Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-12
CDC Division of Reproductive Health's Emergency Preparedness Resources and Activities for Radiation Emergencies: Public Health Considerations for Women's Reproductive Health
Pregnant, postpartum, and lactating people, and infants have unique needs during public health emergencies, including nuclear and radiological incidents. This report provides information on the CDC Division of Reproductive Health's emergency preparedness and response activities to address the needs of women of reproductive age (aged 15–49 years), people who are pregnant, postpartum, or lactating, and infants during a radiation emergency. Highlighted preparedness activities include: (1) development of a quick reference guide to inform key questions about pregnant, postpartum, and lactating people, and infants during radiation emergencies; and (2) exercising the role of reproductive health experts during nuclear and radiological incident preparedness activities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
US. Congress, 116 sess (Sen. Burr RR-N 2019). S. 1379, Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness and Advancing Innovation Act of 2019. 2019. Available from: https://www.congress.gov/113/plaws/publ5/PLAW-113publ5.pdf [Last accessed: October7, 2022].
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Environmental Health. Acute Radiation Syndrome: A Fact Sheet for Clinicians. 2018. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/emergencies/arsphysicianfactsheet.htm [Last accessed: September27, 2022].
3.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Environmental Health. Types of Radiation Emergencies. 2018. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/emergencies/typesofemergencies.htm [Last accessed: September27, 2022].
4.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Environmental Health. Radiation and Pregnancy: A Fact Sheet for Clinicians. 2020. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/emergencies/prenatalphysician.htm [Last accessed: September27, 2022].
5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Environmental Health. Contamination vs. Exposure. 2022. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/emergencies/contamination.htm [Last accessed: September27, 2022].
6.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Environmental Health. Possible health effects of radiation exposure and contamination. 2018. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/emergencies/healtheffects.htm [Last accessed: July10, 2023].
7.
Salame-AlfieA, WhitcombRC, EvansCL, et al.Developing a radiation-savvy public health workforce. Environ Adv, 2022; 9:100269; doi: 10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100269.
8.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Environmental Health. Radiation Emergencies. Radiation Emergencies & Your Health—Pregnancy. 2022. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/emergencies/prenatal.htm [Last accessed: September30, 2022].
9.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Environmental Health. Radiation Emergencies. Radiation Emergencies & Your Health—Infant Feeding. 2023. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/emergencies/breastfeeding.html [Last accessed: July10, 2023].
10.
Department of Homeland Security. Quick Reference Guide: Radiation Risk Information for Responders Following a Nuclear Detonation. 2016. Available from: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Quick%20Reference%20Guide%20Final.pdf [Last accessed: December09, 2022].
11.
ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection). Pregnancy and medical radiation. ICRP Publication 84. Ann. ICRP 30 (1). 2000.
12.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Environmental Health. Radiation Emergencies Resource Library. 2022. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/emergencies/resourcelibrary/all.htm [Last accessed: September27, 2022].
13.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Environmental Health. Radiation Emergency Training, Education, and Tools. 2022. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/emergencies/training.htm [Last accessed: September27, 2022].
14.
PerezM, GalangRR, SneadMC, et al.Emergency preparedness and response: Highlights from the Division of Reproductive Health, 2011–2021. J Womens Health, 2021; 30(12):1673–1680; doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0553.
15.
WatsonAK, EllingtonS, NelsonC, et al.Preparing for biological threats: Addressing the needs of pregnant women. Birth Defects Res, 2017; 109(5):391–398; doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1016.
16.
MilesEF, TatsukawaY, FunamotoS, et al.Biomarkers of radiosensitivity in a-bomb survivors pregnant at the time of bombings in hiroshima and nagasaki. ISRN Obstet Gynecol, 2011; 2011:264978; doi: 10.5402/2011/264978.
17.
BusbyC, LengfelderE, PflugbeilS, et al.The evidence of radiation effects in embryos and fetuses exposed to Chernobyl fallout and the question of dose response. Med Conflict Surv, 2009; 25(1):20–40.
18.
IrgensLM, LieRT, UlsteinM, et al.Pregnancy outcome in Norway after Chernobyl. Biomed Pharmacother, 1991; 45(6):233–241.
19.
PetrovaA, GnedkoT, MaistrovaI, et al.Morbidity in a large cohort study of children born to mothers exposed to radiation from Chernobyl. Stem Cells, 1997; 15(Suppl. 2):141–150.
20.
ScherbHH, MoriK, HayashiK. Increases in perinatal mortality in prefectures contaminated by the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident in Japan: A spatially stratified longitudinal study. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016; 95(38):e4958; doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004958.
21.
National Center for Environmental Health. Medical Countermeasures (Treatments) for Radiation Exposure and Contamination. 2022. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/emergencies/countermeasures.htm [Last accessed: October17, 2022].
22.
Food and Drug Administration. Guidance Potassium Iodide as a Thyroid Blocking Agent in Radiation Emergencies. 2001. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/72510/download [Last accessed: September27, 2022].
23.
National Center for Environmental Health. DTPA (Diethylenetriamine pentaacetate). 2018. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/emergencies/dtpa.htm [Last accessed: October17, 2022].
24.
National Center for Environmental Health. Prussian Blue. 2022. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/emergencies/prussianblue.htm [Last accessed: October7, 2022].
25.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Environmental Health. Cancer and Long-Term Health Effects of Radiation Exposure and Contamination. 2018. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/emergencies/cancer.htm [Last accessed: September30, 2022].
26.
RichardsonDB. Exposure to ionizing radiation in adulthood and thyroid cancer incidence. Epidemiology, 2009; 20(2):181–187.
27.
RivkindN, StepanenkoV, BelukhaI, et al.Female breast cancer risk in Bryansk Oblast, Russia, following prolonged low dose rate exposure to radiation from the Chernobyl power station accident. Int J Epidemiol, 2020; 49(2):448–456; doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz214.
28.
CahoonEK, PrestonD, ZhangR, et al.Breast cancer risk in residents of Belarus exposed to Chernobyl fallout while pregnant or lactating: Standardized incidence ratio analysis, 1997 to 2016. Int J Epidemiol, 2021; 23:23; doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab226.
29.
TabuchiA, HoriiE, NishidaS, et al.Obstetric-gynecological investigation on the exposed. Hiroshima J Med Sci, 1955; 4(2–3):223–236.
30.
CwikelJ, SergienkoR, GutvirtzG, et al.Reproductive effects of exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation: A long-term follow-up of immigrant women exposed to the Chernobyl accident. J Clin Med, 2020; 9(6):08; doi: 10.3390/jcm9061786.
31.
National Cancer Institute. Accidents at Nuclear Power Plants and Cancer Risk. 2022. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/radiation/nuclear-accidents-fact-sheet [Last accessed: October7, 2022].
32.
DubrovaYE. Long-term genetic effects of radiation exposure. Mutat Res, 2003; 544(2–3):433–439; doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2003.05.003.
33.
OtakeM, SchullWJ. Radiation-related small head sizes among prenatally exposed A-bomb survivors. Int J Radiat Biol, 1993; 63(2):255–270; doi: 10.1080/09553009314550341.
34.
HatchM, LittleMP, BrennerAV, et al.Neonatal outcomes following exposure in utero to fallout from Chernobyl. Eur J Epidemiol, 2017; 32(12):1075–1088; doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0299-y.
35.
OtakeM, SchullWJ. Radiation-related brain damage and growth retardation among the prenatally exposed atomic bomb survivors. Int J Radiat Biol, 1998; 74(2):159–171; doi: 10.1080/095530098141555.
36.
SugiyamaH, MisumiM, SakataR, et al.Mortality among individuals exposed to atomic bomb radiation in utero: 1950–2012. Eur J Epidemiol, 2021; 36(4):415–428; doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00713-5.
37.
HatchM, BrennerAV, CahoonEK, et al.Thyroid cancer and benign nodules after exposure in utero to fallout from Chernobyl. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2019; 104(1):41–48; doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-00847.
38.
KolominskyY, IgumnovS, DrozdovitchV. The psychological development of children from Belarus exposed in the prenatal period to radiation from the Chernobyl atomic power plant. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip, 1999; 40(2):299–305.
39.
GiussaniA, RisicaS. Validation of the ICRP model for caesium intake by lactating mothers with Italian data after the Chernobyl fallout. Environ Int, 2012; 39(1):122–127; doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.10.010.
40.
UnnoN, MinakamiH, KuboT, et al.Effect of the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident on radioiodine 131I content in human breast milk. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2012; 38(5):772–779; doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01810.x.
41.
SimonSL, LuckyanovN, BouvilleA, et al.Transfer of 131I of 131I into human breast milk and transfer coefficients for radiological dose assessments. Health Phys, 2002; 82(6):796–806.
42.
MountfordPJ, CoakleyAJ. A review of the secretion of radioactivity in human breast milk: Data, quantitative analysis and recommendations. Nuclear Med Commun, 1989; 10(1):15–27; doi: 10.1097/00006231-198901000-00003.
43.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Division of Reproductive Health. Toolkits for Emergency Planning and Response. Pregnancy Estimator. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/emergency/tools.html [Last accessed: July18, 2023].
44.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Center for Preparedness and Response. 2023. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/cpr/index.htm [Last accessed: July11, 2023].
45.
WoodworthKR, ReynoldsMR, BurkelV, et al.A preparedness model for mother–baby linked longitudinal surveillance for emerging threats. Matern Child Health J, 2021; 25(2):198–206; doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03106-y.
46.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity. Infant and young child feeding in emergencies toolkit. 2022. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nutrition/emergencies-infant-feeding/index.html [Last accessed: September27, 2022].
47.
AuvinenA, VahteristoM, ArvelaH, et al.Chernobyl fallout and outcome of pregnancy in Finland. Environ Health Perspect, 2001; 109(2):179–185.
48.
UlsteinM, JensenTS, IrgensLM, et al.Outcome of pregnancy in one Norwegian county 3 years prior to and 3 years subsequent to the Chernobyl accident. Acta Obstetr Gynecol Scand, 1990; 69(4):277–280.
49.
TabuchiA. A study of the productivity and offspring of women exposed to the atomic bomb. Hiroshima J Med Sci, 1957; 5(4):309–316.
50.
GoldhaberMK, StaubSL, TokuhataGK. Spontaneous abortions after the Three Mile Island nuclear accident: A life table analysis. Am J Public Health, 1983; 73(7):752–759.
51.
ScherbH, WeigeltE, Bruske-HohlfeldI. European stillbirth proportions before and after the Chernobyl accident. Int J Epidemiol, 1999; 28(5):932–940.
52.
Food and Drug Administration. Frequently Asked Questions on Potassium Iodide (KI). 2011. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/bioterrorism-and-drug-preparedness/frequently-asked-questions-potassium-iodide-ki [Last accessed: September27, 2022].
53.
International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation protection of pregnant women in nuclear medicine. 2022. Available from: https://www.iaea.org/resources/rpop/health-professionals/nuclear-medicine/pregnant-women [Last accessed: October7, 2022].
54.
WaselenkoJK, MacVittieTJ, BlakelyWF, et al.Medical management of the acute radiation syndrome: Recommendations of the Strategic National Stockpile Radiation Working Group. Ann Intern Med, 2004; 140(12):1037–1051.
55.
UtadaM, BrennerAV, PrestonDL, et al.Radiation risk of ovarian cancer in atomic bomb survivors: 1958–2009. Radiat Res, 2021; 195(1):60–65; doi: 10.1667/RADE-20-00170.1.
56.
ZhangZH, LiangL, ZhangSL, et al.Follow-up study of a pregnant woman 16 years after exposure in the Xinzhou radiation accident. J Radiol Prot, 2011; 31(4):489–494; doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/31/4/N01.
57.
CaglayanS, KayhanB, MentesogluS, et al.Changing incidence of neural tube defects in Aegean Turkey. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 1989; 3(1):62–65.
58.
VolosovetsOP, KryuchkoTO, VeselskyiVL, et al.Congenital anomalies in children of Ukraine: 25-Year monitoring of morbidity and prevalence. Wiadomosci Lekarskie, 2020; 73(10):2193–2197.
59.
McColloughCH, SchuelerBA, AtwellTD, et al.Radiation exposure and pregnancy: When should we be concerned?. Radiographics, 2007; 27(4):909–917; discussion 917.
60.
MillerRW. Delayed effects of external radiation exposure: A brief history. Radiat Res, 1995; 144(2):160–169.
61.
YamazakiJN, WrightSW, WrightPM. A study of the outcome of pregnancy in women exposed to the atomic bomb blast in Nagasaki. J Cell Comparat Physiol, 1954; 43(Supp, 1):319–328.
62.
OstroumovaE, AkleyevA, HallP. Infant mortality among offspring of individuals living in the radioactively contaminated Techa river area, Southern Urals. Acta Med Nagasakiensia, 2005; 50(Suppl. 1):23–28.
63.
PrestonDL, CullingsH, SuyamaA, et al.Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors exposed in utero or as young children. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2008; 100(6):428–436; doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn045.
64.
BusbyCC. Very low dose fetal exposure to Chernobyl contamination resulted in increases in infant leukemia in Europe and raises questions about current radiation risk models. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2009; 6(12):3105–3114; doi: 10.3390/ijerph6123105.
65.
HoffmannW. Has fallout from the Chernobyl accident caused childhood leukaemia in Europe? A commentary on the epidemiologic evidence. Eur J Public Health, 2002; 12(1):72–76.
66.
GallM, MahlerS, WirthE. Transfer of 137Cs into mother's milk. J Environ Radioact, 1991; 14(4):331–339; doi: 10.1016/0265-931X(91)90023-9.
67.
VenutiGC, RisicaS, RoganiA. Radioactive caesium contamination in human milk in Italy after the Chernobyl accident. Radiat Protect Dosimetry, 1991; 37(1):43–49.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
