The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of thermography in the diagnosis of lymphedema.
Methods:
The study included 43 women after axillary dissection caused by breast cancer, whose mean age was 64.4 ± 7.8 years. The subjects were divided into two groups, with the criterion for division being the appearance of secondary lymphedema. The size of lymphedema was verified by Limb Volumes Professional 5.0; body surface temperatures were registered using a thermal camera.
Results:
In the control group, the difference in the volume of the limb on the operated side and the contralateral limb was 7.5 ± 77.7 mL (3.6%). The temperature on the nonoperated side tended to be higher than on the opposite side. In the test group, the difference in size between the limbs was 54.5 ± 312.7 mL (29.3%). In the case of mild or moderate edema, a reverse tendency was observed. While measuring the difference in the mean surface temperatures of both limbs belonging to two groups, a significance of differences at the level of p = 0.04 was observed. Moreover, a negative Spearman correlation coefficient (−0.34) was observed between the size of secondary lymphedema and the surface temperature.
Conclusion:
Noninvasive thermography can provide a valuable supplementary tool in the diagnostics of secondary lymphedema.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SzubaA, ShinWS, StraussHW, RocksonS. The third circulation: radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy in the evaluation of lymphedema. J Nucl Med, 2003; 44:43–57.
2.
ShihYC, XuY, CormierJN, GiordanoS, RidnerSH, BuchholzTA, PerkinsGH, EltingLS. Incidence, treatment costs, and complications of lymphedema after breast cancer among women of working age: a 2-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol, 2009; 27:2007–2014.
3.
GarzaR3rd, SkorackiR, HockK, PovoskiSP. A comprehensive overview on the surgical management of secondary lymphedema of the upper and lower extremities related to prior oncologic therapies. BMC Cancer, 2017; 17:468.
4.
BrownJ. A clinically useful method for evaluating lymphedema. Clin J Oncol Nurs, 2004; 8:35–38.
5.
DiSipioT, RyeS, NewmanB, HayesS. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol, 2013; 14:500–515.
6.
FuMR. Breast cancer-related lymphedema: symptoms, diagnosis, risk reduction, and management. World J Clin Oncol, 2014; 5:241–247.
7.
BarnesRB. Thermography of the human body. Science, 1963; 140:870–875.
8.
NowakowskiA, ed. Advances in thermography-medical applications [In Polish]. Gdańsk, Poland: Gdańsk University of Technology, 2001:27–31.
9.
BiagoniPA, LongomoreRB, McGimpseyJG, LameyPJ. Infrared thermography. Its role in dental research with particular reference to craniomandibular disorders. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 1996; 25:119–124.
10.
PolkowskiH. The use of thermography in non-destructive testing, heat wave method, pulse thermography [In Polish]. 4th National Conference “Thermography and infrared thermometry,” Łódź 2000.
11.
TsaiRJ, DennisLK, LynchCF, et al., The risk of developing arm lymphedema among breast cancer survivors: a meta-analysis of treatment factors. Ann Surg Oncol, 2009; 16:1959–1972.
12.
CucchiF, RossmeislovaL, SimonsenL, JensenMR, BülowJ. A vicious circle in chronic lymphoedema pathophysiology? An adipocentric view. Obes Rev, 2017; 18:1159–1169.
13.
HespeGE, NoresGG, HuangJJ, MehraraBJ. Pathophysiology of lymphedema-Is there a chance for medication treatment?. J Surg Oncol, 2017; 115:96–98.
14.
ClodiusL, PillerNB, Casley-SmithJR. The problems of lymphatic microsurgery for lymphedema. Lymphology, 1981; 14:69–76.
AmmerK. Thermography in lymphedema. In: MabuchiK, ed. International Advance Techniques and Clinical Applications in Biomedical Thermology. Chur/Schweiz, Harwood Academic Publishers; 1995:213–220.
17.
StantonAW, Rodney LevickJ, MortimerPS. Cutaneous vascular control in the arms of women with postmastectomy oedema. Exp Physiol, 1996; 81:447–464.
18.
Pawik Ł, SkrzekA, Dębiec-BakA. Application of thermometer in diagnostics and monitoring of traffic injection training. In: PodbielskaH, SkrzekA, eds., Biomedical Application of Thermovision. Wroclaw: Wroclaw University of Technology; 2013.
19.
BadzaV, JovancevicV, FraticF, RoglicG, SudarovN. Possibilities of thermovision application in sport and sport rehabilitation. Vojnosanit Pregl, 2012; 69:904–907.
20.
CohM, SirokB. Use of the thermovision method in sport training. Vojnosanit Pregl, 2012; 69:904–907.
21.
SchmittM, GuillotY. Thermography and Muscular Injuries in Sport Medicine, Recent Advances in Medical Thermology. New York: Plenum Press; 1984.
22.
BenEliyahuD. Infrared thermography and the sport injury practice. Dyn Chiropr, 1992; 10:1–7.
23.
HildebrandtC, RaschnerC, AmmerK. An overview of recent application of medical infrared thermography in sport medicine in Austria, Sensors (Basel). 2010; 10:4700–4715.
ChudeckaM, LubkowskaA. The use of thermal imaging to evaluate body temperature changes of athletes during training and a study on the impact of physiological and morphological factors on skin temperature. Hum Movement, 2012; 13:33–39.
28.
SunD, YuZ, ChenJ, WangL, HanL, LiuN. The value of using a SkinFibroMeter for diagnosis and assessment of secondary lymphedema and associated fibrosis of lower limb skin. Lymphat Res Biol, 2017; 15:70–76.
Dębiec-BąkA, GruszkaK, SobiechKA, SkrzekA. Age dependence of thermal imaging analysis of body surface temperature in women after cryostimulation. Hum Movement, 2013; 14:299–304.
31.
ChudeckaM, LubkowskaA, Kempińska-PodhorodeckaA. Body surface temperature distribution in relation to body composition in obese women, J Therm Biol, 2014; 43:1–6.
32.
MelnizkyP, SchartelmullerT, AmmerK. Examination of the intra and interindividual reliability of the evaluation of infrared thermograms [In German]. Eur J Thermol, 1997; 7:224–226.
