National Center for Health Statistics (US). Health, United States, 2009: With special feature on medical technology. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics (US), 2010: Report No. 2010–1232. Available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK44745 Accessed April17, 2014.
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National hospital discharge survey: 2010 table: Procedures by selected patient characteristics—number by procedure, category, and age. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2010.
3.
StaufferRN. Ten-year follow-up study of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1982; 64:983–990.
4.
JazrawiLM, KummerFJ, Di CesarePE. Hard bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 1998; 27:283–292.
5.
Hip and knee implant review. Orthopedic Network News. 2008; 19:1–20. Available at: www.orthopedicnetworknews.com/onn193.pdf Accessed April10, 2014.
6.
CucklerJM. The rationale for metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2005; 441:132–136.
7.
BozicKJ, KurtzS, LauE, et al.The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2009; 91:1614–1620.
8.
RizekR, GandhiR, SyedK, MahomedN. Evaluation of the failed total hip arthroplasty. In: BerryDJ, and LiebermanJR, eds. Surgery of the hip. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2013:1026–1038.
9.
KhatodM, CafriG, NambaRS, InacioMC, PaxtonEW. Risk factors for total hip arthroplasty aseptic revision. J Arthroplasty, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.023.
10.
WillertHG, BuchhornGH, FayyaziA, et al.Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2005; 87:28–36.
11.
PanditH, Glyn-JonesS, McLardy-SmithP, et al.Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2008; 90:847–851.
12.
WileyKF, DingK, StonerJA, TeagueDC, YousufKM. Incidence of pseudotumor and acute lymphocytic vasculitis associated lesion (ALVAL) reactions in metal-on-metal hip articulations: A meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty, 2013; 28:1238–1245.
13.
WilliamsDH, GreidanusNV, MasriBA, DuncanCP, GarbuzDS. Prevalence of pseudotumor in asymptomatic patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2011; 93:2164–2171.
14.
FehringTK, OdumS, SproulR, WeathersbeeJ. High frequency of adverse local tissue reactions in asymptomatic patients with metal-on-metal THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014; 472:517–522.
15.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Concerns about metal-on-metal hip implants. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2013. Available at: www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/MetalonMetalHipImplants/ucm241604.htm Accessed April7, 2014.
16.
KwonYM, LombardiAV, JacobsJJ, FehringTK, LewisCG, CabanelaME. Risk stratification algorithm for management of patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: Consensus statement of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, and the Hip Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2014; 96:e4.
17.
SiddiquiIA, SabahSA, SatchithanandaK, et al.A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of MARS MRI and ultrasound of the painful metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop, 2014. [Epub ahead of print].
18.
ChangEY, McAnallyJL, Van HorneJR, et al.Relationship of plasma metal ions and clinical and imaging findings in patients with ASR XL metal-on-metal total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013; 95:2015–2020.
19.
MalekIA, KingA, SharmaH, et al.: The sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of raised plasma metal ion levels in the diagnosis of adverse reaction to metal debris in symptomatic patients with a metal-on-metal arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2012; 94:1045–1050.
20.
van der WeegenW, SijbesmaT, HoekstraHJ, BrakelK, PilotP, NelissenRG. Treatment of pseudotumors after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing based on magnetic resonance imaging, metal ion levels and symptoms. J Arthroplasty, 2014; 29:416–421.
21.
LiddleAD, SatchithanandaK, HenckelJ, et al.Revision of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty in a tertiary center: a prospective study of 39 hips with between 1 and 4 years of follow-up. Acta Orthop, 2013; 84:237–245.
22.
GrammatopolousG, PanditH, KwonYM, et al.Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2009; 91:1019–1024.
