Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2022-08
A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of the Evidence Underpinning Theoretical Perspectives and Cultural Influences on Forgiveness in Palliative Care
The process of forgiveness is proposed to reduce patient and family conflict and suffering in the face of life-limiting illness. However, it is unclear which theoretical perspectives underpin the concept of forgiveness in palliative care, and how culture may influence it.
Objectives:
To identify and synthesize primary evidence that underpins the concept of forgiveness within palliative care, and identify theoretical perspectives, including cultural assumptions.
Design:
A systematic review of studies on forgiveness in palliative care regardless of design was prospectively registered on PROSPERO. Narrative synthesis was conducted and the modified Seven-Point Checklist and modified Status Assessment Tool applied to appraise study quality (level 1) and contributions to theory building (level 2).
Data Sources:
Reference chaining and hand-searching were conducted for 10 electronic databases from 1960 to June 30, 2020.
Results:
Thirty-nine studies were included. Seven provided a definition of forgiveness, and six studies reported a process model. Twelve patient studies scored “high” on quality level 1 and nine scored “high” on level 2. Conceptualization of forgiveness included a conscious decision to abandon negative thoughts, feelings, and behaviors associated with conflicts, to find positive outcomes through processing of negative affect and cognitive reframing of conflicts. The process of forgiveness develops through time paralleled by an attributional movement from an external to an internal locus of control. Theoretical perspectives of systems, exchange and choice, social constructionism, behaviorism, and humanism were identified. Cultural contexts impact forgiveness.
Conclusion:
The synthesized model is based on primary evidence of mixed quality. Future research needs better theoretical conceptualization utilizing cultural perspectives. Forgiveness interventions with consideration of cultural influences are encouraged.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WorthingtonEL and SchererM: Forgiveness is an emotion-focused coping strategy that can reduce health risks and promote health resilience: Theory, review, and hypotheses. Psychol Health, 2004; 19:385–405.
2.
WorthingtonE, WitvlietC, PietriniP, and MillerA: Forgiveness, health, and well-being: A review of evidence for emotional versus decisional forgiveness, dispositional forgivingness, and reduced unforgiveness. J Behav Med, 2007; 30:291–302.
3.
BerryJW and WorthingtonEL: Forgivingness, relationship quality, stress while imagining relationship events, and physical and mental health. J Couns Psychol, 2001; 48:447–455.
4.
FinchamFD, MayRW, and Sanchez-GonzalezMA: Forgiveness and cardiovascular functioning in married couples. Couple Fam Psychol, 2015; 4:39–48.
5.
FriedbergJP, SuchdayS, and ShelovDV: The impact of forgiveness on cardiovascular reactivity and recovery. Int J Psychophysiol, 2007; 65:87–94.
6.
FriedbergJP, SuchdayS, and SrinivasVS: Relationship between forgiveness and psychological and physiological indices in cardiac patients. Int J Behav Med, 2009; 16:205–211.
7.
HannonPA, FinkelEJ, KumashiroM, and RusbultCE: The soothing effects of forgiveness on victims' and perpetrators' blood pressure. Pers Relationsh, 2012; 19:279–289.
8.
LawlerK, YoungerJ, PiferiR, et al.A change of heart: Cardiovascular correlates of forgiveness in response to interpersonal conflict. J Behav Med, 2003; 26:373–393.
9.
LawlerK, YoungerJ, PiferiR, et al.: The unique effects of forgiveness on health: An exploration of pathways. J Behav Med, 2005; 28:157–167.
10.
van Oyen WitvlietC, De YoungNJ, HofelichAJ, and De YoungPA: Compassionate reappraisal and emotion suppression as alternatives to offense-focused rumination: Implications for forgiveness and psychophysiological well-being. J Posit Psychol, 2011; 6:286–299.
11.
van Oyen WitvlietC, HinzeSR, and WorthingtonELJr.: Unresolved injustice: Christian religious commitment, forgiveness, revenge, and cardiovascular responding. J Psychol Christ, 2008; 27:110–119.
12.
van Oyen WitvlietC, KnollRW, HinmanNG, and De YoungPA: Compassion-focused reappraisal, benefit-focused reappraisal, and rumination after an interpersonal offense: Emotion-regulation implications for subjective emotion, linguistic responses, and physiology. J Posit Psychol, 2010; 5:226–242.
13.
WorthingtonELJr., LavelockC, WitvlietCVO, et al.: Measures of forgiveness. In: SaklofskeGJBDH (ed): Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs. UK: Elsevier Inc., 2015, pp. 474–502.
14.
FinchamFD, BeachSRH, and DavilaJ: Forgiveness and conflict resolution in marriage. J Fam Psychol, 2004; 18:72–81.
15.
GiorgiaP, RegaliaC, and FinchamFD: Forgiveness and conflict resolution in close relationships: Within and cross partner effects. Univ Psychol, 2010; 9:35–56.
16.
FinchamF and BeachSRH: Forgiveness and marital quality: Precursor or consequence in well-established relationships?. J Posit Psychol, 2007; 2:260–268.
17.
KramerBJ, BoelkAZ, and AuerC: Family conflict at the end of life: Lessons learned in a model program for vulnerable older adults. J Palliat Med, 2006; 9:791–801.
18.
HansenMJ, EnrightRD, BaskinTW, and KlattJ: A palliative care intervention in forgiveness therapy for elderly terminally iii cancer patients. J Palliat Care, 2009; 25:51–60.
McCulloughME, FinchamFD, and TsangJA: Forgiveness, forbearance, and time: The temporal unfolding of transgression-related interpersonal motivations. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2003; 84:540–557.
21.
MatthewsLJ, BrownRA, and KennedyDP: A Manual for Cultural Analysis. United States: RAND Corporation, 2018.
22.
WorthingtonEL: Handbook of Forgiveness. New York: New York: Routledge, 2005.
23.
FiskeAP, KitayamaS, MarkusHR, and NisbettRE: The cultural matrix of social psychology. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske S, and Lindzey G (eds): Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 1998, pp. 915–981.
24.
SwansonRA: Theory Building in Applied Disciplines. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2013.
25.
LiberatiA, AltmanDG, TetzlaffJ, et al.: The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 2009; 151:W65–W94.
26.
PhoonJML: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence underpinning the theoretical perspectives and cultural influences on forgiveness in palliative care [Internet]. PROSPERO. 2020. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=192581 (Last accessed May24, 2022).
27.
GreenhalghT: How to Read a Paper the Basics of Evidence-Based Medicine, 4th ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
28.
Endnote:. Endnote X9 for Windows. Philadelphia, PA: Clarivate Analytics, 2016.
29.
PopayJ, RobertsH, SowdenA, et al.: Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews: A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Lancaster: Lancaster University, 2006.
30.
Windows Mf:. Microsoft Excel 365. Redmond, USA: Microsoft, 2021.
31.
Dixon-WoodsM, CaversD, AgarwalS, et al.: Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2006; 6:35.
32.
HutchisonED: Dimensions of Human Behavior: Person and Environment, 6th ed. Beaverton: Ringgold, Inc., 2019.
33.
Prince-PaulM: Relationships among communicative acts, social well-being, and spiritual well-being on the quality of life at the end of life in patients with cancer enrolled in hospice. J Palliat Med, 2008; 11:20–25.
34.
RenzM, BuecheD, ReichmuthO, et al.: Forgiveness and reconciliation processes in dying patients with cancer. Am J Hosp Palliat Med, 2020; 37:222–234.
35.
KaldjianLC, JekelJF, and FriedlandG: End-of-life decisions in HIV-positive patients: The role of spiritual beliefs. AIDS, 1998; 12:103–107.
36.
SteinhauserKE, AlexanderSC, ByockIR, et al.: Do preparation and life completion discussions improve functioning and quality of life in seriously ill patients? Pilot randomized control trial. J Palliat Med, 2008; 11:1234–1240.
37.
ParkCL, LimH, NewlonM, et al.: Dimensions of religiousness and spirituality as predictors of well-being in advanced chronic heart failure patients. J Relig Health, 2014; 53:579–590.
38.
ParkCL: Estimated longevity and changes in spirituality in the context of advanced congestive heart failure. Palliat Support Care, 2008; 6:3–11.
39.
VilaltaA, VallsJ, PortaJ, and ViñasJ: Evaluation of spiritual needs of patients with advanced cancer in a palliative care unit. J Palliat Med, 2014; 17:592–600.
40.
Prince-PaulJM, ZyzanskiJS, and ExlineJJ: The RelCom-S: A screening instrument to assess personal relationships and communication in advanced cancer. J Hosp Palliat Nurs, 2013; 15:298–306.
41.
Van LaarhovenHWM, SchildermanJ, VerhagenCAHHVM, and PrinsJB: Comparison of attitudes of guilt and forgiveness in cancer patients without evidence of disease and advanced cancer patients in a palliative care setting. Cancer Nurs, 2012; 35:483–492.
42.
WinkelmanWD, LauderdaleK, BalboniMJ, et al.: The relationship of spiritual concerns to the quality of life of advanced cancer patients: Preliminary findings. J Palliat Med, 2011; 14:1022–1028.
43.
NakazatoK, ShiozakiM, HiraiK, et al.: Verbal communication of families with cancer patients at end of life: A questionnaire survey with bereaved family members. Psychooncology, 2018; 27:155–162.
44.
KeallRM, ButowPN, SteinhauserKE, and ClaytonJM: Nurse-facilitated preparation and life completion interventions are acceptable and feasible in the Australian palliative care setting: Results from a phase 2 trial. Cancer Nurs, 2013; 36:E39–E46.
45.
SteinhauserKE, OlsenA, JohnsonKS, et al.: The feasibility and acceptability of a chaplain-led intervention for caregivers of seriously ill patients: A caregiver outlook pilot study. Palliat Support Care, 2016; 14:456–467.
46.
ExlineJJ, Prince-PaulM, RootBL, et al.: Forgiveness, depressive symptoms, and communication at the end of life: A study with family members of hospice patients. J Palliat Med, 2012; 15:1113–1119.
47.
WittenbergE, FerrellB, GoldsmithJ, and BullerH: Provider difficulties with spiritual and forgiveness communication at the end of life. Am J Hosp Palliat Care, 2016; 33:843–848.
48.
SteinhauserKE, AlexanderSC, ByockIR, et al.: Seriously ill patients' discussions of preparation and life completion: An intervention to assist with transition at the end of life. Palliat Support Care, 2009; 7:393–404.
49.
KeallRM, ButowPN, SteinhauserKE, and ClaytonJM: Discussing life story, forgiveness, heritage, and legacy with patients with life-limiting illnesses. Int J Palliat Nurs, 2011; 17:454–460.
50.
MickleyJR and CowlesK: Ameliorating the tension: Use of forgiveness for healing. Oncol Nurs Forum, 2001; 28:31–37.
51.
ChaoCC, ChenCH, and YenM: The essence of spirituality of terminally ill patients. J Nurs Res, 2002; 10:237–245.
52.
SimhaS, NobleS, and ChaturvediS: Spiritual concerns in Hindu cancer patients undergoing palliative care: A qualitative study. Indian J Palliat Care, 2013; 19:99–105.
53.
HatamipourK, RassouliM, YaghmaieF, et al.: Spiritual needs of cancer patients: A qualitative study. Indian J Palliat Care, 2015; 21:61–67.
54.
KeeleyMP: ‘Turning toward death together’: The functions of messages during final conversations in close relationships. J Soc Pers Relationsh, 2007; 24:225–253.
55.
ChanCLW, HoAHY, LeungPPY, et al.: The blessings and the curses of filial piety on dignity at the end of life: Lived experience of Hong Kong Chinese adult children caregivers. J Ethn Cult Divers Soc Work, 2012; 21:277–296.
56.
KeallR, ClaytonJM, and ButowP: Australian palliative care nurses' reflections on existential/spiritual interventions. J Hosp Palliat Nurs, 2014; 16:105–112.
57.
FerrellB, Otis-GreenS, BairdRP, and GarciaA: Nurses' responses to requests for forgiveness at the end of life. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2014; 47:631–641.
58.
FerrellB, WittenbergE, BattistaV, and WalkerG: Exploring the spiritual needs of families with seriously ill children. Int J Palliat Nurs, 2016; 22:388–394.
59.
ChangBH, SteinNR, TrevinoK, et al.: End-of-life spiritual care at a VA medical center: Chaplains' perspectives. Palliat Support Care, 2012; 10:273–278.
60.
EntMR and GergisMA: The most common end-of-life reflections: A survey of hospice and palliative nurses. Death Studies, 2020; 44:256–260.
61.
ClarkR: Forgiveness in the hospice setting. Palliat Med, 1990; 4:305–310.
62.
RocheJ: Creative ritual in a hospice. Health Prog, 1994; 75:45–47, 55.
63.
DerricksonBS: The spiritual work of the dying: A framework and case studies. Hosp J, 1996; 11:11–30.
64.
BakerM: Facilitating forgiveness and peaceful closure: The therapeutic value of psychosocial intervention in end-of-life care. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care, 2005; 1:83–95.
65.
CameronDA: On death and dying—Forty years later, how well are we dying?. S Afr Fam Pract, 2009; 51:125–127.
66.
ConlonA: The use of poetry in reconciling unfinished business near end-of-life. J Poet Ther, 2012; 25:1–8.
67.
BrennanM: Four butterflies: End of life stories of transition and transformation. Pastoral Psychol, 2013; 62:139–149.
68.
Abd RahmanFN, LeeVY, ShamsuddinAF, and YaakupH: Full circle: Resolving an adolescent's end-of-life issues. Pediatr Int, 2015; 57:1015–1016.
69.
KannaiR and AlonA: To come full circle. Patient Educ Couns, 2017; 100:1619–1620.
70.
StrakerN: The treatment of cancer patients who die. Psychodyn Psychiatry, 2020; 48:1–25.
71.
ByockI: The four things that matter most: a book about living. In: Saunders CMD (ed): The Four Things that Matter Most. New York: New York: Free Press, 2004, 3–8.
72.
LopezSJ, EdwardsLM, and MarquesSC: The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2016.
73.
McCulloughME: Forgiveness: Who Does It and How Do They Do It?. Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 2001; 10:194–197.
74.
McCulloughME and WitvlietCVO: The psychology of forgiveness. In: SnyderCR, Lopez SJ (eds): Handbook of Positive Psychologu. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 446–458.
75.
McCulloughME, FinchamFD, and TsangJ-A: Forgiveness, forbearance, and time: The temporal unfolding of transgression-related interpersonal motivations. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2003; 84:540–557.
76.
DiMaggioP: Culture and cognition. Annu Rev Sociol, 1997; 23:263.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
