The prevention and relief of suffering in palliative care are critical to the well-being and quality of life of patients and families facing life-threatening diseases. Many tools to assess different issues in health care are available, but few are specifically designed to evaluate suffering, which is essential for its prevention, early management, and treatment.
Objective:
The purpose of this review was to identify and describe existing instruments developed to assess suffering in palliative care, as well as to comment on their psychometric properties.
Methods:
A review of articles indexed in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and SciELO up to June 2011 was conducted. All articles reporting the development, description, or psychometric properties of instruments that assess suffering were included. An assessment of their psychometric quality was performed following a structured checklist.
Results:
Ten instruments that assess suffering were identified. Their main features and psychometric properties are described in order to facilitate the selection of the appropriate one given each patient's context.
Conclusion:
By taking into consideration all features of the assessment instruments under review, the evaluation of suffering can be made easier. A wide and ever expanding range of approaches is now available, which facilitates the selection of the suffering-assessment instrument that is best suited to the needs of the specific patient. One of the challenges ahead will be to further analyze the psychometric properties of some existing instruments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CassellEJ. Diagnosing suffering: A perspective. Ann Intern Med, 1999; 131:531–534.
2.
Cancer Control Program: Policies. Cancer Control Program: Policies and Managerial Guidelines. 2nd. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO), 2002
3.
MystakidouK, TsilikaE, ParpaEet al. Assessment of anxiety and depression in advanced cancer patients and their relationship with quality of life. Qual Life Res, 2005; 14:1825–1833.
4.
FerrellB, ConnorSR, CordesAet al. The national agenda for quality palliative care: The National Consensus Project and the National Quality Forum. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2007; 33:737–744.
5.
BainesBK, NorlanderL. The relationship of pain and suffering in a hospice population. Am J Hosp Palliat Care, 2000; 17:319–326.
6.
AbrahamA, KutnerJS, BeatyB. Suffering at the end of life in the setting of low physical symptom distress. J Palliat Med, 2006; 9:658–665.
7.
BenedictS. The suffering associated with lung cancer. Cancer Nurs, 1989; 12:34–40.
8.
BostonP, BruceA, SchreiberR. Existential suffering in the palliative care setting: An integrated literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2011; 41:604–618.
9.
KuuppelomakiM, LauriS. Cancer patients' reported experiences of suffering. Clin J Oncol Nurs, 2000; 4:45–46.
ChochinovHM. Dying, dignity, and new horizons in palliative end-of-life care. CA Cancer J Clin, 2006; 56:84–103
14.
KrikorianA, LimoneroJT. An integrated view of suffering in palliative care. J Palliat Care, 2012; 28:41–49.
15.
SulmasyD. A biopsychosocial-spiritual model for the care of patients at the end of life. Gerontologist, 2002; 42:24–33.
16.
KrikorianA, LimoneroJT, MatéJ. Suffering, distress at the end-of-life. Psychooncology(in press).
17.
KrikorianA. Valoración del sufrimiento en pacientes con cáncer avanzado. Psicooncología, 2008; 5:257–264.
18.
CassellEJ, RichBA. Intractable end-of-life suffering and the ethics of palliative sedation. Pain Med, 2010; 11:435–438.
19.
MeiselA. Quality of life and end-of-life decision-making. Qual Life Res, 2003; 12,Suppl 1:91–94.
20.
JansenLA. Intractable end-of-life suffering and the ethics of palliative sedation: A commentary on Cassell and Rich. Pain Med, 2010; 11:440–441.
21.
LimoneroJT. Evaluación de necesidades y preocupaciones en enfermos en situación terminal. Revista de Psicología de la Salud, 2001; 13:63–77.
22.
BayésR. Paliación y evaluación del sufrimiento en la práctica clínica. Med Clín (Barc), 1998; 110:740–743.
23.
BayésR. Una estrategia para la detección del sufrimiento en la práctica clínica. Rev Soc Española Dolor, 2000; 7:70–74.
24.
BayésR. Afrontando la vida, esperando la muerte. Barcelona: Alianza Editorial, 2006.
25.
HalesS, ZimmermannC, RodinG. Review: The quality of dying and death: A systematic review of measures. Palliat Med, 2010; 24:127–144.
26.
JordhoyMS, Inger RingdalG, HelbostadJLet al. Assessing physical functioning: A systematic review of quality of life measures developed for use in palliative care. Palliat Med, 2007; 21:673–682.
27.
PerezDJ, McGeeR, CampbellAVet al. Comparison of time trade-off and quality of life measures in patients with advanced cancer. Qual Life Res, 1997; 6:133–138.
28.
BrueraE, KuehnN, MillerMJet al. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): A simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care, 1991; 7:6–9.
29.
ThekkumpurathP, VenkateswaranC, KumarMet al. Screening for psychological distress in palliative care: performance of touch screen questionnaires compared with semistructured psychiatric interview. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2009; 38:597–605.
30.
MitchellAJ. Short screening tools for cancer-related distress: A review and diagnostic validity meta-analysis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2010; 8:487–494.
31.
Fernández-RiosL, Buela-CasalG. Standards for the preparation and writing of psychology reviews. Int J Clin Health Psychol, 2009; 9:329–344.
32.
MulrowCD. The medical review article: State of the science. Ann Intern Med, 1987; 106:485–488.
33.
OxmanAD, GuyattGH. Guidelines for reading literature reviews. CMAJ, 1988; 138:697–703.
34.
NCCN Practice Guidelines for the Management of Psychosocial Distress. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Oncology (Williston Park), 1999; 13:113–147.
35.
BotSD, TerweeCB, van der WindtDAet al.Psychometric evaluation of self-report questionnaires: The development of a checklist. AderHJ, MellenberghGJ. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Research Methodology, June 25–27, 2003, Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam, 2003; 161–168.
36.
LohrKN, AaronsonNK, AlonsoJ, BurnamMAet al. Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: Development of scientific review criteria. Clin Ther, 1996; 18:979–992.
BotSD, TerweeCB, van der WindtDAet al. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: A systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis, 2004; 63:335–341.
39.
De BoerMR, MollAC, de VetHC, TerweeCBet al. Psychometric properties of vision-related quality of life questionnaires: A systematic review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2004; 24:257–273.
40.
VeenhofC, BijlsmaJW, van den EndeCHet al. Psychometric evaluation of osteoarthritis questionnaires: A systematic review of the literature. Arthritis Rheum, 2006; 55:480–492.
41.
JaeschkeR, SingerJ, GuyattGH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials, 1989; 10:407–415.
42.
TerweeCB, JansmaEP, RiphagenIIet al. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Qual Life Res, 2009; 18:1115–1123.
43.
MacAdamDB, SmithM. An initial assessment of suffering in terminal illness. Palliat Med, 1987; 1:37–47.
BayésR, LimoneroJT, BarretoPet al. A way to screen for suffering in palliative care. J Palliat Care, 1997; 13:22–26.
46.
GonzálezM, LacastaMA, OrdóñezAet al. Control of oncologic pain in relief of suffering. Our experience. Clin Transl Oncol, 2006; 8:525–532.
47.
LlantáMC, PireT, GrauJet al. Evaluación del sufrimiento en pacientes con quimioterapia del Instituto Cubano de Oncología y Radiobiología. Psicología y Salud, 2008; 18:149–154.
48.
MontoyaR, SchmidtJ, GarcíaMP. Influencia en la comunicación del diagnóstico y el pronóstico en el sufrimiento del enfermo terminal. Med Paliat, 2010; 17:24–30.
49.
JuradoMA, EsteveR, VillalbaO. Causas de sufrimiento en enfermos oncológicos al final de la vida. Med Paliat, 2010; 17:90–95.
50.
BüchiS, SenskyT, SharpeLet al. Graphic representation of illness: A novel method of measuring patients' perceptions of the impact of illness. Psychother Psychosom, 1998; 67:222–225.
51.
BüchiS, SenskyT. PRISM: Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure. A brief nonverbal measure of illness impact and therapeutic aid in psychosomatic medicine. Psychosomatics, 1999; 40:314–320.
52.
BüchiS, VilligerP, KauerYet al. PRISM (Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure): A novel visual method to assess the global burden of illness in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus, 2000; 9:368–373.
53.
BüchiS, BuddebergC, KlaghoferRet al. Preliminary validation of PRISM (Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure): A brief method to assess suffering. Psychother Psychosom, 2002; 71:333–341.
54.
BüchiS, BrändliO, KlinglerKet al. Inpatient rehabilitation in inpatients with chronic obstructive lung diseases (COPD): Effect on physical capacity for work, psychological well-being and quality of life. Schweiz Med Wochenschr, 2000; 130:135–142.
55.
BhattiF, HawthorneJ, MorganCet al. Pictorial representation of illness self measure (prism), illness intrusiveness in rheumatoid arthritis. British Society for Rheumatology XIX Annual General Meeting, Brighton, UK, 2002; 75.
56.
HamacherJ, BüchiS, GeorgescuCLet al. Improved quality of life after lung volume reduction surgery. Eur Respir J, 2002; 19:54–60.
57.
DentonF, SharpeL, SchrieberL. PRISM: Enmeshment of illness and self-schema. Psychother Psychosom, 2004; 73:57–63.
58.
RumpfHJ, LöntzW, UesselerS. A self-administered version of a brief measure of suffering: First aspects of validity. Psychother Psychosom, 2004; 73:53–56.
59.
ReinhardtS, BischofG, GrothuesJet al. Performance of the pictorial representation of illness and self measure in individuals with alcohol dependence, alcohol abuse or at-risk drinking. Psychother Psychosom, 2006; 75:249–256.
60.
ReimusJL, VingerhoetsAJ, SoonsPHet al. Suffering in psoriasis patients: Its relation with illness severity and subjective well-being. Int J Dermatol, 2007; 46:1042–1045.
61.
KassardjianCD, Gardner-NixJ, DupakKet al. Validating PRISM (Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure) as a measure of suffering in chronic non-cancer pain patients. J Pain, 2008; 9:1135–1143.
62.
KlisS, VingerhoetsAJ, de WitMet al. Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure Revised II (PRISM-RII): A novel method to assess perceived burden of illness in diabetes patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2008; 6:104.
63.
WoutersEJ, ReimusJL, van NunenAMet al. Suffering quantified? Feasibility and psychometric characteristics of 2 revised versions of the Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM)Behav Med, 2008; 34:65–78.
64.
MuhleisenB, SchmidhauserS, BuchiSet al. PRISM (Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure) is a reliable and valid method to measure perception of the impact of illness in hospitalised dermatological patients. Exp Dermatol, 2008; 16:228.
65.
WittmannL, SenskyT, MederLet al. Suffering and posttraumatic growth in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): A qualitative/quantitative case study. Psychosomatics, 2009; 50:362–374.
66.
MühleisenB, BüchiS, SchmidhauserSet al. Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM): A novel visual instrument to measure quality of life in dermatological inpatients. Arch Dermatol, 2009; 145:774–780.
67.
StrefferML, BüchiS, MörgeliHet al. PRISM (pictorial representation of illness and self measure): a novel visual instrument to assess pain and suffering in orofacial pain patients. J Orofac Pain, 2009; 23:140–146.
68.
BüchiS, StraubS, SchwagerU. Shared decision-making and individualized goal setting—A pilot trial using PRISM (Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure) in psychiatric inpatients. Praxis (Bern 1994), 2010; 99:1467–1477.
69.
NiedermannK, de BieRA, KubliRet al. Effectiveness of individual resource-oriented joint protection education in people with rheumatoid arthritis. A randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns, 2011; 82:42–48.
70.
TönduryB, MuehleisenB, Ballmer-WeberBKet al. The Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM) instrument reveals a high burden of suffering in patients with chronic urticaria. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol, 2011; 21:93–100.
71.
KlisS, VeldingK, GidronYet al. Posttraumatic stress and depressive symptoms among people living with HIV in the Gambia. AIDS Care, 2011; 23:426–434.
72.
LehmannV, OerlemansS, van de Poll-FranseLVet al. Suffering in long-term cancer survivors: An evaluation of the PRISM-R2 in a population-based cohort. Qual Life Res, 2011; 20:1645–1654.
73.
AminoffBZ, PuritsE, NoySet al. Measuring the suffering of end-stage dementia: reliability and validity of the Mini-Suffering State Examination. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2004; 38:123–130.
74.
AminoffBZ, AdunskyA. Dying dementia patients: Too much suffering, too little palliation. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen, 2004; 19:243–247.
75.
AminoffBZ, AdunskyA. Their last 6 months: Suffering and survival of end-stage dementia patients. Age Ageing, 2006; 35:597–601.
76.
AminoffBZ. Mini-Suffering State Examination scale: Possible key criterion for 6-month survival and mortality of critically ill dementia patients. Am J Hosp Palliat Care, 2007; 24:470–474.
77.
AdunskyA, AminoffBZ, AradMet al. Mini-Suffering State Examination: Suffering and survival of end-of-life cancer patients in a hospice setting. Am J Hosp Palliat Care, 2007; 24:493–498.
78.
van Soest-PoortvlietMC, van der SteenJT, ZimmermanSet al. Measuring the quality of dying and quality of care when dying in long-term care settings: A qualitative content analysis of available instruments. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2011; 42:852–863.
79.
WilsonKG, GrahamID, ViolaRAet al. Structured interview assessment of symptoms and concerns in palliative care. Can J Psychiatry, 2004; 49:350–358.
80.
RuijsKD, Onwuteaka-PhilipsenBD, van derWal Get al. Unbearability of suffering at the end of life: The development of a new measuring device, the SOS-V. BMC Palliat Care, 2009; 8:16.
81.
ChabanV, ShaheenM, RapkinA. Suffering scale—A novel way to assess pain and suffering in patients with chronic pelvic pain. Ann Epidemiol, 2009; 19:651–680.
82.
SchulzR, MoninJK, CzajaSJet al. Measuring the experience and perception of suffering. Gerontologist, 2010; 50:774–784.
83.
MoninJK, SchulzR. The effects of suffering in chronically ill older adults on the health and well-being of family members involved in their care: The role of emotion-related processes. GeroPsych (Bern), 2010; 23:207–213.
84.
MoninJK, SchulzR, FeeneyBCet al. Attachment Insecurity and Perceived Partner Suffering as Predictors of Personal Distress. J Exp Soc Psychol, 2010; 46:1143–1147.
85.
GanziniL, JohnstonWS, HoffmanWF. Correlates of suffering in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology, 1999; 52:1434–1440.
86.
AndoM, MoritaT, OkamotoTet al. One-week short-term life review interview can improve spiritual well-being of terminally ill cancer patients. Psychooncology, 2008; 17:885–890.
87.
AndoM, MoritaT, AkechiTet al. Japanese Task Force for Spiritual Care. Efficacy of short-term life-review interviews on the spiritual well-being of terminally ill cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2010; 39:993–1002.
88.
CassellEJ. The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine. N Engl J Med, 1982; 306:639–645.
89.
MoritaT, MiyashitaM, TsunetoSet al.Palliative care in Japan: Shifting from the stage of disease to the intensity of suffering. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2008; 36:e6–7.
90.
GillTM, FeinsteinAR. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. JAMA, 1994; 272:619–626.
91.
BayésR, ArranzP, BarberoJet al. Propuesta de un modelo integral para una intervención terapéutica paliativa. Med Palliat, 1996; 3:114–121.
92.
MokkinkLB, TerweeCB, StratfordPWet al. Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments. Qual Life Res, 2009; 18:131–333.
