Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Code status discussions (CSDs) can be challenging for many clinicians. Barriers associated with them include lack of education, comfort level, and experience.

Objective:

To conduct an educational intervention to improve knowledge and communication approaches related to CSDs.

Design:

A cross-sectional multidisciplinary educational intervention was conducted over one year consisting of an interactive presentation, live role-play, and pre- and post-intervention tests to measure impact of the formal training. Evaluations and comments were also collected.

Setting/Subjects:

Attending physicians, nurses, residents, fellows, and physician assistants (PAs) at an urban community teaching hospital of 500 beds serving an ethnically diverse population.

Measurements:

Data from pre- and post-intervention tests evaluating knowledge and communication approach regarding CSDs were collected. Participants completed a qualitative evaluation of the program.

Results:

There were 165 participants: 29 attending physicians, 26 residents, 17 fellows, 18 PAs, and 75 nurses. All (100%) completed the pre-intervention test and 154 (93.3%) completed the post-intervention test. There was an overall improvement in scores, 43.8% pre-intervention to 75.6% post-intervention (p-values <0.005). Attending physicians and fellows had the highest pre-intervention scores, while nurses and PAs had the lowest. Most participants (97%) reported they learned new information and 91% stated they would change patient management.

Conclusions:

Our study found that a brief educational intervention with multipronged teaching tools improved knowledge concerning CSDs. Participants felt it provided new insights and would change their practice. This study contributes to the literature by examining CSD training across different disciplines, allowing for cross-group comparisons. Future studies should try to correlate educational interventions and clinician knowledge with clinical practice outcomes.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Szmuilowicz

, Neely

, Sharma

, et al.: Improving residents' code status discussion skills: A randomized trial. J Palliat Med, 2012; 15:768–774.

Calam

, Far

, Andrew

: Discussions of “code status” on a family practice teaching ward: What barriers do family physicians face?. CMAJ-JAMC, 2000; 163:1255–1259.

Rosenberg

, Greenwald

, Caponi

, et al.: Confidence with and barriers to serious illness communication: A national survey of hospitalists. J Palliat Med, 2017; 20:1013–1019.

Mills

, Rhoads

, Curtis

: Medical student training on code status discussions: How far have we come?. J Palliat Med, 2016; 19:323–325.

Diem

, Lantos

, Tulsky

: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation on television- miracles and misinformation. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334:1578–1582.

Girotra

, Brahmagee

, Spertus

, et al.: Trends in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med, 2012; 367:1912–1920.

Ehlenbach

, Barnato

, Curtis

, et al.: Epidemiologic study of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the elderly. N Engl J Med, 2009; 361:22–31.

Bedell

, Delbanco

, Cook

, Epstein

: Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital. N Engl J Med, 1983; 309:569–576.

Ebell

, Becker

, Barry

, Hagen

: Survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med, 1998; 13:805–816.

10.

Guidelines for the appropriate use of do-not-resuscitate orders. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. JAMA, 1991; 265:1868–1871.

11.

Anderson

, Chase

, Pantilat

, et al.: Code status discussions between attending hospitalist physicians and medical patients at hospital admission. J Gen Intern Med, 2011; 26:359–366.

12.

Tulsky

, Chesney

, Lo

: How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients?. J Gen Intern Med, 1995; 10:436–442.

13.

Tulsky

, Fischer

, Rose

, Arnold

: Opening the black box: How do physicians communicate about advance directives?. Ann Intern Med, 1998; 129:441–449.

14.

Chopra

: Communicating effectively at the end of life. J Am Osteopath Assoc, 2001; 101:594–598.

15.

Ebell

, Jang

, Shen

, Geocadin

: Get with the guidelines–resuscitation investigators. Development and validation of the good outcome following attempted resuscitation (GO-FAR) score to predict neurologically intact survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. JAMA Intern Med, 2013; 173:1872–1878.

16.

Shah

, Swinton

, You

: Barriers and facilitators for goals of care discussions between residents and hospitalised patients. Postgrad Med J, 2017; 93:127–132.

17.

Siddiqui

, Holley

: Residents' practices and perceptions about do not resuscitate orders and pronouncing death: An opportunity for clinical training. Am J Hosp Palliat Care, 2011; 28:94–97.

18.

Sulmasy

, Sood

, Ury

: Physicians' confidence in discussing do not resuscitate orders with patients and surrogates. J Med Ethics, 2008; 34:96–101.

19.

Block

, Sullivan

: Attitudes about end-of-life care: A national cross-sectional study. J Palliat Med, 1998; 1:347–355.

20.

Tulsky

, Chesney

, Lo

: See one, do one, teach one? House staff experience discussing do-not-resuscitate orders. Arch Intern Med, 1996; 156:1285–1289.

21.

Gorman

, Ahern

, Wiseman

, Skrobik

: Residents' end-of-life decision making with adult hospitalized patients: A review of the literature. Acad Med, 2005; 80:622–633.

22.

Einstein

, Einstein

, Mathew

: Dying for advice: Code status discussions between resident physicians and patients with advanced cancer—A national survey. J Palliat Med, 2015; 18:535–541.

23.

Sulmasy

, He

, McAuley

, Ury

: Beliefs and attitudes of nurses and physicians about do not resuscitate orders and who should speak to patients and families about them. Crit Care Med, 2008; 36:1817–1822.

24.

, Ogrinc

: Assessing third year medical students' understanding of code status. J Palliat Med, 2011; 14:1254–1258.

25.

Ratanawongsa

, Teherani

, Hauer

: Third-year medical students' experiences with dying patients during the internal medicine clerkship: A qualitative study of the informal curriculum. Acad Med, 2005; 80:641–647.

26.

Smith

, O'Sullivan

, Lo

, Chen

: An educational intervention to improve resident comfort with communication at the end of life. J Palliat Med, 2013; 16:54–59.

27.

Alexander

, Keitz

, Sloane

, Tulsky

: A controlled trial of a short course to improve residents' communication with patients at the end of life. Acad Med, 2006; 81:1008–1012.

28.

Sharma

, Szmuilowicz

, Ogunseitan

, et al.: Evaluation of a mastery learning intervention on hospitalists' code status discussion skills. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2017; 53:1066–1070.

29.

Warm

: PCNOW Fast Facts #012 Myths about Advance Directives. https://www.mypcnow.org. Published 2015. (Last accessed December 4, 2017).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB

To Code or Not To Code: Teaching Multidisciplinary Clinicians to Conduct Code Status Discussions

Abstract

Abstract

Background:

Objective:

Design:

Setting/Subjects:

Measurements:

Results:

Conclusions:

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material