Restricted accessBrief reportFirst published online 2025-07
Variability of the Analgesia Nociception Index During Painful Procedures in Noncommunicative Patients at the End of Life: A Prospective,Observational Pilot Study
Monitoring parasympathetic activity by the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) is reliable for assessing nociception during general anesthesia or in sedated critically ill patients. The aim of our study is to evaluate the variability of the ANI during painful procedures in noncommunicative patients at the end of life (EOL).
Methods:
This study was a blinded, prospective, observational study. Consecutive noncommunicative EOL patients were recruited from the palliative care unit. The minimum ANI score and the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) scale were collected before, during, and after a painful procedure.
Results:
Twenty patients were included; five were sedated. We found that ANI scores decreased significantly (p < 0.001) and CPOT scores increased (p = 0.006) during painful procedures. ANI changed more frequently than CPOT. There was no correlation between ANI and CPOT scores.
Conclusion:
In this preliminary study, we found that the ANI was effective in detecting discomfort during painful procedures at the EOL.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrinkkemperT, van NorelAM, SzadekKM, et al.The use of observational scales to monitor symptom control and depth of sedation in patients requiring palliative sedation: A systematic review. Palliat Med, 2013; 27(1):54–67; doi: 10.1177/0269216311425421
2.
DeschepperR, BilsenJ, LaureysS. Assessment of patient comfort during palliative sedation: Is it always reliable? In: Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2014. (VincentJ-L. ed) Springer International Publishing: Cham; 2014; pp. 663–675; doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-03746-2_49
3.
ImaiK, MoritaT, YokomichiN, et al.Association of the RASS score with intensity of symptoms, discomfort, and communication capacity in terminally Ill cancer patients receiving palliative sedation: Is RASS an appropriate outcome measure? Palliat Med Rep, 2022; 3(1):47–54; doi: 10.1089/pmr.2021.0087
4.
TappD, ChenacherS, GérardNPA, et al.Observational pain assessment instruments for use with nonverbal patients at the end-of-life: A systematic review. J Palliat Care, 2019; 34(4):255–266; doi: 10.1177/0825859718816073
5.
ChernyNI, RadbruchL, Board of the European Association for Palliative Care. European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework for the use of sedation in palliative care. Palliat Med, 2009; 23(7):581–593; doi: 10.1177/0269216309107024
6.
SixS, BilsenJ, LaureysS, et al.A reflection on using observational measures for the assessment and/or monitoring of level of consciousness in palliatively sedated patients. J Palliat Med, 2020; 23(4):442–443; doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0574
7.
WestN, McBethPB, BrodieSM, et al.Feasibility of continuous sedation monitoring in critically ill intensive care unit patients using the NeuroSENSE WAVCNS index. J Clin Monit Comput, 2018; 32(6):1081–1091; doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0115-6
8.
LedowskiT. Objective monitoring of nociception: A review of current commercial solutions. Br J Anaesth, 2019; 123(2):e312–e321; doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.024
9.
AslanidisT, GrosomanidisV, KarakoulasK, et al.Electrodermal activity monitoring during painful stimulation in sedated adult intensive care unit patients: A pilot study. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove), 2018; 61(2):47–52; doi: 10.14712/18059694.2018.50
10.
LogierR, JeanneM, De JonckheereJ, et al.PhysioDoloris: A monitoring device for analgesia/nociception balance evaluation using heart rate variability analysis. In: 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology IEEE: Buenos Aires; 2010; pp. 1194–1197; doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5625971
11.
JeanneM, DelecroixM, De JonckheereJ, et al.Variations of the analgesia nociception index during propofol anesthesia for total knee replacement. Clin J Pain, 2014; 30(12):1084–1088; doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000083
12.
FunckeS, SauerlaenderS, PinnschmidtHO, et al.Validation of innovative techniques for monitoring nociception during general anesthesia. Anesthesiology, 2017; 127(2):272–283; doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001670
13.
Broucqsault-DédrieC, De JonckheereJ, JeanneM, et al.Measurement of heart rate variability to assess pain in sedated critically Ill patients: A prospective observational study. Gemma M. ed. PLoS One, 2016; 11(1):e0147720; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147720
14.
De JonckheereJ, RommelD, NandrinoJ, et al.Heart Rate Variability Analysis as an Index of Emotion Regulation Processes: Interest of the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI). In: 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE: San Diego, CA; 2012; pp. 3432–3435; doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346703
15.
De JonckheereJ, LogierR, JounwazR, et al.From pain to stress evaluation using heart rate variability analysis: Development of an evaluation platform. In: 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology IEEE: Buenos Aires; 2010; pp. 3852–3855; doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627661
16.
BauschertL, Prod’hommeC, PierratM, et al.End-of-life comfort evaluation, is clinic enough? a retrospective cohort study of combined comfort evaluation with analgesia/nociception index and clinic in non-communicative patients. J Palliat Care, 2024; 39(2):122–128; doi: 10.1177/08258597211063687
17.
SixS, Van OvermeireR, BilsenJ, et al.Attitudes of professional caregivers and family members regarding the use of monitoring devices to improve assessments of pain and discomfort during continuous sedation until death. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2020; 60(2):390–399; doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.02.015
18.
Dieudonné RahmN, MorawskaG, PautexS, et al.Monitoring nociception and awareness during palliative sedation: A systematic review. Palliat Med, 2021; 35(8):1407–1420; doi: 10.1177/02692163211022943
19.
XuJ, SmalingHJA, SchoonesJW, et al.Noninvasive monitoring technologies to identify discomfort and distressing symptoms in persons with limited communication at the end of life: A scoping review. BMC Palliat Care, 2024; 23(1):78; doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01371-0
20.
FedeleS, StrasserS, RoulinM-J. Validation of the critical care pain observational tool in palliative care. Pain Manag Nurs, 2020; 21(4):360–364; doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2019.12.003
21.
GélinasC, FillionL, PuntilloKA, et al.Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool in adult patients. Am J Crit Care Off Publ Am Assoc Crit-Care Nurses, 2006; 15(4):420–427.
22.
BoselliE, BouvetL, BégouG, et al.Prediction of immediate postoperative pain using the analgesia/nociception index: A prospective observational study. Br J Anaesth, 2014; 112(4):715–721; doi: 10.1093/bja/aet407
23.
Julien-MarsollierF, RachdiK, CaballeroM-J, et al.Evaluation of the analgesia nociception index for monitoring intraoperative analgesia in children. Br J Anaesth, 2018; 121(2):462–468; doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.034
24.
Le GuenM, JeanneM, SievertK, et al.The analgesia nociception index: A pilot study to evaluation of a new pain parameter during labor. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2012; 21(2):146–151; doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.01.001
25.
RecherM, BoukhrisMR, JeanneM, et al.The newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation in pediatric and neonatology: A literature review. J Clin Monit Comput, 2021; 35(5):959–966; doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00670-8
26.
ChanquesG, TarriT, RideA, et al.Analgesia nociception index for the assessment of pain in critically ill patients: A diagnostic accuracy study. Br J Anaesth, 2017; 119(4):812–820; doi: 10.1093/bja/aex210
27.
SixS, LaureysS, PoelaertJ, et al.Neurophysiological assessments during continuous sedation until death put validity of observational assessments into question: A prospective observational study. Pain Ther, 2021; 10(1):377–390; doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00214-z
