FialhoSL, da Silva-CunhaA. New vehicle based on a microemulsion for topical ocular administration of dexamethasone. Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2004; 32(6):626–632; doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2004.00914.x
2.
FialhoSL, Silva-CunhaA. Manufacturing techniques of biodegradable implants intended for intraocular application. Drug Deliv, 2005; 12(2):109–116; doi: 10.1080/10717540590921432
3.
GragoudasES, AdamisAP, CunninghamETJr., et al.VEGF Inhibition Study in Ocular Neovascularization Clinical Trial Group. Pegaptanib for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med, 2004; 351(27):2805–2816; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042760
4.
MichelsS, RosenfeldPJ, PuliafitoCA, et al.Systemic bevacizumab (Avastin) therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration twelve-week results of an uncontrolled open-label clinical study. Ophthalmology, 2005; 112(6):1035–1047; doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.02.007
5.
RosenfeldPJ, MoshfeghiAA, PuliafitoCA. Optical coherence tomography findings after an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (Avastin) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging, 2005; 36(4):331–335.
6.
AveryRL, PieramiciDJ, RabenaMD, et al.Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology, 2006; 113(3):363–372.e5; doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.11.019
7.
RichRM, RosenfeldPJ, PuliafitoCA, et al.Short-term safety and efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Retina, 2006; 26(5):495–511; doi: 10.1097/01.iae.0000225766.75009.3a
8.
El-MollayessGM, NoureddineBN, BashshurZF. Bevacizumab and neovascular age related macular degeneration: Pathogenesis and treatment. Semin Ophthalmol, 2011; 26(3):69–76; doi: 10.3109/08820538.2010.545100
9.
OzturkBT, KerimogluH, BozkurtB, et al.Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab treatment for diabetic macular edema. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther, 2011; 27(4):373–377; doi: 10.1089/jop.2010.0195
10.
ZhangH, LiuZL, SunP, et al.Intravitreal bevacizumab for treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion: Eighteen-month results of a prospective trial. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther, 2011; 27(6):615–621; doi: 10.1089/jop.2011.0050
11.
JonasJB, KreissigI, SöfkerA, et al.Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone for diffuse diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol, 2003; 121(1):57–61.
12.
JonasJB, KamppeterBA, HarderB, et al.Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic macular edema: A prospective, randomized study. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther, 2006; 22(3):200–207; doi: 10.1089/jop.2006.22.200
13.
BaathJ, EllsAL, CrichtonA, et al.Safety profile of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther, 2007; 23(3):304–310; doi: 10.1089/jop.2006.125
14.
MartinDF, ParksDJ, MellowSD, et al.Treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis with an intraocular sustained-release ganciclovir implant. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Arch Ophthalmol, 1994; 112(12):1531–1539; doi: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090240037023
AzadR, ChandraP, GuptaR. The economic implications of the use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs in age-related macular degeneration. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2007; 55(6):441–443; doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.3647
17.
SpoonerKL, MhlangaCT, HongTH, et al.The burden of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A patient’s perspective. Clin Ophthalmol, 2018; 12:2483–2491; doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S185052
18.
FialhoSL, RêgoMB, SiqueiraRC, et al.Safety and pharmacokinetics of an intravitreal biodegradable implant of dexamethasone acetate in rabbit eyes. Curr Eye Res, 2006; 31(6):525–534; doi: 10.1080/02713680600719036
19.
FialhoSL, SiqueiraRC, JorgeR, et al.Biodegradable implants for ocular delivery of anti-inflammatory drug. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol, 2007; 17(1):93–97; doi: 10.1016/S1773-2247(07)50013-4
20.
SiqueiraRC, Dos SantosWF, ScottIU, et al.Neuroprotective effects of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and dexamethasone implant in rabbit retinas after pars plana vitrectomy and silicone oil injection. Retina, 2015; 35(2):364–370; doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000284
21.
CunhaRB, SiqueiraRC, MessiasA, et al.Safety and feasibility of a novel 25-gauge biodegradable implant of dexamethasone for treatment of macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion: A phase I clinical trial. Retin Cases Brief Rep, 2018; 12(1):50–58; doi: 10.1097/ICB.0000000000000413
22.
SalibaJB, FaracoAAG, YoshidaMI, et al.Development and characterization of an intraocular biodegradable polymer system containing cyclosporine-A for the treatment of posterior uveitis. Mat Res, 2008; 11(2):207–211; doi: 10.1590/S1516-14392008000200016
23.
SalibaJB, GomesCLG, Silva-CunhaA, et al.Development and validation of a high performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of cyclosporine-A from biodegradable intraocular implants. Quím Nova, 2011; 34(1):140–144; doi: 10.1590/S0100-40422011000100026
24.
SalibaJB, Silva-CunhaA, SilvaGR, et al.Characterization and in vitro release of cyclosporine-A from poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide implants obtained by solvent/extraction evaporation. Quím Nova, 2012; 35(4):723–727; doi: 10.1590/S0100-40422012000400013
25.
de AlmeidaFP, SalibaJB, RibeiroJA, et al.In vivo release and retinal toxicity of cyclosporine-loaded intravitreal device. Doc Ophthalmol, 2015; 131(3):207–214; doi: 10.1007/s10633-015-9520-z
26.
SouzaMC, FialhoSL, SouzaPA, et al.Tacrolimus-loaded PLGA implants: In vivo release and ocular toxicity. Curr Eye Res, 2014; 39(1):99–102; doi: 10.3109/02713683.2013.819927
27.
GasparinF, AguiarRG, IoshimotoGL, et al.Pharmacokinetics, electrophysiological, and morphological effects of the intravitreal injection of mycophenolic acid in rabbits. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther, 2014; 30(6):502–511; doi: 10.1089/jop.2013.0236
28.
ByrroRMD, de OliveiraGF, RochaPC, et al.Determination of Mycophenolic acid in the vitreous humor using the HPLC-ESI-MS/MS method: Application of intraocular pharmacokinetics study in rabbit eyes with ophthalmic implantable device. J Pharm Biomed Anal, 2013; 84:30–35; doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2013.05.030
29.
PaivaMRB, LageNA, GuerraMCA, et al.Toxicity and in vivo release profile of sirolimus from implants into the vitreous of rabbits’ eyes. Doc Ophthalmol, 2019; 138(1):3–19; doi: 10.1007/s10633-018-9664-8
30.
PaivaMRB, Vasconcelos-SantosDV, VieiraLC, et al.Sirolimus-loaded intravitreal implant for effective treatment of experimental uveitis. AAPS PharmSciTech, 2021; 22(1):35; doi: 10.1208/s12249-020-01898-4
31.
SolanoAGR, SilvaGR, FialhoSL, et al.Development and validation of a High Performance Liquid Chromatographic method for determination of etoposide in biodegradable polymeric implants. Quím Nova, 2012; 35(6):1239–1243; doi: 10.1590/S0100-40422012000600032
32.
SolanoAGR, de Fátima PereiraA, PintoFC, et al.Development and evaluation of sustained-release etoposide-loaded poly(ε-caprolactone) implants. AAPS PharmSciTech, 2013; 14(2):890–900; doi: 10.1208/s12249-013-9977-6
33.
SolanoAGR, de Fátima PereiraA, de FariaLGA, et al.Etoposide-Loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) intravitreal implants: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. AAPS PharmSciTech, 2018; 19(4):1652–1661; doi: 10.1208/s12249-018-0978-3
34.
SoaresDCF, de Paula OliveiraDC, BarcelosLS, et al.Antiangiogenic activity of PLGA-Lupeol implants for potential intravitreal applications. Biomed Pharmacother, 2017; 92:394–402; doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.05.093
35.
ToledoCR, PereiraVV, FerreiraGA, et al.PLGA-corosolic acid implants for potential application in ocular neovascularization diseases. Braz J Pharm Sci, 2020; 56:e18484; doi: 10.1590/s2175-97902019000418484
36.
VieiraLC, MoreiraCPS, CastroBFM, et al.Rosmarinic acid intravitreal implants: A new therapeutic approach for ocular neovascularization. Planta Med, 2020; 86(17):1286–1297; doi: 10.1055/a-1223-2525
37.
ToledoCR, PereiraVV, DuarteLP, et al.Anti-angiogenic activity and safety of intraocular application of triterpenes. Doc Ophthalmol, 2021; 143(3):259–270; doi: 10.1007/s10633-021-09841-z
38.
OzgonulC, BesirliCG. Recent development in the diagnosis and treatment of ocular toxoplasmosis. Ophthalmic Res, 2017; 57(1):1–12; doi: 10.1159/000449169
39.
MeloLA, PaivaMRB, Fernandes-CunhaGM, et al.Clinical outcomes of intravitreal treatment for ocular toxoplasmosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop, 2023; 56:e05522022; doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0552-2022
40.
Fernandes-CunhaGM, GouveaDR, de OliveiraGF, et al.Development of a method to quantify clindamycin in vitreous humor of rabbits’ eyes by UPLC-MS/MS: Application to a comparative pharmacokinetic study and in vivo ocular biocompatibility evaluation. J Pharm Biomed Anal, 2015; 102:346–352; doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2014.08.023
41.
Fernandes-CunhaGM, RezendeCM, MusselWN, et al.Anti-Toxoplasma activity and impact evaluation of lyophilization, hot molding process, and gamma-irradiation techniques on CLH-PLGA intravitreal implants. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2016; 27(1):10; doi: 10.1007/s10856-015-5621-1
42.
Fernandes-CunhaGM, FialhoSL, SilvaGR, et al.Ocular safety of intravitreal clindamycin hydrochloride released by PLGA implants. Pharm Res, 2017; 34(5):1083–1092; doi: 10.1007/s11095-017-2118-2
43.
JorgeR, CoelhoIN, Silva-CunhaA, et al.Use of a slow-release intravitreal clindamycin implant for the management of ocular toxoplasmosis. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep, 2021; 22:101093; doi: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2021.101093
44.
FialhoSL, SouzaPAF, FulgêncioGO, et al.In vivo release and retinal safety of intravitreal implants of thalidomide in rabbit eyes and antiangiogenic effect on the chorioallantoic membrane. J Drug Target, 2013; 21(9):837–845; doi: 10.3109/1061186X.2013.829074
45.
SilvaGR, AlmeidaAPR, Fernandes-CunhaGM, et al.Safety and in vivo release of fluconazole-loaded implants in rabbits’ eyes. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol, 2016; 35:323–326; doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2016.08.009
46.
ResendeAFC, PereiraAF, MoreiraTP, et al.PLGA Implants containing vancomycin and dexamethasone: Development, characterization and bactericidal effects. Pharmazie, 2016; 71(8):439–446; doi: 10.1691/ph.2016.6009
47.
JorgeR, VillelaIF, FernandesC, et al.Intravitreal acetazolamide implant for pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Doc Ophthalmol, 2023; 147(1):71–75; doi: 10.1007/s10633-023-09939-6
48.
SilvaGR, FialhoSL, SiqueiraRC, et al.Implants as drug delivery devices for the treatment of eye diseases. Braz J Pharm Sci, 2010; 46(3):585–595; doi: 10.1590/S1984-82502010000300024
49.
ArribadaRG, Behar-CohenF, de BarrosALB, et al.The use of polymer blends in the treatment of ocular diseases. Pharmaceutics, 2022; 14(7):1431; doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14071431
50.
FialhoSL, Behar-CohenF, Silva-CunhaA. Dexamethasone-loaded poly(epsilon-caprolactone) intravitreal implants: A pilot study. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 2008; 68(3):637–646; doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.08.004
51.
Silva-CunhaA, FialhoSL, NaudMC, et al.Poly-epsilon-caprolactone intravitreous devices: An in vivo study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009; 50(5):2312–2318; doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2969
52.
SilvaGR, Silva-CunhaA, AyresE, et al.Effect of the macromolecular architecture of biodegradable polyurethanes on the controlled delivery of ocular drugs. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2009; 20(2):481–487; doi: 10.1007/s10856-008-3607-y
53.
SilvaGR, AyresE, OreficeRL, et al.Controlled release of dexamethasone acetate from biodegradable and biocompatible polyurethane and polyurethane nanocomposite. J Drug Target, 2009; 17(5):374–383; doi: 10.1080/10611860902839510
54.
SilvaGR, Silva-CunhaA, Behar-CohenF, et al.Biodegradation of polyurethanes and nanocomposites to non-cytotoxic degradation products. Polym Degrad Stab, 2010; 95(4):491–499; doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.01.001
55.
MouraSA, LimaLD, AndradeSP, et al.Local drug delivery system: Inhibition of inflammatory angiogenesis in a murine sponge model by dexamethasone-loaded polyurethane implants. J Pharm Sci, 2011; 100(7):2886–2895; doi: 10.1002/jps.22497
56.
SilvaGR, Silva-CunhaA, Behar-CohenF, et al.Biodegradable polyurethane nanocomposites containing dexamethasone for ocular route. Mater Sci Eng C, 2011; 31(2):414–422; doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2010.10.019
57.
PintoFC, Silva-CunhaA, OréficeRL, et al.Controlled release of triamcinolone acetonide from polyurethane implantable devices: Application for inhibition of inflammatory-angiogenesis. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2012; 23(6):1431–1445; doi: 10.1007/s10856-012-4615-5
58.
Barbosa SalibaJ, VieiraL, Fernandes-CunhaGM, et al.Anti-Inflammatory effect of dexamethasone controlled released from anterior suprachoroidal polyurethane implants on endotoxin-induced uveitis in rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2016; 57(4):1671–1679; doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18127
59.
SilvaGR, LimaTH, OréficeRL, et al.In vitro and in vivo ocular biocompatibility of electrospun poly(ɛ-caprolactone) nanofibers. Eur J Pharm Sci, 2015; 73:9–19; doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2015.03.003
60.
de SouzaSOL, GuerraMCA, HeneineLGD, et al.Biodegradable core-shell electrospun nanofibers containing bevacizumab to treat age-related macular degeneration. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2018; 29(11):173; doi: 10.1007/s10856-018-6187-5
61.
SilvaGR, LimaTH, Fernandes-CunhaGM, et al.Ocular biocompatibility of dexamethasone acetate loaded poly(ɛ-caprolactone) nanofibers. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 2019; 142:20–30; doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.05.010
62.
GuerraMCA, NetoJT, GomesMG, et al.Nanofiber-coated implants: Development and safety after intravitreal application in rabbits. Int J Pharm, 2023; 636:122809; doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122809
63.
KapoorKG, WagnerMG, WagnerAL. The sustained-release dexamethasone implant: Expanding indications in vitreoretinal disease. Semin Ophthalmol, 2015; 30(5–6):475–481; doi: 10.3109/08820538.2014.889179
64.
ZengS, LiuXL. A review of ten years of experience using dexamethasone intravitreal implants (Ozurdex) for uveitis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2023; 27(5):1743–1758; doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202303_31535
65.
MorrisonPW, KhutoryanskiyVV. Advances in ophthalmic drug delivery. Ther Deliv, 2014; 5(12):1297–1315; doi: 10.4155/tde.14.75
66.
ChenH. Recent developments in ocular drug delivery. J Drug Target, 2015; 23(7–8):597–604; doi: 10.3109/1061186X.2015.1052073
67.
BansalP, GargS, SharmaY, et al.Posterior segment drug delivery devices: Current and novel therapies in development. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther, 2016; 32(3):135–144; doi: 10.1089/jop.2015.0133
68.
KajiH, NagaiN, NishizawaM, et al.Drug delivery devices for retinal diseases. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2018; 128:148–157; doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.07.002
69.
NayakK, MisraM. A review on recent drug delivery systems for posterior segment of eye. Biomed Pharmacother, 2018; 107:1564–1582; doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.08.138
70.
García-EstradaP, García-BonMA, López-NaranjoEJ, et al.Polymeric implants for the treatment of intraocular eye diseases: Trends in biodegradable and non-biodegradable materials. Pharmaceutics, 2021; 13(5):701; doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13050701