Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

As gender is known to be a major determinant of health, monitoring gender equity in health systems remains a vital public health priority. Focusing on a low-income (Peru), middle-income (Colombia), and high-income (Canada) country in the Americas, this study aimed to (1) identify and select gender-sensitive health indicators and (2) assess the feasibility of measuring and comparing gender-sensitive health indicators among countries.

Methods:

Gender-sensitive health indicators were selected by a multidisciplinary group of experts from each country. The most recent gender-sensitive health measures corresponding to selected indicators were identified through electronic databases (CINAHL, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, LIPECS, Latindex, and BIREME) and expert consultation. Data from population-based studies were analyzed when indicator information was unavailable from reports.

Results:

Twelve of the 17 selected gender-sensitive health indicators were feasible to measure in at least two countries, and 9 of these were comparable among all countries. Indicators that were available were not stratified or adjusted by age, education, marital status, or wealth. The largest between-country difference was maternal mortality, and the largest gender inequity was mortality from homicides.

Conclusions:

This study shows that gender inequities in health exist in all countries, regardless of income level. Economic development seemed to confer advantages in the availability of such indicators; however, this finding was not consistent and needs to be further explored. Future initiatives should include identifying health system factors and risk factors associated with disparities as well as assessing the cost-effectiveness of including the routine monitoring of gender inequities in health.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beck

. Using gender-sensitive indicators: A reference manual for governments and other stakeholders. London: Commonwealth Secretariat, 1999. www.thecommonwealth.org/shared_asp_files/uploadedfiles/%7BD30AA2D0-B43E-405A-B2F0-BD270BCEFBA3%7D_ugsi_ref.pdf. 2009 December 9.

Phillips

. Defining and measuring gender: A social determinant of health whose time has come. Int J Equity Health, 2005; 4:11.

Marmot

, Ryff

, Bumpass

, Shipley

, Marks

. Social inequalities in health: Next questions and converging evidence. Soc Sci Med, 1997; 44:901–910.

Colman

. A profile of women's health indicators in Canada. Ottawa, Canada: Health Canada, 2003. www.gpiatlantic.org/pdf/health/womens/whbreport.pdf. 2009 December 9.

Braveman

, Gruskin

. Defining equity in health. J Epidemiol Community Health, 2003; 57:254–258.

Braveman

, Tarimo

. Social inequalities in health within countries: Not only an issue for affluent nations. Soc Sci Med, 2002; 54:1621–1635.

Sen

, Ostlin

. Gender inequity in health: Why it exists and how we can change it. Glob Public Health, 2008; 3,Suppl 1:1.

Anderson

, Newman

. Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Q, 2005; 83. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00428.x

Doyal

. Gender equity in health: Debates and dilemmas. Soc Sci Med, 2000; 51:931–939.

10.

Doyal

. Sex, gender, and health: The need for a new approach. BMJ, 2001; 323:1061–1063.

11.

Doyal

. Sex and gender: The challenges for epidemiologists. Int J Health Serv, 2003; 33:569–579.

12.

Kessler

. Epidemiology of women and depression. J Affect Disord, 2003; 74:5–13.

13.

Case

, Paxson

. Sex differences in morbidity and mortality. Demography, 2005; 42:189–214.

14.

Garcia-Moreno

, Jansen

, Ellsberg

, Heise

, Watts

. WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women Study Team. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from the WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence. Lancet, 2006; 368:1260–1269.

15.

Garcia-Moreno

, Heise

, Jansen

, Ellsberg

, Watts

. Public health. Violence against women. Science, 2005; 310:1282–1283.

16.

Garcia-Moreno

. Dilemmas and opportunities for an appropriate health-service response to violence against women. Lancet, 2002; 359:1509–1514.

17.

Moss

. Gender equity and socioeconomic inequality: A framework for the patterning of women's health. Soc Sci Med, 2002; 54:649–661.

18.

Theobald

, Tolhurst

, Elsey

, Standing

. Engendering the bureaucracy? Challenges and opportunities for mainstreaming gender in ministries of health under sector-wide approaches. Health Policy Plan, 2005; 20:141–149.

19.

Pan-American Health Organization. Gender, health, and development in the Americas: Basic indicators 2005. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization, 2005. www.paho.org/English/AD/GE/GenderBrochure05.pdf. 2009 December 9.

20.

Pan American Health Organization. Health indicators: Building blocks for health situation analysis. Epidemiol Bull, 2001; 22:1–5.

21.

Arah

, Klazinga

, Delnoij

, ten Asbroek

, Custers

. Conceptual frameworks for health systems performance: A quest for effectiveness, quality, and improvement. Int J Qual Health Care, 2003; 15:377–398.

22.

Davis

. Measuring the performance of public health agencies. Government, like doctors and hospitals, should meet quality standards. BMJ, 1999; 318:889–890.

23.

Lin

, L'Orange

, Silburn

. Gender-sensitive indicators: Uses and relevance. Int J Public Health, 2007; 52:S27–S34.

24.

Lin

, Gruszin

, Ellickson

et al. Comparative evaluation of indicators for gender equity and health. Int J Public Health, 2007; 52,Suppl 1:S19–26.

25.

Braveman

. Monitoring equity in health and healthcare: A conceptual framework. J Health Popul Nutr, 2003; 21:181–192.

26.

World Health Organization Centre for Health Development Proceedings of the Fourth International Meeting on Women and Health: Gender perspective for better health and welfare systems development, Kobe, Japan. WHO Kobe Centre, 2004. www.who.or.jp/library/0370 p.pdf. 2009 December 5.

27.

Pan-American Health Organization. Basic indicators for gender equity analysis in health. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization, 2005. www.bvsde.paho.org/bvsacd/cd20/basicindicators.pdf. 2009 December 5.

28.

Lin

, Gruszin

, Ellickson

et al. Comparative evaluation of indicators for gender equity and health. Kobe, Japan: World Health Organization Centre for Health Development, 2003. www.who.or.jp/library/tf1_report.pdf. 2009 December 4.

29.

Hiltz

, Cleroux

. SLID labour interview questionnaire and income dynamics: Income research paper series. Ottawa, Canada: Ministry of Industry, Statistics Canada, 2004Report nr 75F0002MIE, No. 007.

30.

Beland

. Canadian community health survey—Methodological overview. Health Rep, 2002; 13:9–14.

31.

Garfield

, Llanten Morales

. The public health context of violence in Colombia. Rev Panam Salud Publica, 2004; 16:266–271.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.10 MB

Monitoring Gender Equity in Health Using Gender-Sensitive Indicators: A Cross-National Study

Abstract

Background:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material