Communication between clinicians and patients fundamentally shapes the experience of serious illness. There is increasing recognition that health systems should routinely implement structures and processes to assure high-quality serious illness communication (SIC) and measure the effectiveness of their efforts on key outcomes. The absence, underdevelopment, or limited applicability of quality measures related specifically to SIC, and their limited application only to those seen by specialist palliative and hospice care teams, hinder efforts to improve care planning, service delivery, and health outcomes for all seriously ill patients.
Objective:
We convened an expert stakeholder symposium and subsequently surveyed participants to consider challenges, opportunities, priorities, and strategies to improve quality measurement specific to SIC.
Results:
We identified several barriers and opportunities to improving quality measurement of SIC. These include issues related to the definition of SIC, methodological challenges related to measuring SIC and related outcomes, underutilization of technologies that can facilitate measurement, and measurement development, and dissemination.
Conclusions:
Patients, clinicians, and health systems increasingly align around the importance of high-quality communication in serious illness. We offer recommendations for various stakeholder groups to advance SIC quality measurement. Enthusiasm and a sense of urgency among health systems to drive and measure communication improvements inform our proposal for a set of example measures for implementation now.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SimpsonM, BuckmanR, StewartM, et al.: Doctor-patient communication: the Toronto consensus statement. BMJ, 1991; 303:1385–1387.
2.
BernackiRE, BlockSD; American College of Physicians High Value Care Task F: Communication about serious illness care goals: A review and synthesis of best practices. JAMA Intern Med, 2014; 174:1994–2003.
3.
KelleyAS, Bollens-LundE: Identifying the population with serious illness. The “denominator” challenge. J Palliat Med, 2018; 21:S7.
4.
DeteringKM, HancockAD, ReadeMC, SilvesterW: The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 2010; 340:c1345.
5.
MackJW, WeeksJC, WrightAA, et al.: End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: Predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences. J Clin Oncol, 2010; 28:1203–1208.
6.
WrightAA, ZhangB, RayA, et al.: Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA, 2008; 300:1665–1673.
7.
ZhangB, WrightAA, HuskampHA, et al.: Health care costs in the last week of life: Associations with end-of-life conversations. Arch Intern Med, 2009; 169:480–488.
8.
WeinerJS, ColeSA: Three principles to improve clinician communication for advance care planning: Overcoming emotional, cognitive, and skill barriers. J Palliat Med, 2004; 7:817–829.
9.
MeierDE, BackAL, MorrisonRS: The inner life of physicians and care of the seriously ill. JAMA, 2001; 286:3007–3014.
10.
GrunfeldE, WhelanTJ, ZitzelsbergerL, et al.: Cancer care workers in Ontario: Prevalence of burnout, job stress and job satisfaction. CMAJ, 2000; 163:166–169.
11.
LeungJM, UdrisEM, UmanJ, AuDH: The effect of end-of-life discussions on perceived quality of care and health status among patients with COPD. Chest, 2012; 142:128–133.
12.
StreetRLJr., MakoulG, AroraNK, EpsteinRM: How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns, 2009; 74:295–301.
13.
BernackiR, PaladinoJ, NevilleBA, et al.: Effect of the serious illness care program in outpatient oncology: A cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med, 2019; 179:751–759.
14.
BillingsJA, BernackiR: Strategic targeting of advance care planning interventions: The Goldilocks phenomenon. JAMA Intern Med, 2014; 174:620–624.
15.
LorenzKA, RosenfeldK, WengerN: Quality indicators for palliative and end-of-life care in vulnerable elders. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2007; 55Suppl 2:S318–S326.
16.
Global Palliative Care Quality Alliance: www.gpcqa.org
TulskyJA, BeachMC, ButowPN, et al.: Research agenda for communication in serious illness: A review. JAMA Intern Med, 2017; 177:1361–1366.
20.
TenoJM, PriceRA, MakarounLK: Challenges of measuring quality of community-based programs for seriously ill individuals and their families. Health Aff (Millwood), 2017; 36:1227–1233.
21.
HenryM, Hudson ScholleS, Briefer FrenchJ: Accountability for the quality of care provided to people with serious illness. J Palliat Med, 2018; 21(S2):S68–S73.
22.
DonabedianA: Quality assurance. Structure, process and outcome. Nurs Stand, 1992; 7(11Suppl QA):4–5.
23.
SikkaR, MorathJM, LeapeL: The quadruple aim: Care, health, cost and meaning in work. BMJ Qual Saf, 2015; 24:608–610.
24.
FerrellB, ConnorSR, CordesA, et al.: The national agenda for quality palliative care: The National Consensus Project and the National Quality Forum. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2007; 33:737–744.
25.
ChassinMR, LoebJM, SchmaltzSP, WachterRM: Accountability measures—using measurement to promote quality improvement. N Engl J Med, 2010; 363:683–688.
26.
TenoJM, MontgomeryR, ValuckT, et al.: Accountability for community-based programs for the seriously ill. J Palliat Med, 2018; 21(S2):S81–S87.
27.
TenoJM, ClarridgeBR, CaseyV, et al.: Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care. JAMA, 2004; 291:88–93.
28.
GeerseOP, LamasDJ, SandersJJ, et al.: A qualitative study of serious illness conversations in patients with advanced cancer. J Palliat Med, 2019; 22:773–781.
29.
LamasD, PanarielloN, HenrichN, et al.: Advance care planning documentation in electronic health records: Current challenges and recommendations for change. J Palliat Med, 2018; 21:522–528.
30.
CasalinoLP: The unintended consequences of measuring quality on the quality of medical care. N Engl J Med, 1999; 341:1147–1150.
31.
TolleSW, TenoJ.M: Counting POLST form completion can hinder quality. In: Health Affairs Blog. Health Affairs, 2018.
32.
AvatiAJ, K; HarmanS; DowningL; et al.: Improving palliative care with deep learning. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 2018; 18(Suppl 4):122.
33.
DelbancoT, WalkerJ, DarerJD, et al.: Open notes: Doctors and patients signing on. Ann Intern Med, 2010; 153:121–125.
34.
EschT, MejillaR, AnselmoM, et al.: Engaging patients through open notes: An evaluation using mixed methods. BMJ Open, 2016; 6:e010034.
35.
PhippsE, TrueG, HarrisD, et al.: Approaching the end of life: Attitudes, preferences, and behaviors of African-American and white patients and their family caregivers. J Clin Oncol, 2003; 21:549–554.
36.
EngelbergR, DowneyL, CurtisJR: Psychometric characteristics of a quality of communication questionnaire assessing communication about end-of-life care. J Palliat Med, 2006; 9:1086–1098.
37.
CurtisJR, EngelbergRA, NielsenEL, et al.: Patient-physician communication about end-of-life care for patients with severe COPD. Eur Respir J, 2004; 24:200–205.
38.
CurtisJR, DowneyL, BackAL, et al.: Effect of a patient and clinician communication-priming intervention on patient-reported goals-of-care discussions between patients with serious illness and clinicians: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med, 2018; 178:930–940.
39.
CurtisJR, BackAL, FordDW, et al.: Effect of communication skills training for residents and nurse practitioners on quality of communication with patients with serious illness: A randomized trial. JAMA, 2013; 310:2271–2281.
40.
SudoreRL, LumHD, YouJJ, et al.: Defining advance care planning for adults: A consensus definition from a multidisciplinary Delphi panel. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2017.
41.
Anhang PriceR, ElliottMN: Measuring patient centeredness of care for seriously ill individuals: Challenges and opportunities for accountability initiatives. J Palliat Med, 2018; 21:5–28.
42.
PatelMI, SundaramV, DesaiM, et al.: Effect of a lay health worker intervention on goals-of-care documentation and on health care use, costs, and satisfaction among patients with cancer: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol, 2018; 4:1359–1366.
43.
TenoJM, CoppolaKM: For every numerator, you need a denominator: A simple statement but key to measuring the quality of care of the “dying”. J Pain Symptom Manage, 1999; 17:109–113.
44.
DySM, HerrK, BernackiRE, et al.: Methodological research priorities in palliative care and hospice quality measurement. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2016; 51:155–162.
45.
SinuffT, DodekP, YouJJ, et al.: Improving end-of-life communication and decision making: The development of a conceptual framework and quality indicators. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2015; 49:1070–1080.
46.
HeylandDK, DodekP, YouJJ, et al.: Validation of quality indicators for end-of-life communication: Results of a multicentre survey. CMAJ, 2017; 189:E980–E989.
47.
LakinJR, KoritsanszkyLA, CunninghamR, et al.: A systematic intervention to improve serious illness communication in primary care. Health Aff (Millwood), 2017; 36:1258–1264.
48.
PaladinoJ, BernackiR, NevilleBA, et al.: Evaluating an intervention to improve communication between oncology clinicians and patients with life-limiting cancer: A cluster randomized clinical trial of the serious illness care program. JAMA Oncol, 2019; 5:801–809.
49.
SandersJJ, CurtisJR, TulskyJA: Achieving goal-concordant care: A Conceptual model and approach to measuring serious illness communication and its impact. J Palliat Med, 2018; 21(S2):S17–S27.
50.
UnroeKT, HickmanSE, TorkeAM, GroupARCW: Care consistency with documented care preferences: Methodologic considerations for implementing the “Measuring What Matters” quality indicator. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2016; 52:453–458.
51.
KhandelwalN, CurtisJR, FreedmanVA, et al.: How often is end-of-life care in the United States inconsistent with patients' goals of care?. J Palliat Med, 2017; 20:1400–1404.
52.
PasmanHR, KaspersPJ, DeegDJ, Onwuteaka-PhilipsenBD: Preferences and actual treatment of older adults at the end of life. A mortality follow-back study. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2013; 61:1722–1729.
53.
FawoleOA, DySM, WilsonRF, et al.: A systematic review of communication quality improvement interventions for patients with advanced and serious illness. J Gen Intern Med, 2013; 28:570–577.
54.
YabroffKR, MandelblattJS, InghamJ: The quality of medical care at the end-of-life in the USA: Existing barriers and examples of process and outcome measures. Palliat Med, 2004; 18:202–216.
55.
BernackiR, HutchingsM, VickJ, et al.: Development of the Serious Illness Care Program: A randomised controlled trial of a palliative care communication intervention. BMJ Open, 2015; 5:e009032.
56.
GramlingR, StanekS, LadwigS, et al.: Feeling heard and understood: A patient-reported quality measure for the inpatient palliative care setting. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2016; 51:150–154.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
