Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the short-term morbidity of incidental hysterectomy at the time of adnexectomy for benign adnexal disease outweighs the theoretical benefits of the procedure. Design: Retrospective observational. Patients: The medical records of 100 patients who underwent adnexectomy plus incidental hysterectomy for benign adnexal disease were compared to the records of 100 ageand risk-matched women who underwent adnexectomy without incidental hysterectomy for the same indication. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Short-term morbidity and hospital stay. Results: A significant increase was noted for total morbidity (p <.0001), estimated blood loss (p <.00001), and hospital stay (p <.0001) in patients who had incidental hysterectomy performed as compared with patients who had adnexectomies only. Conclusions: Although potential benefit has been claimed for routine removal of a normal uterus in this setting, no prospective studies have been performed to verify this assertion. These data suggest that until the long-term benefit of this practice is demonstrated, the increased short-term risk and expense associated with incidental hysterectomy argue against its performance at the time of laparotomy for benign adnexal disease.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
