Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major health problem worldwide. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs are effective in reducing mortality and improving the quality of life of patients with CVD. Women are under-represented in CR and have a higher dropout rate than men. We aimed to systematically review the literature on barriers perceived by women with CVD affecting their nonparticipation in and/or dropping out from CR programs.
Methods:
Systematic review was done using MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Open Grey, and Cochrane Database from inception to September 2016. Search terms included (1) heart disease and other cardiac conditions, (2) CR and secondary prevention, and (3) nonparticipation in and/or dropout. Databases were searched following the “participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes, and study design” method.
Results:
A total of 24 studies (17 descriptive, 6 qualitative, and 1 randomized controlled trial) reporting several barriers were grouped into five broad categories: intrapersonal barriers (self-reported health, health beliefs, lack of time, motivation, and religious reasons); interpersonal barriers (lack of family/social support and work conflicts); logistical barriers (transport, distance, and availability of personal/community resources); CR program barriers (services offered, group format, exercise component, and CR sessions); and health system barriers (lack of referral, cost, negative experiences with the health system, and language). We found differences between the barriers related to nonparticipation in and dropout from CR programs.
Conclusions:
Women reported multilevel barriers for nonparticipation in and dropout from CR programs. Future clinical guidelines should evaluate and eliminate these barriers to improve adherence to CR programs in women. In addition, understanding the barriers for nonparticipation and dropout may be beneficial for future intervention trials.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LozanoR, NaghaviM, ForemanK, et al.Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet, 2012; 380:2095–2159.
2.
World Health Organization. Global Status Report on noncommunicable diseases. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data, 2014.
3.
MoscaL, HammondG, Mochari-GreenbergerH, et al.Fifteen-year trends in awareness of heart disease in women. Results of a 2012 American Heart Association National Survey. Circulation, 2013; 127:1254–1263.
4.
NicholsM, TownsendN, ScarboroughP, RaynerM. Cardiovascular disease in Europe 2014: Epidemiological update. Eur Heart J, 2014; 35:2950–2959.
5.
MozaffarianD, BenjaminEJ, GoAS, et al.Heart disease and stroke statistics—2015 update. A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 2015; 131:00–00.
6.
GarcíaM, MillerVM, GulatiM, et al.Focused cardiovascular care for women: The need and role in clinical practice. Mayo Clin Proc, 2016; 91:226–240.
7.
ArcherE, ShookRP, ThomasDM, et al.45-year trends in women's use of time and household management energy expenditure. PLoS One, 2013; 8:e56620.
8.
LavieCJ, ArcherE, JahangirE. Cardiovascular health and obesity in women: Is cardiorespiratory fitness the answer?. J Womens Health, 2016; 25:657–659.
9.
BaladyGJ, AdesPA, BittnerVA, et al.Referral, enrollment, and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs at clinical centers and beyond. A presidential advisory From the American Heart Association. Circulation, 2011; 124:2951–2960.
10.
SmithSC, BenjaminEJ, BonowRO, et al.AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update. Circulation, 2011; 22:2459–2473.
11.
BaladyGJ, WilliamsMA, AdesPA, et al.Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update. Circulation, 2007; 115:2675–2682.
12.
SuayaJA, ShepardDS, NormandST, AdesPA, ProttasJ, StasonWB. Use of cardiac rehabilitation by medicare beneficiaries after myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery. Circulation, 2007; 116:1653–1662.
SamayoaL, GraceSL, GravelyS, ScottLB, MarzoliniS, ColellaTJF. Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation enrollment: A meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol, 2014; 30–793:800.
15.
HeranBS, ChenJMH, EbrahimS, et al.Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2011; 6:CD001800.
16.
ColellaTJF, GravelyS, MarzoliniS, et al.Sex bias in referral of women to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation? A meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol, 2015; 22:423–441.
17.
CortesO, ArthurHM. Determinants of referral to cardiac rehabilitation programs in patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic review. Am Heart J, 2006; 151:249–256.
18.
Turk-AdawiKI, GraceSL. Narrative review comparing the benefits of and participation in cardiac rehabilitation in high-, middle- and low-income countries. Heart Lung Circ, 2015; 24:510–520.
19.
ClarkAM, King-ShierKM, SpalingMA, et al.Factors influencing participation in cardiac rehabilitation programmes after referral and initial attendance: Qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis. Clin Rehabil, 2013; 27:948–959.
DanielsKM, ArenaR, LavieCJ, FormanDE. Cardiac rehabilitation for women across the lifespan. Am J Med, 2012; 125:e1–e7.
22.
ScottLAB, Ben-OrK, AllenJK. Why are women missing from outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs? A review of multilevel factors affecting referral, enrollment, and completion. J Womens Health, 2002; 11:773–791.
23.
McCarthyMM, DicksonVV, ChyunD. Barriers to cardiac rehabilitation in women with cardiovascular disease: An integrative review. J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2011; 26:e1–e10.
24.
MoherD, LiberatiA, TetzlaffJ, AltmanDG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med, 2009; 151:264–269.
25.
McLeroyK, BibeauD, StecklerA, GlanzK. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q, 1988; 15:351Y377.
26.
StokolsD. Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: Toward a social ecology of health promotion. Am Psychol, 1992; 47:6Y22.
27.
EvensonKR, JohnsonA, AyturSA. Five-year changes in North Carolina outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil, 2006; 26:366–376.
28.
TongA, SainsburyP, CraigJ. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care, 2007; 19:349–357.
29.
TwymanL, BonevskiB, PaulC, BryantJ. Perceived barriers to smoking cessation in selected vulnerable groups: A systematic review of the qualitative and quantitative literature. BMJ Open, 2014; 4:e006414.
30.
AllenJK, ScottLB, StewartKJ, YoungDR. Disparities in women's referral to and enrollment in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. J Gen Intern Med, 2004; 19:747–753.
31.
FarleyRL, WadeTD, BirchmoreL. Factors influencing attendance at cardiac rehabilitation among coronary heart disease patients. Eur J, 2003; 2:205–212.
32.
GallagherR, McKinleyS, DracupK. Predictors of women's attendance at cardiac rehabilitation programs. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs, 2003; 18:121–126.
33.
GraceSL, AbbeySE, ShnekZM, IrvineJ, FrancheRL, StewartDE. Cardiac rehabilitation II: Referral and participation. Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 2002; 24:127–134.
34.
GraceSL, EvindarA, KungTN, ScholeyPE, StewartDE. Automatic referral to cardiac rehabilitation. Med Care, 2004; 42:661–669.
35.
GraceSL, Gravely-WitteS, KayaniyikS, BrualJ, SuskinN, StewartDE. A Multi-site examination of sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers by participation status. J Womens Health, 2009; 18:209–216.
36.
HalmM, PenqueS, DollN, BeahrsM. Women and cardiac rehabilitation: Referral and compliance patterns. J Cardiovasc Nurs, 1999; 13:83–82.
37.
MochariH, LeeJR, KligfieldP, MoscaL. Ethnic differences in barriers and referral to cardiac rehabilitation among women hospitalized with coronary heart disease. Prev Cardiol, 2006; 9:8–13.
SandersonBK, ShewchukRM, BittnerV. Cardiac rehabilitation and women: What keeps them away?. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev, 2010; 30:12–21.
40.
ShanmugasegaramS, OhP, ReidRD, McCumberT, GraceSL. Cardiac rehabilitation barriers by rurality and socioeconomic status: A cross-sectional study. Int J Equity Health, 2013; 12:72.
41.
YatesBC, Braklow-WhittonJL, AgrawalS. Outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation participants and nonparticipants in a rural area. Rehabil Nurs, 2003; 28:57–63.
42.
CooperAF, JacksonG, WeinmanJ, HorneR. A qualitative study investigating patients' beliefs about cardiac rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil, 2005; 19:87–96.
43.
HeidHG, SchmelzerM. Influences on women's participation in cardiac rehabilitation. Rehabil Nurs, 2004; 29:116–121.
44.
MacInnesJD. The illness perceptions of women following acute myocardial infarction: Implications for behaviour change and attendance at cardiac rehabilitation. Women Health, 2005; 42:105–121.
45.
BeckieTM, MendoncaMA, FletcherGF, SchockenDD, EvansME, BanksSM. Examining the challenges of recruiting women into a cardiac rehabilitation clinical trial. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev, 2009; 29:13–21.
46.
CannistraLB, BaladyGJ, O'MalleyCJ, WeinerDA, RyanTJ. Comparison of the clinical profile and outcome of women and men in cardiac rehabilitation. Am J Cardiol, 1992; 69:1274–1279.
47.
CannistraLB, O'MalleyCJ, BaladyGJ. Comparison of outcome of cardiac rehabilitation in black women and white women. Am J Cardiol, 1995; 75:890–893.
48.
MarzoliniS, BrooksD, OhPI. Sex differences in completion of a 12-month cardiac rehabilitation programme: An analysis of 5922 women and men. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil, 2008; 15:698–703.
49.
SherwoodSA, PoveyRC. Influences on women's completion of a cardiac rehabilitation programme. Int J Ther Rehabil, 2011; 18:266–277.
50.
De VosC, LiX, Van VlaenderenI, et al.Participating or not in a cardiac rehabilitation programme: Factors influencing a patient's decision. Eur J Prev Cardiol, 2013; 20:341–348.
51.
PlachSK. Women and cardiac rehabilitation after heart surgery: Patterns of referral and adherence. Rehabil Nurs, 2002; 27:104–109.
52.
McSweeneyJC, CranePB. An act of courage: Women's decision-making processes regarding outpatient cardiac rehabilitation attendance. Rehabil Nurs, 2001; 26:132–140.
53.
ChauhanU, BakerD, LesterH, EdwardsR. Exploring uptake of cardiac rehabilitation in a minority ethnic population in England: A qualitative study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2010; 9:68–74.
54.
LichtmanJH, FroelicherES, BlumenthalJA, et al.Depression as a risk factor for poor prognosis among patients with acute coronary syndrome: Systematic review and recommendations: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 2014; 129:1350–1369.
55.
MoscaL, Barrett-ConnorE, WengerNK. Sex/gender differences in cardiovascular disease prevention: What a difference a decade makes. Circulation, 2011; 124:2145–2154.
56.
GraceSL, MidenceL, OhP, et al.Cardiac rehabilitation program adherence and functional capacity among women: A randomized controlled trial. Mayo Clin Proc, 2016; 91:140–148.
57.
MoscaL, LinfanteAH, BenjaminEJ, et al.National study of physician awareness and adherence to cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines. Circulation, 2005; 111:499–510.
58.
LeonAS, FranklinBA, CostaF, et al.Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: An American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommitee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physicial Activity, and Metabolism (Subcomittee on Physicial Activity), in collaboration with the American association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation, 2005; 111:369–376.
59.
AdesPA, KeteyianSJ, WrightJS, et al.Increasing cardiac rehabilitation participation from 20% to 70%: A road map from the million hearts cardiac rehabilitation collaborative. Mayo Clin Proc, 2017; 92:234–242.
60.
FernandezRS, SalamonsonY, JuergensC, GriffithsR, DavidsonP. Development and preliminary testing of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrolment Obstacles (CREO) scale: Implications for service development. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2008; 7:96–102.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
