The aim of this study was to determine the impact of dominance and severity on tissue composition changes with lymphedema using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and to determine the relationships between the DXA-determined tissue volumes and the clinical outcomes determined by perometry and bioimpedance spectroscopy.
Methods and Results:
Fifty-six women with secondary lymphedema and 44 women without a history of breast cancer or lymphedema underwent measurement of their upper limbs with DXA, perometry, and bioimpedance spectroscopy. Whether the affected side was the dominant or nondominant arm influenced inter-limb tissue volumes differences (F=16.31 to 35.14; all p<0.001) and interacted with the severity of lymphedema (F=3.22 to 11.07; all p<0.05). In the control group, the dominant limb had more lean tissue but less fat than the nondominant limb. In the lymphedema group, increases in fat in the affected arm were not related to generalized increases in whole body adiposity when the dominant arm was affected. Perometry-measured volumes and BIS ratios were moderately to highly correlated with inter-limb fat, volume, and total tissue differences found by DXA (r=0.39 to 0.86).
Conclusions:
The direction and magnitude of limb composition changes in those with lymphedema are impacted by whether the affected side is the dominant or nondominant limb, as well as the severity of the condition. The stage of tissue composition change may impact on the diagnosis and monitoring as well as treatment of secondary lymphedema.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PrattGH. Surgical correction of lymphedema, with observations on use of electric dermatome. JAMA, 1951; 147:1121–1126.
2.
MatasR. The surgical treatment of elephantiasis and elephantoid states dependent upon chronic obstruction of the lymphatic and venous channels. Am J Trop Med Prevent Med, 1913; I:60–85.
3.
HarveyNL. The link between lymphatic function and adipose biology. Ann NY Acad Sci, 2008; 1131:82–88.
4.
StantonAWB, BadgerC, SitziaJ. Non-invasive assessment of the lymphedematous limb. Lymphology, 2000; 33:122–135.
5.
HaaverstadR, NilsenG, MyhreHO, SaetherOD, RinckPA. The use of MRI in the investigation of leg oedema. Eur J Vasc Surg, 1992; 6:124–129.
6.
TassenoyA, De MeyJ, De RidderF, et al.Postmastectomy lymphoedema: Different patterns of fluid distribution visualised by ultrasound imaging compared with magnetic resonance imaging. Physiotherapy, 2011; 97:234–243.
7.
BrorsonH, OhlinK, OlssonG, KarlssonMK. Breast cancer-related chronic arm lymphedema is associated with excess adipose and muscle tissue. Lymph Res Biol, 2009; 7:3–10.
8.
The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema. 2009 concensus document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology., 2009; 42:51–60.
9.
ChevilleAL, McGarveyCL, PetrekJA, RussoSA, ThiadensSRJ, TaylorME. The grading of lymphedema in oncology clinical trials. Sem Radiat Oncol, 2003; 13:214–225.
10.
McLaughlinSA. Lymphedema: Separating fact from fiction. Oncology, 2012; 26:242–249.
11.
DylkeES, YeeJ, WardLC, ForoughiN, KilbreathSL. Normative volume difference between the dominant and nondominant upper limbs in healthy older women. Lymphat Res Biol, 2012; 10:182–188.
12.
StantonAW, NorthfieldJW, HolroydB, et al.Validation of an optoelectronic limb volumeter (Perometer). Lymphology, 1997; 30:77–97.
13.
CzerniecSA, WardLC, RefshaugeKM, et al.Assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema-comparison of physical measurement methods and self-report. Cancer Investig, 2010; 28:54–62.
14.
WardLC. Early diagnosis in latent phase. In: LeeBB, BerganJ, RocksonSG, eds. Lymphedema: A Concise Compendium of Theory and Practice. London: Springer; 2011:105–110.
15.
WardLC. Is BIS ready for prime time as the gold standard. J Lymphoedema., 2009; 4:52–56.
16.
WardLC, DylkeE, CzerniecS, IsenringE, KilbreathSL. Confirmation of the reference impedance ratios used for assessment of breast cancer-related lymphedema by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy. Lymphat Res Biol, 2011; 9:47–51.
17.
CoinA, GianniniS, MinicuciN, et al.Limb fat-free mass and fat mass reference values by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in a 20–80 year-old italian population. Clin Nutr, 2012; 31:506–511.
18.
GjorupC, ZerahnB, HendelHW. Assessment of volume measurement of breast cancer-related lymphedema by three methods: Circumference measurement, water displacement, and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Lymphat Res Biol, 2009; 8:111–119.
19.
WardLC, RudorferC, IsenringE, KagawaM. Body composition assessment by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA): An inter-machine comparison. Australas Med J, 2010; 3:951.
20.
Maple-BrownLJ, HughesJ, PiersLS, et al.Increased bone density in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians: Impact of body composition differences. Bone, 2012; 51:123–130.
21.
BurkhartTA, ArthursKL, AndrewsDM. Manual segmentation of DXA scan images results in reliable upper and lower extremity soft and rigid tissue mass estimates. J Biomech, 2009; 42:1138–1142.
22.
Laval-JeantetAM, BergotC, CarrollR, Garcia-SchaeferF. Cortical bone senescence and mineral bone density of the humerus. Calcif Tissue Intl, 1983; 35:268–272.
23.
CornishBH, WardLC, ThomasBJ, BunceIH. Quantification of lymphoedema using multi-frequency bioimpedance. Appl Rad Isotopes., 1998; 49:651–652.
24.
CornishBH, ChapmanM, HirstC, et al.Early diagnosis of lymphedema using multiple frequency bioimpedance. Lymphology, 2001; 34:2–11.
25.
DomholdtE. Rehabilitation Research: Principles And Applications: Elsevier Saunders; 2005.
26.
RinehartJK, SingletonRD, AdairJC, SadekJR, HaalandKY: Arm use after left or right hemiparesis is influenced by hand preference. Stroke 2009, 2009; 40:545–550.
27.
GhoS, SteeleJ, JonesS, MunroB. Self-reported side effects of breast cancer treatment: A cross-sectional study of incidence, associations, and the influence of exercise. Cancer Causes Control, 2013; 24:517–528.
28.
WangJ, PiersonRN. Disparate hydration of adipose and lean tissue require a new model for body water distribution in man. J Nutrit, 1976; 106:1687–1693.
29.
WakiM, KralJG, MazariegosM, WangJ, PiersonRN, HeymfieldSB. Relative expansion of extracellular fluid in obese vs. nonobese women. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, 1991; 261:E199–E203.
30.
ShahC, ViciniFA. Breast cancer-related arm lymphedema: Incidence rates, diagnostic techniques, optimal management and risk reduction strategies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2011; 81:907–914.
31.
StahnA, TerblancheE, GungaH-C. Selected application of bioelectrical impedance analysis: Body fluids, blood volume, body cell mass and fat mass. In: PreedyVR, ed. Handbook of Anthropometry Physical Measures of Human Form in Health and Disease. New York: Springer; 2012.
32.
WilsonJP, FanB, ShepherdJA. Total and regional body volumes derived from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry output. J Clin Densitom, 2013; 16:368–373.
33.
BrorsonH, OhlinK, OlssonG, LangstromG, WiklundI, SvenssonH. Quality of life following liposuction and conservative treatment of arm lymphedema. Lymphology, 2006; 39:8–25.
34.
Torres LacombaM, SanchezMJY, GoniAZ, et al.Effectiveness of early physiotherapy to prevent lymphoedema after surgery for breast cancer: randomised, single blinded, clinical trial. Br Med J, 2010; 340:b5396.
35.
MaherJ, RefshaugeK, WardL, PatersonR, KilbreathS. Change in extracellular fluid and arm volumes as a consequence of a single session of lymphatic massage followed by rest with or without compression. Support Care Cancer, 2012; 20:3079–3086.
36.
BrorsonH. Liposuction gives complete reduction of chronic large arm lymphedema after breast cancer. Acta Oncolog, 2000; 39:407–420.
