.2; range, 39–66). DTI was used to examine the integrity of white matter (WM) in 50 regions of the brain using measures of fractional anisotropy (FA), and mean (MD), radial (RD), and axial (AD) diffusivity. FA values that were >2 SDs below the mean, and MD, RD, and AD values that were >2 SDs above the mean, were classified as “abnormal scores” indicative of reduced WM integrity. In the entire sample, the 2+WMHI group had a greater number of abnormal FA, MD, and RD scores, compared to the no-WMHI group (p<0.015 and Cohen's d >0.82, indicating large to very large effect sizes, for all comparisons). When controlling for the effects of age using a matched-groups design, the 2+WMHI group still had a significantly greater number of abnormal FA, MD, and RD scores, compared to the no-WMHI group (all p<0.012, all d >0.89, large to very large effect sizes). Researchers should be aware that the inclusion or exclusion of subjects with incidental WMHIs will influence the results of DTI studies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
van EwijkH., HeslenfeldD.J., ZwiersM.P., BuitelaarJ.K., and OosterlaanJ. (2012). Diffusion tensor imaging in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 36, 1093–1106.
2.
VandermostenM., BoetsB., WoutersJ., and GhesquiereP. (2012). A qualitative and quantitative review of diffusion tensor imaging studies in reading and dyslexia. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 36, 1532–1552.
3.
AylingE., AghajaniM., FoucheJ.P., and van der WeeN. (2012). Diffusion tensor imaging in anxiety disorders. Curr. Psychiatry Rep., 14, 197–202.
4.
LiaoY., HuangX., WuQ., YangC., KuangW., DuM., LuiS., YueQ., ChanR.C., KempG.J., and GongQ. (2013). Is depression a disconnection syndrome? Meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging studies in patients with MDD. J. Psychiatry Neurosci., 38, 49–56.
5.
BühlerM., and MannK. (2011). Alcohol and the human brain: a systematic review of different neuroimaging methods. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res., 35, 1771–1793.
6.
DimouS., BattistiR.A., HermensD.F., and LagopoulosJ. (2012). A systematic review of functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging modalities used in presurgical planning of brain tumour resection. Neurosurg. Rev., 36, 205–214.
7.
JangS.H. (2010). Prediction of motor outcome for hemiparetic stroke patients using diffusion tensor imaging: a review. NeuroRehabilitation, 27, 367–372.
8.
ShentonM.E., HamodaH.M., SchneidermanJ.S., BouixS., PasternakO., RathiY., VuM.A., PurohitM.P., HelmerK., KoerteI., LinA.P., WestinC.F., KikinisR., KubickiM., SternR.A., and ZafonteR. (2012). A review of magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging findings in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Imaging Behav., 6, 137–192.
9.
SextonC.E., KaluU.G., FilippiniN., MackayC.E., and EbmeierK.P. (2011). A meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol. Aging, 32, 2322.e5–18.
10.
PoloniG., MinagarA., HaackeE.M., and ZivadinovR. (2011). Recent developments in imaging of multiple sclerosis. Neurologist, 17, 185–204.
11.
LangeR.T., IversonG.L., BrubacherJ.R., MädlerB., and HeranM.K. (2012). Diffusion tensor imaging findings are not strongly associated with postconcussional disorder 2 months following mild traumatic brain injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil., 27, 188–198.
12.
WozniakJ.R., KrachL., WardE., MuellerB.A., MuetzelR., SchnoebelenS., KiraguA., and LimK.O. (2007). Neurocognitive and neuroimaging correlates of pediatric traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) study. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol., 22, 555–568.
13.
LevinH.S., WildeE., TroyanskayaM., PetersenN., ScheibelR., NewsomeM., RadaidehM., WuT., RaginiY., ChuZ., and LiX. (2010). Diffusion tensor imaging of mild to moderate blast-related traumatic brain injury and its sequelae. J. Neurotruma, 27, 683–694.
14.
TothA., KovacsN., PerlakiG., OrsiG., AradiM., KomaromyH., EzerE., BukovicsP., FarkasO., JanszkyJ., DocziT., BukiA., and SchwarczA. (2013). Multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging in the acute and sub-acute phase of mild traumatic brain injury: can we see the difference? J. Neurotrauma, 30, 2–10.
15.
LiptonM.L., KimN., ParkY.K., HulkowerM.B., GardinT.M., ShiftehK., KimM., ZimmermanM.E., LiptonR.B., and BranchC.A. (2012). Robust detection of traumatic axonal injury in individual mild traumatic brain injury patients: intersubject variation, change over time and bidirectional changes in anisotropy. Brain Imaging Behav., 6, 329–342.
16.
WadaT., AsanoY., and ShinodaJ. (2012). Decreased fractional anisotropy evaluated using tract-based spatial statistics and correlated with cognitive dysfunction in patients with mild traumatic brain injury in the chronic stage. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., 33, 2117–2122.
17.
WildeE.A., McCauleyS.R., HunterJ.V., BiglerE.D., ChuZ., WangZ.J., HantenG.R., TroyanskayaM., YallampalliR., LiX., ChiaJ., and LevinH.S. (2008). Diffusion tensor imaging of acute mild traumatic brain injury in adolescents. Neurology, 70, 948–955.
18.
ArfanakisK., HaughtonV.M., CarewJ.D., RogersB.P., DempseyR.J., and MeyerandM.E. (2002). Diffusion tensor MR imaging in diffuse axonal injury. Am. J. Neuroradiol., 23, 794–802.
19.
NewcombeV.F.J., OuttrimJ.G., ChatfieldD.A., ManktelowA., HutchinsonP.J., ColesJ.P., WilliamsG.B., SahakianB.J., and MenonD.K. (2011). Parcellating the neuroanatomical basis of impaired decision-making in traumatic brain injury. Brain, 134, 759–768.
20.
GrossmanE.J., GeY., JensenJ.H., BabbJ.S., MilesL., ReaumeJ., SilverJ.M., GrossmanR.I., and IngleseM. (2012). Thalamus and cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury: a diffusional kurtosis imaging study. J. Neurotrauma, 29, 2318–2327.
21.
HopkinsR.O., BeckC.J., BurnettD.L., WeaverL.K., VictoroffJ., and BiglerE.D. (2006). Prevalence of white matter hyperintensities in a young healthy population. J. Neuroimaging, 16, 243–251.
22.
WenW., SachdevP.S., LiJ.J., ChenX., and AnsteyK.J. (2009). White matter hyperintensities in the forties: their prevalence and topography in an epidemiological sample aged 44–48. Hum. Brain Mapp., 30, 1155–1167.
23.
de LeeuwF.E., de GrootJ.C., AchtenE., OudkerkM., RamosL.M., HeijboerR., HofmanA., JollesJ., van GijnJ., and BretelerM.M. (2001). Prevalence of cerebral white matter lesions in elderly people: a population based magnetic resonance imaging study. The Rotterdam Scan Study. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 70, 9–14.
24.
SoderlundH., NybergL., AdolfssonR., NilssonL.G., and LaunerL.J. (2003). High prevalence of white matter hyperintensities in normal aging: relation to blood pressure and cognition. Cortex, 39, 1093–1105.
25.
HuangM.X., TheilmannR.J., RobbA., AngelesA., NicholsS., DrakeA., D'AndreaJ., LevyM., HollandM., SongT., GeS., HwangE., YooK., CuiL., BakerD.G., TraunerD., CoimbraR., and LeeR.R. (2009). Integrated imaging approach with MEG and DTI to detect mild traumatic brain injury in military and civilian patients. J. Neurotrauma, 26, 1213–1226.
MesséA., CaplainS., ParadotG., GarrigueD., MineoJ.-F., Soto AresG., DucreuxD., VignaudF., RozecG., DesalH., Pélégrini-IssacM., MontreuilM., BenaliH., and LehéricyS. (2011). Diffusion tensor imaging and white matter lesions at the subacute stage in mild traumatic brain injury with persistent neurobehavioral impairment. Hum. Brain Mapp., 32, 999–1011.
28.
ZhangK., JohnsonB., PennellD., RayW., SebastianelliW., and SlobounovS. (2010). Are functional deficits in concussed individuals consistent with white matter structural alterations: combined FMRI & DTI study. Exp. Brain Res., 204, 57–70.
29.
LingJ.M., PenaA., YeoR.A., MeridethF.L., KlimajS., GasparovicC., and MayerA.R. (2012). Biomarkers of increased diffusion anisotropy in semi-acute mild traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal perspective. Brain, 135, 1281–1292.
30.
KasaharaK., HashimotoK., AboM., and SenooA. (2012). Voxel- and atlas-based analysis of diffusion tensor imaging may reveal focal axonal injuries in mild traumatic brain injury—comparison with diffuse axonal injury. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 30, 496–505.
31.
MayerA.R., MannellM.V., LingJ., GasparovicC., and YeoR.A. (2011). Functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury. Hum. Brain Mapp., 32, 1825–1835.
32.
YallampalliR., WildeE.A., BiglerE.D., McCauleyS.R., HantenG., TroyanskayaM., HunterJ.V., ChuZ., LiX., and LevinH.S. (2010). Acute white matter differences in the fornix following mild traumatic brain injury using diffusion tensor imaging. J. Neuroimaging, 23, 224–227.
33.
Yurgelun-ToddD.A., BuelerC.E., McGladeE.C., ChurchwellJ.C., BrennerL.A., and Lopez-LarsonM.P. (2011). Neuroimaging correlates of traumatic brain injury and suicidal behavior. J. Head Trauma Rehabil., 26, 276–289.
34.
SponheimS.R., McGuireK.A., KangS.S., DavenportN.D., AviyenteS., BernatE.M., and LimK.O. (2011). Evidence of disrupted functional connectivity in the brain after combat-related blast injury. Neuroimage, 54, S21–S29.
GearyE.K., KrausM.F., PliskinN.H., and LittleD.M. (2010). Verbal learning differences in chronic mild traumatic brain injury. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc., 16, 506–516.
37.
MayerA.R., LingJ., MannellM.V., GasparovicC., PhillipsJ.P., DoezemaD., ReichardR., and YeoR.A. (2010). A prospective diffusion tensor imaging study in mild traumatic brain injury. Neurology, 74, 643–650.
38.
ChuZ., WildeE.A., HunterJ.V., McCauleyS.R., BiglerE.D., TroyanskayaM., YallampalliR., ChiaJ.M., and LevinH.S. (2009). Voxel-based analysis of diffusion tensor imaging in mild traumatic brain injury in adolescents. Am. J. Neuroradiol., 31, 340–346.
39.
WuT.C., WildeE.A., BiglerE.D., LiX., MerkleyT.L., YallampalliR., McCauleyS.R., SchnelleK.P., VasquezA.C., ChuZ., HantenG., HunterJ.V., LevinH.S. (2010). Longitudinal changes in the corpus callosum following pediatric traumatic brain injury. Dev. Neurosci., 32, 361–373.
40.
RutgersD.R., ToulgoatF., CazejustJ., FillardP., LasjauniasP., and DucreuxD. (2008). White matter abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Am. J. Neuroradiol., 29, 514–519.
41.
KrausM.F., SusmarasT., CaughlinB.P., WalkerC.J., SweeneyJ.A., and LittleD.M. (2007). White matter integrity and cognition in chronic traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Brain, 130, 2508–2519.
42.
DavenportN.D., LimK.O., ArmstrongM.T., and SponheimS.R. (2012). Diffuse and spatially variable white matter disruptions are associated with blast-related mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage, 59, 2017–2024.
43.
LoC., ShiftehK., GoldT., BelloJ.A., and LiptonM.L. (2009). Diffusion tensor imaging abnormalities in patients with mild traumatic brain injury and neurocognitive impairment. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 33, 293–297.
44.
RutgersD.R., FillardP., ParadotG., TadieM., LasjauniasP., and DucreuxD. (2008). Diffusion tensor imaging characteristics of the corpus callosum in mild, moderate, and severe traumatic brain injury. Am. J. Neuroradiol., 29, 1730–1735.
45.
IversonG.L., HakulinenU., WäljasM., DastidarP., LangeR.T., SoimakallioS., and ÖhmanJ. (2011). To exclude or not to exclude: white matter hyperintensities in diffusion tensor imaging research. Brain Inj., 25, 1325–1332.
46.
PruessmannK.P., WeigerM., ScheideggerM.B., and BoesigerP. (1999). SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn. Reson. Med., 42, 952–962.
47.
SmithS.M., JenkinsonM., WoolrichM. W., BeckmannC. F., BehrensT. E. J., Johansen-, and BergH., BannisterP. R., De LucaM., DrobnjakI., FlitneyD.E., NiazyR.K., SaundersJ., VickersJ., ZhangY., De StefanoN., BradyJ.M., MatthewsP.M. (2004). Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage, 23, S208–S219.
48.
GreveD.N., and FischlB. (2009). Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary based registration. Neuroimage, 48, 63–72.
49.
JenkinsonM., BannisterP., BradyM., and SmithS. (2002). Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage, 17, 825–841.
50.
JenkinsonM., and SmithS. (2001). A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med. Image Anal., 5, 143–156.
RueckertD., SonodaL. I., HayesC., HillD. L. G, LeachM. O., and HawkesD. J. (1999). Non-rigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 18, 712–721.
55.
MoriS., WakanaS., and Van ZijlP. C. M. (2004). MRI atlas of Human White Matter. San Diego, CA:. Elsevier.
56.
National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse. (2005). Helping Patients Who Drink Too Much: A Clinician's Guide. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse.
57.
BrooksB.L., HoldnackJ.A., and IversonG.L. (2011). Advanced clinical interpretation of the WAIS-IV and WMS-IV: prevalence of low scores varies by level of intelligence and years of education. Assessment, 18, 156–167.
58.
BrooksB.L., IversonG.L., ShermanE.M., and HoldnackJ.A. (2009). Healthy children and adolescents obtain some low scores across a battery of memory tests. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc., 15, 613–617.
59.
BinderL.M., IversonG.L., and BrooksB.L. (2009). To err is human: “abnormal” neuropsychological scores and variability are common in healthy adults. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol., 24, 31–46.
60.
BrooksB.L., IversonG.L., FeldmanH.H., and HoldnackJ.A. (2009). Minimizing misdiagnosis: psychometric criteria for possible or probable memory impairment. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord., 27, 439–450.
