Demographic factors, such as disease context and family relationships, are communication mediators and moderators; however, little is known about how understanding these factors can improve caregiver communication with providers. Recognition of communication differences among caregivers may aid the development of approaches to improve serious illness communication.
Objective:
To explore whether caregiver communication differs by disease context (cancer vs. dementia) and caregiver communication type (Manager, Carrier, Partner, and Lone). Caregiver communication type is based on communication patterns between the care recipient and caregiver.
Design and Measurements:
Caregivers of persons with cancer and/or dementia were surveyed from a U.S. national research registry website. Measures of caregiver communication included information needs, communication confidence, perception of provider understanding of the caregiver, perceived frequency of caregiver assessment, and caregiver stress. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) determined significant differences between caregiver communication (p < 0.05) based on disease context and caregiver communication type.
Results:
Cancer caregivers reported higher unrecognized-demanded information states (i.e., not recognizing information was needed), more communication confidence, and more frequent caregiver assessment compared to dementia caregivers. Among caregiver communication types, Manager caregiver types were more confident communicating than other caregiver types and perceived greater understanding by providers than the Lone caregiver type. Manager caregivers reported significantly less stress than other caregiver communication types.
Conclusions:
Understanding disease context and caregiver communication type may help improve caregiver communication with health care providers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
JooJY, LiuMF. The experience of chronic illness transitional care: A qualitative systematic review. Clin Nurs Res, 2022; 31(2):163–173.
2.
SuterN, ArdizzoneG, GiarelliG, et al.The power of informal cancer caregivers' writings: Results from a thematic and narrative analysis. Support Care Cancer, 2021; 29(8):4381–4388.
3.
LeslieM, GrayRP, Khayatzadeh-MahaniA. What is ‘care quality’ and can it be improved by information and communication technology? A typology of family caregivers' perspectives. Scand J Caring Sci, 2021; 35(1):220–232.
4.
WernerNE, StanislawskiB, MarxKA, et al.Getting what they need when they need it. Identifying barriers to information needs of family caregivers to manage dementia-related behavioral symptoms. Appl Clin Inform, 2017; 8(1):191–205.
5.
HyattA, ShellyA, CoxR, et al.How can we improve information for people affected by cancer? A national survey exploring gaps in current information provision, and challenges with accessing cancer information online. Patient Educ Couns, 2022; 105(8):2763–2770.
6.
HarvathTA, MongovenJM, BidwellJT, et al.Research priorities in family caregiving: Process and outcomes of a conference on family-centered care across the trajectory of serious illness. Gerontologist, 2020; 60(Suppl. 1):S5–S13.
7.
National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. Families Caring for an Aging America. National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine: Washington, DC, USA; 2016.
8.
YoungHM, BellJF, WhitneyRL, et al.Social determinants of health: Underreported heterogeneity in systematic reviews of caregiver interventions. Gerontologist, 2020; 60(Suppl. 1):S14–S28.
9.
TarbiEC, Blanch-HartiganD, van VlietLM, et al.Toward a basic science of communication in serious illness. Patient Educ Couns, 2022; 105(7):1963–1969.
10.
LiJ, LuoX, CaoQ, et al.Communication needs of cancer patients and/or caregivers: A critical literature review. J Oncol, 2020; 2020:7432849.
11.
LitzelmanK, Al NassarN. Partner effects on caregiver and care recipient depressed mood: Heterogeneity across health condition and relationship type. J Behav Med, 2022; 45(5):750–759.
12.
FitzpatrickMA. Family communication patterns theory: Observations on its development and application. J Fam Commun, 2004; 4(3/4):167–179.
13.
WittenbergE, GoldsmithJ, RaganSL, et al.Caring for the Family Caregiver: Palliative Care Communication and Health Literacy. Oxford University Press; New York, NY, USA; 2020.
14.
WittenbergE, FerrellB, KoczywasM, et al.Pilot study of a communication coaching telephone intervention for lung cancer caregivers. Cancer Nurs, 2018; 41(6):506–512.
15.
ShinDW, ChoJ, RoterDL, et al.Preferences for and experiences of family involvement in cancer treatment decision-making: Patient-caregiver dyads study. Psychooncology, 2013; 22(11):2624–2631.
16.
NagelschmidtK, LeppinN, SeifartC, et al.Systematic mixed-method review of barriers to end-of-life communication in the family context. BMJ Support Palliat Care, 2021; 11(3):253–263.
17.
KoehlyLM, PetersJA, KenenR, et al.Characteristics of health information gatherers, disseminators, and blockers within families at risk of hereditary cancer: Implications for family health communication interventions. Am J Public Health, 2009; 99(12):2203–2209.
18.
SmithL, MortonD, van RooyenD. Family dynamics in dementia care: A phenomenological exploration of the experiences of family caregivers of relatives with dementia. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs, 2022; 29(6):861–872.
19.
Valero-CanteroI, CasalsC, Carrion-VelascoY, et al.The influence of symptom severity of palliative care patients on their family caregivers. BMC Palliat Care, 2022; 21(1):27.
20.
AdashekJJ, SubbiahIM. Caring for the caregiver: A systematic review characterising the experience of caregivers of older adults with advanced cancers. ESMO Open, 2020; 5(5):e000862.
21.
KimY, SchulzR. Family caregivers' strains: Comparative analysis of cancer caregiving with dementia, diabetes, and frail elderly caregiving. J Aging Health, 2008; 20(5):483–503.
22.
AtoyebiO, EngJJ, RouthierF, et al.A systematic review of systematic reviews of needs of family caregivers of older adults with dementia. Eur J Ageing, 2022; 19(3):381–396.
23.
PreislerM, RohrmoserA, GoerlingU, et al.Early palliative care for those who care: A qualitative exploration of cancer caregivers' information needs during hospital stays. Eur J Cancer Care, 2019; 28(2):e12990.
24.
SteenfeldtVO, AagerupLC, JacobsenAH, et al.Becoming a family caregiver to a person with dementia: A literature review on the needs of family caregivers. SAGE Open Nurs, 2021; 7:23779608211029073.
25.
OrnsteinKA, KelleyAS, Bollens-LundE, et al.A national profile of end-of-life caregiving in the United States. Health Aff (Millwood), 2017; 36(7):1184–1192.
26.
TaylorJ, FradgleyE, Clinton-McHargT, et al.What are the sources of distress in a range of cancer caregivers? A qualitative study. Support Care Cancer, 2021; 29(5):2443–2453.
27.
DiZazzo-MillerR, PociaskFD, AdamoDE. The role of confidence in family caregiving for people with dementia. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr, 2020; 38(4):355–369.
28.
OpsomerS, LauwerierE, De LepeleireJ, et al.Resilience in advanced cancer caregiving. A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Palliat Med, 2022; 36(1):44–58.
29.
ParmarJ, AndersonS, DugglebyW, et al.Developing person-centred care competencies for the healthcare workforce to support family caregivers: Caregiver centred care. Health Soc Care Community, 2021; 29(5):1327–1338.
30.
FriedmanEM, TrailTE, VaughanCA, et al.Online peer support groups for family caregivers: Are they reaching the caregivers with the greatest needs?. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2018; 25(9):1130–1136.
31.
WittenbergE, BevanJL, GoldsmithJV. Assessing family caregiver communication in chronic illness: Validation of the FCCT-CI. Am J Hosp Palliat Care, 2022:10499091221106694.
32.
AlzougoolB, ChangS, GrayK. The effects of informal carers' characteristics on their information needs: The information needs state approach. Inform Health Soc Care, 2017; 42(3):261–273.
33.
SmithPD, MartinB, ChewningB, et al.Improving health care communication for caregivers: A pilot study. Gerontol Geriatr Educ, 2018; 39(4):433–444.
34.
Van HoutvenCH, MillerKEM, O'BrienEC, et al.Development and initial validation of the caregiver perceptions about communication with clinical team members (CAPACITY) measure. Med Care Res Rev, 2019; 76(6):784–806.
35.
SteffenAM, McKibbinC, ZeissAM, et al.The revised scale for caregiving self-efficacy: Reliability and validity studies. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 2002; 57(1):P74–P86.
36.
RaganS, Wittenberg-LylesE, GoldsmithJ, et al.Communication as Comfort: Multiple Voices in Palliative Care. Routledge Taylor and Francis: New York, NY, USA; 2008.
37.
BressanV, VisintiniC, PaleseA. What do family caregivers of people with dementia need? A mixed-method systematic review. Health Soc Care Community, 2020; 28(6):1942–1960.
38.
Schulman-GreenD, FederS. Integrating family caregivers into palliative oncology care using the self- and family management approach. Sem Oncol Nurs, 2018; 34(3):252–263.
39.
WittenbergE, KerrA, GoldsmithJV. Exploring family caregiver communication difficulties and caregiver quality of life. Am J Hosp Palliat Med, 2021; 38(2):147–153.
40.
WittenbergE, GoldsmithJV, BeltranE. Collective caregivers: A novel examination of health literacy management approaches. Patient Educ Couns, 2022; 105(7):2497–2503.
41.
TeoI, BaidD, OzedemirS, et al.Family caregivers of advanced cancer patients: Self perceived competency and decision making. BMJ Support Palliat Care, 2020; 10(4):435–442.
42.
SpatuzziR, VespaA, FabbiettiP, et al.Elderly helping other elderly: A comparative study of family caregiver burden between patients with dementia or cancer at the end of life. J Soc Work End-of-Life Palliat Care, 2022; 18(1):96–108.
43.
SingerJ, ShroutMR, PapaA. Rates and prospective psychosocial correlates of pre-loss grief in cancer and dementia family members. J Health Psychol, 2022; 27(7):1547–1555.
44.
ErelM, MarcusEL, Dekeyser-GanzF. Barriers to palliative care for advanced dementia: A scoping review. Ann Palliat Med, 2017; 6(4):365–379.
45.
WittenbergE, KerrA, GoldsmithJV. Family caregivers' perceived communication self-efficacy with physicians. Palliat Support Care, 2021; 19:540–546.
46.
OrnsteinKA, WolffJL, Bollens-LundE, et al.Spousal caregivers are caregiving alone in the last years of life. Health Aff (Millwood), 2019; 38(6):964–972.
47.
LuthEA, RussellDJ, XuJC, et al.Survival in hospice patients with dementia: The effect of home hospice and nurse visits. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2021; 69(6):1529–1538.
48.
VickJB, OrnsteinKA, SzantonSL, et al.Does caregiving strain increase as patients with and without dementia approach the end of life?. J Pain Symptom Manag, 2019; 57(2):199–208.e2.
GengHM, ChuangDM, YangF, et al.Prevalence and determinants of depression in caregivers of cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018; 97(39):e11863.
51.
LunneyJR, LynnJ, FoleyDJ, et al.Patterns of functional decline at the end of life. JAMA, 2003; 289(18):2387–2392.
52.
WittenbergE, GoldsmithJ, BevanJ. Assessing Family Caregiver Communication in Chronic Illness: Validation of the FCCT-C. Am J Hosp Palliat Med, 2022; 10499091221106694.
53.
MaH, KiekhoferR, DulaneyS, et al.The effect of goals of care conversations on advance care planning outcomes for persons with dementia (1944). Neurology, 2021; 96(15Supplement):1944.
54.
McNiffKK, CaligiuriMA, DavidsonNE, et al.Improving goal concordant care among 10 leading academic U.S. cancer hospitals: A collaboration of the alliance of dedicated cancer centers. Oncologist, 2021; 26(7):533–536.
55.
MossKO, DouglasSL, LipsonAR, et al.Understanding of health-related decision-making terminology among cancer caregivers. Western J Nurs Res, 2021; 43(7):649–659.
56.
National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care. National Coalition for Hospice and Palliative Care: Richmond, VA, USA; 2018.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
