Knowing family history is important for understanding cancer risk, yet communication within families is suboptimal. Providing strategies to enhance communication may be useful.
Methods:
Four hundred ninety women were recruited from urban, safety-net, hospital-based primary care women's health clinics. Participants were randomized to receive the KinFact intervention or the control handout on lowering risks for breast/colon cancer and screening recommendations. Cancer family history was reviewed with all participants. The 20-minute KinFact intervention, based in communication and behavior theory, included reviewing individualized breast/colon cancer risks and an interactive presentation about cancer and communication. Study outcomes included whether participants reported collecting family history, shared cancer risk information with relatives, and the frequency of communication with relatives. Data were collected at baseline, 1, 6, and 14 months.
Results:
Overall, intervention participants were significantly more likely to gather family cancer information at follow-up (odds ratio [OR]: 2.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.01, 3.71) and to share familial cancer information with relatives (OR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.37, 2.48). Communication frequency (1=not at all; 4=a lot) was significantly increased at follow-up (1.67 vs. 1.54). Differences were not modified by age, race, education, or family history. However, effects were modified by pregnancy status and genetic literacy. Intervention effects for information gathering and frequency were observed for nonpregnant women but not for pregnant women. Additionally, intervention effects were observed for information gathering in women with high genetic literacy, but not in women with low genetic literacy.
Conclusions:
The KinFact intervention successfully promoted family communication about cancer risk. Educating women to enhance their communication skills surrounding family history may allow them to partner more effectively with their families and ultimately their providers in discussing risks and prevention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
YoonPW, ScheunerMT, GwinnM, et al. Awareness of family health history as a risk factor for disease – United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Weekly Rep, 2004; 53:1044–1147.
2.
MurffHJ, PetersonNB, GreevyRA, et al. Early initiation of colorectal cancer screening in individuals with affected first-degree relatives. J Gen Intern Med, 2007; 22:121–126.
3.
BergAO, BairdMA, BotkinJR, et al. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: family history and improving health. Ann Intern Med, 2009; 151:872–877.
4.
KoehlyLM, PetersJA, KenenR, et al. Characteristics of health information gatherers, disseminators, and blockers within families at risk of hereditary cancer: Implications for family health communication interventions. Am J Public Health, 2009; 99:2203–2209.
5.
HerringtonDM. Cardiovascular genomics: Outcomes and implications. Can J Cardiol, 2010; 26:60A–63A.
6.
KhouryMJ, FeeroWG, ValdezR. Family history and personal genomics as tools for improving health in an era of evidence-based medicine. Am J Prev Med, 2010; 39:184–188.
7.
ValdezR, YoonPW, QureshiN, et al. Family history in public health practice: A genomic tool for disease prevention and health promotion. Annu Rev Public Health, 2010; 31:69–87.
8.
EdwardsAG, NaikG, AhmedH, et al. Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013; 28:196.
9.
ScheunerMT, McNeelTS, FreedmanAN. Population prevalence of familial cancer and common hereditary cancer syndromes. The 2005 California Health Interview Survey. Genet Med, 2010; 12:726–735.
10.
AchesonLS. Recording, interpreting, and updating the family history of cancer: implications for cancer prevention. JAMA, 2011; 306:208–210.
11.
ChowdhuryS, DentT, PashayanN, et al. Incorporating genomics into breast and prostate cancer screening: assessing the implications. Genet Med, 2013; 15:423–432.
12.
Dove-EdwinL, SasieniP, AdamsJ, ThomasHJ. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic surveillance in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer: 16-year, prospective, follow-up study. BMJ, 2005; 331:1047.
13.
FH01 Collaborative Teams. Mammographic surveillance in women younger than 50 years who have a family history of breast cancer: Tumour characteristics and projected effect on mortality in the prospective, single-arm, FH01 study. Lancet Oncol, 2010; 11:1127–1134.
14.
ZlotAI, SilveyK, NewellN, et al. Family history of colorectal cancer: Clinicians' preventive recommendations and patient behavior. Prev Chronic Dis, 2012; 9:100254.
15.
MesherD, Dove-EdwinI, SasieniP, et al. A pooled analysis of the outcome of prospective colonoscopic surveillance for familial colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer, 2014; 134:939–947.
16.
KellyK, SturmA, KempK, et al. How can we reach them? Information seeking and preferences for a cancer family history campaign in underserved communities. J Health Commun, 2009; 14:573–589.
17.
EisingerF, BouhnikA, MalavoltiL, et al. Cancer survivors: Familial risk perception and management advice given to their relatives. Familial Cancer, 2011; 10:147–155.
18.
MaddockC, SchrijversD, TurcoM, et al. To know or not to know? Not the only question in familial breast cancer risk communication. Ecancermedicalscience, 2011; 5:239.
19.
MurthyV, GarzaM, AlmarioD, et al. Using a family history intervention to improve cancer risk perception in a Black community. J Gen Counsel, 2011; 20:639–649.
20.
MitchellJA, HawkinsJ, WatkinsDC. Factors associated with cancer family history communication between African American men and their relatives. J Mens Studies, 2013; 21:97–111.
21.
KenenR, Ardern-JonesA, EelesR. We are talking, but are they listening? Communication patterns in families with a history of breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC). Psychooncology, 2004; 13:335–345.
22.
NiskerJ. A public health education initiative for women with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer: why did it take Angelina Jolie. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2013; 35:689–691.
23.
CarneyPA, O'MalleyJP, GoughA, et al. Association between documented family history of cancer and screening for breast and colorectal cancer. Prev Med, 2013; 57:679–684.
24.
CameronE, RoseS, CareyM. Assessment of family history of colorectal cancer in primary care: Perceptions of first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer. Patient Educ Couns, 2013; 94:427–431.
25.
CatzDS, GreenNS, TobinJN, et al. Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations. Community Genet, 2005; 8:161–172.
26.
ButtyJM, RichardsonF, MoutonCP, et al. Evaluation findings from genetics and family health history community-based workshops for African-Americans. J Community Genet, 2012; 3:1–12.
27.
OromH, KiviniemiM, UnderwoodW3rd, et al. Perceived cancer risk: Why is it lower among nonwhites than whites?. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2010; 19:746–754.
28.
HughesC, LermanC, LustbaderE. Ethnic differences in risk perception among women at increased risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 1996; 40:25–35.
29.
HondaK, NeugutA. Associations between perceived cancer risk and established risk factors in a national community sample. Cancer Detect Prev, 2004; 28:1–7.
30.
HaasJS, KaplanCP, Des JarlaisG, et al. Perceived risk of breast cancer among women at average and increased risk. J Womens Health, 2005; 14:845–851.
31.
GriffithKA, McGuireDB, Royak-SchalerR, et al. Influence of family history and preventive health behaviors on colorectal cancer screening in African Americans. Cancer, 2008;;113:276–285.
32.
WangC, GalloRE, FleisherL, MillerSM. Literacy assessment of family health history tools for public health prevention. Public Health Genomics, 2011; 14:222–237.
33.
EtchegaryH, PotterB, PerrierC, WilsonB. Cultural differences in family communication about inherited cancer: Implications for cancer genetics research. J Cult Divers, 2013; 20:195–201.
34.
WisemanM, DancygerC, MichieS. Communicating genetic risk information within families: A review. Fam Cancer, 2010; 9:691–703.
35.
CronenVE, ParceWB, HarrisLM. The logic of the coordinated management of meaning: A rules-based-approach to the first course in interpersonal communication. Commun Educ, 1979; 28:22–38.
36.
WiensME, WilsonBJ, HoneywellC, EtchegaryH. A family genetic risk communication framework: guiding tool development in genetics health services. J Community Genet, 2013; 4:233–242.
37.
BurnsAC. The expanded Health Belief Model as a basis for enlightened preventive health care practice and research. J Health Care Mark, 1992; 12:32–45.
38.
WilsonBJ, ForrestK, van TeijlingenER, et al. Family communication about genetic risk: The little that is known. Community Genet, 2004; 7:15–24.
39.
DalyMB, BarsevickA, MillerSM, et al. Communicating genetic test results to the family: A six-step, skills-building strategy. Fam Community Health, 2001; 24:13–26.
40.
BuckmanR, ed. How to break bad news, a guide for health care professionals. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.
41.
KincaidJP, FishburneRP, RogersRL, ChissomBS (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count, and Flesch Reading Ease formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch Report 8–75. Millington, TN: Chief of Naval Technical Training, U.S. Naval Air Station, Memphis.
42.
ErbyLH, RoterD, LarsonS, ChoJ. The rapid estimate of adult literacy in genetics (REAL-G): a means to assess literacy deficits in the context of genetics. Am J Med Genet A, 2008;;146A:174–181.
43.
RogersLE, EscuderoV, eds. Communication: The central dynamic in personal relationships—theoretical foundations. In: FriedleySA, ed. Foundations of interpersonal communication theory: A reader. Reno, NV: Bent Tree Press; 2005:51–67.
44.
GaffCL, ClarkeAJ, AtkinsonP, et al. Process and outcome in communication of genetic information within families: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet, 2007; 15:999–1011.
45.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HealthStyles88 Fact Sheet. Available at /www.orau.gov/cdcynergy/soc2web/Content/activeinformation/resources/Healthstyles.pdf Accessed June30, 2014.
46.
BowenDJ, BourcierE, PressN, et al. Effects of individual and family functioning on interest in genetic testing. Community Genet, 2004; 7:25–32.
47.
O'LearyJ, EdelsonV, GardnerN, et al. Community-centered family health history: a customized approach to increased health communication and awareness. Prog Community Health Partnersh, 2011; 5:113–122.
48.
WallaceJP, BaughC, CornettS, et al. A family history demonstration project among women in an urban Appalachian community. Prog Community Health Partnersh, 2009; 3:155–163.
49.
MaysD, SharffME, DeMarcoTA, et al. Outcomes of a systems-level intervention offering breast cancer risk assessments to low-income underserved women. Fam Cancer, 2012; 11:493–502.
50.
RoshanaiAH, RoseqnuistR, LampicC, NordinK. Does enhanced information at cancer genetic counseling improve counselees' knowledge, risk perception, satisfaction and negotiation of information to at-risk relatives?. Acta Oncol, 2009; 48:999–1009.
51.
SeymourKC, Addington-HallJ, LucassenAM, FosterCL. What facilitates or impedes family communication following genetic testing for cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of primary qualitative research. J Genet Counsel, 2010; 19:330–342.
52.
ForrestL, DelatyckiM, CurnowL, et al. An audit of clinical service examining the uptake of genetic testing by at-risk family members. Gen in Med, 2012; 14:122–128.
53.
KardashianA, FehnigerJ, CreasmanJ, et al. A pilot study of the sharing risk information tool (ShaRIT) for families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Hered Cancer Clin Pract, 2012; 10:1–4.
54.
MontgomerySV, BarsevickAM, EglestonBL, et al. Preparing individuals to communicate genetic test results to their relatives: report of a randomized control trial. Fam Cancer, 2013; 12:537–546.
55.
GaffC and HodgsonJ. A genetic counseling intervention to facilitate family communication about inherited conditions. J Genet Counsel, 2014; 23:814–823. [Epub 2014 Mar 1].
56.
KinneyAY, CroyleRT, DudleyWN, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and interest in breast-ovarian cancer gene testing: A survey of a large African-American kindred with a BRCA1 mutation. Prev Med, 2001; 33:543–551.
57.
RussellKM, ChampionVL, MonahanPO, et al. Randomized trial of a lay health advisor and computer intervention to increase mammography screening in African American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2010; 19:201–210.
58.
FairAM, MonahanPO, RussellK, et al. The interaction of perceived risk and benefits and the relationship to predicting mammography adherence in African American women. Oncology Nursing Forum, 2012; 39:53–60.
59.
BergAO. Family history gets a boost. Ann Intern Med, 2012; 156:315–316.
60.
KaphingstKA, GoodmanM, PandyaC, et al. Factors affecting frequency of communication about family health history with family members and doctors in a medically underserved population. Patient Educ Couns, 2012; 88:291–297.
61.
AshidaS, KaphingstKA, GoodmanM, SchaferEJ. Family health history communication networks of older adults: importance of social relationships and disease perceptions. Health Educ Behav, 2013; 40:612–619.
62.
SarfatyM, WenderR, SmithR. Promoting cancer screening within the patient centered medical home. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011; 61:397–408.
63.
SmithML, SosaET, HochhalterAK, et al. Correlates of family health history discussions between college students and physicians: Does family cancer history make a difference?. J Prim Prev, 2011; 32:311–322.
64.
ForrestLE, CurnowL, DelatyckiMB, et al. Health first, genetics second: Exploring families' experiences of communicating genetic information. Eur Jnl Hum Gen, 2008; 16:1329–1335.
65.
AfifiWA, MorganSE, StephensonMT, et al. Examining the decision to talk with family about organ donation: applying theory of motivated information management. Commun Monogr, 2006; 73:188–215.
66.
CoughlinC, VuchinichS. Family experience in preadolescence and the development of male delinquency. J Marriage Fam, 1996; 58:491–501.
67.
SmithEP, PrinzRJ, DumasJE, LaughlinJE. Latent models of family processes in African American families: Relationships to child competence, achievement, and problem behavior. J Marriage Fam, 2001; 63:967–980.
68.
SimonC, AchesonL, BurantC, et al. Patient interest in recording family histories of cancer via the Internet. Genet Med, 2008; 10:895–902.
69.
McBrideCM, AlfordSH, ReidRJ, et al. Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: Implications for physician-patient interaction. Genet Med, 2009; 11:582–587.
70.
GuttmacherAE, CollinsFS, CarmonaRH. The family history—more important than ever. N Engl J Med, 2004; 351:2333–2336.
71.
CoronaR, RodriguezV, QuillinJ, et al. Talking (or not) about family health history in families of Latino young adults. Health Educ Behav, 2013; 40:571–580.
72.
GallagherSK, GerstelN. Kinkeeping and friend keeping among older women: The effect of marriage. Gerontologist, 1993; 33:675–681.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
