Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is a critical procedure for managing choledocholithiasis, with primary closure (PC) and T-tube drainage (TTD) as common methods for common bile duct closure. However, the substantial number of new studies comparing PC and TTD underscores the need for an updated meta-analysis. Therefore, this study aims to compare surgery-related outcomes in PC and TTD for biliary duct closure following LCBDE.
Methods:
We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases on June 20, 2024. Mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled for continuous and binary outcomes, respectively. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. Statistical analysis was performed using Software R, version 4.3.3.
Results:
A total of 31 studies comprising 4432 patients were included. A total of 2301 (51.9%) were submitted to PC and 2131 (48.1%) were submitted to TTD. The mean age of patients ranged from 39 to 69.8 years and 44.3% were male. Compared with TTD, PC significantly reduced retained stones (odds ratio [OR] 0.57; 95% CI 0.35–0.93; P = .02; I2 = 0%), biliary peritonitis (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.08–0.60; P < .01; I2 = 0%), operative time (MD −21.07 minutes; 95% CI −27.68–14.46; P <. 01; I2 = 97%) and postoperative hospital stay (MD −2.20 days; 95% CI −2.80–1.60; P <. 01; I2 = 96%). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in recurrent stones (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.32–1.02; P = .06; I2 = 0%), bile leakage (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.65–1.23; P = .49; I2 = 0%), bile duct stricture (OR 2.08; 95% CI 0.36–12.11; P = .42; I2 = 0%), pneumonia (OR 1.38; 95% CI 0.66–2.88; P = .39; I2 = 0%), and pancreatitis (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.29–1.38; P = .25; I2 = 0%).
Conclusion:
In this meta-analysis, PC was associated with decreased retained stones, biliary peritonitis, operative time, and postoperative hospital stay. However, no significant differences were observed for the other outcomes. These findings underscore PC as a safe and reliable method for bile duct closure following LCBDE.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ShabanzadehDM. Incidence of gallstone disease and complications. Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 2018; 34(2):81–89; doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000418
2.
YangY, HanL, LinD-N, et al.The safety and efficacy of primary duct closure without endoscopic nasobiliary drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Gastrointest Tumors, 2020; 7(4):117–124; doi: 10.1159/000508874
3.
van DijkAH, de ReuverPR, BesselinkMG, et al.Assessment of available evidence in the management of gallbladder and bile duct stones: A systematic review of international guidelines. HPB (Oxford), 2017; 19(4):297–309; doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.12.011
4.
CaiJ-S, QiangS, Bao-BingY. Advances of recurrent risk factors and management of choledocholithiasis. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2017; 52(1):34–43; doi: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1224382
5.
TopalB, AertsR, PenninckxF. Laparoscopic common bile duct stone clearance with flexible choledochoscopy. Surg Endosc, 2007; 21(12):2317–2321; doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9577-1
6.
LiuD, CaoF, LiuJ, et al.Risk factors for bile leakage after primary closure following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Surg, 2017; 17(1):1; doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0201-y
7.
LuoT, HuangY, WangS, et al.Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure is preferred for selected elderly individuals with choledocholithiasis. Ann Gastroenterol Surg, 2023; 7(5):772–783; doi: 10.1002/ags3.12668
8.
ZhuT, LinH, SunJ, et al.Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: A meta-analysis. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 2021; 22(12):985–1001; doi: 10.1631/jzus.B2100523
9.
HigginsJPT, ThomasJ, ChandlerJ, et al.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.4 (Updated August 2023). n.d.
10.
PageMJ, McKenzieJE, BossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 2021; 372:n71; doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
11.
Anonymous. U.S. National Institute of Health Research. PROSPERO. International prospective register of systematic reviews. n.d.
12.
WohlinC. Guidelines for Snowballing in Systematic Literature Studies and a Replication in Software Engineering. n.d.
13.
SterneJA, HernánMA, ReevesBC, et al.ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ, 2016; 355:i4919; doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919
14.
SterneJAC, SavovićJ, PageMJ, et al.RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 2019; 366:l4898; doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898
15.
EggerM, SmithGD, SchneiderM, et al.Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 1997; 315(7109):629–634; doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
16.
GjerdevikM, HeuchI. Improving the error rates of the Begg and Mazumdar test for publication bias in fixed effects meta-analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2014; 14(1):109; doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-109
17.
DerSimonianR, LairdN. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials, 1986; 7(3):177–188; doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
18.
DongZ-T, WuG-Z, LuoK-L, et al.Primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus T-tube. J Surg Res, 2014; 189(2):249–254; doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.055
19.
El-GeidieAA-R. Is the use of t-tube necessary after laparoscopic choledochotomy? J Gastrointest Surg, 2010; 14(5):844–848; doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1133-y
20.
FangC, DongY, LiuS, et al.Laparoscopy for hepatolithiasis: Biliary duct exploration with primary closure versus T-Tube drainage. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020; 30(10):1102–1105; doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0081
21.
LeidaZ, PingB, ShuguangW, et al.A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy. Surg Endosc, 2008; 22(7):1595–1600; doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9731-9
22.
PayneRA, WoodsWG. Primary suture or T-tube drainage after choledochotomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 1986; 68(4):196–198.
23.
ZhangLD, BieP, ChenP, et al.Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage following laparoscopic choledochotomy. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2004; 42(9):520–523.
24.
ZhangW-J, XuG-F, WuG-Z, et al.Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with primary closure versus T-Tube drainage: A randomized clinical trial. J Surg Res, 2009; 157(1):e1–e5; doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.03.012
25.
ZhangW, XuG, HuangQ, et al.Treatment of gallbladder stone with common bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era. BMC Surg, 2015; 15:7; doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-15-7 ((Zhang W., zhangweijie1616@163.com.Department; Guan W., guan-wx@163.com.Department) Department of General Surgery, the Affiliated Drum tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, China).
26.
AudouyC, ThereauxJ, KansouG, et al.Primary closure versus biliary drainage after laparoscopic choledocotomy: Results of a comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2016; 26(1):e32–e36; doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000242
27.
CaiH, SunD, SunY, et al.Primary closure following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with intraoperative cholangiography and choledochoscopy. World J Surg, 2012; 36(1):164–170.
28.
JameelM, DarmasB, BakerAL. Trend towards primary closure following laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2008; 90(1):29–35; doi: 10.1308/003588408X242295
29.
JanY, HussainM, AmanZ, et al.Primary Closure vs T-Tube drainage following open choledochotomy for CBD (Common Bile Duct) Stones. Cureus, 2023; 15(3):e35846; doi: 10.7759/cureus.35846
30.
JiangY, ZhangJ, LiW, et al.Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with non-severe acute cholangitis. Updates Surg, 2022; 74(3):899–906; doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01214-0
31.
LuJ, ZhangX, ZengC, et al.Clinical analysis of laparoscopic common bile duct primary suture and T-Tube drainage in the treatment of common bile duct stones. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2023; 33(7):622–625; doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0485
32.
Parra-MembrivesP, Martínez-BaenaD, Lorente-HerceJ, et al.Comparative study of three bile duct closure methods following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2018; 28(2):145–151; doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0433
33.
WangC, WangQ, SunD, et al.Immunogenic alteration in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. J Surg Res, 2014; 187(1):302–309; doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.10.022
34.
WangY, HuangY, ShiC, et al.Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration via choledochotomy with primary closure for the management of acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc, 2022; 36(7):4869–4877; doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08838-8
35.
WenS-Q, HuQ-H, WanM, et al.Appropriate patient selection is essential for the success of primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Dig Dis Sci, 2017; 62(5):1321–1326; doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4507-0
36.
XiangL, LiJ, LiuD, et al.Safety and feasibility of primary closure following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment of choledocholithiasis. World J Surg, 2023; 47(4):1023–1030; doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06871-9
37.
XiaoL-K, XiangJ-F, WuK, et al.The reasonable drainage option after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 2018; 42(6):564–569; doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2018.07.005
38.
YiHJ, HongG, MinSK, et al.Long-term outcome of primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with choledochoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2015; 25(3):250–253; doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000151
39.
YinY, HeK, XiaX. Comparison of primary suture and T-Tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with intraoperative choledochoscopy in the treatment of secondary common bile duct stones: A single-center retrospective analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2022; 32(6):612–619; doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0418
40.
YuanB, ZhangX, KongC, et al.Application of laparoscopic backtracking full-thickness continuous everting suture for non-AOSC choledocholithiasis. BMC Surg, 2023; 23(1):315; doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02222-0
41.
ZhangH-W, ChenY-J, WuC-H, et al.Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure for management of choledocholithiasis: A retrospective analysis and comparison with conventional T-tube Drainage. Am Surg, 2014; 80(2):178–181.
42.
ZhangD, MaY, SunW, et al.Primary suture for patients of bile duct stones after laparoscopic biliary tract exploration: A retrospective cohort study. Updates Surg, 2023; 75(4):897–903; doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01451-5
43.
ZhangZ, JiH, ChenG, et al.A comparative study of laparoscopic choledocholithotomy with primary suture and T-tube drainage. Medicine (Baltimore), 2024; 103(1):E36757; doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036757
44.
ZhaoC, XuZ, HuW, et al.A retrospective study on the three-port technique of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the management of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis. IJGM, 2023; 16:3435–3445; doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S415752 ((Zhao C.; Xu Z.; Hu W.; Ge C.; Zhang Z.; Chen C., bobo19820106@gmail.com) Department of General Surgery, Xishan People’s Hospital of Wuxi City, Wuxi, China).
45.
ZhenW, Xu-ZhenW, Nan-TaoF, et al.Primary closure versus T-Tube drainage following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous biliary surgery. Am Surg, 2021; 87(1):50–55; doi: 10.1177/0003134820947396
46.
ZhouH, WangS, FanF, et al.Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: A single-center medium-term experience. J Int Med Res, 2020; 48(1):300060519878087; doi: 10.1177/0300060519878087
47.
ZhuT, ZhuK, SunJ, et al.The clinical effect of primary duct closure and T-tube drainage: A propensity score matched study. Asian J Surg, 2023; 46(8):3046–3051; doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.09.132
48.
ZhuangL, LiY, ZhangL, et al.A comparison of the therapeutic outcomes between primary duct closure and T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: A single-centre retrospective study. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2023; 18(1):108–116; doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.120672
49.
ZhengW, ZhangY. Efficacy of primary duct closure vs T-tube drainage following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in elderly patients with choledocholithiasis. World Chin J Dig, 2017; 25(1):91–95; doi: 10.11569/wcjd.v25.i1.91
50.
ShakyaJPS, AgrawalN, KumarA, et al.Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledocholithotomy: A prospective randomized study. Int Surg J, 2017; 4(5):1762–1764; doi: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20171635
51.
CawichSO, GriffithSP, GreenidgeCW, et al.Multicenter study of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis in the English-Speaking Caribbean. Cureus, 2023; 15(8):e42949; doi: 10.7759/cureus.42949
52.
LeeHM, MinSK, LeeHK. Long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis: 15-year experience from a single center. Ann Surg Treat Res, 2014; 86(1):1–6; doi: 10.4174/astr.2014.86.1.1
53.
KhandY, BasukalaS, PiyaU, et al.A life-threatening complication of biliary peritonitis following T-tube removal: A case report and review of literature. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2022; 80:104209; doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104209
54.
WuX, YangY, DongP, et al.Primary closure versus T-tube drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2012; 397(6):909–916; doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-0962-4
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
