National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). Proposed changes to existing measure for HEDIS 2014: Breast Cancer Screening (BCS). https://www.ncqa.org/Portals/0/PublicComment/HEDIS2014/2.%20BCS%20Materials.pdf
2.
American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer. Available at www.cancer.org/healthy/findcancerearly/cancerscreeningguidelines/american-cancer-society-guidelines-for-the-early-detection-of-cancer Accessed June5, 2014.
3.
MillerAB, WallC, BainesCJ, et al.Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: Randomized screening trial. BMJ, 2014; 348:g366.
4.
WelchHG, BlackWC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2010; 102:605–613.
5.
EssermanLJ, ShiehY, RutgersEJ, et al.Impact of mammographic screening on the detection of good and poor prognosis breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2011; 130:725–734.
6.
EssermanLJ, ThompsonIMJr., ReidB. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: An opportunity for improvement. JAMA, 2013; 310:797–798.
7.
EssermanLJ, ThompsonIM, ReidB, et al.Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change. Lancet Oncol, 2014; 15:e234–242.
8.
PaceLE, KeatingNL. A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions. JAMA, 2014; 311:1327–1335.
9.
Biller-AndornoN, JüniP. Abolishing mammography screening programs? A view from the Swiss Medical Board. N Engl J Med, 2014; 370:1965–1967.
10.
Committee on a Framework for Development a New Taxonomy of Disease; National Research Council. Toward precision medicine: Building a knowledge network for biomedical research and a new taxonomy of disease. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2011.
11.
EssermanLJ, ThompsonIM, ReidB, et al.Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change. Lancet Oncol, 2014; 15:e234–242.
12.
FlowersCI, O'DonoghueC, MooreD, et al.Reducing false-positive biopsies: A pilot study to reduce benign biopsy rates for BI-RADS 4A/B assessments through testing risk stratification and new thresholds for intervention. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2013; 139:769–777.
13.
O'DonoghueC, EklundM, OzanneEM, EssermanLJ. Aggregate cost of mammography screening in the United States: Comparison of current practice and advocated guidelines. Ann Intern Med, 2014; 160:145.
14.
ElmoreJG, GrossCP. The cost of breast cancer screening in the United States: A picture is worth…a billion dollars?. Ann Intern Med, 2014; 160:203.
15.
WebbML, CadyB, MichaelsonJS, et al.A failure analysis of invasive breast cancer: Most deaths from disease occur in women not regularly screened. Cancer, 2013 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28199
16.
Berry, DonaldA. Breast cancer screening: Controversy of impact. Breast, 2013; 22:S73–S76.
17.
BerryDA. Failure of researchers, reviewers, editors, and the media to understand flaws in cancer screening studies. Cancer, 2014. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28795. [Epub ahead of print]
18.
Kopans, DanielB. Mammograms save lives: Criticism of breast-cancer screenings is more about rationing than rationality. Wall Street Journal, May22, 2014. Available at http://online.wsj.com/news/article_email/SB10001424052702304547704579564440536353948-lMyQjAxMTA0MDIwMjEyNDIyWj Accessed June, 4, 2014.
19.
EklundM, EssermanLJ. Screening: Biology dictates the fate of young women with breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2013; 10:673–675.