Abstract
.
Background:
Maternal Mortality Review Committees (MMRCs) operate at the state and local levels and play a vital role in understanding and addressing maternal mortality by systematically reviewing maternal deaths to identify preventable factors. The recent Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision has raised concerns about access to reproductive healthcare, which may exacerbate maternal health outcomes.
Objective:
In a series of recent political moves, the state of Idaho passed legislation to both restrict abortion care and replace its state-level MMRC with what will likely be a pro forma board. This article is a response to these legislative decisions, which have not been isolated and must be understood in the context of the Dobbs decision.
Methods:
The analysis draws on existing literature regarding maternal mortality data and its limitations, as well as MMRCs, their functions, and their impact on maternal health.
Results:
MMRCs serve a pertinent public health function. As such, maintaining these committees is critical to maternal surveillance systems, racial and ethnic equity, and reproductive and criminal justice. Furthermore, although MMRCs are beneficial for understanding the drivers of maternal mortality and complications of pregnancy, as well as determining applicable patient, provider, and community interventions, they are also subject to political interference and affected by restrictive reproductive laws.
Conclusion:
In the wake of the Dobbs decision, it is imperative to uphold and strengthen MMRCs as they are integral to advancing maternal health initiatives. This work ultimately provides an informative narrative and a call to action, as women’s health is at stake.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
