Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-08
Representation of Women on Journal Editorial Boards Affiliated with the Association of American Medical College's Council of Faculty and Academic Societies
The Council of Faculty and Academic Societies (CFAS) comprises representatives from medical schools and professional societies who guide the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). Given the AAMC's stated mission to improve diversity and inclusion, we used gender-related representation on journal editorial boards as a proxy for evaluating CFAS member societies' commitments to equity.
Methods:
From screenshots of journal mastheads (n = 44) collected June 3–6, 2019, individuals were categorized by editorial position. Outcome measures included numbers of men and women among faculty, deans, department chairs, physicians, and nonphysicians on editorial boards. Outcomes were compared with 2018 AAMC and US Bureau of Labor Statistics workforce data.
Results:
Overall, the proportion of women among journal editors was 29.0% (364 of 1,255), range 0%–53.3%. This proportion was significantly less than the proportion of women among US medical school faculty and medical scientists. The lowest percentages of women were found among journals' section or topic editors (19.2%) and editors-in-chief (20.4%). Men were significantly more likely to be a professor or department chair and women were significantly more likely to be an associate professor or assistant professor, suggesting a bidirectional process between rank and editorial position that may inhibit the advancement of academic women, particularly women physicians.
Conclusions:
This study revealed disparities in the equitable representation of women among CFAS member-affiliated journal editors. Because CFAS member societies participate in a mutually beneficial relationship with the AAMC, they should strive to attain the equity goals set forth by the AAMC.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Association of American Medical Colleges. Mission areas. Association of American Medical Colleges, 2019. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/what-we-do/mission-areas Accessed June22, 2020.
2.
Association of American Medical Colleges. AAMC statement on gender equity. Association of American Medical Colleges, 2020. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/what-we-do/mission-areas/diversity-inclusion/aamc-statement-gender-equity Accessed June22, 2020.
3.
SklarDP. Women in medicine: Enormous progress, stubborn challenges. Acad Med, 2016; 91:1033–1035.
4.
Association of American Medical Colleges. AAMC names next editor-in-chief of Academic Medicine. Association of American Medical Colleges, 2019. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/press-releases/aamc-names-next-editor-chief-academic-medicine Accessed June22, 2020.
5.
Association of American Medical Colleges. The benefits of CFAS membership. Association of American Medical Colleges, 2019. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/system/files/2019-08/gro-cfas-benefits-of-membership.pdf Accessed June22, 2020.
6.
Association of American Medical Colleges. CFAS active society list. Association of American Medical Colleges, 2019. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/members/cfas/aboutcfas/494478/activesocietylist.html Accessed June22, 2020.
7.
Association of American Medical Colleges. About CFAS. Association of American Medical Colleges, 2019. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/members/cfas/aboutcfas Accessed June22, 2020.
8.
SilverJK, GhalibR, PoormanJA, et al.Analysis of gender equity in leadership of physician-focused medical specialty societies, 2008–2017. JAMA Intern Med, 2019; 179:433–435.
9.
JagsiR, MeansO, LautenbergerD, et al.Women's representation among members and leaders of national medical specialty societies. Acad Med, 2020; 95:1043–1049.
10.
SilverJK, CuccurulloSJ, AmbroseAF, et al.Association of Academic Physiatrists women's task force report. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2018; 97:680–690.
11.
SilverJK, SlocumCS, BankAM, et al.Where are the women? The underrepresentation of women physicians among recognition award recipients from medical specialty societies. PMR, 2017; 9:804–815.
12.
SilverJK, BlauwetCA, BhatnagarS, et al.Women physicians are underrepresented in recognition awards from the Association of Academic Physiatrists. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2018; 97:34–40.
13.
EllinasEH, RebelloE, ChandraboseRK, ShillcuttSK, HernandezM, SilverJK. Distinguished service awards in anesthesiology specialty societies: Analysis of gender differences. Anesth Analg, 2019; 129:e130–e134.
14.
SilverJK, BankAM, SlocumCS, et al.Women physicians underrepresented in American Academy of Neurology recognition awards. Neurology, 2018; 91:e603–e614.
15.
SpectorND, AsantePA, MarcelinJR, et al.Women in pediatrics: Progress, barriers, and opportunities for equity, diversity, and inclusion. Pediatrics, 2019; 144:e20192149.
16.
FlatenHK, GoodmanL, WongE, HammesA, BrownMR. Analysis of speaking opportunities by gender at National Dermatologic Surgery Conferences. Dermatol Surg, 2020; 46:1195–1201.
17.
LarsonAR, SharkeyKM, PoormanJA, et al.Representation of women among invited speakers at medical specialty conferences. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 2020; 29:550–560.
18.
DumitraTC, TrepanierM, LeeL, et al.Gender distribution of speakers on panels at the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) annual meeting. Surg Endosc, 2020; 34:4140–4147.
19.
LoblM, GrinnellM, HigginsS, et al.Representation of women as editors in dermatology journals: A comprehensive review. Int J Womens Dermatol, 2019; 6:20–24.
20.
ChenK, HaG, SchultzBD, et al.Is there gender inequality in plastic surgery? Evaluation of society leadership and composition of editorial boards. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2020; 145:433e–437e.
21.
BissingMA, LangeEMS, DavilaWF, et al.Status of women in academic anesthesiology: A 10-year update. Anesth Analg, 2019; 128:137–143.
22.
PiperCL, ScheelJR, LeeCI, FormanHP. Representation of women on radiology journal editorial boards: A 40-year analysis. Acad Radiol, 2018; 25:1640–1645.
23.
GoldstoneK, EdgleyC, MehtaS, LeslieK. Peer review for the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia in 2016 and 2017: A retrospective analysis by reviewer and author gender. Can J Anaesth, 2020; 67:336–342.
24.
HartKL, PerlisRH. Trends in proportion of women as authors of medical journal articles, 2008–2018. JAMA Intern Med, 2019; 179:1285–1287.
25.
LoderE, BurchR. Underrepresentation of women among authors of invited commentaries in medical journals-where are the female editorialists?. JAMA Netw Open, 2019; 2:e1913665.
26.
LarsonA, PoormanJ, SilverJ. Representation of women among physician authors of perspective-type articles in high-impact dermatology journals. JAMA Dermatol, 2019; 155:386–388.
27.
SilverJK, PoormanJA, ReillyJM, SpectorN, GoldsteinR, ZafonteRD. Assessment of women physicians among authors of perspective-type articles published in high-impact pediatric journals. JAMA Netw Open, 2018; 1:e180802.
28.
HeidariS, BaborTF, De CastroP, TortS, CurnoM. Sex and gender equity in research: Rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Res Integr Peer Rev, 2016; 1:2.
29.
HengelE. Publishing while female. Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review. Cambridge, England: University of Cambridge, 2017.
30.
NoccoSE, LarsonAR. Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 2020; 273:1022–1025.
31.
LarsonAR, CawcuttKA, EnglanderMJ, et al.Representation of women in authorship and dissemination of analyses of physician compensation. JAMA Netw Open, 2020; 3:e201330.
32.
CarrPL, RajA, KaplanSE, TerrinN, BreezeJL, FreundKM. Gender differences in academic medicine: Retention, rank, and leadership comparisons from the National Faculty Survey. Acad Med, 2018; 93:1694–1699.
33.
SilverJK. Gender equity on journal editorial boards. Lancet, 2019; 393:2037–2038.
34.
DickersinK, FredmanL, FlegalKM, ScottJD, CrawleyB. Is there a sex bias in choosing editors? Epidemiology journals as an example. JAMA, 1998; 280:260–264.
35.
JagsiR, TarbellNJ, HenaultLE, ChangY, HylekEM. The representation of women on the editorial boards of major medical journals: A 35-year perspective. Arch Intern Med, 2008; 168:544–548.
36.
Association of American Medical Colleges. AAMC faculty roster: Table 20. U.S. medical school faculty by sex, rank, degree, and department type, 2018. Assocation of American Medical Colleges, 2019. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/system/files/2019-07/18table20.pdf Accessed June22, 2020.
37.
Association of American Medical Colleges. Trends: Department chairs by chair type and sex, December 31 snapshots. Association of American Medical Colleges, 2018. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/download/495118/data/usmsf-trends-chairs.xlsx Accessed June22, 2020.
38.
Association of American Medical Colleges. Trends: U.S. medical school dean trends by dean type and sex, December 31 snapshots. Association of American Medical Colleges, 2019. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/download/495120/data/usmsf-trends-deans.xlsx Accessed June22, 2020.
39.
United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. Labor force statistics from the current population: Table 11. Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. United States Department of Labor, 2018. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/cps/aa2018/cpsaat11.htm Accessed June22, 2020.
40.
HuangBI. The “inexorable zero.”. Harvard Law Rev, 2004; 117:1215–1235
41.
SilverJK. Her Time Is Now Report. Version 2. Published September 1, 2020. Available at https://sheleadshealthcare.com Accessed October19, 2020
42.
AmreinK, LangmannA, Fahrleitner-PammerA, et al.Women underrepresented on editorial boards of 60 major medical journals. Gend Med, 2011; 8:378–387.
43.
LautenbergerDM, DandarVM. The State of Women in Academic Medicine: Exploring Pathways to Equity 2018–2019. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges, 2020.
44.
BeelerWH, MangurianC, JagsiR. Unplugging the pipeline—A call for term limits in academic medicine. N Engl J Med, 2019; 381:1508–1511.
45.
RichterKP, ClarkL, WickJA, et al.Women physicians and promotion in academic medicine. N Engl J Med, 2020; 383:2148–2157.
46.
ThomasEG, JayabalasinghamB, CollinsT, GeertzenJ, BuiC, DominiciF. Gender disparities in invited commentary authorship in 2459 medical journals. JAMA Netw Open, 2019; 2:e1913682.
47.
Harvard Medical School. Promotion profile library. The President and Fellows of Harvard College, 2019. Available at: https://fa.hms.harvard.edu/promotion-profile-library Accessed June24, 2020.
48.
LarsonAR, KanCK, SilverJK. Representation of women physician deans in U.S. medical schools. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 2019; 28:600–605.
49.
SilverJK. Be Ethical Report. Version 4. Published September 17, 2018. Available at: Available at https://sheleadshealthcare.com Accessed October19, 2020.
50.
ShahSS, ShaughnessyEE, SpectorND. Leading by example: How medical journals can improve representation in academic medicine. J Hosp Med, 2019; 14:393.
51.
SilverJK. Medical journals must tackle gender bias. BMJ, 2019; 367:l5888.
52.
FloresLE, SafoSA, SilverJK. Reader response: Neurology's commitment to address gender bias in neurology journals. https://n.neurology.org/content/reader-response-neurologys-commitment-address-gender-bias-neurology-journals Accessed October31, 2020.
53.
Dean and Chair Pledge to Achieve Gender Equity. Her Time Is Now Campaign. Version 2. Published on September 30, 2020. Available at https://sheleadshealthcare.com Accessed October19, 2020.
54.
ShahSS, ShaughnessyEE, SpectorND. Promoting Gender Equity at the Journal of Hospital Medicine. J Hosp Med, 2020; 9:517
55.
MerinoJG, WorrallBB, BaskinPK, CiccarelliO. Neurology®'s commitment to address gender bias in neurology journals. Neurology, 2020; 95:465–466.
56.
BowenA, CasadevallA. Increasing disparities between resource inputs and outcomes, as measured by certain health deliverables, in biomedical research. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2015; 112:11335–11340.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
