Disparities in the management of coronary artery disease were consistently documented in blacks and women in the 1980s and 1990s. Our objective was to determine if racial/ethnic and sex differences in the use of coronary revascularization persist in a more recent cohort.
Methods:
We examined all 20,604 Medicare beneficiaries admitted for acute coronary syndrome in 2001 from a random sample of 750,000 enrollees that was oversampled for black and Hispanic subjects to assess any cardiac revascularization.
Results:
After controlling for demographics and comorbidities, black men and women (odds ratios [OR] 0.47, 0.40), Hispanic men and women (ORs 0.61, 0.52), and white women (OR 0.67) had lower rates of revascularization compared with white men. Lower revascularization rates persisted for white women (OR 0.67) and black men and women (OR 0.55 and 0.54), controlling for income status and geographic variation, but were no longer present in the Hispanic population.
Conclusion:
The mechanisms by which disparities operate may differ for Hispanic and black populations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CarlisleDM, LeakeBD, ShapiroMF. Racial and ethnic differences in the use of invasive cardiac procedures among cardiac patients in Los Angeles County, 1986 through 1988. Am J Public Health, 1995; 85:352–356.
2.
GilesWH, AndaRF, CasperML, EscobedoLG, TaylorHA. Race and sex differences in rates of invasive cardiac procedures in US hospitals. Data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Arch Intern Med, 1995; 155:318–324.
3.
HannanEL, van RynM, BurkeJet al.Access to coronary artery bypass surgery by race/ethnicity and gender among patients who are appropriate for surgery. Med Care, 1999; 37:68–77.
4.
KudenchukPJ, MaynardC, MartinJS, WirkusM, WeaverWD. Comparison of presentation, treatment, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in men versus women (the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry)Am J Cardiol, 1996; 78:9–14.
5.
KressinNR, PetersenLA. Racial differences in the use of invasive cardiovascular procedures: review of the literature and prescription for future research. Ann Intern Med, 2001; 135:352–366.
6.
HanchateA, KronmanAC, Young-XuY, AshAS, EmanuelEJ. Racial and ethnic differences in end-of-life costs: why do minorities cost more than whites?Arch Intern Med, 2009; 169:1–9.
7.
National Center for Health Statistics. The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), based on the World Health Organization's Ninth Revision, International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9)Atlanta, GA: National Center for Health Statistics.
8.
WennbergJE. The Dartmouth atlas of health care. Hanover, NH: American Hospital Press Inc., 1997.
9.
BealeC.L. Measuring rurality: rural-urban continuum codes. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2002. http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/rurality/RuralUrbCon/. 2010 February 5.
10.
CramP, BaymanL, PopescuIet al.Racial disparities in revascularization rates among patients with similar insurance coverage. J Natl Med Assoc, 2009; 101:1132–1139.
11.
BoehmerU, KressinNR, BerlowitzDR, ChristiansenCL, KazisLE, JonesJA. Self-reported vs administrative race/ethnicity data and study results. Am J Public Health, 2002; 92:1471–1472.
12.
KressinNR, ChangBH, HendricksA, KazisLE. Agreement between administrative data and patients' self-reports of race/ethnicity. Am J Public Health, 2003; 93:1734–1739.
13.
LaiteerapongN, ShermanBJ, KimK, FreundK. Validation of racial and ethnicity categorization in hospital administrative data. J Gen Intern Med, 2005; 20,Suppl. 1:130.
14.
VaccarinoV, RathoreSS, WengerNKet al.Sex and racial differences in the management of acute myocardial infarction, 1994 through 2002. N Engl J Med, 2005; 353:671–682.
15.
MilcentC, DormontB, Durand-ZaleskiI, StegPG. Gender differences in hospital mortality and use of percutaneous coronary interventions in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation, 2007; 115:833–839.
16.
AndersonRD, PepineCJ. Gender differences in the treatment for acute myocardial infarction: bias or biology?Circulation, 2007; 115:823–826.
17.
AndersonJL, AdamsCD, AntmanEM, BridgesCR, CaliffRM, CaseyDEJr., ChaveyWE2nd, FesmireFM, HochmanJS, LevinTN, LincoffAM, PetersonED, TherouxP, WengerNK, WrightRS, SmithSCJr, JacobsAK, HalperinJL, HuntSA, KrumholzHM, KushnerFG, LytleBW, NishimuraR, OrnatoJP, PageRL, RiegelB. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50:e1–e157.
18.
O'DonoghueM, BodenWE, BraunwaldE, CannonCP, ClaytonTC, de WinterRJ, FoxKAA, LagerqvistB, McCulloughPA, MurphySA, SpacekR, SwahnE, WallentinL, WindhausenF, SabatineMS. Early invasive vs conservative treatment strategies in women and men with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. JAMA, 2008; 300:71–80.
19.
BraunwaldE, AntmanEM, BeasleyJW, CaliffRM, CheitlinMD, HochmanJS, JonesRH, KereiakesD, KupersmithJ, LevinTN, PepineCJ, SchaefferJW, SmithEE3rd, StewardDE, TherouxP, GibbonsRJ, AlpertJS, FaxonDP, FusterV, GregoratosG, HiratzkaLF, JacobsAK, SmithSCJr. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction—summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina)J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 40:1366–1374.
20.
O'ConnorGT, QuintonHB, TravenNDet al.Geographic variation in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. JAMA, 1999; 281:627–633.
21.
BirkmeyerJD, SharpSM, FinlaysonSRG, FisherES, WennbergJE. Variation profiles of common surgical procedures. Surgery, 1998; 124:917–923.
22.
StukelTA, LucasFL, WennbergDE. Long-term outcomes of regional variations in intensity of invasive vs medical management of Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction. JAMA, 2005; 293:1329–1337.
23.
BaickerK, ChandraA, SkinnerJS, WennbergJE. Who you are and where you live: how race and geography affect the treatment of Medicare beneficiaries. Health Aff (Millwood), 2004Suppl Web Exclusives: VAR33–44.
24.
BaickerK, ChandraA, SkinnerJS. Geographic variation in health care and the problem of measuring racial disparities. Perspect Biol Med, 2005; 48,1 Suppl:S42–53.
25.
BraunsteinJB, AndersonGF, GerstenblithGet al.Noncardiac comorbidity increases preventable hospitalizations and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 42:1226–1233.
26.
SheiferSE, CanosMR, WeinfurtKPet al.Sex differences in coronary artery size assessed by intravascular ultrasound. Am Heart J, 2000; 139:649–653.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
