The complex interplay of psychological stress appraisal, biology, chronically stressful environments, and individual coping mechanisms can impact and tax physiological adaptive processes. This can result in increased cardiometabolic risk (CMR), type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Underlying mechanisms are not entirely clear and appear to differ significantly based on age, sex, race, and ethnicity. This crosssectional descriptive study explored stress profiles of psychological and behavioral adjustment to determine the extent to which patterns of stressors, coping, and CMR differentiated these profiles.
Materials and
Methods: African American (AA) women (N = 110; M age = 38.61 years, SD = 6.94 years) were recruited from low-income communities and participated in two home visits to complete stress and coping and cardiovascular risk measures.
Results:
Three distinct stress and coping adjustment profiles were associated with differences in CMR. The “holding steady” profile had less insulin resistance (IR) and substance use compared to “high substance users” and “high internalizers” profiles. Women who were “holding steady” used less avoidant coping than “high internalizers.”
Conclusions:
Less favorable adjustment processes were associated with IR, as well as significantly higher levels of avoidant coping and substance use. In AA women, awareness of and attention to stress and coping patterns may help attenuate CMR.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SelyeH.The stress of life. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Co, 1956.
2.
LazarusRS, FolkmanS.Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer, 1984.
3.
FolkmanS, LazarusRS, Dunkel-SchetterC, DeLongisA, GurenRJ. Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1986; 50:992–1003.
4.
PleisJ, Lethbridge-ÇejkuM. Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2006. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat, 2007; 235:1–153.
5.
McEwenBS, StellarE. Stress and the individual: Mechanisms leading to disease. Arch Intern Med, 1993; 153:2093–2101.
MozaffarianD, BenjaminEJ, GoAS, et al.Heart disease and stroke statistics 2016 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circ, 2016; 133:447–454.
12.
ChenE, MillerGE, LachmanME, GruenewaldTL, SeemanTL. Protective factors for adults from low-childhood socioeconomic circumstances: The benefits of shift-and-persist for allostatic load. Psychosom Med, 2012; 74:178–186.
13.
ChenE, MillerGE. “Shift-and-persist” strategies: Why low socioeconomic status isn't always bad for health. Perspect Psychol Sci, 2012; 7:135–158.
14.
ChenE, McLeanKC, MillerGE. Shift-and-persist strategies: Associations with socioeconomic status and the regulation of inflammation among adolescents and their parents. Psychosom Med, 2015; 77:371–382.
15.
KliewerW, Salifu YendorkJ, WrightAW, PillayBJ. Adjustment profiles of low-income caregivers from the United States and South Africa: Contrasts and commonalities. J Child Fam Stud, 2018; 27:522–534.
16.
LitmanJA.The COPE Inventory: Dimensionality and relationships with approach- and avoidance-motives and positive and negative traits. Pers Individ Differ, 2006; 41:273–284.
17.
BarberS, HicksonDA, WangX, SimsM, NelsonC, Diez-RouxAV. Neighborhood disadvantage, poor social conditions, and CVD incidence among AA adults in the Jackson Heart Study. AJPH, 2016; 106:2219–2226.
18.
CozierYC, AlbertMA, Castro-WebbN, et al.Neighborhood socioeconomic status in relation to serum biomarkers in the Black Women's Health Study. J Urban Health, 2016; 93:279–291.
19.
LeachHJ, O'ConnorDP, SimpsonRJ, RifaiHS, MamaSK, LeeRE. An exploratory decision tree analysis to predict CVD risk in AA Women. Health Psychol, 2016; 35:397–402.
20.
DienerE, EmmonsR, LarsenR, GriffinS. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess, 1985; 49:71–75.
21.
DerogatisLR, MelisaratosN. The brief symptom inventory: An introductory report. Psychol Med, 1983; 13:595–605.
22.
FarrellAD, KungEM, WhiteKS, ValoisRF. The structure of self-reported aggression, drug use, and delinquent behaviors during early adolescence. J Clin Child Psychol, 2000; 29:282–292.
23.
MorlanK, TanS. Comparison of the brief psychiatric rating scale and the brief symptom inventory. J Clin Psychol, 1998; 54:885–894.
24.
FarrellAD, WhiteKS. Peer influences and drug use among urban adolescents: Family structure and parent–adolescent relationship as protective factors. J Consult Clinical Psychol, 1998; 66:248–258.
25.
FarrellAD, DanishSJ, HowardCW. Risk factors for drug use in urban adolescents: Identification and cross-validation. Amer J Community Psychol, 1992; 20:263–286.
26.
Miller-JohnsonS, SullivanTN, SimonTR. Evaluating the impact of interventions in the Multisite Violence Prevention Study: Samples, procedures, and measures. Am J Prev Med, 2004; 26:48–61.
27.
Reid-QuiñonesK, KliewerW, ShieldsBJ, GoodmanK, RayMH, WheatE. Cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses to witnessed versus experienced violence. Am J Orthopsychiatry, 2011; 81:51–60.
28.
HalberstadtAG.Family socialization of emotional expression and nonverbal communication styles and skills. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1986; 51:827–836.
29.
KliewerW, RileyT, ZaharakisN, BorreA, DrazdowskTK, JäggiL. Emotion dysregulation, anticipatory cortisol, and substance use in urban adolescents. Pers Ind Diff, 2016; 99:200–205.
30.
CarverCS, ScheierMF, WeintraubJK. Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1989; 56:267–283.
31.
KarpeF, LindgrenCM. Obesity-on or off?. N Engl J Med, 2016; 374:1486–1488.
32.
RogerVL, GoAS, Lloyd-JonesDM, et al.Heart disease and stroke statistics—update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 2012; 125:e2–e220.
33.
vanDijkG, de VriesK, BenthemL, NyakasC, BuwaldaB, ScheurinkA. Neuroendocrinology of insulin resistance: Metabolic and endocrine aspects of adiposity. Eur J Pharmacol, 2003; 480:31–42.
34.
YusufS, LonnE, PaisP, et al.Blood-pressure and cholesterol lowering in persons without CVD. NEJM, 2016; 374:2032–2043.
35.
RandolphTC, GreinerMA, EgwimC, et al.Associations between blood pressure and outcomes among blacks in the Jackson Heart Study. J Am Heart Assoc, 2016; 5:1–11.
36.
O'DonnellMJ, XavierD, LiuL, et al.Risk factors for ischemic and intracerebral hemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): A case-control study. Lancet, 2010; 376:112–123.
37.
YusufS, HawkenS, OunpuuS, et al.Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): Case control study. Lancet, 2004; 364:937–952.
38.
McQueenMJ, HawdenS, WangX, et al.Lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins as risk markers of myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study). Lancet, 2008; 372:224–233.
39.
SongY, MansonJE, TinkerL, et al.Insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion determined by Homeostasis Model Assessment and risk of diabetes in a multiethnic cohort of women. Diab Care, 2007; 30:1747–1752.
PearsonTA, MensahGA, AlexanderRW, et al.Markers of inflammation and CVD. Application to clinical and public health practice. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Heart Association. Circulation, 2003; 107:499–511.
42.
KurthT, GazianoM, RexrodeK, et al.Prospective study of body mass index and risk of stroke in apparently healthy women. Stroke, 2005; 111:1992–1998.
FazelS, BainsP, DollH. Substance abuse and dependence in prisoners: A systematic review. Addiction, 2006; 101:181–191.
45.
LaVeistT, IsaacLA. Race, ethnicity, and Health A public health reader. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2012.
46.
OosthuizenW, MalanL, ScheepersJD, CockeranM, MalanNT. The defense response and alcohol intake: A coronary artery disease risk? The SABPA Study. Clin Exper Hypertens, 2016; 38:526–532.
47.
EpelES, LithgowGJ. Stress biology and aging mechanisms: Toward understanding the deep connection between adaptation to stress and longevity. J Gerontol Biol Sci, 2014; 69:S10–S16.
