Abstract
Background:
Although minority women are at higher risk of cervical cancer in the United States, little is known about differences in rates of colposcopy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) by race once patients present for care.
Materials and Methods:
A prospective registry of patients presenting to an academic colposcopy clinic was queried from 2008 to 2018. Women with missing race or cytology results, prior hysterectomy, or prior history of cervical, vulvar, or vaginal cancer were excluded. Poisson and logistic regression models were performed to evaluate the associations between race and colposcopy, LEEP, and cancer rates, adjusting for referral Papanicolaou (Pap), human papillomavirus (HPV) result, year of visit, age, insurance, pregnancy, number of sexual partners, and smoking status.
Results:
A total of 4506 women were included (56.1% white and 43.9% non-white). Referral for high-grade cytology was more likely among white compared to non-white women (22.5% vs. 17.5%, p < 0.001), as well as positive HPV testing (white 7.8% vs. non-white 6.0%, p < 0.001). The colposcopy rate was slightly higher among black (incidence rate ratio [IRR]adjusted 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.19, p = 0.006) and Hispanic women (IRRadjusted 1.13, 95% CI 1.06–1.21, p = 0.0003) compared to white women. Hispanic women were significantly more likely to undergo LEEP (odds ratioadjusted 1.26, 95% CI 1.01–1.58, p = 0.04). However, no significant difference in cancer, adenocarcinoma in situ, or high-grade histology was noted by race.
Conclusions:
Black and Hispanic women referred for abnormal Pap or HPV results underwent a greater number of colposcopies compared to white women, and Hispanic women underwent a greater number of LEEPs. Although cancer is rare in our cohort, there was no statistical difference in rate of cancer by race.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
