Abstract
Background:
Despite long-standing recognition that providers should discuss DNR (do-not-resuscitate) orders prior to surgery, there is evidence that perioperative code status discussions are frequently of limited quality. Limited attention has been paid to patient perspectives.
Objective:
Determine the scope of literature on management of perioperative DNR orders from the patient perspective.
Design:
Systematic search of Embase, OVID, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL.
Results:
We identified over 2700 records, of which only three explored surgical patients' perspectives regarding code status discussions. We highlight themes, analyze limitations of existing evidence, and outline implications for future research.
Conclusions:
There has been relatively little attention to the patient's perspective, preferences, and expectations regarding perioperative code status decisions. Careful investigation is necessary to inform patient-centerted approaches to communication and decision making regarding perioperative use of life-sustaining therapies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
