Advance Directives,Control,and Quality of Life for Persons with Disabilities

Abstract

Background:

Personal control over end-of-life (EOL) care via advance care planning is a key component of high-quality care. Although this desire for control has been well documented in some populations, EOL care issues are not well understood within the disabilities community.

Objective:

The objective for this study was to describe the relationships between individual demographic characteristics, health-related quality of life, health locus of control, and attitudes toward advance directives (ADs) in individuals who are disabilities activists.

Methods:

We surveyed 55 participants attending a disability conference. Instruments included a demographic data sheet, the Advance Directive Attitude Survey (ADAS), the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scale, and the Functional Assessment of Non-Life Threatening Conditions quality of life (QOL) scale.

Results:

Most participants were Hispanic females with some college education. About 46% had a disability. Group means revealed a high level of QOL (M=75.72, SD=19.09) and a positive attitude about ADs (M=66.49, SD=8.03). On the Opportunities for Treatment Choices subscale of the ADAS, activists without disabilities (M=14.23) were more positive about their control over EOL decisions than were the activists with disabilities (M=12.97) [t(2,52)=2.116, p<0.05].

Conclusions:

Although participants were positive about ADs, differences in attitudes about control over opportunities for treatment choices between the nondisabled and disabled groups support previous findings that people with disabilities may have concerns regarding undertreatment for serious health conditions. Further study of EOL care issues for persons with disabilities is warranted.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brault

. Americans with Disabilities: 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2008. www.census.gov/prod/2008pubs/p70-117.pdf. 2013 January 2.

Campbell

, Sheets

, Strong

. Secondary health conditions among middle-aged individuals with chronic physical disabilities: Implications for unmet needs for services. Assist Technol, 1999; 11:105–122.

Harrison

, Umberson

, Lin

, Cheng

. Timing of impairment and health-promoting lifestyles in women with disabilities. Qual Health Res., 2010; 20:816–829.

US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People: 2020: Disability and Health. www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/overview.aspx?topicid=9 2012(Last accessed2013 January 2.)

Carlson

, Smith

, Winkler

. Devaluing people with disabilities: Medical procedures that violate civil rights. National Disability Rights Network, 2012. www.ndrn.org/images/Documents/Resources/Publications/Reports/Devaluing_People_with_Disabilities.pdf(Last accessed2013 January 2.)

Iezzoni

, Ngo

, Li

, Roetzheim

, Drews

, McCarthy

. Treatment disparities for disabled Medicare beneficiaries with Stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2008; 89:595–601.

McCarthy

, Ngo

, Chirikos

, Roetzheim

, Drews

, Iezzoni

. Cancer stage at diagnosis and survival among persons with Social Security Disability Insurance on Medicare. Health Serv Res, 2007; 42:611–628.

McCarthy

, Ngo

, Roetzheim

, Chirikos

, Li

, Drews

, Iezzoni

. Disparities in breast cancer treatment and survival for women with disabilities. Ann Intern Med, 2006; 145:637–645.

Schroepfer

, Noh

, Kavanaugh

. The myriad strategies for seeking control in the dying process. Gerontologist, 2009; 49:755–766.

10.

Volker

, Kahn

, Penticuff

. Patient control and end-of-life care. Part II: The patient perspective. Oncol Nurs Forum, 2004; 31:954–960.

11.

Volker

, Wu

. Cancer patients' preferences for control at the end of life. Qual Health Res, 2011; 21:1618–1631.

12.

Amjad

, Towle

, Fried

. Association of experience with illness and end-of-life care with advance care planning [abstract] J Am Geriatr Soc, 2012; 60,Suppl 4:S91.

13.

Cohen

, McCannon

, Edgman-Levitan

, Kormos

. Exploring attitudes toward advance care directives in two diverse settings. J Palliat Med, 2010; 13:1427–1432.

14.

Castillo

, Williams

, Hooper

, Sabatino

, Weithorn

, Sudore

. Lost in translation: The unintended consequences of advance directive law in clinical care. Ann Intern Med, 2011; 154:121–128.

15.

Mirarchi

, Costello

, Puller

, Cooney

, Kottkamp

. TRIAD III: Nationwide assessment of living wills and do not resuscitate orders. J Emerg Med, 2012; 42:511–520.

16.

Lorenz

, Lynn

, Dy

, Shugarman

, Wilkinson

, Mularski

, Morton

, Hughes

, Hilton

, Maglione

, Rhodes

, Rolon

, Sun

, Shekelle

. Evidence for improving palliative care at the end of life: A systematic review. Ann Intern Med, 2008; 148:147–159.

17.

Bravo

, Dubois

, Wagneur

. Assessing the effectiveness of interventions to promote advance directives among older adults: A systematic review and multi-level analysis. Soc Sci Med, 2008; 67:1122–1132.

18.

Stein

, Kerwin

. Disability perspectives on health care planning and decision-making. J Palliat Med, 2010; 13:1059–1064.

19.

Drake

. Not dead yet: The resistance. Diane Coleman's plenary remarks at Advance Care Planning and ‘End of Life’ Conference, Chicago, May 31, 2012 http://www.notdeadyet.org/site/2012/06/diane-colemans-plenary-remarks-at-adv-care-planning-and-end-of-life-conference-on-may-31.html(Last accessed2013 January 2.)

20.

Fadem

, Minkler

, Perry

, Blum

, Moore

Jr , Rogers

, Williams

. Attitudes of people with disabilities toward physician-assisted suicide legislation: Broadening the dialogue. J Health Polit Policy Law, 2003; 28:977–1001.

21.

Hwang

. Attitudes of persons with physical disabilities toward physician-assisted death: An exploratory assessment of the vulnerability argument. J Disabil Policy Stud, 2005; 16:16–21.

22.

Nolan

, Bruder

. Patients' attitudes toward advance directives and end-of-life treatment decisions. Nurs Outlook, 1997; 45:204–208.

23.

Campbell

, Edwards

, Ward

, Weatherby

. Developing a parsimonious model for predicting completion of advance directives. J Nurs Scholarsh, 2007; 165–171.

24.

Cella

. Functional Assessment of Non-Life Threatening Conditions Version 4. 2010. www.facit.org/FACITOrg/Questionnaires(Last accessed2013 January 2.)

25.

Webster

, Cella

, Yost

. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Measurement System: Properties, applications, and interpretation. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2003; 1:79.

26.

Wallston

. Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales. www.vanderbilt.edu/nursing/kwallston/mhlcscales.htm 2007(Last accessed2013 January 2.)

27.

Wallston

. The validity of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scales. J Health Psychol, 2005; 10:623–631.

28.

Hertzog

. Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Res Nurs Health, 2008; 31:180–191.

29.

Corder

, Foremann

. Nonparametric Statistics for Non-statisticians. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2009.

30.

Infurna

, Gerstof

, Ram

, Schupp

, Wagner

. Long-term antecedents and outcomes of perceived control. Psychol Aging, 2011; 26:559–575.

31.

Bárez

, Blasco

, Fernández-Castro

, Viladrich

. Perceived control and psychological distress in women with breast cancer: A longitudinal study. J Behav Med, 2009; 32:187–196.

32.

Mezey

, Leitman

, Mitty

, Bottrell , Ramsey

. Why hospital patients do and do not execute an advance directive. Nurs Outlook, 2000; 48:165–171.

33.

Stein

, Kerwin

. Disability perspectives on health care planning and decision-making. J Palliat Med, 2010; 13:1059–1064.

34.

Asch

. Recognizing death while affirming life: Can end of life reform uphold a disabled person's interest in continued life? Hastings Cent Rep, 2005; 35:S31–S36.