EllershawJ: Clinical pathways for care of the dying: An innovation to disseminate clinical excellence. J Palliat Med, 2002; 5(4):617–621.
3.
MaylandCR, WilliamsEM, Addington-HallJ, CoxTF, EllershawJE: Does the ‘Liverpool Care Pathway’ facilitate an improvement in quality of care for dying cancer patients?. Br J Cancer, 2013; 108:1942–1948.
ParryR, SeymourJ, WhittakerB, BirdL, CoxK: Rapid Evidence Review: Pathways Focused on the Dying Phase in End of Life Care and Their Key Components. Sue Ryder Care Centre for the Study of Supportive, Palliative and End of Life Care, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 2013.
6.
ChanR, WebsterJ: End-of-life care pathways for improving outcomes in caring for the dying. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010; 20(1):CD008006.
JackBA, GamblesM, MurphyD, EllershawJE: Nurses' perceptions of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient in the acute hospital setting. Int J Palliat Nurs, 2003; 9:375–381.
9.
ClarkJ, MarshallB, ShewardK, AllanS: Staff perceptions of the impact of the Liverpool Care Pathway in aged residential care in New Zealand. Int J Palliat Nurs, 2012; 18:171–178.
10.
ClarkJB, ShewardK, MarshallB, AllanSG: Staff perceptions of end-of-life care following implementation of the Liverpool care pathway for the dying patient in the acute care setting: A New Zealand perspective. J Palliat Med, 2012; 15:468–473.
11.
ChinthapathiK: The Liverpool care pathway: What do specialists think?. BMJ, 2013; 346.
12.
BinghamJ: NHS Millions for Controversial Care Pathway. The Daily Telegraph, October31, 2012.
13.
ChaoS: The State of Quality Improvement and Implementation Research: Expert Views, Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007.
14.
DamschroderLJ, AronDC, KeithRE, KirshSR, AlexanderJA, LoweryJC: Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci, 2009; 4:50.
15.
GrolR, DalhuijsenJ, ThomasS, VeldC, RuttenG, MokkinkH: Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: Observational study. BMJ, 1998; 317:858–861.
16.
WoolfSH, GrolR, HutchinsonA, EcclesM, GrimshawJ: Clinical guidelines: Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ, 1999; 318:527–530.
17.
BurgersJS, GrolRP, ZaatJO, SpiesTH, van der BijAK, MokkinkHG: Characteristics of effective clinical guidelines for general practice. Br J Gen Pract, 2003; 53:15–19.
18.
GreenhalghT, RobertG, MacfarlaneF, BateP, KyriakidouO: Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q, 2004; 82:581–629.
19.
RogersEM: Lessons for guidelines from the diffusion of innovations. Jt Comm J Qual Saf, 1995; 21:324–328.
20.
GawandeA: The checklist manifesto: How to get things right. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2010.
21.
Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: The AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care, 2003; 12:18–23.
22.
GustafsonDH, SainfortF, EichlerM, AdamsL, BisognanoM, SteudelH: Developing and testing a model to predict outcomes of organizational change. Health Services Research, 2003; 38:751–776.
23.
FonsecaJ: Complexity and Innovation in Organizations. Routledge, NY, 2002:113–115.
24.
ShipmanC, GyselsM, WhiteP, et al.: Improving generalist end of life care: National consultation with practitioners, commissioners, academics, and service user groups. BMJ, 2008; 337.