The gender-specific role of marital status for the development of frailty has not been clarified. This study evaluates the gender differences in the association between marital status and frailty development, and the possible modifying effect by age cohort in such a relationship.
Methods:
The sample included 2179 community-dwelling older adults involved in the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen, followed up for 6 years. Participants stable in marital status over time were categorized as partnered, widowed, single, and divorced. Changes were classified as losing one's partner and gaining a partner. Frailty was defined as the presence of three or more criteria among: weight loss, low physical activity, slow walking speed, weakness, and exhaustion. The association between marital status and frailty, with death as an alternative outcome and controlling for confounders, was estimated with multinomial logistic regressions.
Results:
Men who remained single (odds ratio [OR] = 2.50, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.05 − 5.98) and those who lost their partner (OR = 2.59, 95% CI 1.16 − 5.77) had higher odds of frailty than those with a partner. The OR differed between younger (60–80 years) and older (≥81 years) women (p-interaction = 0.04). The youngest women who remained divorced had a higher risk of frailty (OR = 2.75, 95% CI 1.24 − 6.08) than those who still had a partner. Conversely, older women who lost their partner had 80% (95% CI 0.05–0.86) lower odds of frailty than those with a partner.
Conclusions:
Marital status can influence frailty development differently for women and men. This gender-specific influence may vary by age cohort, perhaps in response to sociocultural factors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FriedLP, TangenCM, WalstonJ, et al.Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2001; 56:M146–M156.
2.
MorleyJE, VellasB, Abellan van KanG, et al.Frailty consensus: A call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2013; 14:392–397.
3.
YoungACM, GlaserK, SpectorTD, StevesCJ. The identification of hereditary and environmental determinants of frailty in a Cohort of UK Twins. Twin Res Hum Genet, 2016; 19:600–609.
4.
JeonG-S, JangS-N, ParkS. Social support, social network, and frailty in Korean elderly. J Korean Geriatr Soc, 2012; 16:84.
5.
VerbruggeLM. Marital status and health. J Marriage Fam, 1979; 41:267.
6.
ChipperfieldJG, HavensB. Gender differences in the relationship between marital status transitions and life satisfaction in later life. J Gerontol Ser B, 2001; 56:P176–P186.
7.
BarrettAE. Social support and life satisfaction among the never married. Res Aging, 1999; 21:46–72.
8.
GoveWR. Sex, marital status, and mortality. AJS, 1973; 79:45–67.
9.
GoldmanN, KorenmanS, WeinsteinR. Marital status and health among the elderly. Soc Sci Med, 1995; 40:1717–1730.
10.
ManzoliL, Villari PM P, ironeG, BocciaA. Marital status and mortality in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med, 2007; 64:77–94.
11.
ThompsonMQ, TheouO, KarnonJ, AdamsRJ, VisvanathanR. Frailty prevalence in Australia: Findings from four pooled Australian cohort studies. Australas J Ageing, 2018; 37:155–158.
12.
de LabraC, MasedaA, Lorenzo-LópezL, et al.Social factors and quality of life aspects on frailty syndrome in community-dwelling older adults: The VERISAÚDE study. BMC Geriatr, 2018; 18:66.
13.
KojimaG, WaltersK, IliffeS, TaniguchiY, TamiyaN. Marital status and risk of physical frailty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2020; 21:322–330.
14.
HajekA, BrettschneiderC, PosseltT, et al.Predictors of frailty in old age–results of a longitudinal study. J Nutr Heal Aging, 2016; 20:952–957.
15.
YuR, WongM, ChongKC, et al.Trajectories of frailty among Chinese older people in Hong Kong between 2001 and 2012: An age-period-cohort analysis. Age Ageing, 2018; 47:254–261.
16.
TrevisanC, VeroneseN, MaggiS, et al.Marital status and frailty in older people: Gender differences in the Progetto Veneto Anziani Longitudinal Study. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 2016; 25:630–637.
17.
EtmanA, BurdorfA, Van der CammenTJM, MackenbachJP, Van LentheFJ. Socio-demographic determinants of worsening in frailty among community-dwelling older people in 11 European countries. J Epidemiol Community Health, 2012; 66:1116–1121.
18.
PollackLR, Litwack-HarrisonS, CawthonPM, et al.Patterns and predictors of frailty transitions in older men: The osteoporotic fractures in men study. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2017; 65:2473–2479.
19.
TrevisanC, VeroneseN, MaggiS, et al.Factors influencing transitions between frailty states in elderly adults: The Progetto Veneto Anziani Longitudinal Study. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2017; 65:179–184.
20.
ChamberlainAM, St. Sauver JL, Jacobson DJ, et al. Social and behavioural factors associated with frailty trajectories in a population-based cohort of older adults. BMJ Open, 2016; 6:e011410.
21.
MarksNF. Flying solo at midlife: Gender, marital status, and psychological well-being. J Marriage Fam, 1996; 58:917.
22.
WilliamsK, UmbersonD. Marital status, marital transitions, and health: A gendered life course perspective. J Health Soc Behav, 2004; 45:81–98.
23.
SassonI, UmbersonDJ. Widowhood and depression: New light on gender differences, selection, and psychological adjustment. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 2014; 69:135–145.
24.
BennettKM, SmithPT, HughesGM. Coping, depressive feelings and gender differences in late life widowhood. Aging Ment Health, 2005; 9:348–353.
25.
GurinG, VeroffJ, FeldS. Americans view their mental health: A nationwide interview survey. New York: Basic Books, 1960.
26.
GoveWR. Gender differences in mental and physical illness: The effects of fixed roles and nurturant roles. Soc Sci Med, 1984; 19:77–84.
27.
LiuH, UmbersonDJ. The times they are a changin’: Marital status and health differentials from 1972 to 2003. J Health Soc Behav, 2008; 49:239–253.
28.
BerntsenKN. Trends in total and cause-specific mortality by marital status among elderly Norwegian men and women. BMC Public Health, 2011; 11:537.
29.
Study plan—SNAC-K. Available at: https://www.snac-k.se/about/study-plan Accessed September23, 2019.
30.
LagergrenM, FratiglioniL, HallbergIR, et al.A longitudinal study integrating population, care and social services data. The Swedish National study on Aging and Care (SNAC). Aging Clin Exp Res, 2004; 16:158–168.
31.
ElmE von, AltmanDG, EggerM, et al.Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ, 2007; 335:806–808.
32.
VellasB, BalardyL, Gillette-GuyonnetS, et al.Looking for frailty in community-dwelling older persons: The Gerontopole Frailty Screening Tool (GFST). J Nutr Health Aging, 2013; 17:629–631.
33.
LewisEG, ColesS, HoworthK, et al.The prevalence and characteristics of frailty by frailty phenotype in rural Tanzania. BMC Geriatr, 2018; 18:283.
34.
van KanGA, RollandYM, MorleyJE, VellasB. Frailty: Toward a clinical definition. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2008; 9:71–72.
35.
Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. World Health Organization, 2010. Available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26180873 Accessed November19, 2019.
36.
NelsonME, RejeskiWJ, BlairSN, et al.Physical activity and public health in older adults. Med Sci Sport Exerc, 2007; 39:1435–1445.
37.
RydwikE, WelmerA-K, KareholtI, AnglemanS, FratiglioniL, WangH-X. Adherence to physical exercise recommendations in people over 65—The SNAC-Kungsholmen study. Eur J Public Health, 2013; 23:799–804.
38.
BohannonRW. Population representative gait speed and its determinants. J Geriatr Phys Ther, 2008; 31:49–52.
39.
KatzS. Assessing self-maintenance: Activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1983; 31:721–727.
40.
O'BryantSE, HumphreysJD, SmithGE, et al.Detecting dementia with the Mini-Mental State Examination in highly educated individuals. Arch Neurol, 2008; 65:963–967.
41.
SjöbergL, KarlssonB, AttiA-R, SkoogI, FratiglioniL, WangH-X. Prevalence of depression: Comparisons of different depression definitions in population-based samples of older adults. J Affect Disord, 2017; 221:123–131.
42.
Calderón-LarrañagaA, VetranoDL, OnderG, et al.Assessing and measuring chronic multimorbidity in the older population: A proposal for its operationalization. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2016: glw233.
43.
R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2008.
44.
TherneauTM. Survival analysis [R Package Survival Version 2.42-6]. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survival/index.html Accessed July31, 2018.
45.
WaldronI, HughesME, BrooksTL. Marriage protection and marriage selection—Prospective evidence for reciprocal effects of marital status and health. Soc Sci Med, 1996; 43:113–123.
46.
HuYR, GoldmanN. Mortality differentials by marital status: An international comparison. Demography, 1990; 27:233–250.
47.
ScottD, BlizzardL, FellJ, JonesG. The epidemiology of sarcopenia in community living older adults: What role does lifestyle play?. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle, 2011; 2:125–134.
48.
RollandY, CzerwinskiS, Abellan Van KanG, et al.Sarcopenia: Its assessment, etiology, pathogenesis, consequences and future perspectives. J Nutr Health Aging, 2008; 12:433–450.
49.
WilcoxS, BoppM, OberrechtL, KammermannSK, McElmurrayCT. Psychosocial and perceived environmental correlates of physical activity in rural and older African American and white women. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 2003; 58:P329–P337.
50.
DoblhammerG, PetersS, RizzutoD, WelmerA-K. The effect of current family situation on slow walking speed at old age. In: DoblhammerG, Gumà, J, eds. A demographic perspective on gender, family and health in Europe. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018:283–303.
51.
HewittB, TurrellG, GiskesK. Marital loss, mental health and the role of perceived social support: Findings from six waves of an Australian population based panel study. J Epidemiol Community Health, 2012; 66:308–314.
52.
WooJ, GogginsW, ShamA, HoSC. Social determinants of frailty. Gerontology, 2005; 51:402–408.
53.
AlvaradoBE, ZunzuneguiM-V, BélandF, BamvitaJ-M. Life course social and health conditions linked to frailty in Latin American older men and women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2008; 63:1399–1406.
54.
UmbersonD, WortmanCB, KesslerRC. Widowhood and depression: Explaining long-term gender differences in vulnerability. J Health Soc Behav, 1992; 33:10–24.
55.
van GrootheestDS, BeekmanAT, Broese van GroenouMI, DeegDJ. Sex differences in depression after widowhood. Do men suffer more?. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 1999; 34:391–398.
56.
ClyburnLD, StonesMJ, HadjistavropoulosT, TuokkoH. Predicting caregiver burden and depression in Alzheimer's disease. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 2000; 55:S2–S13.
57.
FingermanKL, Gallagher-ThompsonD, LovettS, RoseJ. Internal resourcefulness, task demands, coping, and dysphoric affect among caregivers of the frail elderly. Int J Aging Hum Dev, 1996; 42:229–248.
58.
BerglundE, LytsyP, WesterlingR. Health and wellbeing in informal caregivers and non-caregivers: A comparative cross-sectional study of the Swedish general population. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2015; 13:109.
59.
GiannantoniP, EgidiV. Similarity of perceived health between household members: The “Mutual Influences” hypothesis. In: DoblhammerG, GumàJ, eds. A demographic perspective on gender, family and health in Europe. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018:133–154.
60.
StroebeMS. New directions in bereavement research: Exploration of gender differences. Palliat Med, 1998; 12:5–12.
61.
SchutHA, StroebeMS, van den BoutJ, de KeijserJ. Intervention for the bereaved: Gender differences in the efficacy of two counselling programmes. Br J Clin Psychol, 1997; 36 (Pt 1):63–72.
62.
KhanferR, LordJM, PhillipsAC. Neutrophil function and cortisol:DHEAS ratio in bereaved older adults. Brain Behav Immun, 2011; 25:1182–1186.
63.
HirokawaK, UtsuyamaM, HayashiY, KitagawaM, MakinodanT, FulopT. Slower immune system aging in women versus men in the Japanese population. Immun Ageing, 2013; 10:19.
64.
HankK, WagnerM. Parenthood, marital status, and well-being in later life: evidence from SHARE. Soc Indic Res, 2013; 114:639–653.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
