Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Purpose:

Women lag behind men in several key academic indicators, such as advancement, retention, and securing leadership positions. Although reasons for these disparities are multifactorial, policies that do not support work-life integration contribute to the problem. The objective of this descriptive study was to compare the faculty work-life policies among medical schools in the Big Ten conference.

Methods:

Each institution's website was accessed in order to assess its work-life policies in the following areas: maternity leave, paternity leave, adoption leave, extension of probationary period, part-time appointments, part-time benefits (specifically health insurance), child care options, and lactation policy. Institutions were sent requests to validate the online data and supply additional information if needed.

Results:

Each institution received an overall score and subscale scores for family leave policies and part-time issues. Data were verified by the human resources office at 8 of the 10 schools. Work-life policies varied among Big Ten schools, with total scores between 9.25 and 13.5 (possible score: 0–21; higher scores indicate greater flexibility). Subscores were not consistently high or low within schools.

Conclusions:

Comparing the flexibility of faculty work-life policies in relation to other schools will help raise awareness of these issues and promote more progressive policies among less progressive schools. Ultimately, flexible policies will lead to greater equity and institutional cultures that are conducive to recruiting, retaining, and advancing diverse faculty.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Association of American Medical Colleges. Women in U.S. Academic Medicine. Statistics and benchmarking report 2008–2009, 2009.

Valian

. Why so slow. The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.

Wenneras

, Wold

. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Science, 1997; 387:341–343.

Trix

, Psenka

. Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse Society, 2003; 14:191–220.

Ash

, Carr

, Goldstein

, Friedman

. Compensation and advancement of women in academic medicine: Is there equity? Ann Intern Med, 2004; 141:205–212.

Bickel

, Wara

, Atkinson

et al. Increasing women's leadership in academic medicine: Report of the AAMC Project Implementation Committee. Acad Med 2002, 2002; 77:1043–1061.

Jagsi

, Guaneial

, Worobey

et al. The “gender gap” in authorship of academic medical literature - A 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med, 2006; 355:281–287.

Jagsi

, Motomura

, Griffith

, Rangarajan

, Ubel

. Sex differences in attainment of independent funding by career development awardees. Ann Intern Med, 151:804–811.

Shollen

, Bland

, Finstad

, Taylor

. Organizational climate and family life: How these factors affect the status of women faculty at one medical school. Acad Med, 2009; 84:87–94.

10.

Carr

, Ash

, Friedman

et al. Relation of family responsibilities and gender to productivity and career satisfaction of medical faculty. Ann Intern Med, 1998; 129:532–538.

11.

Mason

, Goulden

. Do babies matter (Part II)? Closing the baby gap. Academe, 2004; 90:10–15.

12.

National Academy of Sciences. Beyond bias and barriers. Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006.

13.

Bickel

, Brown

. Generation X: Implications for faculty recruitment and development in academic health centers. Acad Med, 2005; 80:205–210.

14.

McCracken

. Winning the talent war for women. Harvard Business Rev, 2000; 78:159–167.

15.

American Council on Education. An agenda for excellence. Creating flexibility in tenure track faculty careers, 2005.

16.

Lester

, Sallee

. Establishing the family-friendly campus. Models for effective practice. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, 2009.

17.

Bristol

, Abbuhl

, Cappola

, Sonnad

. Work-life policies for faculty at the top ten medical schools. J Womens Health, 2008; 17:1311–1320.

18.

Big Ten Conference. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten. 2010 August 9.

19.

The College Sustainability Report Card. 2010. www.greenreportcard.org/report-card-2010. 2010 January 6.

20.

Lancaster

, Stillman

. When generations collide. New York: HarperCollins, 2002.

21.

Bickel

, Brown

. Generation X: Implications for faculty recruitment and development in academic health centers. Acad Med, 2005; 80:205–210.

22.

Linzer

, Warde

, Alexander

et al. Part-time careers in academic internal medicine: A report from the Association of Specialty Professors Part-Time Careers Task Force on behalf of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine. Acad Med, 2009; 84:1395–1400.

23.

Mechaber

, Levine

, Manwell

et al. Part-time physicians…prevalent, connected, and satisfied. J Gen Intern Med, 2008; 23:300–303.

24.

Benko

, Weisberg

. Mass career customization. Aligning the workplace with today's nontraditional workforce. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2007.

25.

Adams

. Making a female-friendly workplace. Forbes Magazine, April 16, 2010.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.13 MB

Flexibility in Faculty Work-Life Policies at Medical Schools in the Big Ten Conference

Abstract

Purpose:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material