Abstract
A systematic review of the literature was performed to address pertinent clinical questions regarding nutritional management in the setting of acute spinal cord injury (SCI). Specific metabolic challenges are present following spinal cord injury. The acute stage is characterized by a reduction in metabolic activity, as well as a negative nitrogen balance that cannot be corrected, even with aggressive nutritional support. Metabolic demands need to be accurately monitored to avoid overfeeding. Enteral feeding is the optimal route following SCI. When oral feeding is not possible, nasogastric, followed by nasojejunal, then by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, if necessary, is suggested.
Introduction
A
A systematic review was undertaken to determine the optimal nutritional approach for patients in the acute stage of SCI. Three clinically-relevant questions regarding nutritional management of patients following acute SCI were used to guide this systematic review: 1. Is there evidence of metabolic abnormalities that warrant specific nutritional protocols following SCI? 2. What methods for evaluating metabolic demands are most applicable to SCI patients? 3. What is the optimal route for administration of nutritional requirements following SCI?
Methods
Search strategy
A primary literature search was performed using PubMed for articles that address nutritional status and SCI. The following terms were used in the search: “dietary,” “nutrition,” “nutrient or food,” “vitamins,” “dietary supplements,” and “diet.” These terms were paired with the following: “SCI,” “spinal cord injuries,” and “spinal cord injury,” as well as the MeSH term “Spinal Cord Injuries.” The search was limited to articles written in the English language and involving human subjects. Articles excluded were: any dealing with chronic SCI (rehabilitation site or >3 weeks post-injury); any single-case report (case series were allowed); any review article more than 20 years old; and those with a mixed trauma population where the majority of patients were not those with SCI. Current reviews were read and further articles were identified.
Article review process
Relevant articles from the literature search were rated by two independent reviewers according to Downs and Black scoring (Downs and Black, 1998). Any variance in the scoring between the two reviewers was addressed by a third reviewer. Data were presented to the Spinal Cord Injury Solutions Network (Acute Practice Network), and subjected to a modified Delphi review process to establish an expert consensus to address the guiding questions.
Results
In all, 506 articles were returned by the search. Abstracts were screened, and 13 met inclusion/exclusion criteria. The relevant articles were then rated according to Downs and Black criteria (Table 1).
BEE, basal energy expenditure; PEE, predicted energy expenditure; SCI, spinal cord injury; NB, nitrogen balance; PEG, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; TPN, total parenteral nutrition; NG, nasogastric; NJ, nasojejunal; PEDro, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (de Morton, 2009).
Question 1: Is there evidence of metabolic abnormalities that warrant specific nutritional protocols following SCI?
Several studies have demonstrated that there are specific metabolic abnormalities that affect the acute stage of SCI. There is an obligatory negative nitrogen balance (NB) in these patients in spite of aggressive nutritional support (Kaufman et al., 1985; Laven et al., 1989; Rodriguez et al., 1991; Rodriguez et al., 1997). This negative NB persists for up to 2 months post-injury (Rodriguez et al., 1991). Some patients do demonstrate a positive NB in the first week post-injury; however, this is thought to be a delay in protein losses rather than a true incorporation of protein into body stores (Rodriguez et al., 1997). Patients show nutritional depletion based on several measures: anthropometric, biochemical, and NB (Kaufman et al., 1985; Kearns et al., 1992). Poor appetite is common among patients with acute SCI; average oral intake has been reported at 848 kcal (Kaufman et al., 1985; Laven et al., 1989). Significant weight loss is observed between 2 and 4 weeks post-injury (Kearns et al., 1992; Laven et al., 1989). Plasma levels of biochemical indicators, such as albumin, transferrin, creatinine, carotene, folate, and ascorbate, have been shown to decline post-injury (Kaufman et al., 1985; Kearns et al., 1992; Laven et al., 1989).
Question 2: What methods for evaluating metabolic demands are most applicable in SCI patients?
Biochemical and anthropometric testing may be useful in the assessment of metabolic demands (Dvorak et al., 2004; Kaufman et al., 1985; Laven et al., 1989). Predictive equations, such as the Harris-Benedict equation, have been used to determine a patient's predicted energy expenditure (PEE) in order to set a caloric target. Activity and stress factors are used to improve the equation's accuracy for specific clinical situations. However, there is variation within the SCI literature with respect to the value assigned by different studies to both the stress and activity factors. One study reviewed omitted the activity factor (Kolpek et al., 1989), while others used 1.1 (Barco et al., 2002; Kaufman et al., 1985), or 1.2 (Rodriguez et al., 1991, 1997). The stress factor, which is more consistently used, ranges from 1.2 to as high as 1.6 in some studies (Kaufman et al., 1985; Rodriguez et al., 1991, 1997). However, serial metabolic cart measurements (indirect calorimetry) reveal that basing patient nutritional management upon these higher stress and activity factors may result in overfeeding of patients (Rodriguez et al., 1997). Barco and colleagues incorporated an activity factor of 1.1 and a stress factor of 1.2, and found a strong correlation between measured and predicted energy expenditures (Barco et al., 2002). This study examined a relatively homogeneous population of only ventilator-dependent C1- to C7-level injuries; however, studies of chronic SCI patients suggest that the level of injury plays a significant role in the caloric requirements of this population (Mollinger et al., 1985). This may further complicate equation-based prediction of nutritional needs; similarly, the completeness of the injury may play a role in metabolic responses (Rodriguez et al., 1997).
Question 3: What is the optimal route for administration for nutritional requirements following SCI?
Dysphagia is a common issue following SCI, particularly with higher-level injuries (Abel et al., 2004; Wolf and Meiners, 2003). Poor appetite, dysgeusia, and dysosmia can also present a challenge post-injury (Laven et al., 1989). Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) insertion may provide a safe alternative with low complication rates in patients unable to tolerate an oral diet. In their case series, Frost and colleagues reported two complications among 11 patients who received a PEG: one incidence of aspiration, and one patient who needed a jejunostomy due to poor absorption (Frost et al., 1995).
An organized nutritional protocol (supplemental parenteral nutrition to meet defined energy requirements is initiated if not tolerating an enteral diet) significantly decreases the likelihood of upper GI bleeding, and allows patients to reach total energy requirements nearly threefold faster (Kuric et al., 1989). Although enteral feeding has historically been delayed in SCI patients secondary to concerns about ileus and other complications, studies have found that feeding these patients within the first 72 h is safe (Dvorak et al., 2004; Rowan et al., 2004)
Discussion
Unlike other trauma patients, such as those with traumatic brain injury, burns, or multi-trauma, patients with SCI do not demonstrate hypermetabolism following injury (Kearns et al., 1992; Kolpek et al., 1989; Rodriguez et al., 1991, 1997). Although these patients exhibit a negative NB, this negative balance is obligatory, and attempts to correct it by increasing caloric intake may result in overfeeding. Overfeeding carries its own risks, including hypercapnia, hyperglycemia, uremia, and hypertriglyceridemia (Todd et al., 2008), and should be avoided. Nutritional requirements have traditionally been estimated through the use of the Harris-Benedict equation; however, it can be difficult to accurately estimate the needs of any one individual through equations alone (da Rocha et al., 2006), and no predictive equation has been established for this patient population. One study of ventilator-dependent patients (Barco et al., 2002) did find a close correlation between predicted and measured energy expenditure using low activity and stress factors; however, the authors still recommend serial metabolic monitoring, when available, to account for variability between individuals (Barco et al., 2002). Likewise, Young and associates used indirect calorimetry on four acute, ventilated quadriplegic patients and found that measured energy expenditure was 97 % of the expenditure predicted by the Harris-Benedict equation, without inclusion of an injury activity factor (Young et al., 1987). However, indirect calorimetry may provide a more accurate reflection of the patient's caloric requirements, particularly in a more heterogeneous SCI population, and could prevent overfeeding in many cases by allowing adjustments of intake based on measured energy expenditure rather than predicted energy expenditure (Dvorak et al., 2004; Rodriguez et al., 1997). This technology holds promise but further study is required.
Although the optimal route of nutritional support has not been studied specifically in SCI patients, several studies of trauma populations have shown that enteral feeding is preferable to the parenteral route, as it produces a lower incidence of infectious complications and hyperglycemia (Gramlich et al., 2004; Kudsk et al., 1992). The preferred initial route for enteral feeding in critically ill patients is nasogastric (NG); patients who do not tolerate NG feeding as evidenced by either by vomiting or by high residual volumes (250 ml more than the amount delivered since the last gastric aspirate) should proceed to the nasojejunal (NJ) route (Davies et al., 2002). If the patient requires gastric feeding tube placement, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the preferred method for trauma patients (Dwyer et al., 2002).
Systematic review recommended answers to clinical questions
Is there evidence of metabolic abnormalities that warrant specific nutritional protocols following SCI?
• Multiple studies document metabolic abnormalities following SCI, including an obligatory negative nitrogen balance.
• These patients have unique requirements mandating the development of specific treatment protocols.
• (Recommendation strong, data moderate.)
What methods for evaluating metabolic demands are most applicable in SCI patients?
• The use of indirect calorimetry to calculate measured energy expenditure will most accurately predict the patient's caloric needs.
• (Recommendation weak, data weak.)
What is the optimal route for administration for nutritional requirements following SCI?
• Enteral feeding is the optimal route for administration of nutritional requirements following SCI. When oral feeding is not possible, NG, followed by NJ, followed by PEG, if necessary, would be suggested. If enteral feeds do not meet the metabolic demands within 5 days of injury, total parenteral nutrition should be started to ensure adequate caloric intake.
• (Recommendation strong, data weak.)
Footnotes
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
