NovackG.D.Ophthalmic drug delivery: Development and Regulatory Considerations. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 85:539–543, 2009.
2.
Anonymous. 20-5026- Genus Medical Technologies LLC v. FDA, 2021.
3.
Anonymous. Genus Medical Technologies LLC versus Food and Drug Administration; Request for Information and Comments. Fed. Reg. 86:43553–43555, 2021.
4.
Anonymous. Certain ophthalmic products: policy regarding compliance with 21 CFR Part 4; guidance for industry. Fed. Reg. 87:16391–16393, 2022.
5.
BakerN.D., BarnebeyH.S., MosterM.R., et al.Ab-externo microshunt versus trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma: one-year results from a 2-year randomized, multicenter study. Ophthalmology. 128:1710–1721, 2021.
6.
GallardoM.J., PyferM.F., VoldS.D., et al.Canaloplasty and trabeculotomy combined with phacoemulsification for glaucoma: 12-month results of the GEMINI study. Clin. Ophthalmol. 16:1225–1234, 2022.
7.
ChawlaD.S.How a site peddles author slots in reputable publishers' journals. Science. 376:231–232, 2022.
8.
MaronJ.L.Pledging to address scientific bias in published literature. Clin. Ther. 44:349–350, 2022.
9.
MorrowR.L., MintzesB., GrayG., LawM.R., GarrisonS., and DormuthC.R.Industry sponsor influence in clinical trial reporting in Canada: a qualitative interview study. Clin. Ther. 44:374–388, 2022.
10.
ZarinD.A., and SelkerH.P.Reporting of clinical trial results: aligning incentives and requirements to do the right thing. Clin. Ther. 44:439–441, 2022.
11.
Anonymous. Withdrawing rule on securing updated and necessary statutory evaluations timely. Fed. Reg. 87:32246–32288, 2022.
12.
LoftusP. FDA rejects two proposed cancer drugs developed in China. Wall. St. J. 2022. Accessed May2, 2022.