The method by which breast cancer is detected becomes a factor for long-term survival and should be considered in treatment plans. This report describes patient characteristics and time trends for various methods of breast cancer detection in the United States.
Methods:
The 2003 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a nationally representative self-report health survey, included 361 women survivors diagnosed with breast cancer between 1980 and 2003. Responses to the question, How was your breast cancer found? were categorized as accident, self-examination, physician during routine breast examination, mammogram, and other. We examined responses by income, race, age, and year of diagnosis.
Results:
Most women survivors (57%) reported a detection method other than mammographic examination. Women often detected breast cancers themselves, either by self-examination (25%) or by accident (18%).
Conclusions:
Despite increased use of screening mammography, a large percentage of breast cancers are detected by the patients themselves. Patient-noted breast abnormalities should be carefully evaluated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
McPhersonCP, SwensonKK, JolitzG, MurrayCL. Survival of women ages 40–49 years with breast carcinoma according to method of detection. Cancer, 1997; 79:1923–1932.
2.
ShenY, YangY, InoueLY, MunsellMF, MillerAB, BerryDA. Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: Analysis of randomized screening trials. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2005; 97:1195–1203.
3.
BerryDA, CroninKA, PlevritisSKet al.Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 2005; 353:1784–1792.
4.
National Cancer Institute. Cancer trends progress report—2005 update. 2005.
5.
CoatesRJ, UhlerRJ, BroganDJet al.Patterns and predictors of the breast cancer detection methods in women under 45 years of age (United States)Cancer Causes Control, 2001; 12:431–442.
6.
NewcomerLM, NewcombPA, Trentham-DietzAet al.Detection method and breast carcinoma histology. Cancer, 2002; 95:470–477.
7.
ReevesMJ, NewcombPA, RemingtonPL, MarcusPM. Determinants of breast cancer detection among Wisconsin (United States) women, 1988–90. Cancer Causes Control, 1995; 6:103–111.
8.
BreenN, YabroffKR, MeissnerHI. What proportion of breast cancers are detected by mammography in the United States?Cancer Detect Prev, 2007; 31:220–224.
9.
RosenbergA, BurkeL, VosP, LilesD. Self-exam is the most common method of breast cancer identification. J Clin Oncol, 2007ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (post-meeting edition). 25,18S:1543.
10.
BakerL. Breast cancer detection demonstration project: Five-year summary report. Cancer J Clin, 1982; 32:194–225.
11.
BeahrsO, ShapiroS, SmartC, McDivittR. Report of the Working Group to Review the National Cancer Institute-American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Projects. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1979; 62:639–709.
12.
ShapiroS. Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial. Cancer, 1977; 39,Suppl 6:2772–2782.
13.
NemotoT, NatarajanN, SmartCR, MettlinC, MurphyGP. Patterns of breast cancer detection in the United States. J Surg Oncol, 1982; 21:183–188.
14.
JoensuuH, LehtimakiT, HolliKet al.Risk for distant recurrence of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods. JAMA, 2004; 292:1064–1073.
15.
Centers for Disease Control National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey (NHIS): Questionnaires, datasets, and related documentation 1997–2007. www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm. 2010January.
16.
SchillerJS, AdamsPF, NelsonZC. Summary health statistics for the U.S. population: National Health Interview Survey, 2003. Vital Health Stat, 2005; 10:1–104.
ConwayBJ, SuleimanOH, RueterFG, AntonsenRG, SlaytonRJ. National survey of mammographic facilities in 1985, 1988, and 1992. Radiology, 1994; 191:323–330.
19.
FintorL, BrownM, FischerRet al.The impact of mammography quality improvement legislation in Michigan: Implications for the National Mammography Quality Standards Act. Am J Public Health, 1998; 88:667–671.
20.
CroninKA, YuB, KrapchoMet al.Modeling the dissemination of mammography in the United States. Cancer Causes Control, 2005; 16:701–712.
21.
HiattRA, KlabundeC, BreenN, SwanJ, Ballard-BarbashR. Cancer screening practices from National Health Interview Surveys: Past, present, and future. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2002; 94:1837–1846.
22.
ThindA, DiamantA, HoqL, MalyR. Method of detection of breast cancer in low-income women. J Womens Health, 2009; 18:1807–1811.
23.
HakamaM, PukkalaE, HeikkilaM, KallioM. Effectiveness of the public health policy for breast cancer screening in Finland: Population based cohort study. BMJ, 1997; 314:864–867.
24.
MaunsellE, DroletM, OuhoummaneN, RobertJ. Breast cancer survivors accurately reported key treatment and prognostic characteristics. J Clin Epidemiol, 2005; 58:364–369.
25.
PhillipsKA, MilneRL, BuysSet al.Agreement between self-reported breast cancer treatment and medical records in a population-based Breast Cancer Family Registry. J Clin Oncol, 2005; 23:4679–4686.
26.
SchootmanM, JeffeDB, WestMM, AftR. Self-report by elderly breast cancer patients was an acceptable alternative to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) abstract data. J Clin Epidemiol, 2005; 58:1316–1319.
27.
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med, 2009; 151:716–726.
