Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2015-03
Care Management by Oncology Nurses To Address Palliative Care Needs: A Pilot Trial To Assess Feasibility,Acceptability,and Perceived Effectiveness of the CONNECT Intervention
Specialty palliative care is not accessible for many patients with advanced cancer. There is a need to find alternative palliative care strategies in oncology clinics.
Objective:
The objective of the study was to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and perceived effectiveness of an oncology nurse-led care management approach to improve primary palliative care.
Methods:
The study design was a single-arm pilot trial of the Care Management by Oncology Nurses (CONNECT) intervention, in which registered oncology nurses receive specialized training and work closely with oncologists to (1) address symptom needs; (2) engage patients and caregivers in advance care planning; (3) provide emotional support; and (4) coordinate care. The subjects were 23 patients with advanced cancer, 19 caregivers, and 5 oncologists from a community oncology clinic in western Pennsylvania. Feasibility was assessed through enrollment rates, outcome assessment rates, and visit checklists. Patients, caregivers, and oncologists completed three-month assessments of acceptability and perceived effectiveness.
Results:
The consent-to-approach rate was 86% and enrolled-to-consent rate, 77%. CONNECT was implemented according to protocol for all participants. No participants withdrew after enrollment. Four patients died during the study; three-month outcome assessments were completed with all remaining participants (83%). Patients and caregivers reported high satisfaction with CONNECT and perceived the intervention as helpful in addressing symptoms (85%), coping (91%), and planning for the future (82%). Oncologists unanimously agreed that CONNECT improved the quality of care provided for patients with advanced cancer.
Conclusion:
An oncology nurse-led care management intervention is feasible, acceptable, and was perceived to be effective for improving provision of primary palliative care. A randomized trial of CONNECT is warranted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrueraE, KimHN: Cancer pain. JAMA, 2003; 290:2476–2479.
2.
TeunissenSC, WeskerW, KruitwagenC, et al.: Symptom prevalence in patients with incurable cancer: A systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2007; 34:94–104.
3.
DowneyL, EngelbergRA: Quality-of-life trajectories at the end of life: Assessments over time by patients with and without cancer. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2010; 58:472–479.
4.
GiesingerJM, WintnerLM, OberguggenbergerAS, et al.: Quality of life trajectory in patients with advanced cancer during the last year of life. J Palliat Med, 2011; 14:904–912.
5.
ZhangB, WrightAA, HuskampHA, et al.: Health care costs in the last week of life: Associations with end-of-life conversations. Arch Intern Med, 2009; 169:480–488.
6.
WrightAA, ZhangB, RayA, et al.: Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA, 2008; 300:1665–1673.
7.
BarnatoAE, HerndonMB, AnthonyDL, et al.: Are regional variations in end-of-life care intensity explained by patient preferences?: A study of the US Medicare population. Med Care, 2007; 45:386–393.
8.
BraunM, MikulincerM, RydallA, et al.: Hidden morbidity in cancer: Spouse caregivers. J Clin Oncol, 2007; 25:4829–4834.
9.
NorthouseLL, KatapodiMC, SchafenackerAM, WeissD: The impact of caregiving on the psychological well-being of family caregivers and cancer patients. Semin Oncol Nurs, 2012; 28:236–245.
10.
NorthouseL, WilliamsAL, GivenB, McCorkleR: Psychosocial care for family caregivers of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol; 30:1227–1234.
11.
DetmarSB, MullerMJ, WeverLD, et al.: The patient-physician relationship: Patient-physician communication during outpatient palliative treatment visits: An observational study. JAMA, 2001; 285:1351–1357.
12.
DetmarSB, AaronsonNK, WeverLD, et al.: How are you feeling? Who wants to know? Patients' and oncologists' preferences for discussing health-related quality-of-life issues. J Clin Oncol, 2000; 18:3295–3301.
13.
PollakKI, ArnoldRM, JeffreysAS, et al.: Oncologist communication about emotion during visits with patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2007; 25:5748–5752.
14.
TemelJS, GreerJA, AdmaneS, et al.: Code status documentation in the outpatient electronic medical records of patients with metastatic cancer. J Gen Intern Med; 25:150–153.
15.
HeylandDK, BarwichD, PichoraD, et al.: Failure to engage hospitalized elderly patients and their families in advance care planning. JAMA Intern Med, 2013; 173:778–787.
16.
EarleCC, LandrumMB, SouzaJM, et al.: Aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life: Is it a quality-of-care issue?. J Clin Oncol, 2008; 26:3860–3866.
17.
TemelJS, GreerJA, MuzikanskyA, et al.: Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med, 2010; 363:733–742.
18.
ZimmermannC, SwamiN, KrzyzanowskaM, et al.: Early palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: A cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2014; 383:1721–1730.
19.
MeyersFJ, CarducciM, LoscalzoMJ, et al.: Effects of a problem-solving intervention (COPE) on quality of life for patients with advanced cancer on clinical trials and their caregivers: Simultaneous care educational intervention (SCEI): Linking palliation and clinical trials. J Palliat Med, 2011; 14:465–473.
20.
BakitasM, LyonsKD, HegelMT, et al.: Effects of a palliative care intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: The Project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 2009; 302:741–749.
21.
BrumleyR, EnguidanosS, JamisonP, et al.: Increased satisfaction with care and lower costs: Results of a randomized trial of in-home palliative care. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2007; 55:993–1000.
22.
RabowMW, DibbleSL, PantilatSZ, McPheeSJ: The comprehensive care team: A controlled trial of outpatient palliative medicine consultation. Arch Intern Med, 2004; 164:83–91.
23.
GadeG, VenohrI, ConnerD, et al.: Impact of an inpatient palliative care team: A randomized control trial. J Palliat Med, 2008; 11:180–190.
24.
SmithTJ, TeminS, AlesiER, et al.: American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: The integration of palliative care into standard oncology care. J Clin Oncol, 2012; 30:880–887.
National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care, 3rd ed. 2013. www.nationalconsensusproject.org/guidelines_download2.aspx. National Consensus Project, Pittsburgh, PA. (Last accessed October8, 2014.)
27.
Commission on Cancer: Cancer Program Standards 2012, Version 1.2.1: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care. Chicago: American College of Surgeons, 2012. www.facs.org/quality%20programs/cancer/coc/standards. (Last accessed October8, 2014.)
28.
HuiD, ElsayemA, De la CruzM, et al.: Availability and integration of palliative care at US cancer centers. JAMA, 2010; 303:1054–1061.
29.
LupuD, American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Workforce Task Force: Estimate of current hospice and palliative medicine physician workforce shortage. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2010; 40:899–911.
30.
SchenkerY, Crowley-MatokaM, DohanD, et al.: Oncologist factors that influence referrals to subspecialty palliative care clinics. J Oncol Pract, 2014; 10:e37–e44.
31.
WentlandtK, KrzyzanowskaMK, SwamiN, et al.: Referral practices of oncologists to specialized palliative care. J Clin Oncol, 2012; 30:4380–4386.
32.
JohnsonCE, GirgisA, PaulCL, CurrowDC: Cancer specialists' palliative care referral practices and perceptions: Results of a national survey. Palliat Med, 2008; 22:51–57.
33.
SmithCB, NelsonJE, BermanAR, et al.: Lung cancer physicians' referral practices for palliative care consultation. Ann Oncol, 2012; 23:382–387.
34.
MaciaszRM, ArnoldRM, ChuE, et al.: Does it matter what you call it? A randomized trial of language used to describe palliative care services. Support Care Cancer, 2013; 21:3411–3419.
35.
SchenkerY, ParkSY, MaciaszR, ArnoldRM: Do patients with advanced cancer and unmet palliative care needs have an interest in receiving palliative care services?. J Palliat Med, 2014; 17:667–672.
WagnerEH, BennettSM, AustinBT, et al.: Finding common ground: Patient-centeredness and evidence-based chronic illness care. J Altern Complement Med, 2005; 11Suppl 1:S7–S15.
38.
WagnerEH, AustinBT, DavisC, et al.: Improving chronic illness care: Translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood), 2001; 20:64–78.
39.
BodenheimerT, WagnerEH, GrumbachK: Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA, 2002; 288:1775–1779.
40.
BodenheimerT, WagnerEH, GrumbachK: Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: The chronic care model, Part 2. JAMA, 2002; 288:1909–1914.
41.
BoultC, WielandGD: Comprehensive primary care for older patients with multiple chronic conditions: “Nobody rushes you through.”. JAMA, 2010; 304:1936–1943.
42.
UnutzerJ, KatonW, CallahanCM, et al.: Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 2002; 288:2836–2845.
43.
MeierDE, TharW, JordanA, et al.: Integrating case management and palliative care. J Palliat Med, 2004; 7:119–134.
MossAH, LunneyJR, CulpS, et al.: Prognostic significance of the “surprise” question in cancer patients. J Palliat Med, 2010; 13:837–840.
46.
LeBlancTW: In the sandbox: Palliative care and hematologic malignancies. J Community Support Oncol, 2014; 12:44–45.
47.
QuillTE, AbernethyAP: Generalist plus specialist palliative care: Creating a more sustainable model. N Engl J Med, 2013; 368:1173–1175.
48.
WatanabeSM, NekolaichukCL, BeaumontC: The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, a proposed tool for distress screening in cancer patients: Development and refinement. Psychooncology, 2012; 21:977–985.
49.
ChangVT, HwangSS, FeuermanM: Validation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Cancer, 2000; 88:2164–2171.
50.
VitekL, RosenzweigMQ, StollingsS: Distress in patients with cancer: Definition, assessment, and suggested interventions. Clin J Oncol Nurs, 2007; 11:413–418.
BackAL, AndersonWG, BunchL, et al.: Communication about cancer near the end of life. Cancer, 2008; 113:1897–1910.
53.
CoulehanJL, PlattFW, EgenerB, et al.: “Let me see if I have this right…:” Words that help build empathy. Ann Intern Med, 2001; 135:221–227.
54.
SuchmanAL, MarkakisK, BeckmanHB, FrankelR: A model of empathic communication in the medical interview. JAMA, 1997; 277:678–682.
55.
BriggsL: Shifting the focus of advance care planning: Using an in-depth interview to build and strengthen relationships. J Palliat Med, 2004; 7:341–349.
56.
KirchhoffKT, HammesBJ, KehlKA, et al.: Effect of a disease-specific planning intervention on surrogate understanding of patient goals for future medical treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2010; 58:1233–1240.
57.
SudoreRL, KnightSJ, McMahanRD, et al.: A novel website to prepare diverse older adults for decision making and advance care planning: A pilot study. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2014; 47:674–686.
58.
SudoreRL, FriedTR: Redefining the “planning” in advance care planning: Preparing for end-of-life decision making. Ann Intern Med, 2010; 153:256–261.
59.
YoongJ, ParkER, GreerJA, et al.: Early palliative care in advanced lung cancer: A qualitative study. JAMA Intern Med, 2013; 173:283–290.
60.
BellgAJ, BorrelliB, ResnickB, et al.Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: Best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychol, 2004; 23:443–451.
61.
LyonsKD, BakitasM, HegelMT, et al.: Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative care (FACIT-Pal) scale. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2009; 37:23–32.
62.
GreisingerAJ, LorimorRJ, AdayLA, et al.: Terminally ill cancer patients: Their most important concerns. Cancer Pract, 1997; 5:147–154.
63.
ZigmondAS, SnaithRP: The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 1983; 67:361–370.
64.
BjellandI, DahlAA, HaugTT, NeckelmannD: The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res, 2002; 52:69–77.
65.
BedardM, MolloyDW, SquireL, et al.: The Zarit Burden Interview: A new short version and screening version. Gerontologist, 2001; 41:652–657.
66.
HarrisPA, TaylorR, ThielkeR, et al.: Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap): A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform, 2009; 42:377–381.
