To evaluate the validity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for screening during the perinatal period in the United States and concerns regarding its acceptability and performance.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic search in OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE (OVID), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and PsycInfo (EBSCO) for articles published from inception of the database through February 2023. We included primary quantitative and qualitative studies on the validation of the EPDS in the United States and identified 880 articles of which 9 met criteria for inclusion. We extracted data related to aim, study population, setting, methods, outcomes, and key findings from each study into a table based on Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Scoping Review Guidelines.
Results:
We found no evidence that the original wording of the EPDS, which was developed in the United Kingdom, was adapted before validation in the United States.
Conclusion:
Our findings suggest that adaptation of the EPDS for use in the United States with a focus on contextual equivalence and validity could improve the performance of the tool and patients' experiences with completing the tool. Future research is warranted on optimal methods to adapt the EPDS for mental health screening in the perinatal period in the United States.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SalisburyA, MoyerS, ErismanS, et al.The Maternal-Fetal Dyad: Challenges and Adaptations. In: Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics, 5th ed. (Feldman HM, Elias ER, Blum NJ, Jimenez ME, Stancin T. eds.) Elsevier: Philidelphia, PA; 2023, pp. 37–48.
2.
McKeeK, AdmonLK, WinkelmanTNA, et al.Perinatal mood and anxiety disorders, serious mental illness, and delivery-related health outcomes, United States, 2006–2015. BMC Womens Health, 2020; 20(1):150; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-00996-6
3.
KinserPA, JalloN, AmstadterAB, et al.Depression, anxiety, resilience, and coping: The experience of pregnant and new mothers during the first few months of the COVID-19 pandemic. J Womens Health, 2021; 30(5):654–664. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8866
4.
ACOG. Screening for Perinatal Depression. Replaces Committee Opin, 2018; 132(757):208–212.
5.
AWHONN. AWHONN Position Statement: Mood and Anxiety Disorders in Pregnant and Postpartum Women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs, 2015; 44(5):687–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/1552-6909.12734
6.
EarlsMF, YogmanMW, MattsonG, et al.Incorporating recognition and management of perinatal depression into pediatric practice. Pediatrics, 2019; 143(1):e20183260; https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-3259
7.
Lewis JohnsonTE, ClareCA, JohnsonJE, et al.Preventing perinatal depression now: A call to action. J Womens Health, 2020; 00(00):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8646
8.
CoxJL, HoldenJM, SagovskyR. Detection of postnatal depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression scale. Br J Psychiatry, 1987; 150(JUNE):782–786. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.150.6.782
9.
CoxJL, HoldenJM, HenshawC. Perinatal Mental Health: The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Manual, 2nd ed. Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, England, 2014.
10.
CoxJL. Use and misuse of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): A ten point ‘survival analysis.’ Arch Womens Mental Health, 2017; 20(6):789–790; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-017-0789-7
11.
CoxJL. Thirty years with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Voices from the past and recommendations for the future. Br J Psychiatry, 2019; 214(3):127–129. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2018.245
12.
FlahertyJA, GaviriaFM, PathakDet al.Developing Instruments for cross-cultural psychiatric research. J Nerv Mental Dis, 1998; 176:257–263.
13.
CliffordC, DayA, CoxJ. Women's health after birth. Developing the use of the EPDS in a Punjabi-speaking community. Br J Midwifery, 1997; 5:616–619.
14.
RowelD, JayawardenaP, FernandoN. Validation of Sinhala translation of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Ceylon Med J, 2008; 53:10–13.
15.
Garcia EsteveL, AscasoC, OjuelJ, et al.Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in Spanish Mothers. J Affect Disord, 2003; 75:71–77.
16.
Alvarado-EsquivelC, SifuentesAA, SalasMC, et al.Validation of the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale in a population of puerperal women in Mexico. Clin Pract Epidemiol Mental Health, 2006; 2:33.
17.
WojcickiJM, GeisslerJ. The Spanish translation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and the use of the word “desgraciada.”. Transcult Psychiatry, 2013; 50(1):152–154.
18.
PetersMDJ, MarnieC, TriccoAC, et al.Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synthesis, 2020; 18(10):2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
19.
PetersMDJ, GodfreyCM, KhalilH, et al.Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthcare, 2015; 13(3):141–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
20.
ArkseyH, O'MalleyL. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol, 2005; 8(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
21.
TriccoAC, LillieE, ZarinW, et al.PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med, 2018; 169(7):467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Eberhard-GranM, EskildA, TambsK, et al.Review of validation studies of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 2001; 104(4):243–249. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0447.2001.00187.x
24.
GibsonJ, McKenzie-MchargK, ShakespeareJ, et al.A systematic review of studies validating the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in antepartum and postpartum women. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 2009; 119(5):350–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01363.x
25.
ChaudronLH, SzilagyiPG, TangW, et al.Accuracy of depression screening tools for identifying postpartum depression among urban mothers. Pediatrics, 2010; 125(3):e609–17. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-3261
26.
HanusaBH, ScholleSH, HaskettRF, et al.Screening for depression in the postpartum period: A comparison of three instruments. J Womens Health, 2008; 17(4);585–596; https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2006.0248
27.
JiS, LongQ, NewportDJ, et al.Validity of depression rating scales during pregnancy and the postpartum period: Impact of trimester and parity. J Psychiatr Res, 2011; 45(2):213–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.05.017
28.
LogsdonMC, MyersJA. Comparative performance of two depression screening instruments in adolescent mothers. J Womens Health, 2010; 19(6):1123–1128.
29.
VenkateshKK, ZlotnickC, TricheEW, et al.Accuracy of brief screening tools for identifying postpartum depression among adolescent mothers. Pediatrics, 2014; 133(1):45–53. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1628
30.
AndersonCA. Using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale to Screen for Symptoms of Depression among Latina, African American and Caucasian Adolescents. Southern Online J Nurs Res, 2010; 10(1).
31.
ChiuYHM, SheffieldPE, HsuHHL, et al.Subconstructs of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in a multi-ethnic inner-city population in the U.S. Arch Womens Mental Health, 2017; 20(6):803–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-017-0765-2
32.
HartleyCM, BarrosoN, ReyY, et al.Factor structure and psychometric properties of English and Spanish versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal depression scale among Hispanic women in a primary care setting. J Clin Psychol, 2014; 70(12):1240–1250. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22101
33.
Lee KingPA. Replicability of structural models of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in a community sample of postpartum African American women with low socioeconomic status. Arch Womens Mental Health, 2012; 15(2):77–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-012-0260-8
34.
LogsdonMC, UsuiWM, NeringM. Validation of Edinburgh postnatal depression scale for adolescent mothers. Arch Womens Mental Health, 2009; 12(6):433–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-009-0096-z
35.
GollanJK, WisniewskiSR, LutherJF, et al.Generating an efficient version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in an urban obstetrical population. J Affect Disord, 2017; 208:615–620.
36.
LongMM, CramerRH, BenningtonL, et al.Psychometric assessment of the Edinburgh Postnatal depression Scale in an obstetric population. Psychiatry Res, 2020; 291:113161.
37.
HeckJL. Screening for postpartum depression in American Indian/Alaska Native women: A comparison of two instruments. Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res, 2018; 25(2):74–102. https://doi.org/10.5820/aian.2502.2018.74
38.
PriceSK, MashoSW. What does it mean when we screen? A closer examination of perinatal depression and psychosocial risk screening within one MCH home visiting program. Matern Child Health J, 2014; 18(4):765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-013-1317-7
39.
WallsML, WhitesellNR, BarlowA, et al.Research with American Indian and Alaska Native populations: Measurement matters. J Ethn Subst Abuse, 2019; 18(1):129–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332640.2017.1310640
40.
GodderisR, AdairCE, BragerN. Applying new techniques to an old ally: A qualitative validation study of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Women Birth, 2009; 22(1):17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2008.10.002
41.
PageMJ, McKenzieJE, BossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 2021; 372:n71; doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
