This commentary responds to the assertions by Foreman et al. that credentialing of women's health (WH) fellows by the American Board of Medical Subspecialties and accreditation of current and future WH fellowships by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education would improve the health and healthcare of women by increasing the number of primary care providers competent to meet a growing clinical need. They speculate that such accreditation would raise the status of WH fellowships, increase the number of applicants, and result in more academic leaders in WH. They assert that curricular deficiencies in WH exist in physician training and that WH fellowships are the preferred means of training physicians to care for midlife women. We review the evidence to support or refute these claims and conclude that accrediting WH fellowships would not have the forecasted outcomes and would jeopardize the success of current WH fellowships.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ForemanH, WeberL, ThackerH. Update: A review of women's health fellowships, their role in interdisciplinary health care, and the need for accreditation. J Womens Health, 2015; 24:336–340.
2.
CarnesM. The Department of Veterans Affiars: A major force in women's health. SGIM Forum, 1998; 21:2; 9.
3.
TilstraSA, KraemerKL, RubioDM, McNeilMA. Evaluation of VA Women's Health Fellowships: Developing leaders in academic women's health. J Gen Intern Med, 2013; 28:901–907.
4.
World Health Organization (WHO) Health Professions Networks. Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2010.
5.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. VA Fellowships in Women's Health. 2014 Available at www.va.gov/oaa/specialfellows/programs/SF_WomensVets.asp?p=20 Accessed March10, 2015.
6.
Association of Academic Women's Health Programs. Directory of residency and fellowship programs in women's health. J Womens Health, 2014; 23:1–41.
7.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. 2015. Available at www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/tabid/134/ProgramandInstitutionalAccreditation/MedicalSpecialties/InternalMedicine.aspx Accessed March13, 2015.
8.
TaylorJS, FriedmanRH, SpeckmanJL, AshAS, MoskowitzMA, CarrPL. Fellowship training and career outcomes for primary care physician-faculty. Acad Med, 2001; 76:366–372.
9.
BrothertonSE, RockeyPH, EtzelSI. US graduate medical education, 2004–2005: Trends in primary care specialties. Jama, 2005; 294:1075–1082.
10.
GaribaldiRA, PopkaveC, BylsmaW. Career plans for trainees in internal medicine residency programs. Acad Med, 2005; 80:507–512.
11.
GerberSE, Lo SassoAT. The evolving gender gap in general obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2006; 195:1427–1430.
12.
The Match, National Resident Matching Program. Results and data specialties matching service, 2014. www.nrmp.org/match-data/fellowship-match-data Accessed March7, 2015.
13.
WarshawGA, BraggEJ. The training of geriatricians in the United States: Three decades of progress. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2003; 51:S338–S345.
14.
WarshawGA, BraggEJ, ShaullRW, GoldenharLM, LindsellCJ. Geriatric medicine fellowship programs: A national study from the Association of Directors of Geriatric Academic Programs' Longitudinal Study of Training and Practice in Geriatric Medicine. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2003; 51:1023–1030.
15.
Center for Workforce Studies, Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). 2014 Physician Specialty Data Book Center for Workforce Studies. Washington, DC: AAMC, 2014.
16.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Academic Affairs. VA Fellowship in Advanced Geriatrics. 2015. Available at www.va.gov/oaa/specialfellows/programs/SF_AdvGeriatric.asp?p=3 Accessed March15, 2015.
17.
Medina-WalpoleA, BarkerWH, KatzPR, KaruzaJ, WilliamsTF, HallWJ. The current state of geriatric medicine: A national survey of fellowship-trained geriatricians, 1990 to 1998. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2002; 50:949–955.
18.
NadigNR, VanderbiltAA, FordDW, SchnappLM, PastisNJ. Variability in structure of university pulmonary/critical care fellowships and retention of fellows in academic medicine. Ann Am Thorac SocFeb25, 2015. [Epub ahead of print].
19.
RidgewayCL, BourgC. Gender as status: An expectation states theory approach. In: EaglyAH, BeallAE, SternbergRJ, eds. The Psychology of Gender, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2004:217–241.
20.
HinzeSW. Gender and the body of medicine or at least some body parts: (Re)constructing the prestige hierarchy of medical specialties. Sociol Q, 1999; 40:217–239.
21.
KaatzA, CarnesM. Stuck in the out-group: Jennifer can't grow up, Jane's invisible, and Janet's over the hill. J Womens Health, 2014; 23:481–484.
22.
CarnesM BC, IsaacC, KaatzA, KolehmainenC. Why is John more likely to become department chair than Jennifer?. Trans Am Clin Climatol Soc, 2015; In press.
23.
KaneL, PeckhamC. Medscape Physician Compensation Report, 2014. WebMD, 2014. Available at www.medscape.com/features/slideshow/compensation/2014/public/overview Accessed March7, 2015.
24.
Lo SassoAT, RichardsMR, ChouCF, GerberSE. The $16,819 pay gap for newly trained physicians: The unexplained trend of men earning more than women. Health Aff, 2011; 30:193–201.
25.
WrightAL, SchwindtLA, BassfordTL, et al.Gender differences in academic advancement: patterns, causes, and potential solutions in one U.S. College of Medicine. Acad Med, 2003; 78:500–508.
26.
JagsiR, GriffithKA, StewartA, SambucoD, DeCastroR, UbelPA. Gender differences in salary in a recent cohort of early-career physician-researchers. Acad Med, 2013; 88:1689–1699.
27.
JagsiR, GriffithKA, StewartA, SambucoD, DeCastroR, UbelPA. Gender differences in the salaries of physician researchers. JAMA, 2012; 307:2410–2417.
28.
LyonDS. Where have all the young men gone? Keeping men in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol, 1997; 90:634–636.
29.
CarvajalD. The changing face of medical care. New York Times. March8, 2011.
30.
CejkaMA, EaglyAH. Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 1999; 25:413–423.
31.
GlickP, WilkK, PerreaultM. Images of occupations: Components of gender and status in occupational stereotypes. Sex Roles, 1995; 32:565–582.
32.
AlksnisCDS, CurtisJ. Workforce segregation and the gender wage gap: Is “women's” work valued as highly as “men's”?. J Appl Soc Psychol, 2008; 38:1416–1441.
33.
IsaacC, LeeB, CarnesM. Interventions that affect gender bias in hiring: A systematic review. Acad Med, 2009; 84:1440–1446.
34.
Moss-RacusinCA, DovidioJF, BrescollVL, GrahamMJ, HandelsmanJ. Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2012; 109:16474–16479.
35.
CarnesM, VandenBoscheG, AgatisaPK, et al.Using women's health research to develop women leaders in academic health sciences: The National Centers of Excellence in Women's Health. J Womens Health Gend Based Med, 2001; 10:39–47.
36.
SimonSR, FabinyAR, KotchJ. Geriatrics training in general internal medicine fellowship programs: Current practice, barriers, and strategies for improvement. Ann Intern Med, 2003; 139:621–627.
37.
American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM). Number of first-year fellows by subspecialty. ABIM, 2004–2015. Available at www.abim.org/about/examInfo/data-fellow/chart-04.aspx Accessed March7, 2015.
38.
Institute of Medicine Committee on the Future Health Care Workforce for Older Americans. Retooling for an aging America: Building the health care workforce. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2008.
39.
CaiolaE, LitakerD. Factors influencing the selection of general internal medicine fellowship programs: A national survey. J Gen Intern Med, 2000; 15:656–658.
40.
BarkerW, PodgorskiC. Physicians completing geriatric fellowships, 1980–88, abstr. A940. American Geriatrics Society Annual Scientific Meeting Final Program. Chicago, IL: American Geriatrics Society, 1991.
41.
SpencerAL, BostJE, McNeilM. Do women's health internal medicine residency tracks make a difference?. J Womens Health, 2007; 16:1219–1223.
42.
LarsonEB, FihnSD, KirkLM, et al.The future of general internal medicine: Report and recommendations from the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) Task Force on the Domain of General Internal Medicine. J Gen Intern Med, 2004; 19:69–77.
43.
American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP). Recommended curriculum guidelines for family medicine residents: Women's Health. AAFP Reprint No. 282. AAFP, 1994.
44.
Institute of Medicine Committee on Planning a Continuing Health Care Professional Education Institute, Board on Health Care Service. Redesigning Continuing Education in the Health Professions. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2010.
45.
Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Report of an expert panel. Washington, DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative, 2011.
46.
JosiahMacyJr.Foundation. Conference recommendations. Transforming patient care: Aligning interprofessional education with clinical practice redesign, Atlanta, Georgia, January 17–20, 2013. New York: Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation, 2013.
47.
HenrichJB. Women's health education initiatives: Why have they stalled?. Acad Med, 2004; 79:283–288.
48.
HenrichJB, ViscoliCM, AbrahamGD. Medical students' assessment of education and training in women's health and in sex and gender differences. JWomens Health, 2008; 17:815–827.
49.
WayneDB, DaRosaDA. Evaluating and enhancing a women's health curriculum in an internal medicine residency program. J Gen Intern Med, 2004; 19:754–759.
50.
RavenBH. The bases of power and the power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy, 2008; 8:1–22.
51.
PortesA. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Ann Rev Sociol, 1998; 24:1–24.
52.
LyonDS. Graduate education in women's health care: Where have all the young men gone?. Curr Womens Health Rep, 2002; 2:170–174.
53.
RiskaE. Towards gender balance: But will women physicians have an impact on medicine?. Soc Sci Med, 2001; 52:179–187.
54.
LevinsonW, LurieN. When most doctors are women: what lies ahead?. Ann Intern Med, 212004; 141:471–474.
