This study evaluates Project Catalyst's impact on policies related to Intimate Partner Violence (IV) and Human Trafficking (HT), which contribute to negative health outcomes for survivors.
Methods:
We utilized continuous evaluation using data from policy assessment tools and interviews with participating state leadership team (SLT) members.
Results:
Five SLTs reported integration of IPV into state-level initiatives. All implemented clinical practice and organizational policy recommendations. SLTs reported that Project Catalyst increased awareness of IPV/HT and health impacts and established ongoing partnerships between the three organizations.
Conclusions:
Funding, training, and technical assistance to encourage cross-sector collaboration at the state level can promote policy changes that support comprehensive health center responses to IPV/HT.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SmithSG, ZhangX, BasileKC, et al. National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2015 Data Brief—Updated Release. National Center for Injury Prevention of Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, USA; 2018.
2.
CokerAL, SmithPH, BetheaL, et al.Physical health consequences of physical and psychological intimate partner violence. Arch Fam Med, 2000; 9(5):451–457.
3.
CampbellJC, LewandowskiLA. Mental and physical health effects of intimate partner violence on women and children. Psychiatr Clin North Am, 1997; 20(2):353–374.
4.
OttisovaL, HemmingsS, HowardLM, et al.Prevalence and risk of violence and the mental, physical and sexual health problems associated with human trafficking: An updated systematic review. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci, 2016; 25(4):317–341.
5.
MessingerAM. Invisible victims: Same-sex IPV in the national violence against women survey. J Interpers Violence, 2011; 26(11):2228–2243.
6.
SmithSG, ChenJ, BasileKC, et al. National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010–2012 State Report. National Center for Injury Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, USA; 2017.
7.
BreidingMJ, ArmourBS. The association between disability and intimate partner violence in the United States. Ann Epidemiol, 2015; 25(6):455–457.
8.
MontesantiSR, ThurstonWE. Mapping the role of structural and interpersonal violence in the lives of women: Implications for public health interventions and policy. BMC Womens Health, 2015; 15(1):100.
9.
MillerE, McCawB, HumphreysBL, et al.Integrating intimate partner violence assessment and intervention into healthcare in the United States: A systems approach. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 2015; 24(1):92–99.
10.
TeitelbaumJ, McGowanAK, RichmondTS, et al.Law and policy as tools in healthy people 2030. J Public Health Manag Pract, 2021; 27(Suppl. 6):S265–S273.
11.
ToweVL, LevitonL, ChandraA, et al.Cross-sector collaborations and partnerships: Essential ingredients to help shape health and well-being. Health Aff (Millwood), 2016; 35(11):1964–1969.
12.
HamerMK, MaysGP. Public health systems and social services: Breadth and depth of cross-sector collaboration. Am J Public Health, 2020; 110(S2):S232–S234.
13.
HoggRA, VardaD. Insights into collaborative networks of nonprofit, private, and public organizations that address complex health issues. Health Aff (Millwood), 2016; 35(11):2014–2019.
14.
TungEL, GunterKE, BergeronNQ, et al.Cross-sector collaboration in the high-poverty setting: Qualitative results from a community-based diabetes intervention. Health Serv Res, 2018; 53(5):3416–3436.
15.
RoussosST, FawcettSB. A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annu Rev Public Health, 2000; 21:369–402.
16.
KowalczykS, RandolphSM, OraveczL. Community coalitions' gender-aware policy and systems changes to improve the health of women and girls. Womens Health Issues, 2017; 27(Suppl. 1):S6–S13.
17.
Miller-WalfishS, KwonJ, RaibleC, et al.Promoting cross-sector collaborations to address intimate partner violence in health care delivery systems using a quality assessment tool. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 2021; 30(11):1660–1666.
18.
DuttonMA, JamesL, LanghorneA, et al.Coordinated public health initiatives to address violence against women and adolescents. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 2015; 24(1):80–85.
19.
KimballE, RockhillA, HeyenC, et al.The safer futures model: Developing partnerships between intimate partner violence and health care agencies. Health Soc Work, 2018; 43(3):201–204.
20.
ColombiniM, MayhewS, WattsC. Health-sector responses to intimate partner violence in low- and middle-income settings: A review of current models, challenges and opportunities. Bull World Health Organ, 2008; 86(8):635–642.
21.
GmelinT, RaibleCA, DickR, et al.Integrating reproductive health services into intimate partner and sexual violence victim service programs. Violence Against Women, 2018; 24(13):1557–1569.
22.
MattessichPW, RauschEJ. Cross-sector collaboration to improve community health: A view of the current landscape. Health Aff (Millwood), 2014; 33(11):1968–1974.
23.
GreenAE, TrottE, WillgingCE, et al.The role of collaborations in sustaining an evidence-based intervention to reduce child neglect. Child Abuse Negl, 2016; 53:4–16.
24.
Educate Health Providers on How to Respond to Intimate Partner Violence [Internet]. Available from: https://ipvhealth.org/health-professionals/educate-providers/ [Last accessed: April 28, 2023].
25.
WeistMD, LowieJA, FlahertyLT, et al.Collaboration among the education, mental health, and public health systems to promote youth mental health. Psychiatr Serv, 2001; 52(10):1348–1351.
26.
HambergerLK, RhodesK, BrownJ. Screening and intervention for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: Creating sustainable system-level programs. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 2015; 24(1):86–91.
