The objective of this study was to examine the association between portal use and end-of-life (EOL) outcomes in the last year of life.
Methods:
A retrospective cohort (n = 6,517) study at Kaiser Permanente Colorado among adults with serious illness deceased between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2019. Portal use was categorized into engagement types: no use, nonactive, active without a provider, and active with a provider. EOL outcomes were hospitalizations in the month before death, last-year advance directive completion, and hospice use. Association between EOL outcomes and levels of portal use was assessed using χ2 statistics and generalized linear models.
Results:
Higher portal engagement types were associated with higher rates of hospitalizations (p = 0.0492), advance directive completion (p = 0.0226), and hospice use (p = 0.0070).
Conclusion:
Portal use in the last year of life was associated with increases in a poor EOL outcome, hospitalizations, and beneficial EOL outcomes, advance directives, and hospice care.
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC): What is Health IT? 2023; Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-patient-portal [Last accessed: September30, 2023].
3.
Dickman PortzJ, PowersJD, CasillasA, et al.Characteristics of patients and proxy caregivers using patient portals in the setting of serious illness and end of life. J Palliat Med, 2021; 24(11):1697–1704.
4.
DendereR, SladeC, Burton-JonesA, et al.Patient portals facilitating engagement with inpatient electronic medical records: A systematic review. J Med Internet Res, 2019; 21(4):e12779.
5.
CariniE, VillaniL, PezzulloAM, et al.The impact of digital patient portals on health outcomes, system efficiency, and patient attitudes: Updated systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res, 2021; 23(9):e26189.
6.
AntonioMG, PetrovskayaO, LauF. The state of evidence in patient portals: Umbrella review. J Med Internet Res, 2020; 22(11):e23851.
7.
PortzJD, PowersJD, BaldwinM, et al.Patient portal use near the end-of-life. J Gen Intern Med, 2021.
8.
ChenC, GarridoT, ChockD, et al.The Kaiser Permanente electronic health record: Transforming and streamlining modalities of care. Health Aff (Millwood), 2009; 28(2):323–333.
9.
ZhouYY, GarridoT, ChinHL, et al.Patient access to an electronic health record with secure messaging: Impact on primary care utilization. Am J Manag Care, 2007; 13(7):418–424.
10.
PalenTE, RossC, PowersJD, et al.Association of online patient access to clinicians and medical records with use of clinical services. JAMA, 2012; 308(19):2012–2019.
11.
GriffinA, SkinnerA, ThornhillJ, et al.Patient portals: Who uses them? What features do they use? And do they reduce hospital readmissions? Appl Clin Inform, 2016; 7(2):489–501.
12.
SinhaS, GarrigaM, NaikN, et al.Disparities in electronic health record patient portal enrollment among oncology patients. JAMA Oncol, 2021; 7(6):935–937.
13.
PhoK, LuR, GatesS, et al.Characteristics of patients using patient portals in oncology. JAMA Oncol, 2018; 4(3):416–418.
14.
RoblinDW, HoustonTK2nd, AllisonJJ, et al.Disparities in use of a personal health record in a managed care organization. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2009; 16(5):683–689.
15.
FraccaroP, VigoM, BalatsoukasP, et al.Patient portal adoption rates: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2017; 245:79–83.
16.
QuanH, LiB, CourisCM, et al.Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol, 2011; 173(6):676–682.
17.
ZhouYY, WongW, LiH. Improving care for older adults: A model to segment the senior population. Perm J, 2014; 18(3):18–21.
18.
BaylissEA, ShetterlySM, DraceML, et al.Deprescribing education vs usual care for patients with cognitive impairment and primary care clinicians: The optimize pragmatic cluster randomized trial. JAMA Intern Med, 2022; 182(5):534–542.
19.
NgoJ, LeJ, GandhiCH, et al.Evolving advance care planning in a health ecosystem: The Kaiser Permanente experience. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2023; 66(2):e245–e253.
20.
PortzJD, BrungardtA, ShanbhagP, et al.Advance care planning among users of a patient portal during the COVID-19 pandemic: Retrospective observational study. J Med Internet Res, 2020; 22(8):e21385.
21.
Kaiser Institute for Health Policy. Palliative Care Promotes Quality of Life for those with Advanced Illness, Volume 4. Institute for Health Policy; 2016.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Electronic Health Record Incentive Program—Stage 2, September 2012. 2012; Available from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2012-09-04/pdf/2012-21050.pdf [Last accessed: September30, 2023].
25.
WanS, LorenzKA, FischerSM, et al.Local area hospice capacity and rural disparities in hospice use among older adults with metastatic breast cancer. J Palliat Med, 2022; 26(2):182–190.
26.
BowersSP, ChinM, O’RiordanM, et al.The end of life experiences of people living with socio-economic deprivation in the developed world: An integrative review. BMC Palliat Care, 2022; 21(1):193.
27.
BrownCE, CurtisJR, DollKM. A race-conscious approach toward research on racial inequities in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2022; 63(5):e465–e471.
28.
JohnsonKS. Racial and ethnic disparities in palliative care. J Palliat Med, 2013; 16(11):1329–1334.
29.
OrlovicM, SmithK, MossialosE. Racial and ethnic differences in end-of-life care in the United States: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). SSM Popul Health, 2019; 7:100331.
30.
RichwineC, JohnsonC, PatelV. Disparities in patient portal access and the role of providers in encouraging access and use. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2023; 30(2):308–317.
