Abstract
Purpose:
Optimal treatment regimens are yet to be established for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE). We assessed the in vitro efficacy of meropenem (MEM) and cefmetazole (CMZ) combination treatment against blaKPC-2-positive Enterobacteriaceae, in comparison with that of double-carbapenem therapy using ertapenem (ERT).
Materials and Methods:
We performed checkerboard assay for 10 blaKPC-2-positive clinical isolates and Klebsiella pneumoniae BAA-1705 (possessing blaKPC-2), with synergistic effect being defined by a fractional inhibitory concentration index of ≤0.5. Subsequently, we conducted time–kill assays using K. pneumoniae BAA-1705 with an initial inoculum of 104–107 colony forming unit (CFU)/mL. Bactericidal effect was defined as the reduction of initial bacterial count by ≥103 CFU/mL in 24 hr. Finally, we applied scanning electron microscopy to observe morphological changes induced by the combination of MEM and CMZ.
Results:
Checkerboard assays revealed a synergistic effect in 7 out of 11 blaKPC-2 -positive Enterobacteriaceae when the MEM and CMZ combination was used, and no effect when the MEM and ERT combination was used. The minimum inhibitory concentration of MEM decreased 4–8-fold when combined with CMZ. Time–kill assays with an initial inoculum of 5 × 105 CFU/mL revealed regrowth under the combination of MEM and ERT (0.25 × minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] each), whereas the combination of 0.25 × MIC each of MEM and CMZ exhibited bactericidal effect. Scanning electron microscopy results demonstrated that the combination of 0.5 × MIC MEM and 0.5 × MIC CMZ facilitated bacterial cell lysis compared with each antibiotic alone.
Conclusion:
The combination therapy using MEM and CMZ potentially has bactericidal effect against KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
