Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2011-04
Racial and Ethnic Patterns of Allostatic Load Among Adult Women in the United States: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2004
This study provides a descriptive sociodemographic profile of allostatic load (AL) among adult women of all age groups, focusing on how age patterns of AL vary across racial/ethnic groups. Allostatic load, an index of cumulative physiological dysregulation, captures how the cumulative impact of physiological stress responses from person-environment interactions causes wear and tear on the body's regulatory systems, which in turn can lead to disease outcomes and health disparities.
Methods:
Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2004, this study examines AL in a nationally representative sample of women ≥18 years of age (n=5765). Measures of AL using 10 biomarkers representing cardiovascular, inflammatory, and metabolic system functioning were created. Multivariate negative binomial regression models were used, and predicted AL scores were computed.
Results:
Black women had the highest predicted AL scores relative to other racial/ethnic groups, and a marked black/white gap in AL persisted across all age groups. Age by race/ethnicity interaction terms revealed significant racial/ethnic differences in AL patterns across age groups. Black women 40–49 years old had AL scores 1.14 times higher than white women 50–59 years old, suggesting earlier health deterioration. Mexican women not born in the United States had lower predicted AL scores than those born in the United States.
Conclusions:
This study provides one of the first descriptive profiles of AL among a nationally representative sample of adult women in the United States and presents racial/ethnic trends in AL across age groups that are useful for identifying demographically and clinically important subgroups at risk of having high cumulative physiological dysregulation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
TaylorSE, RepettiRL, SeemanT. Health psychology: What is an unhealthy environment and how does it get under the skin?Annu Rev Psychol, 1997; 48:411–447.
2.
AdlerNE, RehkopfDH. U.S disparities in health: Descriptions, causes, and mechanisms. Annu Rev Public Health, 2008; 29:235–252.
3.
LinkBG, PhelanJ. Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. J Health Soc Behav, 1995; 35:80–94.
4.
CrimminsEM, SeemanTE. Integrating biology into the study of health disparities. Popul Dev Rev, 2004; 30:89–107.
5.
SingerB, RyffCD, SeemanTE. Operationalizing allostatic load. SchulkinJ. Protective and damaging effects of the mediators of stress and adaptation: Allostasis and allostatic load. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
6.
McEwenBS. The end of stress as we know it. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press, 2002.
7.
McEwenBS. Protective and damaging effects of the mediators of stress and adaptation: Allostasis and allostatic load. SchulkinJ. Allostasis, homeostasis, and the costs of phyisiological adaptation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
8.
SeemanTE, CrimminsE, HuangMHet al.Cumulative biological risk and socioeconomic differences in mortality: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Soc Sci Med, 2004; 58:1985–1997.
9.
SeemanTE, McEwenBS, RoweJW, SingerBH. Allostatic load as a marker of cumulative biological risk: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001; 98:4770–4775.
10.
SeemanTE, SingerBH, RoweJW, HorwitzRI, McEwenBS. Price of adaptation—Allostatic load and its health consequences. MacArthur studies of successful aging. Arch Intern Med, 1997; 157:2259–2268.
11.
McEwenBS. Stress, adaptation, and disease. Allostasis and allostatic load. Ann NY Acad Sci, 1998; 840:33–44.
12.
CohenS, KesslerRC, GordonLU. Strategies for measuring stress in studies of psychiatric and physical disorders. CohenS, KesslerRC, GordonLU. Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995; 3–26.
13.
McEwenBS, SeemanT. Protective and damaging effects of mediators of stress. Elaborating and testing the concepts of allostasis and allostatic load. Ann NY Acad Sci, 1999; 896:30–47.
14.
McEwenBS, StellarE. Stress and the individual. Mechanisms leading to disease. Arch Intern Med, 1993; 153:2093–2101.
15.
SeplakiCL, GoldmanN, WeinsteinM, LinYH. How are biomarkers related to physical and mental well-being?J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2004; 59:201–217.
16.
KarlamanglaAS, SingerBH, McEwenBS, RoweJW, SeemanTE. Allostatic load as a predictor of functional decline. MacArthur studies of successful aging. J Clin Epidemiol, 2002; 55:696–710.
17.
KarlamanglaAS, SingerBH, SeemanTE. Reduction in allostatic load in older adults is associated with lower all-cause mortality risk: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Psychosom Med, 2006; 68:500–507.
18.
MatteiJ, DemissieS, FalconLM, OrdovasJM, TuckerK. Allostatic load is associated with chronic conditions in the Boston Puerto Rican Health Study. Soc Sci Med, 2010; 70:1988–1996.
19.
SabbahW, WattRG, SheihamA, TsakosG. Effects of allostatic load on the social gradient in ischemic heart disease and periodontal disease: Evidence from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Epidemiol Community Health, 2008; 62:415–420.
20.
CrimminsEM, JohnstonM, HaywardM, SeemanTE. Age differences in allostatic load: An index of physiological dysregulation. Exp Gerontol, 2003; 38:731–734.
21.
CarlsonED, ChamberlainRM. Allostatic load and health disparities: A theoretical orientation. Res Nurs Health, 2005; 28:306–315.
22.
GeronimusAT, HickenM, KeeneD, BoundJ. “Weathering” and age patterns of allostatic load scores among blacks and whites in the United States. Am J Public Health, 2006; 96:826–833.
23.
KaestnerR, PearsonJA, KeeneD, GeronimusAT. Stress, allostatic load, and the health of Mexican immigrants. Soc Sci Q, 2009; 90:1090–1111.
24.
PeekMK, CutchinMP, SalinasJJet al.Allostatic load among non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and people of Mexican origin: Effects of ethnicity, nativity, and acculturation. Am J Public Health, 2009; 99:1–12.
25.
CrimminsEM, KimJK, AlleyDE, KarlamanglaA, SeemanT. Hispanic paradox in biological risk profiles. Am J Public Health, 2007; 97:1305–1310.
26.
BirdCE, SeemanTE, EscarceJJet al.Neighbourhood socioeconomic status and biological “wear and tear” in a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults. J Epidemiol Community Health, 2010; 64:860–865.
27.
SeemanTE, MerkinSS, CrimminsEM, KoretzB, CharetteS, KarlamanglaA. Education, income and ethnic differences in cumulative biological risk profiles in a national sample of U.S. adults: NHANES III (1988–1994)Soc Sci Med, 2008; 66:72–87.
28.
KinnunenML, KaprioJ, PulkkinenL. Allostatic load of men and women in early middle age. J Individual Differences, 2005; 26:20–28.
29.
SeplakiCL, GoldmanN, WeinsteinM, LinYH. Measurement of cumulative physiological dysregulation in an older population. Demography, 2006; 43:165–183.
30.
GoldmanN, WeinsteinM, CornmanJ, SingerB, SeemanT, ChangMC. Sex differentials in biological risk factors for chronic disease: Estimates from population-based surveys. J Womens Health, 2004; 13:393–403.
31.
BertraisS, BalkauB, VolSet al.Relationships between abdominal body fat distribution and cardiovascular risk factors: An explanation for women's healthier cardiovascular risk profile. The D.E.S.I.R. Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 1999; 23:1085–1094.
32.
BushTL, FriedLP, Barrett-ConnorE. Cholesterol, lipoproteins, and coronary heart disease in women. Clin Chem, 1988; 34:B60–70.
33.
HayesSN, TalerSJ. Hypertension in women: Current understanding of gender differences. Mayo Clin Proc, 1998; 73:157–165.
34.
StoneyCM, MatthewsKA, McDonaldRH, JohnsonCA. Sex differences in lipid, lipoprotein, cardiovascular, and neuroendocrine responses to acute stress. Psychophysiology, 1988; 25:654–656.
35.
AlleyDE, SeemanTE, KimJK, KarlamanglaA, HuP, CrimminsEM. Socioeconomic status and C-reactive protein levels in the U.S. population: NHANES IV. Brain Behav Immun, 2006; 20:298–504.
36.
KudielkaBM, KirschbaumC. Sex differences in HPA axis responses to stress: A review. Biol Psychol, 2005; 69:113–132.
37.
YoungDG, SkibinskiG, MasonJI, JamesK. The influence of age and gender on serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEA-S), IL-6, IL-6 soluble receptor (IL-6 sR) and transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-beta1) levels in normal healthy blood donors. Clin Exp Immunol, 1999; 117:476–481.
38.
CrewsDE. Biocultural influences on variations in allostatic load across populations. Am J Hum Biol, 2003; 15:257–258.
39.
StewartJA. The detrimental effects of allostasis: Allostatic load as a measure of cumulative stress. J Physiol Anthropol, 2006; 25:133–145.
40.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Content. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1999–2004; 2007.
41.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). NHANES response rates and CPS totals. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1999–2004; 2007.
42.
PalatainiP. Need for a revision of the normal limits of resting heart rate. Hypertension, 1999; 33:622–625.
43.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Expert Panel on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: The evidence report. Obes Res, 1998; 6:51S–209S.
44.
Executive summary of the third report on the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP). Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. JAMA, 2001; 285:2486–2497.
45.
Executive summary. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2009. Current criteria for diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2009; 32:S6–S12.
46.
CarreteroOA, OparilS. Essential hypertension: Part I: Definition and etiology. Circulation, 2000; 101:329–335.
47.
FordES, GilesWH, MokdadAH, MyersGL. Distribution and correlates of C-reactive protein concentrations among adult U.S. women. Clin Chem, 2004; 50:574–581.
48.
VincentJL. Relevance of albumin in modern critical care medicine. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2009; 23:183–191.
49.
MoscaL, AppelLJ, BenjaminEJet al.American Heart Association scientific statement: Evidence-based guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in women. Circulation, 2004; 109:672–693.
50.
ChobanianAV, BakrisGL, BlackHRet al.Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension, 2003; 42:1206–1252.
51.
SeemanTE, SingerBH, RyffCD, Dienberg LoveG, Levy-StormsL. Social relationships, gender, and allostatic load across two age cohorts. Psychosom Med, 2002; 64:395–406.
52.
LaVeistT. Disentangling race and socioeconomic status: A key to understanding health inequalities. J Urban Health Bull NY Acad Med, 2005; 82:iii26–iii32.
53.
WilliamsDR, CollinsC. U.S. socioeconomic and racial differences in health: Patterns and explanations. Annu Rev Sociol, 1995; 21:349–386.
54.
CameronAC, TrivediPK. Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
55.
LongJS, FreeseJ. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press, 2001.
56.
WinkelmannR. Econometric analysis of count data, 5th. NewYork: Springer-Verlag, 2008.
57.
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 10. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, 2007.
58.
GeronimusAT. The weathering hypothesis and the health of African-American women and infants: Evidence and speculations. Ethn Dis, 1992; 2:207–221.
59.
GeronimusAT. Teenage childbearing and social disadvantage: Unprotected discourse. Fam Relations, 1992; 41:244–248.
60.
GeronimusAT. Black/white differences in the relationship of maternal age to birthweight: A population-based test of the weathering hypothesis. Soc Sci Med, 1996; 42:589–597.
61.
GeronimusAT, BoundJ, WaidmannTA, ColenCG, SteffickD. Inequality in life expectancy, functional status, and active life expectancy across selected black and white populations in the United States. Demography, 2001; 38:227–251.
62.
CrimminsEM, SoldoBJ, KimJK, AlleyDE. Using anthropometric indicators for Mexicans in the United States and Mexico to understand the selection of migrants and the “Hispanic paradox.”Soc Biol, 2005; 52:164–177.
McDadeTW. Challenges and opportunities for integrative health research in the context of culture: A commentary on Gersten. Soc Sci Med, 2008; 66:520–524.
