RocksonSG. Solving the puzzle of breast cancer-associated lymphedema: The role of imaging. Lymphat Res Biol, 2005; 3:1–2.
2.
CornishB. Bioimpedance analysis: Scientific background. Lymphat Res Biol, 2006; 4:47–50.
3.
GawR, BoxR, CornishB. Bioimpedance in the assessment of unilateral lymphedema of a limb: The optimal frequency. Lymphat Res Biol, 2011; 9:93–99.
4.
MoseleyA, PillerN. Reliability of bioimpedance spectroscopy and tonometry after breast conserving cancer treatment. Lymphat Res Biol, 2008; 6:85–87.
5.
RidnerSH, DietrichMS, DengJ, BonnerCM, KiddN. Bioelectrical impedance for detecting upper limb lymphedema in nonlaboratory settings. Lymphat Res Biol, 2009; 7:11–115.
6.
WardLC. Bioelectrical impedance analysis: proven utility in lymphedema risk assessment and therapeutic monitoring. Lymphat Res Biol, 2006; 4:51–56.
7.
WardLC, DylkeE, CzerniecS, IsenringE, KilbreathSL. Confirmation of the reference impedance ratios used for assessment of breast cancer-related lymphedema by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy. Lymphat Res Biol, 2011; 9:47–51.
8.
WardLC, DylkeE, CzerniecS, IsenringE, KilbreathSL. Reference ranges for assessment of unilateral lymphedema in legs by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy. Lymphat Res Biol, 2011; 9:43–46.
9.
WardLC, DylkeES, KilbreathSL. Measurement of hand volume by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy. Lymphat Res Biol, 2012; 10:81–86.
10.
KilbreathS, RefshaugeK, WardL, KastaniasK, YeeJ, KoelmeyerLet al.Factors affecting the pre- and post-operative extracellular fluid in the arm on the side of breast cancer: A cohort study. Lymphat Res Biol, 2013; 11:66–71.
11.
NewmanA, RosenthallL, TowersA, HodgsonP, ShayC, TidharDet al.Determining the precision of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and bioelectric impedance spectroscopy in the assessment of breast cancer-related lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol, 2013; 11:104–109.
