GellerSE, KochAR, RoeschP, FilutA, HallgrenE, CarnesM. The more things change, the more they stay the same: A study to evaluate compliance with inclusion and assessment of women and minorities in randomized controlled trials. Acad Med, 2018; 93:630–635.
2.
ClaytonJA, CollinsFS. Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies. Nature, 2014; 509:282–283.
3.
National Institutes of Health. Consideration of Sex as a Biological Variable in NIH funded Research. 2015. Available at: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/noticefiles/NOT-OD-15-102.html Accessed November18, 2018.
4.
WoitowichNC, WoodruffTK. Implementation of the NIH sex-inclusion policy: Attitudes and opinions of study section members. J Women's Health, 2019; 28:9–16.
5.
BerkleyKJ. Vive la difference! Trends Neurosci. 1992; 15:331–332.
6.
BeeryAK, ZuckerI. Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2011; 35:565–572.
7.
HughesR. Sex does matter: Comments on the prevalence of male-only investigations of drug effects on rodent behaviour. Behav Pharmacol, 2007; 18:583–589.
8.
PrendergastBJ, OnishiKG, ZuckerI. Female mice liberated for inclusion in neuroscience and biomedical research. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2014; 40:1–5.
9.
ItohY, ArnoldAP. Are females more variable than males in gene expression? Meta-analysis of microarray datasets. Biol Sex Differ, 2015; 6:18.
10.
BeckerJB, PrendergastBJ, LiangJW. Female rats are not more variable than male rats: A meta-analysis of neuroscience studies. Biol Sex Differ, 2016; 7:34.
11.
DaytonA, ExnerEC, BukowyJD, et al.Breaking the cycle: Estrous variation does not require increased sample size in the study of female rats. Hypertension, 2016; 68:1139–1144.
12.
SmarrBL, GrantAD, ZuckerI, PrendergastBJ, KriegsfeldLJ. Sex differences in variability across timescales in BALB/c mice. Biol Sex Differ, 2017; 8:7.
13.
BeeryAK. Inclusion of females does not increase variability in rodent research studies. Curr Opin Behav Sci, 2018; 23:143–149.
