Women Veterans have unique health care utilization patterns; however, video-based primary care utilization among and between women and men has not been well examined.
Methods:
In a retrospective cohort study, we calculated gender-stratified video visit adoption (i.e., likelihood) and frequency (i.e., rate of use among users) between April 1, 2020, and March 31, 2022, by demographic and clinical characteristics known to impact health care utilization.
Results:
Among 5,389,139 Veterans (9.2% women), 32% of women and 18.6% of men had a video-based primary care visit over the 2-year study period. Gender interacted with Veteran characteristics and the likelihood of any video care. Men often had associations stronger in magnitude (both positive and negative) than women, including by age, rurality, history of housing instability, mental health conditions, and marital status. The direction of effect never diverged by gender. A positive association among women always coincided with a positive association among men, and vice versa, across all characteristics assessed. Only the risk ratio for video care use comparing Veterans of Black race with White race was stronger among women. In contrast to the video care adoption differences by gender, we found few differences in the frequency of video-based care by gender.
Conclusions:
The findings suggest there are fewer disparities by demographic and clinical characteristics in any video care use among women compared with men and little to no disparities in the frequency of video care use by gender. Understanding the variation in video care utilization by gender could help improve acceptance, appropriate utilization, and uptake of video-based visits for all.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WolfeMK, McDonaldNC, HolmesGM. Transportation barriers to health care in the United States: Findings from the National Health Interview Survey, 1997-2017. Am J Public Health, 2020; 110(6):815–822; doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305579
2.
DouthitN, KivS, DwolatzkyT, et al.Exposing some important barriers to health care access in the rural USA. Public Health, 2015; 129(6):611–620; doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.04.001
3.
FunderburkCD, BatulisNS, ZelonesJT, et al.Innovations in the plastic surgery care pathway: Using telemedicine for clinical efficiency and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2019; 144(2):507–516; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005884
4.
MartinezKA, RoodM, JhangianiN, et al.Patterns of use and correlates of patient satisfaction with a large nationwide direct to consumer telemedicine service. J Gen Intern Med, 2018; 33(10):1768–1773; doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4621-5
5.
SabesanS, AllenD, LohK, et al.Practical aspects of telehealth: Are my patients suited to telehealth? Intern Med J, 2013; 43(5):581–584; doi: 10.1111/imj.12145
6.
SturessonL, GrothK. Clinicians’ selection criteria for video visits in outpatient care: Qualitative study. J Med Internet Res, 2018; 20(11):e288; doi: 10.2196/jmir.9851
7.
GarvinLA, HuJ, SlightamC, et al.Use of video telehealth tablets to increase access for veterans experiencing homelessness. J Gen Intern Med, 2021; 36(8):2274–2282; doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06900-8
8.
ZulmanDM, WongEP, SlightamC, et al.Making connections: Nationwide implementation of video telehealth tablets to address access barriers in veterans. JAMIA Open, 2019; 2(3):323–329; doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz024
9.
ConnollySL, StolzmannKL, HeyworthL, et al.Patient and provider predictors of telemental health use prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic within the department of veterans affairs. Am Psychol, 2022; 77(2):249–261; doi: 10.1037/amp0000895
10.
NordG, RisingKL, BandRA, et al.On-demand synchronous audio video telemedicine visits are cost effective. Am J Emerg Med, 2019; 37(5):890–894; doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.017
ChapmanKA, MachadoSS, van der MerweK, et al.Exploring Primary Care Non-Attendance: A Study of Low-Income Patients. J Prim Care Community Health, 2022; 13:21501319221082352; doi: 10.1177/21501319221082352
13.
MatinBK, WilliamsonHJ, KaryaniAK, et al.Barriers in access to healthcare for women with disabilities: A systematic review in qualitative studies. BMC Women’s Health, 2021; 21(1):44; doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01189-5
14.
HernandezSM, SparksPJ. Barriers to health care among adults with minoritized identities in the United States, 2013–2017. Am J Public Health, 2020; 110(6):857–862; doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305598
15.
WashingtonDL, Bean-MayberryB, RiopelleD, et al.Access to care for women veterans: Delayed healthcare and unmet need. J Gen Intern Med, 2011; 26 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):655–661; doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1772-z
16.
KlapR, DarlingJE, HamiltonAB, et al.Prevalence of stranger harassment of women veterans at veterans affairs medical centers and impacts on delayed and missed care. Women’s Health Issues, 2019; 29(2):107–115; doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.12.002
17.
SkinnerKM, KressinN, FrayneS, et al.The prevalence of military sexual assault among female veterans’ administration outpatients. J Interpers Violence, 2000; 15(3):291–310; doi: 10.1177/088626000015003005
18.
O’MalleyAS, SheppardVB, SchwartzM, et al.The role of trust in use of preventive services among low-income African-American women. Prev Med, 2004; 38(6):777–785; doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.01.018
19.
HendersonV, MadrigalJM, HandlesA. A Mixed Methods Study: Midlife African-American women’s knowledge, beliefs, and barriers to a well-woman visit, flu vaccine, and mammogram use. Physiol Behav, 2018; 176(5):139–148.
20.
EscofferyC. Gender similarities and differences for e-health behaviors among U.S. adults. Telemed J E Health, 2018; 24(5):335–343; doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0136
21.
KontosE, BlakeKD, ChouWYS, et al.Predictors of eHealth usage: Insights on the digital divide from the health information national trends survey 2012. J Med Internet Res, 2014; 16(7):e172–21; doi: 10.2196/jmir.3117
22.
FergusonJM, JacobsJ, YefimovaM, et al.Virtual care expansion in the Veterans Health Administration during the COVID-19 pandemic: Clinical services and patient characteristics associated with utilization. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2021; 28(3):453–462; doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa284
23.
FergusonJM, WrayCM, GreeneL, et al.Variation in initial and continued use of primary, mental health, and specialty video care among Veterans. Health Serv Res, 2022; 58(2):402–414; doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14098
24.
HeyworthL, KirshS, ZulmanD, et al.Expanding access through virtual care: The VA’s early experience with Covid-19. NEJM Catal Innov Care Deliv, 2020; 1(4):1–11; doi: 10.1056/CAT.20.0327
25.
FergusonJ, WrayC, Van CampenJ, et al.A new equilibrium for telemedicine: Prevalence of in-person, video-based, and telephone-based care in the Veterans Health Administration, 2019–2023. Ann Intern Med, 2024; 177(2):262–264; doi: 10.7326/M23-2644
26.
DonelanK, BarretoEA, SossongS, et al.Patient and clinician experiences with telehealth for patient follow-up care. Am J Manag Care, 2019; 25(1):40–44.
27.
FrayneSM, PhibbsCS, SaechaoF, et al.Women veterans in the Veterans Health Administration. Volume 4: Longitudinal trends in sociodemographics, utilization, health profile, and geographic distribution. Women’s Heal Eval Initiat Women’s Heal Serv Veterans Heal Adm, 2018; 4.
28.
YanoEM, HaskellS, HayesP. Delivery of gender-sensitive comprehensive primary care to women veterans: Implications for VA patient aligned care teams. J Gen Intern Med, 2014; 29 Suppl 2:S703–707; doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2699-3
29.
DekleijnM, Lagro-JanssenALM, CaneloI, et al.Creating a roadmap for delivering gender-sensitive comprehensive care for women veterans results of a national expert panel. Med Care, 2015; 53(4 Suppl 1):S156–S164; doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000307
30.
Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records Administration. Federal Register Volume 79, Issue 17-VHA Corporate Data Warehouse – VA. 79 FR 4377. 2014.
31.
BarrDA. Health Disparities in the United States: Social Class, Race, Ethnicity, and Health. JHU Press; 2014.
32.
AndersenRM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter? J Health Soc Behav, 1995; 36(1):1–10.
33.
AndersenR, DavidsonP. Improving access to care in American: individual and contextual indicators. In: Changing the US Health Care System: Key Issues in Health Services, Policy, and Management. (AndersenR, RiceT, KominskiE. eds.) John Wiley & Sons: San Francisco, CA; 2001; pp. 3–30.
WangJZ, DhanireddyP, PrinceC, et al.2019 Survey of Veteran Enrollees’ Health and Use of Health Care- Data Findings Report. Monterey, CA; 2019.
36.
YuW, RaveloA, WagnerTH, et al.Prevalence and costs of chronic conditions in the VA health care system. Med Care Res Rev, 2003; 60(3 Suppl):146S–167S; doi: 10.1177/1077558703257000
37.
FishmanP, Von KorffM, LozanoP, et al.Chronic care costs in managed care. Health Aff (Millwood), 1997; 16(3):239–247; doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.3.239
38.
RayGT, CollinF, LieuT, et al.The cost of health conditions in a health maintenance organization. Med Care Res Rev, 2000; 57(1):92–109; doi: 10.1177/107755870005700106
39.
National Academies of Sciences and Medicine E. Evaluation of the Department of Veterans Affairs Mental Health Services. National Academies Press; 2018.
40.
GagnonDR, Doron-LaMarcaS, BellM, et al.Poisson regression for modeling count and frequency outcomes in trauma research. J Trauma Stress, 2008; 21(5):448–454; doi: 10.1002/jts
41.
AltmanDG, BlandJM. Interaction revisited: The difference between two estimates. Br Med J, 2003; 326(January):7050.
42.
KnolMJ, VanderWeeleTJ. Recommendations for presenting analyses of effect modification and interaction. Int J Epidemiol, 2012; 41(2):514–520; doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr218
43.
MacdonaldS, HausmannLRM, SileanuFE, et al.Associations between perceived race-based discrimination and contraceptive use among women veterans in the ECUUN study. Med Care, 2017; 55 Suppl 9 Suppl 2(Suppl 9 2):S43–S49; doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000746
44.
GrauPP, ValentineLM, VuperTC, et al.Military sexual trauma in context: Ethnoracial differences in ecological resources among treatment-seeking veterans. J Trauma Stress, 2022; 35(5):1535–1545; doi: 10.1002/jts.22859
45.
AndersonM. Mobile technology and home broadband. Pew Res Cent, 2019:1–26.
46.
McKeeGB, KnoppK, MorlandLA, et al.Use of telemental health for VA family services before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol Serv, 2023; 20(Suppl 2):20–32; doi: 10.1037/ser0000704
47.
ChoiNG, DiNittoDM, MartiCN, et al.Telehealth use among older adults during COVID-19: Associations with sociodemographic and health characteristics, technology device ownership, and technology learning. J Appl Gerontol, 2022; 41(3):600–609; doi: 10.1177/07334648211047347
48.
KakaniP, SorensenA, QuintonJK, et al.Patient characteristics associated with telemedicine use at a large academic health system before and after COVID-19. J Gen Intern Med, 2021; 36(4):1166–1168; doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06544-0
49.
SachsJW, GravenP, GoldJA, et al.Disparities in telephone and video telehealth engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMIA Open, 2021; 4(3):ooab056–5; doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab056
50.
ChunaraR, ZhaoY, ChenJ, et al.Telemedicine and healthcare disparities: A cohort study in a large healthcare system in New York City during COVID-19. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2021; 28(1):33–41; doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa217
51.
WashingtonDL, Bean-MayberryB, MitchellMN, et al.Tailoring VA primary care to women veterans: Association with patient-rated quality and satisfaction. Women’s Health Issues, 2011; 21(4 Suppl):S112–S119; doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.04.004
52.
WashingtonDL, YanoEM, SimonB, et al.To use or not to use: What influences why women veterans choose VA health care. J Gen Intern Med, 2006; 21 Suppl 3(SUPPL. 3):S11–S18; doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00369.x
53.
KimerlingR, PavaoJ, WongA. Patient activation and mental health care experiences among women veterans. Adm Policy Ment Health, 2016; 43(4):506–513; doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0653-x
54.
GoldsteinKM, BosworthHB, GierischJM. Can right-sizing the use of virtual care improve access to equitable, patient-centered care for women veterans? J Gen Intern Med, 2023; 38(Suppl 3):868–870; doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08113-7
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
