Opposition to Waterbirth Is Not Evidence Based

Papoutsis D , Antonakou A , Gornall A , Tzavara C . The incidence of and predictors for severe perineal trauma and intact perineum in women having a waterbirth in England: A hospital-based study. J Womens Health, 2021; 30:681–688.

Otigbah CM , Dhanjal MK , Harmsworth G , Chard T . A retrospective comparison of water births and conventional vaginal deliveries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2000; 91:15–20.

Geissbuehler V , Stein S , Eberhard J . Waterbirths compared with landbirths: An observational study of nine years. J Perinat Med, 2004; 32:308–314.

Thöni A , Moroder L . Waterbirth: A safe and natural delivery method. Experience after 1355 waterbirths in Italy. Midwifery Today Int Midwife, 2004:44–48.

Lenstrup C , Schantz A , Berget A , Feder E , Rosenø H , Hertel J . Warm tub bath during delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 1987; 66:709–712.

Geissbühler V , Eberhard J . Waterbirths: A comparative study. A prospective study on more than 2,000 waterbirths. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2000; 15:291–300.

Cortes E , Basra R , Kelleher CJ . Waterbirth and pelvic floor injury: A retrospective study and postal survey using ICIQ modular long form questionnaires. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2011; 155:27–30.

Bovbjerg MJ , Cheyney M , Everson C . Maternal and newborn outcomes following waterbirth: The MANA Statistics Project 2004–2009 cohort (n = 18,343). J Midwifery Womens Health, 2016; 61:11–20.

Preston HL , Alfirevic Z , Fowler GE , Lane S . Does water birth affect the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury? Development of a prognostic model. Int Urogynecol J, 2019; 30:909–915.

Dahlen HG , Dowling H , Tracy M , Schmied V , Tracy S . Maternal and perinatal outcomes amongst low risk women giving birth in water compared to six birth positions on land. A descriptive cross sectional study in a birth centre over 12 years. Midwifery, 2013; 29:759–764.

Burns E , Price L , Carpenter J , Smith L. Predictors of obstetric anal sphincter injury during waterbirth: A secondary analysis of a prospective observational study. Int Urogynecol J, 2019. DOI:10.1007/s00192-019-04167-6

Henderson J , Burns EE , Regalia AL , Casarico G , Boulton MG , Smith LA . Labouring women who used a birthing pool in obstetric units in Italy: Prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2014; 14:17.

Woodward J , Kelly SM . A pilot study for a randomised controlled trial of waterbirth versus land birth. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol, 2004; 111:537–545.

Comparing the. 2014. and 2016 ACOG and AAP Statements about Waterbirth, 2019. Available at: https://evidencebasedbirth.com/comparing-the-2014-and-2016-acog-and-aap-statements-about-waterbirth/ Accessed September 15, 2020 .

Midwifery care in labour guidance for all women in all settings. The Royal College of Midwives, RCM Midwifery Blue Top Guidance, No. 1, 2018. Available at: https://www.rcm.org.uk/ Accessed September 15, 2020 .

Committee on Obstetric Practice , American Academy of Pediatrics . Committee Opinion: Immersion in water during labor and delivery. 2014. Available at: www.acog.org/Resources_And_Publications/Committee_Opinions/Committee_on_Obstetric_Practice/Immersion_in_Water_During_Labor_and_Delivery Accessed March 29, 2014 .

Cluett ER , Burns E , Cuthbert A . Immersion in water during labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018; 5:CD000111.

Hernán MA , Alonso A , Logan R , et al. Observational studies analyzed like randomized experiments: An application to postmenopausal hormone therapy and coronary heart disease. Epidemiol Camb Mass, 2008; 19:766–779.

Tilden EL , Snowden JM . The causal inference framework: A primer on concepts and methods for improving the study of well-woman childbearing processes. J Midwifery Womens Health, 2018; 63:700–709.

Bailey JM , Zielinski RE , Emeis CL , Kane Low L . A retrospective comparison of waterbirth outcomes in two United States hospital settings. Birth, 2020; 47:98–104.

Vanderlaan J , Hall PJ , Lewitt MJ . Neonatal outcomes with water birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Midwifery, 2018; 59:27–38.

Chatsis V , Frey N . Misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour: A review of clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and guidelines. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, 2018. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538944 Accessed August 25, 2020 .

Induction of Labor: The Misoprostol Controversy. Medscape. Available at: www.medscape.com/viewarticle/458959 Accessed August 25, 2020 .

Wagner M. From caution to certainty: Hazards in the formation of evidence-based practice—A case study on evidence for an association between the use of uterine stimulant drugs and amniotic fluid embolism. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 2005; 19:173–176.

Buckley S , Moberg KU . Nature and consequences of oxytocin and other neurohormones during the perinatal period. In: Squaring the circle: Normal birth research, theory, and practice in a technological age. Pinter & Martin Ltd., 2019, pp. 19–31.

Jansen L , Gibson M , Bowles BC , Leach J . First do no harm: Interventions during childbirth. J Perinat Educ, 2013; 22:83–92.

Declercq ER , Sakala C , Corry MP , Applebaun S , Herrlich A . Listening to Mothers III: Pregnancy and BIrth. Childbirth Connection, 2013. Available at: http://transform.childbirthconnection.org/reports/listeningtomothers Accessed July 5, 2018 .

Sartwelle TP , Johnston JC . Continuous electronic fetal monitoring during labor: A critique and a reply to contemporary proponents. Surg J N Y N, 2018; 4:e23–e28.

Alfirevic Z , Devane D , Gyte GM , Cuthbert A . Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017; 2:CD006066.

Heelan L. Fetal monitoring: Creating a culture of safety with informed choice. J Perinat Educ, 2013; 22:156–165.

Cypher RL. Electronic fetal monitoring documentation. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs, 2018; 32:24–33.